eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations
Instructor: Brian Hall
Available Survey Results
MATH24, Fall 2012MATH1A, Fall 2011
MATH1B, Fall 2011
MATH1C, Fall 2011
MATH1D, Fall 2011
MATH22, Fall 2011
MATH66, Fall 2011
Brian Hall : MATH24, Fall 2012
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 24  Elementary Algebra I  Crn (Section):  17195 (0) 17196 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.  


16. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.  


17. Other comments:  

Brian Hall : MATH1A, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1A  Basic Mathematics A  Crn (Section):  15057 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Brian Hall : MATH1B, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1B  Basic Mathematics B  Crn (Section):  15058 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Brian Hall : MATH1C, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1C  Basic Mathematics C  Crn (Section):  15059 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Brian Hall : MATH1D, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1D  Basic Mathematics D  Crn (Section):  15060 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Brian Hall : MATH22, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 22  PreAlgebra Mathematics  Crn (Section):  15079 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Brian Hall : MATH66, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 66  Trig & AlgDreng & ET  Crn (Section):  15094 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  
