|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.14 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
2 (29%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.29 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
3 (43%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (57%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.29 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
3 (43%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.14 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
2 (29%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.14 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
2 (29%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (57%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (57%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
2 (29%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (57%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
1 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| i would not have changed anything i enjoyed the class the way it was. |
| I would change the text. It was incomplete, hard to follow, and filled with errors. |
| Nothing he gave the appropriate amount of time to each of the different subjects depending on the difficulty level of the content. |
| I would have to say that we could slow down a bit and give more time on all subjects. I realize that their is only a certain amount of time but maybe meeting 3x a week would be good. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| I thought the teaching materials were very important and relevant to real life situations. I thought the teacher was very dedicated and knowledeable regarding the subject of math. |
| He taught math the only possible way that I think you can teach math. He did explain things good. |
| I thought he was wonderful he was always available during after class and even weekends and by phone. He was awesome!! |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| Yes, math is a big part of the job and career world. |
| Definitely I have learned so much. I feel like I have better knowledge of basic math skills even complicated ones. |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| None. |
| I learned so much during math this was one of the toughest classes of all my years at school. I have never studied so much in my life. I came to this class hating math now I kind of like it. |
|
|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.7 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
1 (10%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
2 (20%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (50%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
1 (10%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
2 (20%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.9 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
3 (30%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (100%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
1 (10%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
1 (10%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.3 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
3 (30%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.7 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
6 (60%) |
4 (40%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| nothing |
| Nothing could be changed to make it better. It was a honor taking this course with Micky. |
| Teach the students to be a better reader, Go on the computer more. Looking up words you don't know and look up the definition of the word and put the word in a sentence, in a better way. |
| nothing |
| Nothing, the way he set up the class with the assignments and quizzes was excellent. |
| i thought he was very good at what he was doing and i wouldnt need to change anything |
| no need improvements & changes |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| very helpful |
| Micky's teaching methods were great. He always provided help in and out of the classroom and is always willing to meet with his students on his days off to have study sessions. I loved having Micky as the instructor for this course. |
| She is a great teacher, and has a good attitude. |
| there great and easy to understand |
| i like his teaching methods, but I wish he would stop bringing up irrelevant topics to math like music..it just confuses the students |
| He knew the subject material very well and explained it good. He was always willing to help us in and out of class. |
| he helped me to understand better than i was so i think his methods were very effective |
| excellent |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| yes |
| Micky has definitely contributed to my general knowledge of math. |
| I've learned alot from her, and appriciate her help when I'm uncomfortable with my work. |
| yes, he makes time for any student who has questions |
| I have learned a lot from this class that I know will benefit me extremely in the future with jobs and just life in general. Math wasn't and still isn't my best subject but with this class I did learn a lot that will help me with future math classes. |
| yeah now i have a better understanding of math |
| yes, my memory improved greatly |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| great math teacher |
| I would be willing to take ANY math course as long as Micky was the instructor. |
| great job teacher |
|
|
23. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
2 (25%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
24. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
3 (33%) |
3 (33%) |
|
|
25. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
2 (22%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
26. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.89 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
3 (33%) |
3 (33%) |
|
|
27. This course was helpful in developing new skills.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
28. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.11 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
29. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.89 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
3 (33%) |
3 (33%) |
|
|
30. The instructor gives clear explanations.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
2 (22%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
31. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.22 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
32. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.22 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
33. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (56%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
34. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.22 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
3 (33%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
35. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
36. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.89 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
2 (22%) |
3 (33%) |
|
|
37. Students in this course are free to disagree and ask questions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.22 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
38. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| nothing |
| I don't feel that anything can be done to improve the course. |
| Sitting down next to the student and teach them til they're comfortable with the work. |
| keep doing what he is doing |
| Nothing this class was very good. |
| no need |
|
|
39. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
40. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|