|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.64 |
11 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
11 |
1.25 |
Freq(%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
3 (27%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
4. I developed creative ability in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.91 |
11 |
1.22 |
Freq(%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
4 (36%) |
4 (36%) |
|
|
5. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.91 |
11 |
1.14 |
Freq(%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
6 (55%) |
3 (27%) |
|
|
6. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| learning about photographers |
| I feel that learning about the early history of photography was very compelling, to see how and where it all started. And how photography
revolutionize many things. |
| The slides |
| dry humor, mostly those UHHH and UMM's. Has anyone ever seriously evaluated this guy. He is
about as normal as the guy who leaves his bags outside the art building. evidently all those WI, E,
and O's will make me a successful artist. thank you |
| Lew's ability to incorporate a wide range of side references from the field of art history as examples
and context for photographic images presented. |
| understanding of photographic processes of the 19th century. |
| Professor Andrews puts heavy emphasis on specific reoccurring themes to pay attention to, which
helps make connections between artworks while studying the material. |
|
|
7. The instructor gives clear explanations.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.36 |
11 |
1.21 |
Freq(%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
8. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
9. Students in this course are free to disagree and ask questions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.09 |
11 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
4 (36%) |
4 (36%) |
|
|
10. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.09 |
11 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
4 (36%) |
4 (36%) |
|
|
11. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
11 |
0.6 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
11 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
3 (27%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
13. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
|
| To be honest I think Lew Andrew's teaching style and methods are spot on,
nothing needs to be changed. |
| There's so much to cover, I wish there was a study guide to show focused
sections. But I'm sure he wanted us to know everything. |
| I could never pass a public speaking class in the manner the lecture is given. It is unclear, the Uhh
and Umms are uhh ridiculous. |
| recommend some writing assignments |
|
|
14. Assignments make students think.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.91 |
11 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
4 (36%) |
3 (27%) |
|
|
15. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
11 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
6 (55%) |
4 (36%) |
|
|
16. The grading system was clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.36 |
11 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
5 (45%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
17. Other comments:
|
| He's funny |
| Old fashion blue book essay tests took some getting used to. |
| Professor Andrews is quite funny and willing to bring in items to promote understanding of mechanical devices used during the time period. He also recommends and uses good texts for this course; I wish the classes were only on two days and about a half hour/ 45 minutes longer |
|
