|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
6 |
1.1 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (67%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
6 |
1.1 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
6 |
1.1 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.67 |
6 |
1.21 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
6 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.83 |
6 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
6 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.83 |
6 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| LIKED THE ACTIVITIES, THEY WERE FUN.. |
| well. i like doing the chapters in "Microsoft Office 2007" even though i did not have microsoft access 2007. |
| It was an awesome course to take. |
| I appreciated the fact that the teacher went over the material that was assigned for homework. I also appreciated how "on it" he was with returning test and work. It helped me prepare for finals ect. |
| This class helped me to leanr simple things that I could use everyday... |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| NO |
| hmmm... well... i say that he should try to make the subject more fun. then again how can you make this subject fun? if he could make the lesson more fun, it becomes more memorable. so if he can do that, then he will be fine. |
| I wouldn't change anything about this course. |
| Upgrade the text because some books werent the same as others. |
|
|
15. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
16. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
17. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
6 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
2 (33%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| HAPPY THANKSGIVING!! |
| It was a pleasure being taught by Mr.Shoemaker. |
|
|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
4 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
4 |
1.15 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.5 |
4 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.0 |
4 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.5 |
4 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
4 |
1.15 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.0 |
4 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.5 |
4 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.5 |
4 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| I liked how we went over the programs and flowcharts as a class. |
| The material from this course was brand new to me. I have never done any programming or computer logic before. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| I believe with such a course that it's important to make sure students have a strong foundation, such as learning about variables and such. |
| I think the course was done okay. I think doing more group lecture in the beginning of the course would help a lot. The instructor started with the assumption that everyone in the class had some knowledge of programming. Taking some time early in the semester to assess the knowledge level would have made the course much better. |
|
|
15. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.0 |
4 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
16. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
17. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.5 |
4 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| Mr. Shoemaker is very knowledgeable. Toward the end of the course he was able to communicate the subject material in a manner I could understand. |
|