|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.65 |
17 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (35%) |
11 (65%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.47 |
17 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (53%) |
8 (47%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.88 |
17 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (35%) |
7 (41%) |
4 (24%) |
|
|
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.12 |
17 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
9 (53%) |
5 (29%) |
|
|
5. I learned a lot in this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
17 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
2 (12%) |
7 (41%) |
7 (41%) |
|
|
6. I improved my abilities to do the kinds of writing used by professionals in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.12 |
17 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (24%) |
7 (41%) |
6 (35%) |
|
|
7. I generally understood the material presented in this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.12 |
17 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
0 (0%) |
12 (71%) |
4 (24%) |
|
|
8. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.35 |
17 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (12%) |
7 (41%) |
8 (47%) |
|
|
9. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.41 |
17 |
0.8 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
4 (24%) |
10 (59%) |
|
|
10. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
17 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
6 (35%) |
10 (59%) |
|
|
11. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.76 |
17 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (24%) |
13 (76%) |
|
|
12. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.35 |
17 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (12%) |
7 (41%) |
8 (47%) |
|
|
13. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| The exams we're a bit misleading at times and I would suggest a class review
so the class knows what to clearly study and need to understand for the exam
instead of having to study so much material and only having to need only 20%
of the information they studied. |
| He is an excellent teacher, I just had a little trouble with his thick accent but it's nothing he can fix... |
| Course was very focused on concrete. Almost nothing about other materials. |
| There is so much details about concrete that I felt were irrelevant. There was not enough time going over mix design and how to properly calculate a proper mix. And a lot of the class was saying that you should try to incorporate lightweight concrete into the course since a lot of the students are getting more involved with concrete canoe. That would be cool. |
| N/A |
| sometimes wording of questions can be confusing, so clarifying what is required (in an exam, homework, or lab report) would be a great improvement |
| Nothing needs to be improved; the course was very clear and well organized. |
|
|
14. The writing assignments helped me retain the course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.24 |
17 |
0.56 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
11 (65%) |
5 (29%) |
|
|
15. Reading assignments are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.71 |
17 |
0.85 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
6 (35%) |
7 (41%) |
3 (18%) |
|
|
16. Laboratory assignments are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.24 |
17 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
7 (41%) |
7 (41%) |
|
|
17. The use of laboratory equipment was adequately explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.29 |
17 |
0.59 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
10 (59%) |
6 (35%) |
|
|
18. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.35 |
17 |
0.61 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
9 (53%) |
7 (41%) |
|
|
19. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
17 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (47%) |
9 (53%) |
|
|
20. The field trips were useful learning experiences.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.59 |
17 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (41%) |
10 (59%) |
|
|
21. The guest lecturers were interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
16 |
0.72 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (19%) |
8 (50%) |
5 (31%) |
|
|
22. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.29 |
17 |
0.47 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
12 (71%) |
5 (29%) |
|
|
23. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.94 |
17 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (29%) |
8 (47%) |
4 (24%) |
|
|
24. Other comments:
|
| I felt as if buying the textbook was a waste of time and money. Lecture slides helped the most. Keep
up the good work! :) |
| Exam results are skewed by some students having access to previous semester quizzes and exams which are similar. |
| Having the lecture slides before for us each class was super helpful. |
| recommend more field trips, more mix design labs |
| Great instructor. Learned a lot in this course. |
|
