University of Hawai'i eCAFE

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

Instructor: Baybars Karacaovali

Available Survey Results

ECON 362, Fall 2012
ECON 460, Fall 2012
ECON 321, Spring 2012
ECON 460, Fall 2011

Baybars Karacaovali: ECON 362, Fall 2012

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Economics
Course:	ECON 362 - Trade Policy and Globalization	Crn (Section):	76094 (001)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
3.76	21	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (24%)	16 (76%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
1.48	21	0.51	Freq(%)	11 (52%)	10 (48%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	21	0.3	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (10%)	19 (90%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	21	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (29%)	15 (71%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.76	21	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (24%)	16 (76%)

6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.86	21	0.36	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (14%)	18 (86%)

7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

Case studies because we saw the application of theories and models. Ethical portion provides a good contrast to the intensiveness of ECON 460. Power points help keep students engaged.

I think all the powerpoint, handouts, and teaching material were extremely valuable and I believe I'll be using it for future courses. The teacher was great in elaborating all topics and I look forward to taking his class again if I could.

Application of approaches to ethics to different trade policies.

I enjoyed the trade policy side of the course although I wish we went into more depth on this topic. I also enjoyed the integration of all the books with the lecture and how closely it followed along in what we were learning. Definitely made writing easier.

There were a lot of material covered at a very good pace and a lot of opportunities for questioning.

Baybars Karacaovali: ECON 460, Fall 2012 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Economics
Course:	ECON 460 - International Trade & Welfare	Crn (Section):	76574 (001)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
3.77	43	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (5%)	6 (14%)	35 (81%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
1.64	42	0.48	Freq(%)	15 (36%)	27 (64%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	43	0.43	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	10 (23%)	33 (77%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	43	0.43	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	10 (23%)	33 (77%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.65	43	0.57	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (5%)	11 (26%)	30 (70%)

6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.65	43	0.57	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (5%)	11 (26%)	30 (70%)

7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

The detailed explanations and real life examples given to help us to better understand the concepts presented.

His lecture is so knowledgeable and helpful for me to understand concepts.

His lecture is easy to understand.

Learning about the different policy's of trade and whether it makes countries better or worse off.

Powerpoints used interactively (filling in certain words on slides)and problem sets helped to aid learning.

Professor Karacaovali's explanations of difficult concepts in a way that made it easy for me to understand was very valuable. He knew how to break down the concepts. Also, Professor Karacaovali is very encouraging to his students and personable. He was always available to help.

Lectures

The handouts were good. It was good that he prints them out for everyone and has you attend class to fill in the blanks regarding what he is lecturing.

learning about international economies and how the trade.

Video, PPT, Quizs and Homeworks

N/A

I think the printed lecture notes were really well done. The fact that you still had to go to class to get them, but it wasn't so much where the student is overwhelmed, is something I haven't experienced in a class before this.

Lecture methods which included follow-along handouts with key terms left blank. I found this really helped me to stay involved with the lecture and to add extra notes. Helped me to master the material.

all of them

Reviews of the problem sets were the most important aspect in learning the material for me. I also liked the handouts instead of textbook approach.

learning about trade and welfare

He really encourage students to study and archive their Academic goal through this class

The lectures.

Problem sets, lectures

Studying international trade models.

Looking at real world situations

The comparisons between trade barriers, tariffs, and subsidies. Of course, all other aspects are and have to be presented before these topics in order to understand the diagnostics thereof, therefore making everything exceptionally valuable.

homeworks and quizes

everything

Problem sets and review them very well after graded

Welfare concepts.

Everything done in the course was valuable.

Lecture notes provided good information.

It was a very consistent pace and there were incentives for a student to master the subjects and go above and beyond.

8. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

None

Nothing.

His pronunciation is hard to listen a little bit.

A little bit of the history, but history is always good to know and I'm biased since I don't like history.

More opportunities for extra credit since there are only 2 exams.

Nothing

The attendance sheet. At the beginning of the semester it was made clear that attendance wasn't apart of the grade. However, almost daily he would pass around an attendance sheet. It has nothing to do with the class but just very cryptic regarding grades.

n/a

None

N/A

n/a

Nothing in particular - a couple instances of un-organization but that was about it (quite minor).

i think that they where all valuable

The movie Battle in Seattle and the mockumentary about disappearing Mexicans were not really valuable. While they were a good break from continuous lectures, I think news clips of the situations might have been better.

The homeworks.

None

n/a

Nothing really. Everything was presented appropriately and in accordance to the topic and course.

none

notes were hard

N/A

It seems like this was a very dilute version of the course. A bit of calculus could have been used to consider more interesting trade cases. All the graphs were linear and perhaps not very realistic.

The two-three week long review session at the beginning of the class.

Nothing was unliked. Everything was interesting and taught me something.

N/A

None.

9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	43	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (7%)	12 (28%)	28 (65%)

10. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	42	0.66	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (10%)	9 (21%)	29 (69%)

11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	43	0.58	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (5%)	13 (30%)	28 (65%)

12. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.67	43	0.61	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (7%)	8 (19%)	32 (74%)

13. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	43	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (2%)	7 (16%)	35 (81%)

14. Other comments:

I like his class and I want to take his other class again.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR TEACHING!

I would not hesitate to take another class from him again.

The course was simply too simple and slow-paced for a 400 level class. I would have liked the class much better if the the lectures had been less redundant and if we had spent less time on simple concepts like consumer/producer surplus.

Good teacher and knowledgeable about trade economics

I enjoyed this class. I think that the quizzes and homeworks were graded fairly. The only thing I would make more clear is the policy on attendance and how that affects your grade.

n/a

N/A

I would love to take more classes from Professor Karacaovali!

Great, fair class. I would definitely take another class with Professor Karacaovali. Sincerely, Troy Thompson

really liked this class!

Good professor who knows his material and who knows when students might need a break from lecture.

great teacher!

Excellent professor. Very knowledgeable and moves at a pace that is suitable for students.

Amazing individual and thorough with his teachings. Very generous, and very knowledgeable. Would recommend to take him!

professor k is my favorite teacher he's the best :)

he is very clear

I've learned about trade and welfare very well from handouts and problem sets. I am willing to take more Econ classes from Mr. Karacaovali! Best Econ instructor ever!!

Excellent teacher, but as stated earlier, the review session at the beginning of the semester should be scaled back a little. At the end of the semester we dropped a section, that could have replaced some of the classes of review.

Was a great professor and was very effective at teaching his students and instructing them.

Great professor. Would take another class.

Early in the semester we took too long to get through the review material, and it crunched the amount of time we had for the more interesting and challenging content.

I felt the course was slightly watered down. While I didn't fully ace the first midterm and with the final pending, it's hard for me to say much, but I felt that it could have been much more in-depth. Given the typical department's student, I suppose its OK, but perhaps have optional more difficult problems (original or from the book) available. Other than that, it was a very great class and I learned a lot. Thank you for the great semester!

Baybars Karacaovali: ECON 321, Spring 2012 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Economics
Course:	ECON 321 - Introduction to Statistics	Crn (Section):	86745 (002)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
3.13	31	1.26	Freq(%)	3 (10%)	7 (23%)	8 (26%)	11 (35%)	0 (0%)	2 (6%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
1.9	31	0.3	Freq(%)	3 (10%)	28 (90%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	32	0.57	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (6%)	4 (13%)	26 (81%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	32	0.62	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (6%)	10 (31%)	20 (63%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.25	32	0.95	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (6%)	5 (16%)	8 (25%)	17 (53%)

6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.31	32	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (16%)	12 (38%)	15 (47%)

7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.94	32	1.05	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	3 (9%)	9 (28%)	7 (22%)	13 (41%)

8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

Probability and Standard Deviation

I really appreciated the handouts. It was easier for me to see the material condensed into the important information that we needed to know. I also like that fact that we worked together on problems in class as a group. We had helped each other to understand concepts that we couldn't quite get.

Depends on major

The problem sets and the lecture handouts really helped.

applying all the equations to real situations.

I think that finding probabilities would be helpful for the future.

His explanations were very good.

study in groups

Probability.

The hand-outs gave me a good idea of what was expected and also provided useful information.

The applied statistics. Mostly Probability.

Examples used and handouts given. The formula sheets also really helped during the exam.

Class lecture notes

He went over all the assignments to make sure everyone understand the concepts and the problems.

The pace of the class was great. It gave me time to review the materials and understand them better.

Being able to determine percentages for the numerous different problems we were given.

Understanding and configuring digits and word problems that the common population uses on a daily basis, whether it is towards firms or government evaluations in regards of profit or economies.

Just statistics in general

how the very basics were covered before going into the harder stuff

The lecture handouts for every chapter were incredibly helpful. They laid out everything we needed to know without the often bulky wording of textbooks.

i especialy liked the confidence intervals of normal distrobution.

The homework assignments helped me understand the material more. Thanks for explaining them.

As a biology major learning how to use Excel will be vital in my future career. Prior to this course, Excel was extremely difficult for me to use. Professor Karacaovali demonstrated how to use Excel in a simple, but effective manner.

Although math is not my strong point. I learned a lot from each chapter.

9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

N/A

There really wasn't anything that I din't like about the course. It did move a little fast for me, but I was still able to keep up

depends on major

The computer assignments felt useless.

lectures

N/A

Not too many students showed up to class.

everything else

Computer assignments

N/A

The beginning of the course started off a bit slow. A lot more content could've been easily covered in the amount of time.

Honestly, all of them are valuable when looked at from a third person point of view, because statistics is something that happens and evaluated in our everyday life. So, it is important to at least have a common knowledge of the subject.

not much

computer assignments

alot of the jargon and renaming of simple concepts

There have been no aspects of this course that have not been valuable to my student career.

All were valuable.

10. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.81	32	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	4 (13%)	27 (84%)

11. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.31	32	0.82	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	4 (13%)	11 (34%)	16 (50%)

12. The instructor is friendly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	31	0.59	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (6%)	5 (16%)	24 (77%)

13. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.53	32	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (9%)	9 (28%)	20 (63%)

14. The instructor treated students with respect.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	32	0.51	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	6 (19%)	25 (78%)

15. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.53	32	0.76	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (16%)	5 (16%)	22 (69%)

16. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Genuine, Helpful, Kind

informative and helpful

turkish teacher today

Friendly, understanding.

Motivated, enthusiastic

He was very helpful. Always encourage students. He knew course content very well.

Thorough. Easy to understand

chill consistent

Enthusiastic and knowledgeable

competent, professional

Helpful and understanding.

freindly, foreign, distracted

Friendly, enthusiastic, intelligent

Smart, fast

Fair, well organized,

organized, prepared, available

Generous, Smart, and Kind

Smart, Nice, Awesome

Calm Friendly Knowledgeable

Friendly, accommodating, likable

he is a very aprochable proffesor and is very willing to help outside of class. seems like a cool guy to grab a drink with

Nice, smart, friendly

Professor Karacaovali is helpful to students with questions, knowledgeable in the field of statistics, and makes learning statistics interesting.

Caring, Smart, On time

17. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.44	32	0.62	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (6%)	14 (44%)	16 (50%)

18. The TA gives clear and understandable explanations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
3.48	32	1.24	Freq(%)	2 (6%)	5 (16%)	6 (19%)	9 (28%)	7 (22%)	3 (9%)

19. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
3.83	32	1.1	Freq(%)	1 (3%)	2 (6%)	8 (25%)	8 (25%)	10 (31%)	3 (9%)

20. The TA grades paper (exams, homework) fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
4.0	32	1.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	3 (9%)	5 (16%)	10 (31%)	11 (34%)	3 (9%)

21. The TA was easy to talk with and available for consultation.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
3.72	30	1.21	Freq(%)	1 (3%)	4 (13%)	4 (13%)	8 (27%)	8 (27%)	5 (17%)

22. The TA's oral speaking was clear and effective.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
3.62	31	1.05	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	4 (13%)	11 (35%)	6 (19%)	8 (26%)	2 (6%)

23. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	32	0.76	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (16%)	6 (19%)	21 (66%)

24. Other comments:

I'm glad I took this class with Professor Karacaovali. I learned a lot and it was a great experience.

Regarding what as spoken about in class recently, on of my previous professors ha password protected the lectures and notes he put on laulima and only gave the passwords to those who attended class regularly.

ta wasnt there hardly

It would be a good idea to have students do even more group work and daily presenting

I think you should make attendance mandatory if you want more people to come

He was an excellent professor!

It was a very pleasant environmented class.

I honestly am not a fan of statistics, but I understand the reasoning of why it valuable to the degree requirement. But, if this means anything, I am taking him again, and would like to as many times possible, or as required :)

Good job.

Baybars Karacaovali: ECON 460, Fall 2011 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Economics
Course:	ECON 460 - International Trade & Welfare	Crn (Section):	77343 (001)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
3.89	28	0.31	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (11%)	25 (89%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
1.7	27	0.47	Freq(%)	8 (30%)	19 (70%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	28	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (18%)	23 (82%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.68	28	0.55	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	7 (25%)	20 (71%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.39	28	0.83	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (7%)	0 (0%)	11 (39%)	15 (54%)

6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.54	28	0.79	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	2 (7%)	6 (21%)	19 (68%)

7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.36	28	0.83	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	3 (11%)	9 (32%)	15 (54%)

8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.32	28	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (11%)	13 (46%)	12 (43%)

9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

I enjoyed learning about contemporary issues in trade

The lectures, course content and class materials.

example problems and lotsa of extra resources

All models covered Thank you Baybars!!!

Clear examples and what was covered in class was put in exams

The lectures were useful and easy to understand.

The reading assignments and the problem sets as well as the practice exams greatly helped in preparing for the exams.

Professor Baybars was very thorough in his lectures and went a pace that everyone could follow.

Learning about trade aspects between countries, the power point slides

When Professor Karacaovali would explain further why the models were a certain way. It was helpful for our own sense, so we could understand more than just the surface of the material. I wish it were possible to do more problem sets. Possibly at least two problem sets per topic? If it were possible it would be helpful to have an on-line program to do the homework, so we could get immediate feedback, and do more practice problems. The midterm review sheet and the problem sets were very valuable and helpful though.

power points explanation

The graphs were very helpful in illustrating before and after effects of things such as tariffs, tax, etc. The practice midterms covered a majority of the topics aforementioned and familiarized me with the exam format, such that I was comfortable taking it. The student presentations brought new material, topics, and ideas without being too distracting. It shone light into other areas of economics in which we may be able to apply what we learned in Econ 460.

Materials are pretty good. Easy to understand even if you are no native students.

Learning the basics of Economics once again, i believe was very important. Many times i do forget terminology, so it was nice to revisit Ricardian model.

Understanding the ins and outs of trade between two countries and how it affects the world market.

Chapters on tariffs and barriers were valuable especially considering APEC was held during this semester. Connecting the models with current real events helps a lot. Reading assignments helped.

Probably my favorite class this semester due to the practical application of subject matter.

The effects of international trade in the world economy and how it relates to current day politics as well as trade policies that have been passed or are about to be passed.

reading assignments

Baybars is very clear in his explanations of the various topics presented in class. He doesn't assume that his students should already know the subject matter from reading the book.

This class was thorough on all its theories. I like how the course ramped up in difficulty.

10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

Did not enjoy the extensive math and technical application of theory

None.

some lengthy lectures

NONE Thank you Baybars!!!

Class general interest

This is hard, but I wish we had covered more material. I understand that not all of the class is on the same level, but it was a little slow for me.

The reading assignments weren't terrible but seemed a bit unnecessary. I would have like to see more real life examples brought up during class whether its through a video or a article.

book

The reading assignments were a toss up between good and bad. Good because they related to the topics we covered in class and introduced real life situations in which we could apply what we learned in Econ 460. Bad because they were not included in exams. It would be nice to see some questions related to the reading assignments on the exam so we are constantly reminded that we need to apply what we learned into the real world. Also, including some questions from the readings on the exam would make students take the reading assignments more seriously...

Nothing

all were beneficial to the application of the subject

N/A

None.

nothing

problem sets were too hard i wasnt prepared well enough for them

Probably the reading assignments. I don't feel like I gained much from doing those assignments.

11. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	28	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (21%)	22 (79%)

12. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	28	0.75	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	1 (4%)	9 (32%)	17 (61%)

13. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.46	28	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	1 (4%)	10 (36%)	16 (57%)

14. The instructor is friendly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.68	28	0.55	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	7 (25%)	20 (71%)

15. The instructor acknowledges all questions insofar as possible.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.68	28	0.55	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	7 (25%)	20 (71%)

16. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.54	28	0.69	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (11%)	7 (25%)	18 (64%)

17. The instructor treated students with respect.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	28	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (21%)	22 (79%)

18. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.64	28	0.62	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (7%)	6 (21%)	20 (71%)

19. The instructor was willing to help.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	28	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	6 (21%)	21 (75%)

20. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	27	0.54	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	6 (22%)	20 (74%)

21. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Understanding, passionate, caring

Baybars was motivated, committed, and dedicated to provide a quality course for his students; he cares about his students learning the material.

organized, thorough, considerate

Understanding Patient

Helpful, knowledgeable, compasionate

professional

Helpful, cheerful, encouraging

Thorough, approachable, and fair

interactive

Thorough. Conscientious.

SMART

Wastes no time

Kind

Organized, Intelligent, and willing to help

Hardworking, enthusiastic

Helpful, thorough, eager.

prepared, helpful, encouraging

knowledgable, approachable, easy-going

nice knowledgable

Knowledgeable, intelligent, organized

Intelligent, careful, understanding

22. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.46	28	0.64	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (7%)	11 (39%)	15 (54%)

23. Assignments are returned promptly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.63	27	0.56	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	8 (30%)	18 (67%)

24. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.54	28	0.79	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	2 (7%)	6 (21%)	19 (68%)

25. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	28	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (4%)	5 (18%)	22 (79%)

26. Other comments:

Baybars is an excellent professor. UH Economics Department needs to find more Baybars to teach at our Economics Department. Perhaps UH can develop an International Economics curriculum for students to graduate, just like at other prestigious schools.

Most of the students were not at a high enough level to begin to understand the material which prevented some students from enjoying the class. It was fun. It was easy. I sympathize with the professor because he wanted us to learn and appreciate the material but students enrolled in the course just for a passing grade which is a real shame, but I did sincerely enjoy ALL material covered and was a bit disappointed that other students didn't care, I look forward to your other classes here at UH.

This class gives all the relevant information without too much extra too confuse us. I think the size of the classroom was too large which makes it feel more like a lecture. If the classroom size was smaller, I think it would make the class more interactive but the professor does well in trying to engage the class in discussion.

Professor Karacaovali is a great professor and addition to UH Manoa. Very happy to have taken a course from him.

good teacher, great knowledge

Lectures sometimes felt like they were draggong on and on, but maybe this is because we only meet two days a week so the material has to be "crammed" Idk, but having to jot down notes from the beginning to the end of class hurts my brain. Maybe we could have breaks or something...or you can switch to just verbal teaching or switching to powerpoint.

This class, i must admit was a little challenging for me. I believe Baybars should write more legibly on the board, and notes would be more understandable. Otherwise the course became more and more interesting. Im glad i took this course, it really is something we should all learn since we go through trade and globalization everyday. Dont worry Professor, even though our class doesnt speak much we still appreciate your teaching methods. Most of the econ classes I have taken have been like this. I found that after your first evaluation, you were able to make the class participate more. Thanks professor for an interesting semester.

Prof. Karacaovali is very enthusiastic in teaching, although the material is challenging his demeanor never falters and always comes to class with a smile.

Very fair professors, punctual and eager to teach. It is really encouraging as a student to have a professor that cares. Makes you feel comfortable to ask questions and participate. Lectures can get a bit dry sometimes but lack of student interest does that to you. Constantly relating models to real examples would help connect the material. Material is understandable and examples are too but being able to compare the bigger picture is helpful for visualization.

Powerpoints very very helpful. Always wanted class participation but really shouldn't take it personally if no one wants to speak up. Class presentations and reading assignments were a good way of helping us broaden our view of the subject.

Baybars is a very good professor that comes to class prepared and on time. He is very knowledgable about international trade and welfare and is able to teach it in a clear way. He is always willing to help a student with any questions. I think the class would benefit if he slowed down when writing notes on the board. Overall, I would recommend other Econ majors to take his classes and believe he is a valuable asset to the Econ department

i wasnt well enough informed on due dates for assignments so i ended up not being able to turn in assignments that i wanted to. extra credit presentation i also had no knowledge of how was supposed to do it wether sign up for a day or if we were assigned a day i cant find sign up sheet anywhere also i think my midterm was graded far too harshly and his office hours are always when i have class

I would take a class from this instructor again

The class was great. The reading assignments were a great complement to the topics covered. The student presentations were also a good change up. Trade theory is fairly bland, but the class seemed to go by pretty fast for what it was. He asks some questions that are too easy, so most people don't like to answer those.