|
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
3. The course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
12. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| Mr. Yoneshige is really down to earth and very easy to speak with. Very encouraging, he made this class extremely enjoyable. |
| Mr. Yoneshige is knowledgeable, enthusiastic and passionate about accounting and life! |
| Great knowledge of accounting and the course. |
| know accounting material well. |
| His ability to explain what we were talking about. |
| Awesome teacher wish there were more teachers like him |
|
|
14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| Teach more classes! He's fantastic! |
| Maybe he can speak a little louder in class. |
| Teach the entire class not just the first half of the semester |
| Nope, great job |
|
|
15. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| He was always willing to listen, he took the time to have discussions with the class as a whole when someone had a question. |
| Mr. Yoneshige listened with intent and helped us to understand the curriculum. He also helped us
to realize that we need to raise the bar and have a solid foundation in accounting. |
| He encourage us in the work that was assigned and insight of accounting. |
| by asking questions, taking note down to make sure students have the right answer. He posted answer on Laulima so students can easily have access to correct and study their homework assignment. |
| He listened and would help them find the answers. |
| Yes but the way he teaches no one fell behind |
|
|
16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| Yes! He is awesome! |
| I would absolutely recommend Mr. Yoneshige to other students. He is a wealth of information and
experiences. His personality is addicting and it was hard to see him leave mid-semester. |
| Yes, I enjoyed his class very much. |
| Yes because Mr. Yoneshige know his material well and he shows concern about students. |
| Yes. he is very knowledgable and very informative about the subject. |
| Yes one of the best teachers I've had |
|
|
17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| He made having to be in class fun! |
| Mr. Yoneshige wants the best for all of his students. He loves what he does and he is not afraid to
"bite the bullet" when we find mistakes in his calculations! Hee, hee! |
| Thank you for helping me understand the accounting process. |
| resured me that accounting was for me |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| To Mr. Yoneshige's Superiors: Please hold on to Mr. Yoneshige. He defines a teacher and is a great
man! |
| I believe the Accounting Student Night should be more than just a third of
our grade. With the amount of time and effort that is needed to put into this
event, there should be some type of incentive for all students to put their
best efforts. Bare minimum efforts results in a bare minimum quality of the
event. |
|
|
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
3. The course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
12. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| Knows the subject area well. |
| His class was very organized and he always cares about students. |
| Very familiar with the subject matter. We were able to ask questions outside the subject matter and he was right there with an answer. |
| His class is well structured and organized. He actually follows his schedule! |
| He presented the material in a way that we could apply it to real life
situations which in turn made it easier to understand. |
| kind, explain clearly until the students got it |
|
|
14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| none |
| Class is too short. I love the practical side of accounting. I learned alot and found accounting to be an interesting career for me. Because of him, im eager to start my career in accounting. |
| Nothing |
|
|
15. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| Was always available for questions.
Was always available. |
| Always answering questions outside of class hours. |
| he's available on email and office hours, always helps students |
|
|
16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| yes, great teacher and knows his subject area. |
| Highly recommend Mr. Yoneshige to other students. He creates an atmosphere in class that intrigues our interest in accounting. He is very knowledible on the subject matter and other areas not pertaining to the class. His class is structured, thus you know what needs to be done and when its due. His class gives you the prospective of actually working out there in the field. During my internship class, Mr. Yoneshiges class was highly helpful thus ive been hired as a part time accounting clerk. |
| Yes, why not? He was nice kind don't mind help students |
|
|
17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| I only hoped he would have taught longer. Its not just the class material taught, but his way of teaching that got me wishing he taught other classes. He makes the class interesting by his real life experiences and his full understanding by teaching outside the textbook. I don't even think he looked at the text book for guidence the whole time. He knew his material very well. Possibly auditing. I love his class, but i felt it was too short |
| nothing |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| Being a local guy ( i believe i was) gave me that extra interest because of how he approached the subject matter. The class was very interesting and i learned alot in his class. Thanks to him, my internship was so much easier. Thank you again. |
| n/a |
|
|
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.42 |
12 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
1 (8%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
3. The course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
12 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
12 (100%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
12. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
12 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
12 (100%) |
|
|
13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| He made sure everyone understood what was being taught. |
| - He waited to move onto another subject/chapter until everyone understood
the chapters/subject. Very patient, understanding, easy going, relaxed. |
| He's a great teacher. I would recommend him to everyone. I had a great time in class with him and I learned a lot. |
| He is very knowledgeable about the course. |
| The lecture was very clear |
|
|
14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| No changes. |
| None |
| Nothing that I know of. He is a great instructor! |
| none |
|
|
15. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| He went over quizzes and test after they were graded and went over areas that he felt needed more attention so the students would understand. |
| N/A |
| He was always there to answer questions whenever we needed help. Went out of his way to help us. |
| he doesn't leave the topic without the whole class understanding it. He also takes the blame of not teaching the particular topic very well whenever a lot of students got an item in the quiz/exam wrong. |
| answer questions until we all understand |
|
|
16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| I recommend students to take his class because you will learn and see how accounting is applied manually. |
| Yes. He waits until everyone in class understands a section/chapter then move
onto the next chapter/section. |
| Yes, he's a great teacher and is willing to help you in anyway he can. He's not boring and keeps in engaged. |
| Absolutely! You'll miss half of your Accounting life without taking this course under him. |
| Yes, I learned a lot from him |
|
|
17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| I really enjoyed his class, I like the pace of how he teaches, and he is a very patient teacher. |
| Very good instructor! Please hire him to teach the whole course during the
semester. |
| If there are 5-stars hotels, KCC have a 5-star accounting instructor! |
| none |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| He should continue to teach this class or another accounting course. He's a really good teacher. |
| ****This has nothing to do with the evaluation of Mr. Kerry Yoneshige.***
The course as a whole with four instructors involved is very disorganized.
It doesn't transition smoothly (i.e. have smooth transitions.) We start off
the semester with six weeks of the manual accounting cycle then jump right
into Mr. Kobayashi's accounting research for the rest of the semester. Plus
within the six weeks, the planning of Accounting Student Night starts from
almost the first week of semester to end of October. Then having to deal
with a very disorganized internal control project headed by Accounting
Professor Dooley - getting piece by piece information (by either Mr. Dooley
or another student) of more requirements that is not listed on the timeline
completion schedule up until presentation week from Professor Dooley. After
the internal control project, we have to do a True Blood case presentation.
This course should have two instructors, not three or four instructors
involved. |
| This part of ACC 231B was wonderful. However, having technically 4 professors running this class was very stressful. You could never go to just one professor for a final answer. I really learned a lot from the SUA portion, but after that I feel like I haven't been able to retain everything else. The class went from one subject to a completely different one w/o an in-between. I felt like I was being pulled in 5 different directions. SUA, Accounting Student Night, Acccounting Research and Internal Control Project and a TrueBlood project. There were too many chiefs for this class. I have no idea why we can't evaluate Dooley since he was in-chare of the Internal Controls Project. Also it's a waste of the students time and money when we have to repeat the same activities again for Accounting Student Night and Internal Controls project for ACC 251B. This class is very disorganized! This should be fixed. ACC 231B should only have the SUA and TrueBlood. Accounting Student Night and the Internal Controls Project should be assigned only for ACC 251b. We shouldn't have to do the same projects twice for two different classes. |
| His class have a lot of assignments to be completed but believe me, those will help students to really understands the overall manual process of accounting. |
| none |
|