|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
8 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
4 (50%) |
3 (38%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.38 |
8 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
3 (38%) |
4 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
8 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
4 (50%) |
3 (38%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| I enjoyed doing the projects and work but, I would have liked to have worked
with the program Final Cut Pro more but still it was a good class. |
| getting to use final cut pro |
| greatly enjoyed this class and seeing the films come to life. |
| I liked that I was able to take control of my own movie and decide everything myself, as if I were the Director. |
| I liked this course becuase it focused o one program (final cut pro) rather than 5 programs. Assignments were useful to understand different and varying film styles, camera movements, and different forms of editing. |
| The freedom allowed to create one's own project was greatly effective, and appreciated.
Having Danny willing, and able, to coach and assist all the students in the class, as he rather rotatingly did, was a rare and helpful plus. |
| Knowledge from a true professional with great deal of experience. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| Do more example work before starting final projects-- |
| I enjoyed it and might take the continuation of post production. |
| Perhaps to put less emphasis on the quality of the camera footage and more emphasis on learning Final Cut Pro. |
| -- snipped -- |
| -- snipped -- |
| -- snipped -- |
* Showing 3 out of 6 survey responses.
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| -- snipped -- |
| Daniel Miller is a great teacher. I believe he is newer, and is working out the kinks in his teaching procedures. Overall, he did an excellent job. I loved that we were independent. We were allowed to choose our own topic. We were shown the tools we needed to use immediately. I enjoyed the freedom and the flexibility on the time frame.
I would like to make a request to HCC, to please provide the DMA program with Lavaliers. These were an essentail part of our filming process, and we were often hindered by the lack of there availblity. The DMA room currently has one. Mahalo. |
| I have been very happy to have had the great fortune to be in this program.
Many mahalos are due to Regina & Jackie! |
| Enjoyed the class and Danny's insights. Will take other courses from him. |
* Showing 3 out of 4 survey responses.
|
