|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 5.27 |
30 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
22 (73%) |
8 (27%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 2.0 |
28 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
28 (100%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.47 |
30 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (7%) |
12 (40%) |
16 (53%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.37 |
30 |
0.72 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (13%) |
11 (37%) |
15 (50%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.37 |
30 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (10%) |
13 (43%) |
14 (47%) |
|
|
6. I learned to identify main points and central issues in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.37 |
30 |
0.72 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (13%) |
11 (37%) |
15 (50%) |
|
|
7. I participated actively in class discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.11 |
28 |
0.92 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (7%) |
4 (14%) |
11 (39%) |
11 (39%) |
|
|
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
30 |
0.61 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (7%) |
7 (23%) |
21 (70%) |
|
|
9. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
30 |
0.61 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (7%) |
6 (20%) |
22 (73%) |
|
|
10. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.3 |
30 |
0.79 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (20%) |
9 (30%) |
15 (50%) |
|
|
11. The instructor adjusts to fit individual abilities and interests.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.36 |
28 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (14%) |
10 (36%) |
14 (50%) |
|
|
12. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.03 |
29 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (31%) |
10 (34%) |
10 (34%) |
|
|
13. The guest lecturers were interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
30 |
0.56 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (3%) |
9 (30%) |
20 (67%) |
|
|
14. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| All lectures were interesting and I had no trouble paying attention even
through the four hour lectures! |
| I enjoyed the course content and the variety of lecturers. |
| videos, psa, clinical |
| Guest lecturers were great. |
| Subject matter experts |
| Family planning and contraceptive class was really interesting. |
| Case studies and projects.
PSA was a great idea. |
| Carmen's guest lectures were insightful and thought provoking |
| The way Instructor Fox integrated light-hearted moments into her lectures, such as humerous video clips, in order to break up a 4 hour class block |
| Guest speakers were really good |
| I liked the variety of guest lectururs. Gave fresh views on various topics. |
| Guest lectures, videos, psa, alternative experiences |
| I like instructor's attitude and energy and experience that she used to
inform the way that the lectures went. |
| reviews and rationales book. stories relevant to course material to exemplify issues. engaging
lecturers. technicolor reading schedule. |
|
|
15. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
|
| The PSA assignment seemed like a waste of time. |
| 4 hour lectures are too long, but that might not be feasible in MEPN. |
| the first test had material that was very controversial and did not represent
what we had gone over in class. |
| Wish we could have heard more from our main instructor |
| Powerpoint lectures. |
| None. |
| Lectures that were too heavily focused on the powerpoint presentations |
| Watching the horrifying birth videos!!! |
| It was difficult that the instructor preparing the exams was not the one lecturing us. There was a big difference in the information lectured on and the material tested on. |
| The 4 hour length of the course made it at times difficult to really absorb the content. |
| Case studies |
| 4 hours of straight power points is not an efficient way to learn. |
|
|
16. Other comments:
|
| Thank you Ms. Fox for a very informative class. I have learned so much from this class and
appreciate everything you did to teach and coordinate this course. |
| Thanks for making class interesting |
| None. |
| Good instructor. I think the exams could be a bit more challenging. |
| Professor Fox has a great enthusiasm for everything she teaches. Her passion for her subject really lights up the class. I really enjoyed taking her class. |
| Take care and get well soon! |
| Instructor Fox is a very enthusiastic and engaging lecturer. She is very pleasant to have in class. |
| thank you for a wonderful course |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 5.38 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (63%) |
3 (38%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 2.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
7. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
8. I participated actively in class discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
9. The instructor slowed down when discussing complex and difficult topics.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
10. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
11. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
12. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
13. The instructor gives individual attention to students in the class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
14. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
15. My overall evaluation of this course is...
|
| Instructor Fox did an exemplary job getting us into a clinical setting and ensuring we had a sufficient amount of experiences to make the most out of each day. It was a pleasure and an honor to work with her, and I eagerly look toward the opportunity to do so again |
| It was a great course. It was engaging and exciting. Instructor Fox was enthusiastic and proacive in
ensuring we all got equal opportunities to learn. This was by far my favorite course. |
| Not that great. Like the lecture, it was enormous chunks of time in order to
fulfill requirements. That is an effective strategy to check the box for
requirements, but not an effective way to learn. There was tons of down time
during clinical, which was not anyone's fault, but in the future I would not
recommend that set up if the program values student's learning. Intermittent
8 hour shifts is better than 12 hour shifts crammed together. |
| I had a great experience! |
|
|
16. Other comments:
|
| I think that Mrs. Fox did an excellent job in a tough situation. And I'm
sure that whoever was assisting her/taking charge of scheduling probably
had very limited options. I understand that the bureaucracy and committees
etc necessitate that MEPN students remain flexible and maintain a "take
what comes with a smile" attitude. Still, the way this clinical was set up
makes it difficult to learn. I will add that because of the nature of the
job market, I have been working, trying to get my foot in the door where I
can so I can pay my dues and ascent the nursing CNA-RN-and up ladder that
the current Hawaiian nursing job market demands, and the way this program,
and in particular this clinical is set up, that makes paying our dues next
to impossible. I know MEPN has a don't work during the program attitude,
but I think it might be doing its students a disservice by adopting that
attitude because with no job to hit the ground running after we get done
with the first year, we are in reality starting at a disadvantage compared
to other nursing students (hospitals prefer BSN degrees for the most part).
Maybe MEPN should rethink that aspect of the program. |
|
