University of Hawai'i eCAFE

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

Instructor: Hardwin Blanchard

Available Survey Results

MATH 22, Fall 2007
MATH 25X, Fall 2007
MATH 26, Fall 2007
MATH 50, Fall 2007

Hardwin Blanchard: MATH 22, Fall 2007

Campus:	Hawaii Community College	Department:	Math
Course:	MATH 22 - Pre-Algebra Mathematics	Crn (Section):	15051 (0)

1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

2. Course objectives were met.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	8 (80%)

5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	8 (80%)

6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.3	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	3 (30%)	5 (50%)

9. The instructor was always prepared.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.4	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	6 (60%)

13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	8 (80%)

15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

16. The instructor graded fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (40%)	6 (60%)

18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		A	B	C	D	F
4.8	10	0.0	Freq(%)	9 (90%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?

Nothing!

I THINK THAT HE WAS A GOOD TEACHER.

group assignments.

Mr. Blanchard is genius, I am A total dud at math, even surprised I tested at the pre-algebra level. He needs no improvement.

Nothing!

to improve the class i would try and teach different math strategies to help everyone understand in a fun way.

nothing, its laid out very clearly and i finally enjoy math for the first time ever

20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?

He's a giid teacher. Really helpful!! :D

GOOD

good.

Mr. Blanchard is one cooool dude. He was very compassionate with my personal difficulties, and believe me there are many. I am very un-confident with math.

good teaching methods

he should try more variety. its like everyday is repeated with different numbers. he needs something new.

Prof. blanchard knows numbers in and out, its really amazing

21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?

yes!

THAT I LEARN BETTER MATH PROMDEM

Yes. math is something we need to know.

Mr. Blanchard helped me understand the concept, although often times On paper I am un able to project that, but in discussion I am able to follow along.

yes

yes. i actually did learn math from his class and it will help me and my future.

definately!

22. Other comments:

teach math 26!!

I am not good at all in Math, was very surprised I even tested at the pre-algebra level, Mr. Blanchard has given me a greater appreciation of math even though Im pretty miserable at it.

never had a better teacher

Ive never had a teacher or any body else who could explain mathmatical concepts in a way that was so understandable and even enjoyable. i feel ive learned more form his classes than any of my other classes just because of the amount of information learned

Hardwin Blanchard: MATH 25X, Fall 2007 Back to top

Campus:	Hawaii Community College	Department:	Math
Course:	MATH 25X - Elementary Algebra II	Crn (Section):	15057 (0)

1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.86	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	6 (86%)

2. Course objectives were met.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (29%)	5 (71%)

3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.86	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	6 (86%)

4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.14	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	4 (57%)	2 (29%)

5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (29%)	5 (71%)

6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (29%)	5 (71%)

7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.57	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (43%)	4 (57%)

8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.43	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	2 (29%)	4 (57%)

9. The instructor was always prepared.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.57	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (43%)	4 (57%)

10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.57	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	1 (14%)	5 (71%)

11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.57	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	1 (14%)	5 (71%)

12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	6	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	1 (17%)	4 (67%)

13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (29%)	5 (71%)

14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (29%)	5 (71%)

15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.57	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	1 (14%)	5 (71%)

16. The instructor graded fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (29%)	5 (71%)

17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (29%)	5 (71%)

18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		A	B	C	D	F
4.86	7	0.0	Freq(%)	6 (86%)	1 (14%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?

Strongly encourage students to attend the class

Try to make it more interesting.

Make class time longer. No changes needed.

Nothing.

class should be longer and not 5x a week.

N/A

20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?

Very good!

I like his methods. He makes sure everyone understands the material.

Very well prepared and delivered the topics thoroughly each and every class so we could all understand.

Mr. Blanchard is an excellent teacher.

he is a good teacher and i learned a lot.

I really enjoyed his class because he taught very well and was very understanding.

21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?

Yes.

yes.

Yes

Yes.

yes, but i need to understand more for myself.

Yes

22. Other comments:

He is a great teacher!

Great course with an excellant teacher that has no problem getting through to the students.

None.

N/A

Hardwin Blanchard: MATH 26, Fall 2007 Back to top

Campus:	Hawaii Community College	Department:	Math
Course:	MATH 26 - Elementary Algebra	Crn (Section):	15058 (0)

1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (40%)	9 (60%)

2. Course objectives were met.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	10 (67%)

3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	10 (67%)

4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.27	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	7 (47%)	6 (40%)

5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.27	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (27%)	3 (20%)	8 (53%)

6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.47	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	8 (53%)	7 (47%)

7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (20%)	4 (27%)	8 (53%)

8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (20%)	4 (27%)	8 (53%)

9. The instructor was always prepared.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (33%)	10 (67%)

10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	6 (40%)	7 (47%)

11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (20%)	12 (80%)

12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.27	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	7 (47%)	6 (40%)

13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.93	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	14 (93%)

14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.4	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	5 (33%)	8 (53%)

15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.4	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (20%)	3 (20%)	9 (60%)

16. The instructor graded fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.86	14	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (14%)	12 (86%)

17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	10 (67%)

18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		A	B	C	D	F
4.73	15	0.0	Freq(%)	11 (73%)	4 (27%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?

Nothing. Mr. Blanchard is always open to help students.

I would show more examples.

I think Mr Blanchard did a wonderful job, I hate math and he made it interesting

listen to the studenst a little bit more

nothing. i loved this class!

A. less work B. more time

a. This course was a very good course because the teacher sticked to the syllabus and tryed to help students in every way possible, so I would not change anything about the course. b. Again, I thought everything was fair and appropriate.

none

Refrain from allowing students to continuosly make up failed exams. A student should be allowed to make up no more than two exams. By doing so, the student will be encouraged to study more and ask the needed questions necessary to understand the material.

I would have more hands on activities in class. I would change the lectures up some times.

Take control of class room. example: disruption by students would not be tolerated as it is very annoying to those who want to learn.

I would strongly suggest more student participation (ie. students doing problems on the board)

nothing

20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?

He is very well connected with everything he professes in. He shows his students that math is important; more over helping his students understand the material

He should give more examples.

He is an awesome teacher, I learned alot this semester.

great teacher good short cuts we learned.

he was a great teacher.

Very good, knows what he is doing!

Mr. Blanchard is a great math teacher and his teaching methods are also great.

Very good teacher... makes sure all understand and presents in a way all can understand

rather good

Very effective. Assigned homework is neither too little nor too much; it's the correct amount.

I think that his teaching methods are okay, but he should do some different styles once in a while to make the class more interesting.

excellent methods...just too nice of a person sometimes

Gives in-depth explanations, sometimes veers off into math not pertaining to the class which leads to confusion. Great instuctor overall!

good

21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?

yes.

Yes

Definitely

yes he has

yes. in every way.

yes

Yes

yes the intructor has contributed in learning the text.

Yes =D

yes!

yes

22. Other comments:

If I were taking another math course, I would want to know if he was teaching it.

I wish more instructors could be as supportive and positive as Mr Blanchard. He took time out to tutor students that wanted help, everyday as necessary.

mr.blanchard is the best!

good course!

none

Hardwin Blanchard: MATH 50, Fall 2007 Back to top

Campus:	Hawaii Community College	Department:	Math
Course:	MATH 50 - Technical Mathematics I	Crn (Section):	15063 (0)

1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (67%)	1 (33%)

2. Course objectives were met.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (67%)	1 (33%)

3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)

4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)

5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)

6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)

7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)

8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (67%)	1 (33%)

9. The instructor was always prepared.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (100%)	0 (0%)

10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (67%)	1 (33%)

11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)

13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)	0 (0%)

14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (67%)	1 (33%)

15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (67%)	1 (33%)

16. The instructor graded fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)

17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	3	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	2 (67%)

18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		A	B	C	D	F
5.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?

notting

nothihing, this class was great and excellent

i felt this was a very good course...one math class i was glad to participate in.

20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?

talks to me

that i learned some new techniques in solving some problems

His methods are different, but they worked for me personally. Just do the work and your done for the day. I like that.

21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?

yes

Yes, this stuff may help me down the road with my major and most definitely my job!

22. Other comments: