|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 4.4 |
15 |
0.91 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
7 (47%) |
4 (27%) |
2 (13%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.36 |
14 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
9 (64%) |
5 (36%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
15 |
0.72 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
6 (40%) |
7 (47%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
15 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
8 (53%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
15 |
0.94 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
5 (33%) |
7 (47%) |
|
|
6. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.85 |
13 |
1.21 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (31%) |
3 (23%) |
5 (38%) |
|
|
7. I learned a lot in this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.93 |
15 |
1.03 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
8 (53%) |
4 (27%) |
|
|
8. I participated actively in the small group sessions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.6 |
15 |
1.06 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (40%) |
5 (33%) |
3 (20%) |
|
|
9. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
15 |
1.07 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
7 (47%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
10. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.73 |
15 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (27%) |
11 (73%) |
|
|
11. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
15 |
0.86 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
7 (47%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
12. The instructor is friendly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.73 |
15 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (27%) |
11 (73%) |
|
|
13. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.73 |
15 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (27%) |
11 (73%) |
|
|
14. The instructor has been helpful whenever I have encountered difficulties.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
15 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
3 (20%) |
10 (67%) |
|
|
15. The instructor keeps students informed of their progress.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
15 |
0.64 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
5 (33%) |
9 (60%) |
|
|
16. The objectives of the course were clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
15 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
7 (47%) |
7 (47%) |
|
|
17. In general, the course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.07 |
15 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (53%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
18. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
15 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
6 (40%) |
7 (47%) |
|
|
19. The instructor sets high standards for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.07 |
15 |
1.03 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
8 (53%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
20. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
15 |
0.99 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (60%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
21. Student presentations in class are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
15 |
0.94 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
5 (33%) |
7 (47%) |
|
|
22. I am generally pleased with the materials (texts, handouts) required for this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.93 |
15 |
0.8 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
9 (60%) |
3 (20%) |
|
|
23. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
15 |
0.64 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
5 (33%) |
9 (60%) |
|
|
24. The instructor was objective in evaluating student's work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
15 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (40%) |
9 (60%) |
|
|
25. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
|
| Better notes for students. |
| It could be more organized with clear instructions or objectives put in the
syllabus. Also communication via email could also be improved. |
| Be more organized. Make discussions more engaging/challenging. I understand it is difficult to get students to listen/pay attention for 3.5 hours, but it doesn't help when you're just blabbing. |
| None...there's too little time to teach so much information |
| Maybe having a few powerpoint slides to keep the students more stimulated in the topic. |
| I believe the course could be improved by the use of PowerPoints when
lecturing about the textbook content. Aside from that, I felt Professor
Carment tried his best to lecture on a significantly difficult topic. His
laid-back, easy-going style of teaching is great for students who just want
to learn but without the constant pressure of making sure you "pass" the
class. |
|
|
26. Other comments:
|
| Funny guy. |
| During the first 2 weeks, he was 30-45 minutes late, and ended class at 8/830, class was scheduled to end at 930. There was no lecture/powerpoint presentation. I felt like I wasted my money and time. He did not prepare me for the CPA exam. I learned more in my tax class and business law class then I did from him.
He is a very nice and friendly guy though, just teaching methods is not motivating. |
| I enjoyed having Dr. Carment as an instructor. He kept the course material interesting by involving the class in discussions and being humorous. |
| Great job! |
| great professor |
| Professor Carment is a very friendly, approachable, and humorous professor. I
would recommend his class to other students. |
|
