|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.1 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (60%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.1 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (60%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.3 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
5 (50%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
4 (40%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
6 (60%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
4 (40%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.7 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
2 (20%) |
3 (30%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.9 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
5 (50%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.67 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
2 (22%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
5 (50%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.9 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
6 (60%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.8 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
5 (50%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.8 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
3 (30%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.1 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.1 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (60%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.3 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
5 (50%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
| 3.9 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
2 (20%) |
6 (60%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| help the people that dont understand. |
| Nothing |
| it was fine |
| more examples(warmups) ... change nothing |
| b) new teacher |
| She should explain the material a little better and in detail that we can understand. |
| nothing |
| a. i would have the class as a online class because it seems that this course can basically b tught online and if they needed extra help then u would have to in form that person that he/she isnt doing so well in the class.
b. leave it to the student if h |
| A: Nothing she did a good job
B: I would change nothing |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| GOOD I think she just had a tuff crowd that really did'nt want to be there |
| great |
| good teaching |
| She jus needs to slow down and explain throughly. |
| she is great |
| fairly good. must be a little slower in explaining how to figure out problems especially to those who need it. |
| What I like about her teaching methods is that she is always there and I always get help |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| yes it improved my math skills and made me remember a lot of things that I forgot |
| yes |
| yes |
| yes |
| Yes! |
| yes |
| a fair amount |
| Yeas she has contributed with my learning skills |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| thank you |
| none what so ever just fine to me |
| She's da bomb |
|
