eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Michelle Smith

Available Survey Results

OCN201L, Spring 2014
PHYL141, ZOOL141, Spring 2014
PHYL141L, ZOOL141L, Spring 2014
PHYL142, ZOOL142, Spring 2014
PHYL142L, ZOOL142L, Spring 2014
BIOL172L, Spring 2014
BIOL172, Spring 2011
ZOOL142, Fall 2009
OCN201, Fall 2008

Michelle Smith: OCN201L, Spring 2014

Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Oceanography
Course: OCN 201L - Science of the Sea Lab Crn (Section): 24393 (0)    
1. THIS CLASS contributed to IMPROVING these general education skills; Demonstrate RESEARCH METHODS & SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY skills.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 8 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 3 (38%) 1 (13%)
2. The amount of effort I put into this course was
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Low   Low   Medium   High   Very High  
3.75 8 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 4 (50%) 1 (13%)
3. The instructor clearly explains course procedures (attendance, assignments, exams, etc.).
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.88 8 1.13 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%)
4. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.0 8 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%)
5. The instructor appears to know his or her subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.63 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 1 (13%) 6 (75%)
6. I developed a set of overall values in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%) 4 (50%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%) 4 (50%)
8. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
She needs to be more prepared, more cleaqr with assigment or class assignment
N/A
She did well at teaching us during labs and field trips.
She did a great job making this subject interesting. I enjoyed this class 1,000 times more than I liked the actual OCN 201 course. Great Job!
She could start off by presenting the assignments a little bit better instead of just telling us to go right into it.
9. Comment on the instructor's professional attitude and behavior.
She was very positive,helpful and a great lab teacher
Very kind and indeed understandable. She works with student individual and as a whole for certain activity. Willing to answer any question and continuing to encourage students to improve.
She was brave and very caring about our assignments. If we needed help, she was always available to answer any questions.
very good
Great attitude and behavior. The best professor out of the five classes I took this semester.
Very professional!
10. Comment on the instructor's concern for the students.
n/a
She won't move on until the whole class participate and understand each unit.
She is amazing because she cares enough to tell us to make sure that we are on track.
Always concerned about our safety and our interest in the subject.
Could give a chance.
11. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.13 8 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%) 3 (38%)
12. Lab assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 8 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%) 3 (38%)
13. Lab assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.13 8 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 3 (38%)
14. Other comments:
I loved the field trip , it made it more fun to learn about the class .
N/A
Great job Mrs. Smith. You did an amazing job and made me enjoy OCN 201! Keep it up.

Michelle Smith: PHYL141, ZOOL141, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Physiology
Course: PHYL 141 - Anatomy & Physiology I Crn (Section): 24269 (0)    
Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 141 - Human Anatomy & Phys I Crn (Section): 23485 (0)    
1. THIS CLASS contributed to IMPROVING these general education skills; Demonstrate an Understanding of the life processes of the NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, of the planet and universe (Natural Science).
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
2. The grade I expect in this class is
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 3 (75%)
3. The instructor clearly explains course procedures (attendance, assignments, exams, etc.).
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 4 (67%)
4. The instructor uses class time well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.17 6 0.98 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (75%)
5. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.83 6 0.98 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (75%)
6. The instructor is available for help outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (33%) 2 (50%)
7. The instructor clearly explains the goals, objectives, and overall purpose of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
8. The instructor speaks clearly and is easy to understand.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
9. The instructor answers questions clearly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 2 (50%)
10. The instructor makes good use of examples in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 3 (75%)
11. The instructor appears to know his or her subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (75%)
12. The instructor clearly explains complex ideas.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (33%)
13. The instructor allows time for questions and encourages them.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%)
14. The instructor makes the material interesting.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (50%) 2 (33%)
15. The instructor asks questions to see if students understand.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%)
16. The instructor motivates students to do their best.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
17. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%) 2 (33%)
18. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 4 (67%) 1 (17%)
19. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Michelle could improve teaching this course by talking more in her voice as opposed to just the writing off the slide. She talks in her own voice but sometimes it comes straight from the powerpoint
I hope she cut back number chapter on the exam. Thanks.
Making lecture more clear, instead of only using power points. Lab she could work more with the class, instead of having us do it on our own.
I think her class is perfect the way it is. She is very knowledgeable, nice & gives examples related to real life situations.
Maybe utilizing Mastering A&P more in class.
20. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
She helps with remembering idea's using little phrases to help stick in your mind for tests. She also lets you use a notecard which is very helpful sometimes on the exams
She is really well known her subject...
If you need answers she will answers them. She wants students to learn but will not baby you which is what college students need.
Help of powerpoints
She tells us how to succeed in her class: read, attend lecture, do all assignments & papers, draw pictures, and participate in class
Availability to her slides. Jeopardy!!!
Professor Smith was always friendly and fun in class, making it a pleasure to be there. She showed her enthusiasm for teaching the subject which made it fun to learn. She always answered questions in a helpful way or gave suggestions to find more answers. I enjoyed this course thoroughly.
21. Other comments:
Pretty good course.
I would recommend her to anyone that wants to learn and remember the material.

Michelle Smith: PHYL141L, ZOOL141L, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Physiology
Course: PHYL 141L - Human Anatomy & Physiology Lab Crn (Section): 24270 (0)    
Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 141L - Human Anatomy & Phys Lab I Crn (Section): 23486 (0)    
1. THIS CLASS contributed to IMPROVING these general education skills; Demonstrate an Understanding of the life processes of the NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, of the planet and universe (Natural Science).
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
2. The instructor clearly explains course procedures (attendance, assignments, exams, etc.).
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
3. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
4. The instructor speaks clearly and is easy to understand.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (17%)
5. The instructor appears to know his or her subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
6. The instructor asks questions to see if students understand.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
7. The instructor clearly explains the grading system.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor suggests specific ways to improve.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
9. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
10. The instructor is friendly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
11. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 2 (67%)
12. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
13. The instructor was willing to help.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 4 (67%)
14. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Be prepared. Be organized. Explain the assignments thoroughly.
I don't think this class needs any improvement. She is very clear with directions & tells us how to succeed. She has realistic expectations.
15. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
She is really well known about the course.
She's always there when you need help.
She created a comfortable atmosphere for students to learn.
Her teaching skills with the help of powerpoints.
She has realistic expectations, uses laboratory time well, she let us observe muscle models, skeletons, and others so that we would be familiar with them for the lab exams.
16. Other comments:
This class would have been MUCH better if the school provided a better laboratory classroom equipped with more functional tools for learning anatomy.
I think her lessons are very informative & really interesting. She's very nice & encourages us to do well.

Michelle Smith: PHYL142, ZOOL142, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Natural Sciences
Course: PHYL 142 - Human Anatomy & Physiology II Crn (Section): 24271 (0)    
Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 142 - Human Anatomy & Phys II Crn (Section): 23518 (0)    
1. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%)
2. The instructor speaks clearly and is easy to understand.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (20%)
3. The instructor is interested in the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.0 2 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 2 (100%) 2 (40%)
4. The instructor treats students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%)
5. The instructor grades tests fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.4 5 1.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (20%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 2 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor gave useful writing assignments.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 5 1.22 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor's voice was clear and understandable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 5 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 2 (100%)
9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.6 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor was willing to help.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
11. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
She should give us study guide so that we know what to study for the exam.
EXPLAIN MATERIAL MORE THOROUGHLY
Have a study guide, better use of review days. Use time better.
I don't think the course needs much improvements, maybe some minor tweaking on the jeopardy questions. It is the best zoology course I've taken so far. The lectures, grading system, and assignments are all very good.
I often found that more complicated topics were given the same amount of time/slides as simple topics. More time should be spent on the complicated topics especially if those topics will be covered in detail on the exams. Also, sometimes when I asked a question if Michelle didn't think it was pertinent she would say "that's not important", but when I ask a question I do so because it will help me understand, which is very pertinent.
Writing her own exams. A writing topic and paper more intriguing for the class. more group work.
12. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
none
SHES A LOT MORE FUN THE OTHER PROFESSORS AND IS ALWAYS WILLING TO EXPERIMENT WITH DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES
Nothing.
Michelle is very knowledgeable about the subject and able to answer any questions promptly. It is very easy to get help from her before/after class and through email. The lecture notes are very easy to understand and follow. It helps me retain information better and study for exams. The jeopardy games to review for the exams are also very helpful in telling me what chapters I should study more in depth. I also really appreciate the opportunities given to add more percentage points to the exam.
Michelle is always willing to help. She doesn't mind going over something if you ask. The exam reviews were helpful to prepare for the exam and gauge what areas I needed to study more, but the jeopardy format is terrible. The points should be given based on participation and not which team wins.
Her ability to reach out to her students, meet them half way. She understood that students have lives too.
13. Other comments:
none
GOOD CLASS TO TAKE
Nothing.
Michelle is a very caring instructor and she tries her best to provide students with what they need to succeed, thank you for that.
I felt that a big obstacle to learning in the this class were the students themselves. They were often incredibly disruptive and often rude to Michelle. While I understand it's hard for teachers to "stick up for themselves" it often seemed like the class wasn't under the teacher's control.

Michelle Smith: PHYL142L, ZOOL142L, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Natural Sciences
Course: PHYL 142L - Human Anatomy & Physiology Lab Crn (Section): 24272 (0)    
Campus: Honolulu Community College Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 142L - Human Anatomy & Phys Lab II Crn (Section): 23519 (0)    
1. The instructor is friendly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 2 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
2. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 1 (50%)
3. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%)
4. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 1 (50%)
5. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
1.0 2 0.0 Freq(%) 2 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 1 (20%)
6. Laboratory assignments seem carefully chosen.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.2 5 1.3 Freq(%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%)
7. Directions for laboratory assignments are clear and specific.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%)
8. Lab assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 5 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%)
9. How can the laboratory be improved?
LESS ONLINE WORK AND MORE HANDS ON
Given the limited laboratory equipment available at Honolulu Community College, I know Michelle tried her best to give us interesting experiments to do that related to the subject matter. I think labs went pretty decent and I understood the objectives from the lab.
Better equiptment
I think something that would strongly improve this lab. Is have a worksheet or hand out or some type of lab info for the day on a sheet of paper that was either directions or if we weren't to be doing anything maybe a diagram and the days details. Try and ALWAYS have some type of fun group activity..... doesn't have to be fun but any activity. Something that walks through and follows a long side the course.
This is in no way a reflection of Michelle, but this was the worst lab I have ever taken. We never had the proper supplies or models to do most of the labs. The labs which we could do were on the computer (which can be done at home) so the students got resentful. Michelle didn't have a lab manager so she was always scrambling to get the lab set-up in time (there is only a 15 minute break between the lecture and lab which is an unreasonably short amount of time to set- up). The lab needs to be COMPLETELY inventoried and any missing/old/insufficient equipment needs to be obtained before another section is held. More models need to be ordered and hire a lab assistant! It's not fair to the students who pay for these credits to have such a ill-equipped lab. I wish I would have taken the lab with Michelle at Windward where she would have had the supplies she needs AND I would have had access to a study lab.
10. Other comments:
HCC NEEDS MORE EQUIPMENT!!!
Michelle is a really dedicated professor. I know of professors who stand back and watch the students do the lab without attempting it themselves. Michelle assisted us with the labs and also participated in them herself. This shows her sincerity to helping the students learn.
Michelle Smith is a great teacher who is always willing to help student when asked. I enjoyed taking her for both Zool 141 & 142 Lab!
Nothing.
Michelles easy and understanding nature makes her a great teacher to have a convo with. Talk through something on the book, ask for help.... The exam structure in this course was great tho! the LAb really hit the spot. with picture and structural models etc.
see above.

Michelle Smith: BIOL172L, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: Windward Community College Department: Natural Sciences
Course: BIOL 172L - General Biology Lab II Crn (Section): 60120 (0)    
1. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
2. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Interactive, knowledgeable, efficient
Intelligent and Engaging
Knowledgable; Caring and helpful
Michelle is knowledgeable and fair, with high expectations.
3. The assigned readings were instrumental in the development of my knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
4. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 2 (40%)
5. The instructor clearly explains course procedures (attendance, assignments, exams, etc.).
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%)
6. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 2 (40%)
7. The instructor is available for help outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
8. The instructor clearly explains the goals, objectives, and overall purpose of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%)
9. The instructor allows time for questions and encourages them.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
10. The instructor stimulates student's thinking about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
11. Other comments:
Michelle Smith is a great teacher. Very knowledgeable in what she does. I enjoyed having her as my teacher this semester, especially in this subject :) Great Job Michelle!
Michelle Smith is passionate about biology and is a great lab instructor.

Michelle Smith: BIOL172, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Biology
Course: BIOL 172 - Introduction to Biology II Crn (Section): 87875 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.45 11 1.13 Freq(%) 3 (27%) 2 (18%) 4 (36%) 2 (18%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 12 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 4 (33%) 5 (42%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 12 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 7 (58%) 2 (17%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.08 12 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 5 (42%) 5 (42%)
6. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 12 0.78 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 4 (33%) 6 (50%)
7. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 12 1.34 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 3 (25%) 5 (42%)
8. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 12 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 8 (67%) 2 (17%)
9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 12 1.03 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 8 (67%) 2 (17%)
10. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 12 1.14 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 5 (42%) 3 (25%)
11. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 12 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 6 (50%) 4 (33%)
12. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 12 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 4 (33%) 4 (33%) 2 (17%)
13. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.42 12 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 3 (25%) 7 (58%)
14. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.92 12 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 3 (25%) 4 (33%) 4 (33%)
15. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 12 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 6 (50%) 4 (33%)
16. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 12 1.37 Freq(%) 2 (17%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 5 (42%) 2 (17%)
17. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
I think that Michelle Smith should offer more office hours because that would really help aid my studies.
Work on defining "General info" if you're going to test on it. I got a little better at reading your mind this last exam, but I shouldn't have to nor should anyone else. It's not fair to be graded on a vast body of knowledge when you make no indication of what's important and often times skim over or even skip over the material that will be on the exam
Emphasizing the key points. I ended up studying irrelevant parts of the text book because I thought a more detailed understanding was needed for the exams. Possibly posting past exams for studying puposes. Or a review worksheet.
Add assignments aside from just reading and 4 exams. She did not give specific direction as to the key concepts to study. The exams felt like random aspects of each chapter and I never knew exactly what to focus on in my studies. I understand needing to "know it all" but that's impossible when you are studying for 5-7 chapters of term heavy examination. The classes seemed to go ahead of the labs, or perhaps the labs were too behind. I'm not sure. I love her as a teacher, but the structure of the tests and objectifying a per exam focus need to be adhered for this class.
It would be nice to know what we need to be studying for the tests rather than a "study everything" approach. The note cards are helpful occasionally but I would have rather had a curve on tests than a note card. When students asked if something would be on the test, we were never given a straight answer, only a "it might be" for any and everything we asked about. We're covering a lot of material in the class. A study guide would have helped.
18. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 12 0.78 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 4 (33%) 6 (50%)
19. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 12 0.87 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 3 (25%) 6 (50%)
20. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 12 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 5 (42%) 4 (33%) 2 (17%)
21. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 12 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 4 (33%) 3 (25%)
22. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I liked how clear and concise Michelle was at explaining the topics covered in class. I also liked how easily approachable she was and how easy to talk to she was.
The notecard was slightly helfpul dealing with the overwhelming exams
Learning about the random facts about flowers and animals.
Michelle is highly knowledgeable in every aspect of biology and she has the experience and current professional interaction needed by any professor actively teaching sciences. Her ability to relate the topics to our lives is key.
The material was interesting and the chance to do extra credit was greatly appreciated.
23. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.75 12 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 8 (67%) 1 (8%)
24. Other comments:
Really just don't like the structure of her exams. Only complaint really.
I felt that the tests were harder than they should have been. The questions on the test were not what we studied. After the exam I even went to find out the answer and could not find any easy way to get it except by going to Wikipedia. It wasn't in our notes. I studied a lot for this class and feel that the grades I was getting on the tests did not reflect the amount of work I put in.

Michelle Smith: ZOOL142, Fall 2009     Back to top

Campus: Kapiolani Community College Department: Math & Science
Course: ZOOL 142 - Human Anatomy/Physiology II Crn (Section): 31768 (0)    
1. The instructor did not speak clearly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.0 9 1.0 Freq(%) 3 (33%) 4 (44%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
2. The instructor explained course procedure. (attendance, assignments, grading policy, exams, etc.)
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 9 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (33%) 6 (67%)
3. The instructor was available during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 9 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 5 (56%)
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.89 9 1.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 4 (44%)
5. The instructor explained the course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 9 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 5 (56%)
6. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 9 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 6 (67%)
7. The instructor was prepared for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 9 1.22 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 0 (0%) 3 (33%) 4 (44%)
8. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.22 9 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 4 (44%)
9. The instructor's way of teaching assisted my learning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.78 9 1.48 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 4 (44%)
10. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.89 9 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 3 (33%)
11. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.11 9 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 4 (44%)
12. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 9 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 4 (44%) 4 (44%)
13. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 9 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 4 (44%) 4 (44%)
14. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 9 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (56%) 4 (44%)
15. The instructor spoke clearly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 9 0.87 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 2 (22%) 5 (56%)
16. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
she knew the subject well
Michelle encourage a lot of discussion in the class on various topics but this was often because the students felt they knew more than she did. Her breadth of knowledge about A&P did not seem very broad so the students felt it necessary to share their experiences and knowledge about A&P. I found this undermining to the instructor because the students either had contradictory information to hers or brought up information about which she had no knowledge whatsoever. This also wasted time in class listening to stories that may or may not be founded in fact.
She knows how to effectively connect with the students and explain the content to a degree where we can understand it.
Michelle's knowledge and passion for teaching make her a great instructor. She is prepared with lecture notes and slides, videos, and even Jeopardy review games. She takes the time to explain everything and breaks the information down in a way that helps you to grasp to concepts of such a vast array of information. She is personable and very easy going.
She was able to present the material very well and was always possitve.
17. The instructor was not available during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
1.78 9 0.97 Freq(%) 4 (44%) 4 (44%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
18. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
more specific on what is covered on the test. there is a lot of information to cover.
The instructor would be a better lecturer if she came to class prepared. She was often at a loss for words. Meaning she could not think of important terms we needed to know or did not know what abbreviations in her notes stood for. However, that information was actually in her notes so if she had read her notes before coming to class she would have known this information. The jeopardy reviews at first seemed helpful, however, I realized the questions in the review were not very to the actual exam. Also there were multiple reviews where we had to identify different organs, however identification was not on the exam. This is a waste of time. If jeopardy reviews more closely matched the types of questions on the exam students would do better on the exams.
Area of studies are too broad. Instructor is going to fast, hard to understand. Did not have a specific area of focus on each chapter which makes many students in the class got poor grade on their test.
I wouldn't suggest this instructor any changes.
If anything, I would have preferred to write our topic papers concurrently with the chapters being studies.
I would not change a thing.
19. How did the instructor show concern for students?
Michelle was also willing to answer questions or take comments in class. She asked about personal experiences which makes class more interesting when you can relate what you are learning to your own life. Michelle was also very willing to review questions on the exams and give students the benefit of the doubt.
She was willing to give students a prolonged deadline for assignments if something came up. She also explained things until the class understood it.
The instructor showed concern for me, personally, when I had a family crisis and was unable to attend classes. She followed-up on emails, let me know what was covered in the classes I missed, and did not dock my attendance grade. I am very appreciative of Michelle - I was able to still do well, even when going through an extremely trying time at home.
She would work with the student until the student got the concepts.
20. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
yes, she made the subject easy to understand but went very fast sometimes
No, because I do not feel the lecture was very helpful. Michelle read directly from her PowerPoint presentation and did not expand on the information. I did well in the class but this was because I studied hard on my own and added to her notes. I do not see the point of going to a lecture if the lecturer does not provide additional information. Also the notes did not follow the order of the book which made it harder to study from the notes. Instead of studying from page 1 to page 2, I had to study from page 2 to page 5 to page 3. The order of the notes made no sense. During class, Michelle went too quickly over important information. It would have been helpful if she repeated hormonal pathways (for example) more than once to help the class learn. Also there was very little emphasis on the specific parts of the notes we needed to know for the exam. Not every piece of info in the notes is important enough to memorize. Many instructors make that clear. Michelle did not do this often enough. Not everything in the notes can be equally important.
No, because teaching style is not good. Only lecture but did not show concrete examples for students to truly understand the subject. Need to specify what to study and aim for in each chapter instead of letting the student do the guessing of what needs to be learn.
I would recommend this instructor to other students because I gained a lot of knowledge and it was in a effective way.
Absolutely. Michelle is not only a fun and caring person, but she is an excellent teacher. She knows what she is talking about and is great at sharing her knowledge in ways that you can comprehend, and even look forward to learning.
Yes, she is a really good teacher and she cares about the students progress.
21. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
slow down lectures and cover more areas that are on the exams
The PowerPoints should be bound and sold at the bookstore. It is an inconvenience to print PowerPoints every day before class. It also wastes me toner and my money. There are too many diagrams and pictures in the notes and there is no explanation of these diagrams in the notes. Diagrams without further explanation do not teach me anything. It's just a waste to print these slides out.
A very good and caring person, but not an effective teacher due to reasons listed above. Could use some improvement on teaching style such as being more specific on the subjects being study.
This instructor was one of the best instructors that I had for zoology. it was very easy for me to understand the material.
She is really friendly and funny.
22. The instructor actively listened to students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 9 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 5 (56%)

Michelle Smith: OCN201, Fall 2008     Back to top

Campus: Windward Community College Department: Natural Sciences
Course: OCN 201 - Science of the Sea Crn (Section): 64290 (0)    
1. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.43 14 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 8 (57%) 3 (21%) 2 (14%)
2. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
hard, unprepared,
unorganized scattered nice
passionate, fair, open
nice, confusing
unprepared freindly educated
knowledgeable Unexciting Not lenient
Knowledgeable Funny
knowledgeable, understandable, not clear on instruction. new wardrobe
I need this to be taken seriously, I think that her teaching skills are very poor. She knows what she is talking about but all the students can not get the info across. She does not grade on a curve and she gives the worst test that anyone could take. The average grade is a failing score and she still don't grade on a curve or think that a lot of the questions were faulty. She needs more skill to teach at a Community College.
confusing, unorganised
well organized
3. The assigned readings were instrumental in the development of my knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.57 14 0.94 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 4 (29%) 6 (43%) 2 (14%)
4. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.21 14 1.12 Freq(%) 4 (29%) 6 (43%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 0 (0%)
5. The instructor clearly explains course procedures (attendance, assignments, exams, etc.).
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 14 1.45 Freq(%) 2 (14%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%)
6. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 14 1.41 Freq(%) 2 (14%) 4 (29%) 3 (21%) 2 (14%) 3 (21%)
7. The instructor is available for help outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.14 14 1.17 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 5 (36%) 3 (21%) 2 (14%)
8. The instructor clearly explains the goals, objectives, and overall purpose of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.43 14 1.4 Freq(%) 2 (14%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 3 (21%) 4 (29%)
9. The instructor allows time for questions and encourages them.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.93 14 1.14 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 5 (36%) 5 (36%)
10. The instructor stimulates student's thinking about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.36 14 1.22 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 3 (21%) 3 (21%)