University of Hawai'i eCAFE

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

Instructor: Jan Brunson

Available Survey Results

ANTH 465,WS 465, Fall 2012
ANTH 481, Spring 2012
ANTH 425, Fall 2011

Jan Brunson: ANTH 465,WS 465, Fall 2012

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Anthropology
Course:	ANTH 465 - Science, Sex, & Reproduction	Crn (Section):	79415 (001)
Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Women's Studies Program
Course:	WS 465 - Science, Sex, & Reproduction	Crn (Section):	79900 (002)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
4.06	18	0.73	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	0 (0%)	15 (83%)	1 (6%)	1 (6%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
1.39	18	0.5	Freq(%)	11 (61%)	7 (39%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	18	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	17 (94%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	18	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	18 (100%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.88	17	0.33	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (12%)	15 (88%)

7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

8. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

9. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	18	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	17 (94%)

10. I try to relate what I learn in this course to my own experience.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.88	17	0.33	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (12%)	15 (88%)

11. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	18	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	17 (94%)

12. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	17	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	16 (94%)

13. The course made me think hard and carefully.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	18	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	17 (94%)

14. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

15. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

In-class discussion was most valuable. Jan Brunson's academic guidance in the discipline of anthropology from was also extremely valuable.

The presentation and papers.

Everything, this course was valuable and relatable. I can apply everything that I learned in this class to real life situations.

I really enjoyed the readings. They were intellectually challenging and insightful on various topics.

the way that Jan Brunson made us critically think about theories and themes across multiple materials

The discussions on the different technologies and issues dealing with science sex and reproduction in different societies around the world. The medical technologies.

The ways in which we were guided to new tactics of constructing thought.

Even though they sometimes took quite a bit of time, I thought the reading notes were extremely valuable. They really helped me to synthesize, compare, and connect the various articles, chapters, and ethnographies that we read. The reading notes also helped me to prepare for the intellectual responses, and made me feel organized and (fairly) confident going into the final exam essay. I also found breaking into small groups for discussion to be extremely valuable. The questions our small groups examined often helped me to see the readings for multiple, different perspectives, and challenged me to think about the readings in new ways.

The course outline and

group discussions were valuable for course content. It allowed students to discuss topics about the readings and deconstruct author's literature. Presentations were also good to cover and relate to topics discussed in class.

The in depth discussions we had every class period. Coming into the class I was very intimidated and overwhelmed with the discussions. I began to understand and comprehend better as class went on because of the way each class was outlined with discussion. The readings that we had were awesome and really interesting and the notes we had to take really helped me understand and remember the readings more.

The discussions.

being able to have open discusions.

I've never been in anthropology before and I learned a lot

Presentations and discussions

16. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

The overly zealous reading schedule.

N/A

the amount of reading was a little overwhelming

I can't think of anything we did in this class that didn't seem helpful or that didn't help me organize or express my thoughts in some way.

The grading system for notes did not motivate me to do them.

nothing.

not sure

Some of the books.

17. What things did you get from this course that will benefit you personally?

The enrichment of experience of conceptualizing the human experience. I personally learned a knowledge and understanding of the interplay between culture and reproduction in my own life.

The ability to think critically about sex, science, and reproduction as mechanisms driven by the biomedical paradigm to discipline, control, and maintain women's bodies in particular.

Exactly what the course name is called...Science, sex, and reproduction. Mostly content that covered reproduction is most beneficial. All that I have learned I will be able to apply to my life and the decisions I make concerning birth, motherhood, etc.

a greater understanding of my own personal life in regards to reproductive technologies

A lot of the issues discussed helps me to be aware of whats going around me and how it affects me if it does

A deeper knowledge of the strengthening grasp that biomedicine imposes on society, locally and globally.

A lot! As this class broadly covers a lot of the issues in which I'm interested, it served as a good intro to thinking more critically not only about sex and reproduction, but also about how to evaluate other anthropologists and their works. It also helped me to start thinking more specifically about where I want to focus my studies in the near future. Anthro career aside, the topics and issues we worked through in this class helped me to think critically about my own life and decisions that I will probably be making in the future in regards to whether or not I want to have children, and how I will achieve this.

Learning about issues that span globally such as surrogacy,IVF, and everything else that constitutes reproductive health has expanded my knowledge. A lot of these issues I was aware of within the U.S., but to read about these issues in other countries and how the local views/understandings differs based upon gender, class, and society.

Almost every reading we read made me think about my own life and the people around me. My favorite readings consisted of the medicalization of pregnancy and birth. Reading some of the articles and discussing some of the routine procedures now days really fascinated me. I can honestly say that before this class I would have gone into my first pregnancy just like every other American but now I know I want a midwife and a more natural pregnancy & birth.

Familiarity with topical and contemporary ethnographic work, and learning how to compare, thematically, multiple qualitative studies.

the ability to grasp difficult readings and understand them.

learn how to disect case studies

18. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.61	18	0.78	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	0 (0%)	4 (22%)	13 (72%)

19. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

20. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	18	0.59	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	4 (22%)	13 (72%)

21. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

22. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

23. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.88	17	0.33	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (12%)	15 (88%)

24. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

25. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	18	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	17 (94%)

26. The instructor treated students with respect.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	18	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	17 (94%)

27. The instructor encouraged out-of-class consultations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	17	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (18%)	14 (82%)

28. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	18	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	16 (89%)

29. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

Add in more group projects.

N/A

the course is great as it is

Hmm, this is difficult! This might not be possible, and maybe it's easier to suggest this because I won't have to comply, but more intellectual responses might be helpful. I think that writing one or two more intellectual responses might take some of the "pressure" off for each one, and would encourage students to continually connect themes and ideas throughout the course, as opposed to just two times, which sort of segments the semester.

The use of videos at the beginning of class along with group discussions would be good.

Honestly I have no idea, I learned a lot and it was one of my favorite classes yet

this course is taught it a way that is relevant to the course and helped me to understand things clearly.

she did well

She does very well.

30. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Caring, listener, teacher

Brilliant. Inspiring.

Passionate, intelligent, and funny

Fair & Fun

enthusiastic intellectual knowledgeable

understanding and open minded to her students, AWESOME!

Intelligent, encouraging, reflective

professional, passionate, attentive

Engaging, knowledgeable, approachable, friendly

Kind, understanding, organized

knowledgeable, proficient, and encouraging

knowledgeable, interested & educator

prepared, knowledgeable, understanding.

punctual and passionate

Intelligent, Sweet, Accommodating.

31. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.88	17	0.33	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (12%)	15 (88%)

32. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
4.33	16	1.15	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	13 (81%)

33. The TA is friendly and accessible.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
4.33	16	1.15	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	13 (81%)

34. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.88	17	0.33	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (12%)	15 (88%)

35. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.78	18	0.55	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	2 (11%)	15 (83%)

36. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?

In-class Discussion

The constant discussions in class helped to reify the homework reading information.

I like that it was a small class in a seminar setting

the discussions

Being able to hear other students thoughts and opinions based on the readings and questions professor brings up

The reading material

I really enjoyed the semi-structured discussion aspect of the class. It was a good way to gain/hear different perspectives and insights into the various readings. It also challenged me to think more critically about how I read the readings, and to find ways to express my opinions and contributions thoughtfully and clearly. I also enjoyed the presentations. It helped to expand my knowledge on the various subjects that we read about, and usually provided good "background" or practical information about the topics at hand.

I like how it as discussion based. and we were able to hear the perspectives of our peers

Analyzing different approaches and theories used in ethnographic works of the authors.

The books we read - wayward women & biology unmoored

Group discussions and presentations.

it was all too complicated for me hahah

The discussions were amazing.

The material and the instructor.

37. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.65	17	0.61	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	4 (24%)	12 (71%)

38. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.

Field interviews/observations and commentary may be beneficial.

Add in more group projects to unite the class, helping to foster more interaction between and amongst students.

N/A

Offer the course as a simultaneous option to take it as a non-writing intensive class for those who don't want or need another WI.

Readings got ideas across, but perhaps there are more interesting reads to be assigned.

As I said above, I think more intellectual responses could potentially benefit students. Other than that, I can't think of anything! I thought the course was pretty great as is.

I enjoy discussions however i believe that maybe some debates or movie discussions can be used to enhance the course.

Implementing videos, having the students blog

This course was actually one of my favorite classes to take. The only thing was the readings were overwhelming. overall an interesting class.

not an anth person wouldn't know

Possibly arranging so that more difficult topics would be covered in depth.

39. Other comments:

I really enjoyed having Jan as an intructor. Thats why i decided to take her course twice 2 semesters in a row. I became knowledgeable on how sex and reproduction is being dealt with in our present world.

I really enjoyed this class! Not only did I learn a lot, but I had fun while doing so. Prof Brunson is a great instructor who not only obviously knows what she's talking about, but who is also friendly and willing to answer questions, help with papers, etc.

Overall I enjoyed the class, I would recommend this course as a supplemental course for any person who is interested in the medical field and anthropology.

She was one of the best instructors I have ever had. By far one of my favorite classes. Very challenging.

Jan Brunson: ANTH 481, Spring 2012 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Anthropology
Course:	ANTH 481 - Applied Anthropology	Crn (Section):	88404 (001)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
4.2	10	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	9 (90%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
1.2	10	0.42	Freq(%)	8 (80%)	2 (20%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

7. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

8. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

9. I became interested in community projects related to the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

10. I increased my awareness of my own interests and talents.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

11. I improved my abilities to revise my rough drafts and to make my writing more effective.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.3	10	0.82	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	3 (30%)	5 (50%)

12. I try to relate what I learn in this course to my own experience.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

13. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

14. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

15. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

EVERYTHING! I loved the different topics we had the opportunity to cover. Taking this service-learning course allowed me to explore and see a different side to issues such as homelessness, drug abuse, domestic violence, and alternative forms of birth. I liked how we were able to "save paper" and utilized the world wide web to publish our ideas/papers via wordpress.com. I was actually able to share my work more easily with my family and friends who were willing to read my blogs!

the service learning aspect of the course was the most valuable.

The most valuable thing to me about this course is seeing how applied anthropology establishes a connection with every sub field within anthropology. Also how anthropology is relevant in dealing with reality in our society dealing with many different social issues. Also the most valuable thing was the service learning project.

getting involved with our service learning projects has really been a valuable experience as this represents what I will be doing as an anthropologist in the future. Connecting with the local community and building a relationship from the ground up. Also found valuable that the topics covered although not ideally the same, throughout class discussions and assignments some underlying themes pervaded throughout and we could draw connections.

The ethical discussions and considerations with applying Anthropology were the most stimulating, and useful.

Group discussions, variety of readings (of mainly complete ethnography) community service, and blog

Class discussions, the readings

discussions

-The service-learning component of the course made course materials relevant to practical application. -The atmosphere encouraged open discussion about the uses of applied anthropology in real-life situations and the ethics involved in the field. -Finally, the class really challenged me to question my own biases and notions of the world and gave me new insights into the interactions I encounter every day.

16. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

Actually, I didn't find any aspect not valuable.

everything was valuable.

I felt that this course was very valuable. I felt that we spent a lot of time covering the topic of birth. I feel that to gain a better understanding of the concept it would be helpful to also study the topic of death. If this was included in the course I believe it would be very beneficial to all in the class, and this would also open up other options for service learning projects.

The journals didn't really help, and I can see how some people might take advantage and BS them.

I am still not sure how I feel about the service learning project.

17. Ten years from now I'll probably remember this course most by ...

Our conversations. In being able to digest the information, share ideas, or moreso listen (at least for me), I learned an incredible amount.

This course helped me find my voice as a writer, something I had been struggling with my entire college career. I will remember this course for the confidence that it gave me in my writing abilities.

my service learning project in relation to this course.

our discussion of birth models. I will remember most the birth model video and panel discussion that one of the students in the class did as a project for the class, university, and public community. I will also remember many of the videos/clips that we went over in class. the HBO addiction series, "what are anthropologist" etc.

My service-learning experience.

Birth Models That Work Blog Teaching style

What I learned about understanding drug use and different medical models.

the professor, very knowledgeable and engaging

This course has been one of the most meaningful courses to my future career. I intend to go into the community sector, where I will meet a variety of different people with different experiences; this course has allowed me to be more understanding of individual histories and of social interactions between people of different social standings.

18. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

19. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

20. The instructor gave useful writing assignments.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	8 (80%)

21. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

22. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

23. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

24. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	8 (80%)

25. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	9	0.33	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (11%)	8 (89%)

26. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

To continue teaching this class for future students! And to advertise it, maybe! Although... I did like the small classroom feel.

Having more guest speakers would be nice.

nothing. She was really understanding and flexible to her students and me as a person.

see #16

The book materials seemed to be gendered for the most part. Also, I would suggest using Violence in War and Peace, edited by Bourgois and Schepper-Hughes for this course. If possible, schedule it for Tuesdays and Thursdays to make discussions go longer.

I would have students do a research project rather than a service-learning project.

Jan Brunson: ANTH 425, Fall 2011 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Anthropology
Course:	ANTH 425 - Medical Anthropology	Crn (Section):	74169 (001)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
3.79	29	0.73	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	7 (24%)	19 (66%)	1 (3%)	1 (3%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
1.34	29	0.48	Freq(%)	19 (66%)	10 (34%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	29	0.41	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (21%)	23 (79%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.76	29	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	7 (24%)	22 (76%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.72	29	0.45	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	8 (28%)	21 (72%)

6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.52	29	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (14%)	6 (21%)	19 (66%)

7. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.38	29	0.73	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (14%)	10 (34%)	15 (52%)

8. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.66	29	0.61	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (7%)	6 (21%)	21 (72%)

9. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.72	29	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	6 (21%)	22 (76%)

10. I try to relate what I learn in this course to my own experience.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	27	0.7	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (11%)	6 (22%)	18 (67%)

11. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.69	29	0.54	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	7 (24%)	21 (72%)

12. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

The discussion of topics were really helpful!

Excellent discussions, material was interesting and engaging.

The discussions and readings.

The reverse outline made me understand the text more and extract important data.

The videos we watched were very nice and allowed me to understand the concepts visually. The class discussions and group projects were also fun.

The videos were very helpful when trying to understand the course material.

The books we read.

The readings and discussions

Class discussion and movies

The group project, Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down, Body Silent

The class was very well structured. I feel that we were able to maximize time to cover a good amount of material.

The reverse outlines were a good idea because it helped me analyze complicated academic journals to gather the main ideas out of readings. I also found the group discussions (both big and small discussions) useful because we could bounce ideas off of each other and understand how to approach a theory or an idea from another person's perspective. I enjoyed the group project because we researched and learned about some interesting topics such as "Think Pink"(breast cancer) and "Bodies: the Exhibition". I liked how Dr. Brunson was also able to find some media examples to further our understanding about the topics (ex. TEM website-totally fascinating). The different books for the course were quite valuable too because as we progressed through the semester, the books gave us concrete examples and insights for the different discussion topics or issues. It was also interesting to analyze the roots of social and political issues from a medical anthropologist's perspective and then also read about a variety of theories and try to dissect them, understand them, and then translate them into layman terms.

I enjoyed the class discussions and incites from what other students thought about the readings that were assigned to us. It really helped me to grasp a better understanding, and it helped to analyze each article to really get the authors points across.

The films that were shown in class that related with the material.

the discussion and the examples that tied everything back to current reality. also I loved the books.

I enjoyed the discussion aspect of this course because, for me, it was far from traditional discussion classes that I'm used to.

I enjoyed the seminar style of the course.

Studying social problems from a medical point of view was most intriguing to me and different from the rest of the courses I have taken.

Debates on pertinent topics that are hot items right now

The most valuable to me this semester was learning how theory was employed in our readings, and discussions.

Learning that medicine and health care is not always the best route and that there are always other options.

The group discussions were key in helping me formulate my own opinions on the subjects that were being taught. It also helped to gain different perspectives from the other students.

13. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

Although, the class discussions were great, I felt like I was being pressured into talking in each class because of the grade. There should be more alternatives for participation.

N/A

None.

Certain concepts that we focused on in class, but were not able to completely grasp in one or two class days seemed a little far reached

Didn't like how it was always discussion format

Working in group projects always presents problems.

The amount of reading was a bit much and long. I think if she could select the most important and then try to cut down on the amount of pages, it will totally help trying to make it through all the words.

n/a

sometimes the readings felt excessive even when they were good.

I can't think of any.

Nothing, I thought each aspect of the course was valuable.

Everything we have discussed seems valuable to me and I gained a lot of knowledge through it.

Somtimes I felt lost in the readings.

I found that the all of the elements of the course from the structure of the class, its curriculum as well as the various modalities employed to teach a certain topic made for a strong class that is difficult to critique. However, as they say all things can be improved.

14. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.43	28	0.57	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	14 (50%)	13 (46%)

15. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.34	29	0.72	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (14%)	11 (38%)	14 (48%)

16. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.55	29	0.51	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	13 (45%)	16 (55%)

17. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	28	0.64	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (7%)	10 (36%)	16 (57%)

18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.62	29	0.49	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	11 (38%)	18 (62%)

19. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.55	29	0.57	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	11 (38%)	17 (59%)

20. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.69	29	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	9 (31%)	20 (69%)

21. In general, the course was well organized.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.66	29	0.55	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	8 (28%)	20 (69%)

22. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

Field Trips! To hospital or clinic. or some guest physicians.

-- snipped --

I thought that the way she taught was great, though more various ways of class participation and discussion would be great.

-- snipped --

Since the topics discussed are somewhat difficult to grasp, maybe simplify them more or spend more time in discussing the topics.

Perhaps just a tad less reading, especially concerning books and related articles.

Nothing. Dr. Brunson did a wonderful job of changing methods to engage students and encourage participation in discussions.

Different class time and make sure certain students understand that everyone should participate.

Class not always run in discussion format

This course was wonderful. I have no criticisms.

-- snipped --

I do like the class discussions that we have. I feel that having small group discussions and then a big class discussions would help everyone to participate more in the class.

n/a

-- snipped --

I feel that no improvements are necessary on Professor Brunson's part. Her teaching methods and style is unique yet engaging and I wouldn't change it. I do appreciate her having us do an evaluation in the middle of semester. Something that, too, is unique, yet shows she really wants to meet the needs of her students.

Dr. Brunson did a great job teaching this course, and I don't have any comments about improving the teaching of this course.

Ease up on the reading, to much to read before class. Big group discussion is ok but I suggest using smaller group discussions more frequently so that students can have more active in discussions. Maybe add a midterm then just a final at the end of the course, to not only see if the students are learning but also it eases up on what the students have to remember and makes the final not that much intimating.

By using a variety of teaching methods rather than relying so heavily on discussions and seminars.

Working with given questions before starting a reading was extremely helpful

Having guest speakers come in and share the concepts we are learning about in their field of work or from the experiences they have encountered.

not have it so early in the morning

The group presentations were graded by group with some peer reviews to decide if everyone contributed effectively. I think that these should try to be more individually graded or those who don't put in the work will end up getting an acceptable grade for not contributing anything.

* Showing 18 out of 22 survey responses.

23. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Empowering and thought-provoking

Friendly, Patient

Knowledgeable and understanding

Organized. Friendly. Understanding.

Enthusiastic teaching

Well prepared, Good speaker, Extremely knowledgeable

Excellent, thoughtful, knowledgeable.

Knowledgable. Kind. Creative.

Caring, Intelligent, Articulate

Passionate and enthusiastic

organized, creative, inspiring

Invested, Insightful, Positive

engaging, sophisticated,phenomenological

knowledgable, sincere but challenging

n/a

cheerful (especailly for 7:30 am), prompt, clear, decisive

Perceptive, adaptable, fun

Intellectual/ Knowledgeable. Confident. Polite.

Two words that describe Dr. Brunson are knowledgeable and energetic.

Knows a lot about Cultural Anthropology

Knowledgeable and driven

Organized, intelligent and excited

One word works too:ineffable.

friendly and knowledgable

Supportive, organized, friendly

24. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
3.5	26	1.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (12%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	22 (85%)

25. The TA is friendly and accessible.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
3.5	25	1.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (12%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	21 (84%)

26. Reading assignments seem carefully chosen.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.48	27	0.64	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (7%)	10 (37%)	15 (56%)

27. Other comments:

Very interesting class. It has made me want to pursue a different degree than I originally planned.

Overall, the course was a great experience. It introduced me to the field of medical anthropology itself, as well as to the issues and societal problems that people around the world face today.

The department may want to consider making Anth 152 a pre-req for this course. A basic understanding of some terms and concepts from Cultural Anthropology would have been helpful for some students. If once student mentions liminality or communitas and another student asks what that is...., well, you know, they should know that.

Thank you, Dr. Brunson!

Learned a lot and will take it with me in all of my life experiences!

This course has been one of my favorites of the semester. Dr. Brunson did an excellent job, especially being so new to the department! She effectively challenged her students, and I can say that I am coming out of the class as a more informed and enlightened student. The material was interesting and thought-provoking. I would suggest this course to anyone!

At first I felt a little intimidated because didn't expect the class to be a seminar class and practically everyone was older than me. But, as class progressed I felt a little better. The professor seemed approachable, and gives great feedback. Sometimes it was kind of hard to jump into the conversations because somebody had already taken what you were going to say, you don't feel intelligent enough to make a great comeback or add any information, or you just couldn't get a word in because the same people would control the conversation. It would be great to have more of a variety of class activities during class time, like being creative with the discussions. The novels were great reads and I'm definitely going to hold onto some of them like "Body of Work".

Overall I enjoyed the class as a whole. I learned a lot in this class alone throughout the semester and hope to further my understanding and knowledge of medical anthropology and issues that pertain to medical anthro. throughout my future.

I think that a third writing assignment might have been a nice addition and a slightly more lenient policy on being marked late and it's effects on your grades

I enjoyed coming to this class. Professor Brunson made having discussions less of a chore since her lessons really made students use the materials assigned. I hope to take another class with her again. Just not at 7:30 in the morning.

Patrick was a great presenter. Any more presenters?