|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.22 |
9 |
1.3 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.56 |
9 |
1.51 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
3 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.89 |
9 |
1.45 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
4 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.89 |
9 |
1.45 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
4 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.89 |
9 |
1.45 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
4 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.11 |
9 |
1.27 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
9 |
1.22 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (56%) |
3 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.11 |
9 |
1.27 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
9 |
1.32 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
4 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.22 |
9 |
1.3 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.11 |
9 |
1.27 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.22 |
9 |
1.3 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| I like Tambra Fry as an instructor. Unfortunately she doesn't teach the class. This class is online and
I find it a very ineffective method for such important detail. |
| Feedback and workload |
| I enjoyed the Salvation Army and Psyche clinical rotation. I liked how we would go over things
together as a group with Tambra after clinical. It helped to have the face to face time to discuss
and go over Psyche concepts and meds, and "de-brief" about our day and our patients. |
| Clinicals, lectures and readings complimented eachother well to facilitate student learning. |
| The readings and clinical experience was great. Kept me on my toes in staying up to date with
the latest mental health disorders and it was interesting to actually talk n care for patients with
mental illnesses. |
| i liked all the activities and different types of activities to make the learning fun and full of variety. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| This should never be an online course. Kathleen has created a course that I find less than effective
in "teaching" vital information. |
| This course should be in class NOT ONLINE class. |
| Have more tests or regular assignments during the semester because it is not effective to
have only midterm and finals as majority of grade. An open book online test would be a helpful
teaching tool to keep students working on subject but with low stress as it is open book and
maybe make it open for like a week. |
| It needs to be in person and not online. |
| Make it a classroom lecture, not online. |
| Specify more in rubrics on what should be included in assignments. |
|
|
15. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| By actually teaching the entire course. Kathleen is not an effective instructor and it is all her material
with much of it being incorrect. |
| Tambra for the most part was great. |
| I believe teaching this course was done very efficiently. |
|
|
16. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Tambra is down to earth and explains thing in a manner that I can understand. I wish all of my
instructors could follow her lead. She is amazing. |
| Current experience and up todate knowledge of nursing |
| She offers instruction and seems very committed to her role as teacher. She is very accessible,
approachable, and offers encouragement- which is hugely important and lacking in the nursing
program. I've learned alot from her. |
| Tambra went above and beyond to help us learn material especially because we did not have a face-to-face lecture. I appreciate the extra effort she put into making sure we understood the material and would clarify any misunderstandings. |
| Very helpful and allow me to think critically for myself at the same time. |
|
|
17. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Nothing. |
| Sometimes it seems that she focuses on the smaller less important tasks when a bigger
problem is at hand, maybe try to choose battles more selectively |
| No specific complaints. |
| Being late 10-15 minutes in the morning for clinicals. |
| I found everything valuable and helpful. |
|
|
18. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
|
| There needs to be a classroom setting for the course. |
| Course needs better quality and more current lectures and papers (ie drug list), an impersonal
class lectures would be helpful or even video ie YouTube. I think Tambra's charisma would
make her a good lecturer |
| Course should be in person. Tambra's style and methods are good. |
| Make it a classroom lecture course. |
| I have no suggestions other than to specify a bit more on what to be included in some assignments. Other then that assignment I found everything a positive learning and valuable experience to my futurte career. |
|
|
19. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.56 |
9 |
1.33 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
2 (22%) |
|
|
20. Assignments make students think.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.67 |
9 |
1.41 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
3 (33%) |
|
|
21. I believe I would have gained more knowledge and a better understanding of the course materials had the online course been conducted in-person.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.78 |
9 |
1.72 |
Freq(%) |
2 (22%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
5 (56%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
22. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| Nothing. |
| Did not like that it was online. The lectures Kathleen have recorded need to be done over again
because the volume is WAY TOO LOW!!!! Her lectures are decent, but it was soooo difficult to have
to strain so hard to hear hear- it was a bummer. |
| I did not like the online course. |
| I liked that i could read the lectures n listen to them on my own time instaed of attending class. |
| Variety of teaching that was effective and time efficient. |
|
|
23. What did you like least about your online course experience?
|
| It needs to be conducted in-person |
| Lectures hard to listen to due to poor sound quality and pauses and drawn out speech |
| It is ridiculous to do Psyche online. It definitely should be a face to face class in person with group
interactions, etc... Absolutely! If anything should be online, it should be 260. |
| Lecture powerpoints were hard to hear, understand and conflicted with information in the book readings. |
| I liked everything. |
|
|
24. Other comments:
|
| I think Tambra should take over the course and do HITS. It would be much more effective. The stuff
Kathleen posted you cant hear it, it's too soft and sometimes you cant even get it to open. |
| Hate the On-line lecture... Kathy's voice makes me sleepy. |
| Thank you, Tambra. So happy to have had you for an instructorl Best of luck to you in your new
career in education. You are a great teacher. |
| Tambra is awesome!! Thank you :) |
|
|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.3 |
10 |
0.95 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
6 (60%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
7 (70%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
10 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
4 (40%) |
3 (30%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
6 (60%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.3 |
10 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
5 (50%) |
4 (40%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
7 (70%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.7 |
10 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| I like that it's online and I like when different questions are assigned to different groups of people so we all learn the material but the workload is appropriate for a one credit course. |
| Discussions were interacting and fun. |
| H |
| The subjects/modules were sectioned well. All the information was overwhelming. So, having the information given in sections was an effective way to learn. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| none, I think it's perfect |
| None |
|
|
15. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| None. She is an excellent instructor that is approachable, kind and highly intelligent. She is a
perfect example of what an instructor should be like. She gives guidance, good constructive
criticism that helps build growth and development each day with her. |
| none |
| None |
|
|
16. Comment on the instructor's professional attitude and behavior.
|
| Very professional and caring. Fair, and doesn't put you down. Instead she provides guidance
and allows her students to problem solve and think critically!! |
| Tambra is very professional, a great instructor and has a positive attitude. |
| positive and motivational |
| From Tambra's good example of nursing professionalism, evident in her instruction; I have learned positive aspects of the nursing profession, as well as the legal & ethical principles nurses must adhere to. |
|
|
17. Comment on the instructor's concern for the students.
|
| She is concerned that we are able to provide safe and effective care and be aware of all legal
issues, scope of practice and standars of care, etc |
| Tambra is awesome because she genuinely cares about our learning and was very willing to help me with any questions I've had. |
| very concerned and wanting students to learn |
| Thank you for reminding us on how to do the APA citations |
|
|
18. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Prompt feedback on assignments, with very useful and insightful comments that facilitate learning. |
| very helpful and motivational |
| Tambra provided constructive useful feedback that enhanced my learning from this course. |
|
|
19. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
|
|
|
20. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
|
|
|
|
21. The online course format allowed me to contribute to the discussion more readily than in a face-to-face format.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.67 |
9 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
5 (56%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
22. Online communication with class members and the instructor helped me to learn course materials in an effective manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.89 |
9 |
1.27 |
Freq(%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
3 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
23. I had the necessary equipment and technological skills required for the online course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.1 |
10 |
1.2 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (50%) |
4 (40%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
24. I believe I would have gained more knowledge and a better understanding of the course materials had the online course been conducted in-person.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.1 |
10 |
1.2 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
3 (30%) |
3 (30%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
25. Participation in online conversations (e.g., chats/bulletin boards/discussions boards) facilitated by the instructor contributed to my understanding of the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (56%) |
4 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
26. Participation in online conversations (e.g., chats/bulletin boards/discussions boards) with my classmates contributed to my understanding of the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
9 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
1 (11%) |
|
|
27. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| interaction with others |
| It is nice to communicate a full thought and read other students thoughts in a class's like this |
| flexability with the time |
|
|
28. What did you like least about your online course experience?
|
| none |
| A lot to write about for a one credit class sometimes |
| ATI citation requirement. I feel like it impeded people from sharing their thoughts and feelings
more openly, because then they would have to cite their rationale, etc.. i.e. it would cause more
work. So I think it kept things more superficial than they would have been if people could speak
their mind more freely, without having to then quote some other work to support their point of
view. What happen if it's actually a new idea or new concept? |
| Some people made wrote comments inappropriate reponses. I disliked how people used happy faces or emoticons. Inappropriate comments not related to course material, and emoticons reduced the learning value of the course. |
|
|
29. Other comments:
|
| No survey responses were found. |
|
|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.09 |
11 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (64%) |
3 (27%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.27 |
11 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
6 (55%) |
4 (36%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.45 |
11 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (55%) |
5 (45%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.36 |
11 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (64%) |
4 (36%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.09 |
11 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (64%) |
3 (27%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.27 |
11 |
0.47 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (73%) |
3 (27%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.45 |
11 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (55%) |
5 (45%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.36 |
11 |
0.92 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
6 (55%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.09 |
11 |
1.04 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
2 (18%) |
3 (27%) |
5 (45%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.69 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
3 (27%) |
7 (64%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.45 |
11 |
0.93 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
7 (64%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| In the nursery was where the most learning took place. |
| I liked that Tambra made the nursery portion of our rotation very informative and a great learning experience. I also appreciated the orientation to the unit on the first day. |
| I enjoyed being in the nursery and being able to witness many healthy babies as well as a few that had complications. |
| I enjoyed the class activity that included being in a group with children and
recognizing the stage of development the child is in. Identifying the child's
action also correlated to the stage the child is in. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| -- snipped -- |
| Longer rotation and interaction with doctors more. |
| I think going over the nursery flowsheet and what is expected to be done in the nursery would help other students a lot more. |
| The paperwork should be worth points |
| More orientation to the nursery environment before we are expected to carry out intake and
assessments of newborns would be helpful, including the EMR and paperwork procedures. |
| I have no suggestions in improving this course. |
* Showing 5 out of 6 survey responses.
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| -- snipped -- |
| Thank you! |
| I like that Tambra takes the time to talk or review about something that I may have a question on. |
| Tambra is a good teacher and I learned a lot from her! |
* Showing 3 out of 4 survey responses.
|
|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
12 |
1.14 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (42%) |
6 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.33 |
12 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (67%) |
4 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.33 |
12 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (67%) |
4 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.33 |
12 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (67%) |
4 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
12 |
0.85 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
7 (58%) |
3 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.42 |
12 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
5 (42%) |
6 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.33 |
12 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (67%) |
4 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
12 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (50%) |
5 (42%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
12 |
1.04 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (25%) |
3 (25%) |
5 (42%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.93 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
8 (73%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
12 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
8 (67%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.58 |
12 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
9 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| I enjoyed this course with Tambra because she was very enthusiastic about whatever she taught. She enabled me to think critically but also help guide me in to the right direction with clear and understandable instructions. She was a pleasure to work with at clinicals and in class. To bad she doesn't lecture for class. I feel like she would do a great job in lecturing because she's very informative and it was easy to talk to her. She also is a great advocate and I like that she takes the time to sit down and talk to us about what she see us lacking and allows us to think about what we can do to better ourselves so we can deliver safe and effective care to our patients and family. |
| I enjoyed doing simulations and debriefing after the simulation to evaluate
the care that was just provided. |
| I enjoyed being in the nursery. |
| Seminars and during SIMS~ |
| Tambra was great! |
| I liked my nursery rotation with Tambra. I was terrified of this rotation but Tambra made it a great learning experience by showing me how to correctly and carefully care for newborns and let me perform care on my own under her supervision.
Our paperwork for nursery was set up very well for our learning and EMR recording and I appreciated that a lot. |
| Sims were good learning tools |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| The clinical competency exam should be in the beginning of the semester rather the end because it is sad to see someone work super hard and fail the course d/t a a math test. Its such a heart breaker when that happens. |
| No suggestions to improving the course. |
| Review with the students what is expected of them when they are at the nursery. Explain the nursery flowsheet and what is a routine assessment. |
| I feel the clinical competency exam should be at the beginning of the semester, especially because it is a pass or fail out of the program exam.
I felt some sim days were not organized and a waste of time. The other sim days that were organized were a great learning experience. |
| the paper work should be worth points |
| Teach the students that is your job not expect them to know everything. They will make mistakes
that is apart of learning |
|
|
15. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
12 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
8 (67%) |
3 (25%) |
|
|
16. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
12 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (58%) |
4 (33%) |
|
|
17. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.42 |
12 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (33%) |
7 (58%) |
|
|
18. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (33%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
19. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
| 4.33 |
12 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
6 (50%) |
5 (42%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
20. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
12 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
8 (67%) |
3 (25%) |
|
|
21. I participated actively in class discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
12 |
0.72 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
6 (50%) |
4 (33%) |
|
|
22. I participated actively in the small group sessions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
12 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (50%) |
6 (50%) |
|
|
23. I developed leadership skills in this class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
12 |
0.72 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
6 (50%) |
4 (33%) |
|
|
24. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
12 |
1.14 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (42%) |
6 (50%) |
|
|
25. I performed up to my potential in this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.08 |
12 |
1.16 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
5 (42%) |
5 (42%) |
|
|
26. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
12 |
1.11 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (50%) |
5 (42%) |
|
|
27. My opinions about some topics changed because of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
12 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (67%) |
4 (33%) |
|
|
28. I learned more in this course than I expected to learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
12 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (50%) |
5 (42%) |
|
|
29. The course made me think hard and carefully.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
30. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Clinical experience at HMC was the most valuable because I was able to apply the knowledge I learned in school to reality situations. |
| Communicating among fellow classmates as well as the health care team. |
| The clinical aspects were most valuable because of the hands on experience |
| Teaching me during clinicals. |
| Clinical rotations |
| Being able to make mistakes and learn from them. Mistakes are like puzzles something to be solved
not crimes to be punished |
|
|
31. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| I didn't feel like the SIM seminars were that organized. I sometimes felt like they just threw us in there without getting a clear explanation on what they actually expected from us. The staff as a whole need to come together and communicate first before making the assignments. Communication is key! |
| Explaining of some assignments such as the nursing portfolio. |
| Subjective findings of teachers |
|
|
32. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.42 |
12 |
1.16 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
33. The instructor tells students when they have done especially well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
12 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
34. The instructor was willing to help.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
12 |
1.34 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
7 (58%) |
|
|
35. Other comments:
|
| Tambra's positive and enthusiastic attitude helped me to look forward in seeing her and being around her. She communicated on what she expected us to do in the beginning and then allowed us to tell her what our plan was for patient care, which is awesome. She allowed me to think critically but also she was willing to help if needed. I never felt like she would turn her back on me when I had a question to ask. I really feel that the teachers make a big difference in how each student grow and thrive in the HCC ADN program. She is awesome and a valuable asset to the program. |
| I enjoyed my nursery rotation with you! Thank you for being patient and understanding with us students as we try to keep up with the pace of learning various subjects in such a short time. I truly appreciate it! |
| Thanks for all your help Tambra. I appreciate your encouragement and feedback. A "tap on my shoulder" or acknowledgement that I did good really helps or boost my self-esteem. Mahalo for a great semester. |
| I appreciate Tambra as an instructor because I feel she tries to push me to learn and takes the time to answer questions. If she doesn't know the answer, she finds the answer and explains it. She is very approachable and tells me when I do something good, or what I need to improve on. |
| -- snipped -- |
* Showing 4 out of 5 survey responses.
|
|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.85 |
15 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
11 (73%) |
2 (13%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.69 |
15 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
10 (67%) |
2 (13%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.57 |
15 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (40%) |
8 (53%) |
1 (7%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.6 |
15 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
4 (27%) |
10 (67%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.47 |
15 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (53%) |
7 (47%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.93 |
15 |
0.26 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
14 (93%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.93 |
15 |
0.26 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
14 (93%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
15 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
14 (93%) |
1 (7%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.73 |
15 |
0.8 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
13 (87%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.93 |
15 |
0.26 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
14 (93%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.87 |
15 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
13 (87%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.93 |
15 |
0.26 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
14 (93%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| I enjoyed the hands-on approach of leading community meetings, volunteering at community support centers, and leading activities on the mental health unit. |
| The reading materials were very helpful for this course. The media analysis paper was very
interesting to do and allowed me to put to use of what I have learned. |
| I liked the prep work for medications, side effects, and psych disorders that we did at the end of clinicals each day. |
| The activities, projects, and assignments for this course were appropriate,
and if done correctly, very helpful in mastering the content. Since the
theory portion of this class was online, it really required a lot of self-
motivation. Therefore, in a class such as this, it is very important that the
assigned readings be relevant and informative; and they were. |
| Tambra was very helpful in our clinical experience. She motiaved us to learn and pass the course.
She was very thorough with our paperwork and documentation. |
| This course was well prepared and had straight forward answers to what instruction were to each
project, care plan, etc. |
| Going to the psych rotations was very valuable as I learned a lot about what I was reading in the assigned chapters for the course. |
| The clinical experience was amazing, as well as the activities that were conducted with the various patients. |
| The main thing I enjoyed about this course was learning from Ms. Fry! She is an amazing
instructor, always prepared and eager to help her students. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| I did not care for the online lectures. I would rather have a face to face interaction, especially
for a course like this. |
| I enjoyed the course very much. What you are doing is working well to help students to understand material and become prepared for communicating with all types of patients in a variety of clinical settings. |
| Incorporate more medication administration into the clinical setting. Have a
live lecture. |
| Maybe there is a friendlier way to correct students of their mistakes. |
| Try to incorporate an activity into the schedule on wednesdays that the students perform with the patients of the units. |
| I really feel this class should be an on-site class taught by Ms. Fry. She has such a wealth of
information, it's a shame HCC doesn't take advantage of her talents & knowledge.
I found the on-line lectures not helpful when studying for the exam. In fact, it was mainly from
being on the clinical floor with Ms. Fry and her worksheets which helped me pass the test. |
| a live lecture would be SO much nicer! It is not motivating to log onto laulima every week to listen to
a psych lecture. I learn much better in a classroom setting. |
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| Tambra Fry was an exceptional instructor. She displayed compassion, and concern for us students as well as our patients. She went out of her way to explain subject matter that we had difficulty understanding. I felt that she truly wanted us to be excellent nurses, and did her best to assist us in working toward this goal. |
| Tambra is a very positive, supportive instructor. I really enjoyed having her as my instructor.
She was always prepared and knew about the topic that we discussed. She provided
additional learning materials that helped me a lot. |
| Mrs. Fry is an invaluable clinical instructor who is sensitive to the
students learning needs. She is committed to the learning process and assists
the students in finding what works best for them. Her confidence in her
students in the clinical setting does not prevent her for intervening when
necessary. She is always prepared to answer questions, and provides guidance
when needed. She also prepared worksheets for us to use in post-conference
that were very helpful to us. She also understood that because this was an
online course we would probably have questions from our readings and our
lectures so she was always willing to help us resolve our misunderstandings.
Very positive reviews. Great contributor to our learning experience. |
| tambra is great, she should be running the entire nursing program. She is a GOOD teacher, genuine, and actually talked to you like e human being. |
| Tambra is a great instructor. She motivates her students and she is very positive and encouraging! |
| Thank you for all the handouts and mini-assignments during conference time. |
| I learned a lot in the psych rotation. I really appreciated the worksheets that were given to help us
with our studies. |
| Tambra is an excellent instructor!!!!!! She is helpful and offers constructive criticism. She is always there to listen. Tambra is a great educator!! |
| A big mahalo to Professor Fry. You were such an inspiration to me this semester. I wished you
taught on the medical floor also (I know, that's too much to ask!). I can only imagine how much I
could have learned from you. Not only do you deliver nursing care with the upmost
professionalism, you do with compassion and empathy. And you did the same when teaching us
students.
Much gratitude! |
|
|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
F |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| I would have the clinical instructors collaborate to prepare exams so the same content can
be implemented during clinical days. |
| Have more helpful information on the lectures online than just reading off of what is printed on the outlines for each chapter. Letting us know what to study on the clinical comp exam/outlined study guide. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| I think that Tambra did well in her new role as a clinical instructor. She was very apporachable and always encouraged students to apply themselves to their work. She took the time to look over paperwork and provided pertinent constructive criticism. |
| Tambra is great at teaching us about the concepts we needed to know and helped us by giving us handouts and small little practice worksheets to work on our therapeutic communication, and gave us important feedback on our paperwork. she is very detailed oriented and a great teacher. I wish she taught us the lecture portion too instead of just the clinical portion. |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| Yes |
| yes she has and helped us improve on whatever we needed to fix and clearly explained to us important information. |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| Tambra did an excellent job as our clinical instructor. She provided a positive learning enviornment and took the time to listen to all of her students concrens or questions. |
| She is a great teacher and has empathy towards us being a nursing student because she was once where we are now. she gives great insight to the subject matter and wants you to be a critical thinker. |
|