|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
17 |
0.59 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
3 (18%) |
13 (76%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
17 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (12%) |
15 (88%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
17 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (12%) |
15 (88%) |
|
|
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.69 |
16 |
0.6 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
3 (19%) |
12 (75%) |
|
|
5. I learned to recognize quality work in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
16 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
2 (13%) |
13 (81%) |
|
|
6. I developed a set of overall values in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
15 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (20%) |
12 (80%) |
|
|
7. I participated actively in class discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
16 |
0.72 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
2 (13%) |
12 (75%) |
|
|
8. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
17 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
14 (82%) |
|
|
9. I developed a greater sense of personal responsibility.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
16 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
4 (25%) |
11 (69%) |
|
|
10. I developed more confidence in myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.31 |
16 |
0.79 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (19%) |
5 (31%) |
8 (50%) |
|
|
11. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
16 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (25%) |
12 (75%) |
|
|
12. The instructor is permissive and flexible.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.76 |
17 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (24%) |
13 (76%) |
|
|
13. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
17 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
14 (82%) |
|
|
14. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
17 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
14 (82%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
17 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
14 (82%) |
|
|
16. In general, the course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.76 |
17 |
0.56 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
2 (12%) |
14 (82%) |
|
|
17. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
17 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
14 (82%) |
|
|
18. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
|
| Moti did a great job with this course! I especially liked that discussion and participation was a requirement for the grade. This helped encourage students to speak up. |
|
|
19. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.82 |
17 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
14 (82%) |
|
|
20. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.65 |
17 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (12%) |
2 (12%) |
13 (76%) |
|
|
21. The grading system was clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.87 |
15 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
13 (87%) |
|
|
22. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.82 |
17 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
14 (82%) |
|
|
23. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
|
| Even more student participation by asking questions or discussion. |
| Some of the discussion papers didn't require the whole period - paper presentations should
probably always be two papers per session. |
|
|
24. Other comments:
|
| Having two students present was a good use of time. |
| great job! |
| Good! |
|
