University of Hawai'i eCAFE

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

Instructor: Andrew Rumbach

Available Survey Results

Andrew Rumbach: PLAN 670, Fall 2011

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Urban & Regional Planning
Course:	PLAN 670 - Seminar in DMHA	Crn (Section):	75685 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.93	15	0.26	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	14 (93%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.47	15	0.64	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	6 (40%)	8 (53%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	15	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (27%)	11 (73%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.47	15	0.64	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	6 (40%)	8 (53%)

5. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.2	15	0.94	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	5 (33%)	7 (47%)

6. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.07	14	0.92	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (14%)	6 (43%)	5 (36%)

7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	14	0.76	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (14%)	3 (21%)	9 (64%)

8. I learned to value new viewpoints.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.07	15	0.96	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	3 (20%)	5 (33%)	6 (40%)

9. I developed more confidence in myself.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.93	15	1.16	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	4 (27%)	2 (13%)	7 (47%)

10. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	15	1.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	4 (27%)	6 (40%)

11. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	15	1.07	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	2 (13%)	5 (33%)	6 (40%)

12. My opinions about some topics changed because of this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.87	15	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (33%)	7 (47%)	3 (20%)

13. The course made me think hard and carefully.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.07	15	0.88	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	7 (47%)	5 (33%)

14. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

-- snipped --

* Showing 0 out of 11 survey responses.

15. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

-- snipped --

* Showing 0 out of 11 survey responses.

16. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.47	15	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	8 (53%)	7 (47%)

17. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	10 (67%)

18. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.57	14	0.65	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (29%)	9 (64%)

19. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.4	15	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	5 (33%)	8 (53%)

20. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	10 (67%)

21. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	10 (67%)

22. Students in this course are free to disagree and ask questions.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.51	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (40%)	9 (60%)

23. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.21	14	1.19	Freq(%)	1 (7%)	0 (0%)	2 (14%)	3 (21%)	8 (57%)

24. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.53	15	0.92	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	11 (73%)

25. The course objectives were clear.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.2	15	0.94	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	5 (33%)	7 (47%)

26. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.

-- snipped --

* Showing 0 out of 8 survey responses.

27. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.47	15	0.64	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	6 (40%)	8 (53%)

28. Assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.07	15	1.16	Freq(%)	1 (7%)	1 (7%)	0 (0%)	7 (47%)	6 (40%)

29. The reading materials were relevant to the course objectives.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.27	15	0.96	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	4 (27%)	8 (53%)

30. The projects were valuable in understanding the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.93	14	0.73	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	1 (7%)	10 (71%)	2 (14%)

31. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.13	15	0.83	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (27%)	5 (33%)	6 (40%)

32. Other comments:

-- snipped --

* Showing 0 out of 7 survey responses.