|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| It was very hands on and we went on plenty field trips . It was great. |
| Hands-on learning through field trips brought the course to life! Tangible explanation of curriculum! |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| I would have to say it was spot on but the 3 hours of class wrok on tuesdays was a little much. |
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| Mahalos plenty.
learned alot |
| A joy to learn from! Alleen is not only knowledgable but makes the course really 'dummy proof'. Her positivity and ability to translate to the novice in a clear and understandable way takes away the intimidation of taking a science course. This experience with Alleen has encouraged me to pursue an interest in Ag!!! |
|
