## eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

### Available Survey Results

BUSA320, Spring 2010
BUSA345, Spring 2010

### David Pai: BUSA320, Spring 2010

Campus: Department: University of Hawaii West Oahu Professional Studies BUSA 320 - Statistics for Decision-Making 65045 (0)
1. The instructor taught me methods of analysis for this field of study.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A
4.39 18 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 6 (33%) 10 (56%) 0 (0%)
2. If this course was taken to fulfill course requirements for your concentration/major, how did this course enhance your personal and/or professional development in your concentration/major?
 Yes, the course was to fulfill graduation requirements. This class helped my professional development through learning the methods of statistical analysis. Also it helped with using microsoft excel's stats functions. I don't believe it did at all. gave me an awareness of what goes into statistics and how to generate them, also a general understanding of the importance of statistics and how they are used in business. It helped me understand statistics better. This course has definitely taught us the importance that statistics has in our daily life, and how it aids in business decision-making. Group work helped me to learn to work well with fellow classmates i had a hard time understanding the material.. i really wouldnt take this class if it wasnt required... This class was awful to me. The worst class I have had to take since Calculus. It wasn't fun at all and I didn't enjoy it one bit. I feel like I will never use most of these things and won't help me in the future. I learned a lot about statistics. Taught me how to do Statistics mostly using mega stats and excel.
3. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A
3.89 18 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (22%) 9 (50%) 4 (22%)
4. How much time did you spend during a typical week working on assignments, readings, chats, emails, etc. for this course?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   0 to 2.9 hours   3 to 6.9 hours   7 to 10.9 hours   11 to 14.9 hours   15+ hours
2.44 18 0.86 Freq(%) 2 (11%) 8 (44%) 6 (33%) 2 (11%) 0 (0%)
5. Please comment on the activities or resources that could be added to this course to improve your learning.
 Possibly just a bit more focus on using MS excel in class. I found myself struggling sometimes to correctly fill in the multiple fields that are required when setting up an equation. i think group projects could actually be eliminated. Most of the students are full time employees as well, and finding mutual times to meet is very difficult. None I think that Professor Pai has given us ample paperwork resources to understand the material. Extra credit Group project wasn't as much of a learning experience as I expected it to be, partially because we didn't know much about statistics when we chose our topic. Nothing. good class good as is...
6. I expect my grade for the course to be a/an:
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A
3.88 17 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (41%) 5 (29%) 5 (29%)
7. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.11 18 1.08 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 3 (17%) 6 (33%) 8 (44%)
8. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.17 18 1.1 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 8 (44%) 8 (44%)
9. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.17 18 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 6 (33%) 9 (50%)
10. I participated actively in class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.22 18 0.81 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (22%) 6 (33%) 8 (44%)
11. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.67 18 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (33%) 12 (67%)
12. I learned more in this course than I expected to learn.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.44 18 1.04 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (22%) 12 (67%)
13. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.33 18 1.08 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 4 (22%) 11 (61%)
14. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.39 18 1.04 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 5 (28%) 11 (61%)
15. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.28 18 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 2 (11%) 6 (33%) 9 (50%)
16. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.22 18 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 1 (6%) 6 (33%) 9 (50%)
17. The instructor acknowledges all questions insofar as possible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.53 17 0.8 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 5 (29%) 11 (65%)
18. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.22 18 0.94 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 3 (17%) 5 (28%) 9 (50%)
19. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.22 18 1.26 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 2 (11%) 0 (0%) 4 (22%) 11 (61%)
20. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.0 17 1.37 Freq(%) 2 (12%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 3 (18%) 9 (53%)
21. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
 There was a lot of material to cover. I would have wanted one more lecture on lines of regression. We had to squeeze it in to the last week along with chi squared. Dr. Pai needs to clearly state what he expects us to do. Overall, he was not able to teach us anything. I had to continuously ask for help and look over the book numerous times. He rely on Microsoft Excel to teach us with all the formula, however, he would not be able to do it on the whiteboard. None I think just having more time to answer questions via e-mail or in class. But it is understandable that Professor Pai is busy, so having this time to answer so many questions can be tough. Extra credit. his way of teaching makes you feel like you should read before coming to class to know what he is talking about. Nothing. good class. Statistics is such a boring subject that it has to be brought to life more, especially at 9:30 in the morning. good as is...
22. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
 Great professor, very knowledgeable in the field of statistics. He also has an unbelievable understanding of technology related subjects. Horrible teacher, no idea how to teach. Picks on people because we didn't understand the concept the moment he teaches us, and was not able to teach without Microsoft Excel. very nice guy, but the overall class experience is just OK. Great! A good teacher. A very practical professor who opts for us to learn the concept and focuses on what can be really useful in real life scenarios. He helped us learn ACCURATE information, making sure to correct our errors. He wants to help us succeed, but didn't just give us our grades. Good teacher. he is a great teacher. i like the fact he makes practice exams before the real exam to let us study and know what will be on the test. Good teacher. Willing to help all students. Wants us to do well in the class. Cool guy, okay teacher. Good teacher.
23. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.33 18 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 7 (39%) 9 (50%)
24. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.5 18 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 6 (33%) 11 (61%)
25. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.17 18 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 6 (33%) 9 (50%)
26. I feel that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.72 18 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (28%) 13 (72%)
27. The projects were valuable in understanding the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.0 18 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (33%) 6 (33%) 6 (33%)
28. My overall evaluation of this course is...
 Great course it would've better if Dr. Pai would be able to teach without the guidance of Microsoft Excel, and show us what exactly we're looking for. Difficult, but I managed to pass. =) A good course that someone majoring in business should take. Dr. Pai really knew subject matter. I enjoyed having him as a teacher. i still dont like statistics... didn't like it at all! Not a good requirement. Good class Good introduction to Statistics.
 I would not recommend Dr. Pai to anyone. I like the powerpoint slides they were really helpful. Please consider offering extra credit in the future :) great teacher

Campus: Department: University of Hawaii West Oahu Professional Studies BUSA 345 - Management Information Systems 65111 (0)     65207 (2)
1. The instructor taught me methods of analysis for this field of study.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A
4.16 19 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 7 (37%) 8 (42%) 0 (0%)
2. If this course was taken to fulfill course requirements for your concentration/major, how did this course enhance your personal and/or professional development in your concentration/major?
 Learned interesting things about technology in IT systems. Reading the textbook informed me of all the possibility that technology has to offer for businesses. The applications and the projects were also a variety of skills that I learnt by doing them. This course has given me knowledge about information technology systems, components of nfomration systems, development and use databases, benefits of business networks and telecommunications, characteristics of of web-enabled commerce, developing an information system for an enterprise and teh various types there are, and issues in information technology including risks, ethical and societal issues, secrurity and disaster recovery. This course was very helpful in my understanding of excel, word, social media, and electronic meeting software. The material in the text provided me with a much better understanding of how the digital world works. No comment. It has provided me with different types of tools that I can utilize within my work environment. gave examples of technology in business Well, to be perfectly honest, I didn't learn much from the course. I was given quizzes without much learning. The discussion questions didn't really aid in my learning, and the applications are pretty confusing. gave me practice in using excel features that I rarely use. I really enjoyed the Word/Excel assignments. I finally found out what the different headings are for! It gave me an incite to Microsoft word and excel, I had fun doing the projects, they were challenging. It made me realized how much Information management is used in my daily life and at work. Even though I work in the medical field, it seems that we are doing more things on the computer and learning about it helps me to have a better understanding and advantage. This course was a real eye-opener. I learned so much over the semester and am excited to apply what I have learned throughout the course, especially on Excel and Wiki, to my business and personal life. My goal: plan a trip using wiki. Gave me a greater understanding on what management tools are available for business decision making and productivity. Learned a lot. It introduced me to new material. Interesting course, I would prefer to take it face to face. The material was very technical and I feel that I do not really have a grasp on the material. I gained a lot of knowledge about computers that I will be able to use for my career in the future. I really enjoyed this class. I felt like I learned a lot of useful things about word, excel and the Wiki. I enjoyed this course because it really helped me to sharpen my computer skills and helped to "open my eyes" to the different types of technologies. This course enhhanced your microsoft office abilities which is really helpful for any job in general. I felt the course was two different classes, the book was totally different to what we had to do in our applications. This course helped me understand the computer systems involved in business
3. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A
3.95 21 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 3 (23%) 7 (33%) 7 (33%)
4. How much time did you spend during a typical week working on assignments, readings, chats, emails, etc. for this course?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   0 to 2.9 hours   3 to 6.9 hours   7 to 10.9 hours   11 to 14.9 hours   15+ hours
2.38 21 0.74 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 13 (62%) 5 (24%) 2 (10%) 0 (0%)
5. Please comment on the activities or resources that could be added to this course to improve your learning.
 Online tutorials would be useful. I think that some of the expectations of the students to do the assignments were too high. I think if a basic instructional video or an example of it were posted to give students an idea of what they were doing, it'd be a lot easier than emailing the instructor and waiting for a reply. I thought the Wiki pages were fun to do but while doing the projects, my group members and I ran into a lot of problem. Wiki seems to be limited in what it can do so if possible, I think that the instructor could try to find an alternative to this or a better version. Perhaps using only one type of communication. Other instructors have asked students not to e-mail them at their regular e-mail and to only use the mail tool or discussion tools within Laulima. No comment. The resources for this course were sufficient. None n/a There are a lot of activities (quizzes, chapter questions, etc.), he just wasn't there enough to answer people's questions. Extra Credit I think that he did a great job on giving us a variety of discussions, projects, and great video tutorials to explain what is expected from us from each project. None it was great. I feel that Professor Pai integrated a varied amount activities and resources into the course and that any additional activities would further enhance the course content and learning experience. I honestly do not know what I would add to this course - I like the layout, topics and lessons as-is. Teacher needs to make directionsof assignments clear and get grades back to students in a reasonable amount of time. Nothing. good class. offer the course face to face N/A None have the material of the book requested by the class more applicable to the class.
6. I expect my grade for the course to be a/an:
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A
4.37 19 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 10 (53%) 9 (75%)
7. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.54 13 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (48%) 7 (33%)
8. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.24 21 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 10 (48%) 8 (38%)
9. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
3.95 21 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 3 (23%) 8 (38%) 5 (38%)
10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.0 13 1.08 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1 (8%) 5 (38%) 5 (38%)
11. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
3.46 13 1.27 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 3 (23%) 4 (31%) 3 (23%)
12. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.69 13 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (43%) 9 (69%)
13. The instructor acknowledges all questions insofar as possible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
3.62 21 1.07 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 5 (38%) 4 (31%) 3 (23%)
14. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
3.0 13 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 4 (31%) 3 (23%) 4 (31%) 1 (8%)
15. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
3.92 13 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 5 (24%) 9 (69%) 2 (15%)
16. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.15 13 0.8 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 8 (62%) 4 (31%)
17. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
 Maybe putting in some online tutorials and lectures. I think the weekly quizzes can be improved on. There are so many questions that I am always afraid I will get a question on the quiz that is posted wrongly (instead of a true/false question choice, it is an essay question box). I would suggest grouping the students to do certain chapters instead of having the whole class do one chapter. I would that that would minimise the chances of getting a weird question. The textbook was good and easy to read. I really like the assignments, working with Excel and Word, however I would have liked more instructor instructions. We were kind of left on our own to figure out the assignments and I needed to consult Youtube to learn Excel features. For the number of questions on the exam, more time is needed (or fewer quesitons). The discussion board videos were interesting. Someone have a faster way of correcting assignments for students to know how well they've done on their assignments and discussion posts. Better instructions on the application problems. I feel that the course teaching style and methods are sufficient. Dr. Pai is impossible to get in contact with, he doesn't respond to e-mails and when asked for help he doesn't respond unlessa group of students have the same question. At that point, he sends a mass e-mail to address the issue. None the only thing to suggest is to be more available on line, answer email questions in a more timely manner Please answer e-mails. I don't think it is necessary for questions to be submitted for all chapters. I understand that these questions go into a pool for quizzes/tests but a better effort to review the questions and answers needs to be done. Some of the questions are incomplete or can have multiple "correct" answers that are not recognized in this process. Extra credit. Get rid of the first video assignment ;) I believe that this is by far the greatest experience that I've have in the past three years of attending school. I like having classes on line and being able to do things from my home without to much travel time. I work full time and have three children so being able to have on line classes is the way to go for me. My one suggestion for improving this course is to have assignments returned in a more timely manner. Clearer instuctions on what to do and retun grades in adequate time Nothing. It was good. Acknowledge receipt of assignments. Have a specific time of the week, two times a week, that you check your email. That way the student knows when a submitted question should be answered. I asked a question and did not get a response for over a week. The teacher took a long time in responding to my email. I had to send multiple emails before getting an answer. The grading took forever too.. I liked the way he had videos to show us what to do. Felt like it helped me learn. None, I like it the way it is. It would be nice if he wouldn't make instructions for applications too vague.
18. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
 Knows the subject. Professor Pai seems like a very nice instructor who is willing to help students. He's responded very quickly to our emails regarding the group project and responds to questions (even though they may be rather late). However, like all online courses, I feel that I lose out on contact with the instructor due to the long distance. It is hard to evaluate an instructor this way. Good, knowledgeable. Needs to respond to questions more quickly. a person who know what he is teaching; although, it seems that his time is cut to thin. He is very interesting to listen to and very easy to understand when giving instruction. He is a good teacher however, he gaves us vague instructions on the application problems. His instructions are open for interpretation and students could not understand what does he want us to do. His understanding of technology is a great asset to this university. Dr. Pai was always available to help students out with the very difficult applications that were assigned throughout the course. Dr. Pai makes everything interesting, as well as entertaining us with spreadsheets using excel and reports in proper format has helped me use Word efficient and effective for other classes, i.e., essays. Dr. Pai also makes an effort in elaborating what he expects out of our assignments and ensures clarification with follow up emails. If you are going to be a University professor, you should respond to your students. It took 9 weeks to get feedback on our first application, and by that time we had already turned in another 3 applications and an individual project, not to mention all the chapter questions and discussion questions. If you can't keep up with the workload you give, cut it back or get an assistant. We are all here to learn, and the feedback is part of that learning process. With two weeks left, we still have very little feedback and very little idea how we are doing as far as a grade goes. Great professor understands and is passionate about this topic. Excellent instructor, enjoyed the class very much. He just need to answer e-mails, update classes. But I guess he can be really busy. Tried to do too much in the course: questions, quizzes, tests, discussion questions, multiple projects--it is a bit much. Took a little long to grade assignments, but I understand he has a life outside of this class. I'm lucky that I've met him in person so I know how good a teacher he is, but I'm afraid if I didn't see him outside of this course I wouldn't have known he was a good teacher because he takes a bit to grade assignments. Nonetheless, great teacher. Awesome! I will be taking another class next semester with Mr. David Pai. Dr. Pai is pretty awesome. He answers my questions in a timely manner. He also helps me when I have a problem. I think distance education is a great way for me to work and be able to finish my degree and with teachers like Dr. Pai it makes it a great experience and it makes me feel confident that I can and will finish my degree at West Oahu. Thank you, Dr.Pai! Professor Pai did a great job of sharing the course material. I appreciated the integration of the textbook, weekly videos and assignments. Although the assignments were rather challenging and caused much frustration during completion, the lessons learned while working through assignments were valuable and will stick with me for the rest of my life. This course allowed me to look beyond my major (numbers, stats and calculations) and see how everything is interconnected and relative in the business, networking and information world. good teacher fair I really like how he taught in this class compared to 320. This was the first semester that I had taken on-line classes and am happy to say that I had a good experience with it. At first I had some difficulty with the nature of the work and checking on the due dates but as the weeks went by I was able to learn how to navigate the site and enjoyed the videos. AWESOME! I think his methods are not the best for this class. Pretty good teacher, he knows about the subject but since this was an online course it would have been good if he explained things a little better
19. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.05 21 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (24%) 8 (62%) 5 (38%)
20. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.46 13 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (19%) 7 (54%) 7 (33%)
21. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree
4.15 13 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 6 (46%) 7 (33%)
22. This was my first online course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   True   False   N/A
1.95 21 0.22 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
23. The online course format allowed me to contribute to the discussion more readily than in a face-to-face format.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A
3.7 21 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 5 (24%) 10 (48%) 2 (15%) 1 (5%)
24. I believe I would have gained more knowledge and a better understanding of the course materials had the online course been conducted in-person.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A
3.43 21 1.29 Freq(%) 2 (10%) 3 (14%) 5 (38%) 6 (29%) 5 (38%) 0 (0%)
25. Participation in online conversations (e.g., chats/bulletin boards/discussions boards) facilitated by the instructor contributed to my understanding of the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A
3.82 12 1.08 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 3 (14%) 1 (8%) 7 (58%) 5 (24%) 1 (8%)