eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Marjorie Hale-Fishman

Available Survey Results

ICS101, Spring 2014
ITS108, Spring 2014
ITS118, Spring 2014
ITS221, Spring 2014
ITS103, Fall 2013
ITS104, Fall 2013
ITS151, Fall 2013
ITS218, Fall 2013
ICS101, Spring 2013
ITS108, Spring 2013
ITS118, Spring 2013
ITS121, Spring 2013
ITS221, Spring 2013
ICS101, Fall 2012
ITS103, Fall 2012
ITS104, Fall 2012
ITS218, Fall 2012
ICS101, Spring 2012
ITS108, Spring 2012
ITS118, Spring 2012
ITS121, Spring 2012
BUSN150, Fall 2011
BUSN151, Fall 2011
ICS101, Fall 2011
ITS103, Fall 2011
ITS104, Fall 2011
BUSN151, Spring 2011
ICS101, Spring 2011
ITS118, Spring 2011
ITS121, Spring 2011
BUSN121, Fall 2010
BUSN150, Fall 2010
BUSN151, Fall 2010
ICS101, Fall 2010
BUSN189, Spring 2010
IS55, Spring 2010
ITS108, Spring 2010
ITS121, Spring 2010
BUSN121, Fall 2009
ICS101, Fall 2009
ITS218, Fall 2009
BUSN189, Spring 2009
IS55, Spring 2009
BUSN121, Fall 2008
BUSN150, Fall 2008
BUSN151, Fall 2008
ITS108, Spring 2008
ITS104, Fall 2007
ITS151, Fall 2007

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ICS101, Spring 2014

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information& Computer Sciences
Course: ICS 101 - Digital Tools for Info World Crn (Section): 16177 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 15 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 12 (80%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 10 (67%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 15 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (40%) 9 (60%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.27 15 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 7 (47%) 6 (40%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.53 15 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (47%) 8 (53%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 10 (67%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.79 15 0.43 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I felt that they were all very relevant to the various aspects of modern computer programs.
I liked that we got a chance to learn to different things using different computer programs.
the way she teaches her students.
I liked how Mrs. Hale-Fishman conducted her class.
I liked the assignments, as they were very hands on and comprehensive in teaching me the concepts and techniques needed to properly use a computer in any professional environment.
It was very well paced and the work was very reasonable. My instructor was extremely motivated about out subject and was very passionate about teaching to us.
I enjoyed doing the powerpoint presentation. It was the most personal assignment, which made it a lot easier.
This class made an example of how much more I could still learn about a subject. I learned many new things about the computer, one subject in particular (Microsoft Access), caught me completely off guard. Once it was learned, I felt extremely accomplished.
I liked the fact that I learned way more about a computer and it is way more advanced than I ever thought from before days. the projects were fun and very informal, also going through everything step by step helped out to understand the material.
It was really helpful to someone like me who didn't know anything about the subject at the beginning of the semmester
Everything. Great Class. Best teacher.
I liked that throughout the whole semester, we had enough time in class to complete our assignments if we wanted to stay back.
It was structured well enough for me to learn and not be overwhelmed, but I still was challenged.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
The only thing I was not crazy about were the acronyms on tests.
Have a teachers assistant. A lot of students nowadays are very familiar with the modern computer, and makes it that much harder to find help out side of class hours, considering the class is only twice a week.
give students a microsoft office download.
N/A
None.
None really.
no suggestions
Make the class less early.
I think maybe less work or more time given for me it was hard to just catch on right away so it took awhile for me to comprehend the given material sometimes even with the help of the instructor.
No
nope
The book is not good. The spiral spine comes loose and pages start falling out of the book, this makes it hard to complete assignments because some pages were gone
15. Other comments:
Fantastic teacher. I felt that she really gave the students every opportunity to succeed and to do well if they put in the effort.
Good job, I just had a hard time keeping up because I am not familiar with computers.
N/A
Ms.Hale-fishman was very helpful all the time I needed it and overall learned a whole lot more on computers.
Great Teacher, she obviously is very experienced in this subject
Best Teacher.
the class and teacher overall was great

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS108, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 108 - Computer Software Support Crn (Section): 16142 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Marjorie Hale-Fishman herself. Of all the instructors that I have taken classes from above all she is there and is ready and willing to help everyone.
FUN FUN FUN
Professor Hale-Fishman made the entire course really informative and enjoyable.
This is an interesting class, and you will learn a lot about the software and fixing computer's software.
Enjoyed teaching style by instructor with respect to CompTIA A+ material.
I like how she incorporated the subject matter with possible real life situations. It is much easier to learn using examples than going strictly by the reading materials alone.
the hands on stuff that we did.
I found this course to helpful.
My favorite part was the hands on work we did when programming. Being able to create the things that we see everyday online such as a simple program that basically adds, subtracts, divides, and multiplies things (which is basically like a calculator) is cool. After this class you see computer games and programs in a different perspective. Personally, my mind after this class like to break a game or program to its simple form and figure out how it all comes together in the end.
The hands on work is really helpful and helped with understanding the book.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
No
make study guide extra credit give bonus questions MORE EXTRA CREDIT
Keep it up to date. I would rather learn about what is current, not things that were relevant 5 years ago
Having tutors available.
I love it, keep it the same.
Please change the course material to something more current. The text covers subject matter that is more appropriate for the CompTIA A+ 700 series exams. The CompTIA website specifically cites the 800 series exams for professionals seeking certification in the United States.
Extend the course time and add more lab time.
more hands-on would be nice.
No
No, this class is fine.
I wish it was a two hour class so we would have more time to do hands on stuff.
15. Other comments:
WE LOVE YOU
Professor Hale-Fishman is very knowledgeable and always ready to help. She motivates the entire class to do well.
The top two things I learned from this class are: 1) Ease for Marjorie (she likes things done a specific way, like an actual employer) 2) Blame the the problem on hardware.
Looking forward to taking and passing the CompTIA A+ exams, unfortunately the only certified testing centers are on Oahu, at the Honolulu Community College campus.
N/A
Great teacher

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS118, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 118 - Visual Basic Progmng Bus. Apps Crn (Section): 16143 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.69 13 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 10 (77%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.54 13 0.66 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 4 (31%) 8 (62%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 13 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (77%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.62 13 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 3 (23%) 9 (69%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Marjorie Hale-Fishman herself. Of all the instructors that I have taken classes from above all she is there and is ready and willing to help everyone.
Marge was a great instructor, she has a lot of knowledge and spent time helping me understand the course material
Everything, but especially the professor who was very knowledgeable and willing to help with any problem.
I liked how she took the time to help students when they really needed it. For me I had a difficult time loading the Visual Basic program. It took almost two months before I finally got the program to load onto my computer. It was very stressful as to why the program would not load onto both my HP laptops. Professor Hale-Fishman later determined that the reason the program was not loading onto either my laptops was because of a program glitch between Hewlett Packard and the 2010 Visual Basic Program.
I would say that the work made me understand the concepts a lot better (albeit more frustrating when a program will not work), and this class was awesome.
I found this Hard but very full filling
This course was really good I liked that the teacher knew what she was doing and that she helps out a lot when a student is having a difficult time with a specific subject.
I loved the labs and programs that we made.
working with visual studio
I enjoyed the style of instruction by instructor.
The Programming Challenges in the book were fun but difficult.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
none
Tutors available and maybe a refresher summer course.
No, everything went well.
Keep it the same, it was awesome.
no
Maybe more hands on.
None
no suggestions
Slide decks are very large. Possibly select most informative slides, then follow with one of the chapter walk-through to show working example of code and chapter concepts.
15. Other comments:
none
Professor Hale-Fishman is an awesome teacher.
I hate arrays with a passion!
n/a
Instructor could be more dynamic in teaching. Lots of mistakes. Instructor seems to be more mechanical in teaching. Not very motivating. Change the instructor.
class was great
I have recommended course to peers that want a different presentation style for Visual Basic instruction.
This course in Visual Basic will probably be the most useful tool that I will use in my career.
Overall, an awesome instructor. 10/10

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS221, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 221 - Advanced Computing Topics Crn (Section): 16179 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.0 4 1.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
The textbook was more current than most.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
The textbook and PowerPoint materials could have been more engaging. They gave a fairly dry overview of what could be an exciting course.
15. Other comments:
No survey responses were found.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS103, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 103 - Intro to Programming Process Crn (Section): 15672 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.54 13 0.66 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 4 (31%) 8 (62%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.54 13 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 9 (69%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
programming
Marjorie has an engaging teaching style, and made an effort to connect with the students in order to create a good learning relationship, and communicate to all that her primary goal was to facilitate students learning and mastery of the course material.
I really enjoyed this class. Marjorie is very thorough, as making you understand the material. And she'll offer assistance, all you need to do is ask!!!!
This course was very hands-on. I liked that
I learned how to program which I thought I would never be able to do.
I loved this class, all the assignments helped me a lot.
Everything. Very well rounded course.
The labs were very fun and helpful.
I liked the coding walk-through in class. I could ask questions about a specific line of code I am looking at in front of me.
everything
I enjoyed the teaching methods that Prof. Hale-Fishman extended.
I liked the various labs that we did in this class. We conducted various labs and in class assignments that helped us to better understand how certain things worked.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
less home work
The text book for this course is genuinely poor. Unfortunately there are not many options for Visual Basic course material. The text book Farrel's Programming Logic and Design, overly abstracts and adds complexity to material that is relatively straight forward. Students who are exposed to logic and design for the first time are attempting to create a new mental model, those mental models could be more readily constructed from tangible examples, and then developed into generic or abstract components. Literally 20% of the books, is devoted to diagrams, that say "don't do this". A beginning programming student doesn't have any tools in their "design toolbox" so using negation or counter-examples at this point is a grossly inefficient and confusing instructional model. Statistically upwards of 50% of student's wash out of Freshman level, Computer Science classes for multiple reasons, but not the least, because they fail to generate abstract mental models of the material. The Instructional staff at HCC could likely develop an in house curriculum, in 100 pages or less that could cover the same topics in a more efficient manner for students.
No.
Not really that I can think of.
The books told you more about what not to do than what to actually do. Maybe get better books.
I strongly suggest using another textbook for the Visual Basic introduction class. In addition, to introduce modules when building flowcharts, as suggested by the textbook, and not actually use module structures while coding is very confusing to a beginner programmer.
none
Books that would better explain writing programs.
I would not really suggest anything to improve the course. Just a heads up though, next time we have accrediting work to be turned in, atleast give us more than a week to complete the whole thing.
15. Other comments:
this is for Marjorie hale-fishman
I love Marjorie, she is nice and strict on assignments.
I appreciated the fact that Marjorie Hale-Fishman would design computer programs on her own time, so we could work on them if we needed the extra practice. Course and instructor was fantastic.
N/A
It is unusual to have the air conditioning turned off for a computer room. It takes a whole day for the room to cool down.
n/a
I am eager to be in the spring semester 2014 class.
I really enjoyed your teaching methods. I feel they were effective and helped us learn a lot about the course subject. if you dont understand something youʻll explain it till we do understand it, which was a plus.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS104, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 104 - Computer Hardware Support Crn (Section): 15673 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
this class totally rocked! I have gained so much, by taking this course. And with an instructor like Marjorie, you can't go wrong. She'll offer help wven when she isn't on campus. Thank you M. Hale-Fishman ;)
Prof. Hale-Fishman is a wonderful teacher. I enjoyed all of her classes as she made learning very enjoyable.
The hands on assignments such as taking apart the computer or making cables were much more helpful than just reading about it in a textbook.
everything
Once again a very "Hands-On" Course. I learned a lot.
I really enjoyed the various labs that we do, it really helped me to better understand the course.
I learned stuff.
The hands on labs and book work was very helpful and relevant.
learning about hardware
The hands-on labs were useful.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
I would have liked an opportunity to build a computer from scratch.
none
No.
no suggestions
None
more hands on work
Would have liked more network labs.
15. Other comments:
Prof. Hale-Fishman is a great teacher and I am eager to be in her spring semester class in 2014.
Terrific course and instructor.
n/a
I really liked the way you made sure everyone understood how to do something before moving on to the next subject. It made learning that much more easier.
N/A

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS151, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 151 - Applied Database Programming Crn (Section): 15674 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 5 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I liked how Marjorie seemed to generally care about our class and what happen within it.
Although the pace was quick and a lot of material had to be covered, Marjorie's techniques helped up keep pace and excel in the class.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
The material to be covered on the exams could be communicated better. I was misled a couple times in regards to the format and content that would appear on the exams (to the detriment of my grade).
I didn't like the format of some of the quizzes, and once the format was changed unexpectedly.
15. Other comments:
An excellent instructor, dedicated and helpful.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS218, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 218 - Help Desk Support Crn (Section): 15676 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I enjoy interacting with the cohort of students and our Instructor. Everyone works well together and contributes to class work.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
Although the book had a lot of important information, I thought the book was confusing not in small sections but noticeably in three chapters.
I just did not like nor did I agree at all with the text book. My over ten years of retail and service experience was a complete waste of time if the text book used is to be considered "fact".
Update the textbook.
15. Other comments:
Marjorie Hale-Fishman is an excellent instructor. She teaches her students and trains them to improve their knowledge and skills in IT. She is one of the few instructors that will help you to brainstorm ideas and work with you until you understand the concepts. She does not conduct her class as if it is an online class, meaning students need to teach them selves; students have the book and each other to depend on to complete the course. She teaches us and we have the other alternatives to add to our education. I can not express how important Marjorie Hale-Fishman is to the success of my educational goals and continuing as a student at Hawaii Community College. She is the pillar that makes this major a success. She provides students with IT knowledge, an excellent teaching style, and moral support to continue and strive on to graduate. Thank you.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ICS101, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information& Computer Sciences
Course: ICS 101 - Digital Tools for Info World Crn (Section): 18213 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 10 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
It was really good to learn how to use Microsoft Office.
This was a great course and has a great teacher. She was very clear and easy to understand as well as very helpful, patient, and understanding!
The instructor had a very good and positive veiw on everyone in the class. Also she is understanding and helpful.
Well laid out course (syllabus) and assignments for entire semester given
Very even flow through the textbooks. Nothing extremely difficult.
Really liked the overall criteria of the course. I was familiar with microsoft programs prior to attending the class but with not the programs that were up to date and current. I was amazed at how much the programs overall changed this class was a great way to learn new techniques and formulas to improve my work within the programs. The professor did a great job instructing and providing assistance, it was a pleasure being in her class.
The last minute addition of a text book was a unexpected and unwelcome expense, especially for $100.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
Spend more time on Access, as that is the hardest program to use.
No
None, she does a very good job at teaching.
No
Keep up the great work!
The office apps text book and the technology text book did not relate well. Maybe focus on 50% of the most important topics in the technology text book, and expand additional time on more relavent examples from the office apps text book.
15. Other comments:
Thank You
Very well taught course. Instructor clearly knows the ins and out of the subject.
Marjorie was very helpful and responsive at any time of the day.
Very fun class. Marjorie was very understanding about me having to work and I was able to turn in assignments via email.
Would reccommend this professor to anyone looking to take computer science classes.
Great lecturer. Appreciated that questions were answered to the best of their knowledge. Only refered to text book when needed and not as an immediate response. Lecturer definitely adds value to the money I've spent.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS108, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 108 - Computer Software Support Crn (Section): 18219 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.45 11 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 2 (18%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Very informative about Windows and how they work and how to fix it.
anything hands on
The course material was very thorough.
Homework was very useful to solve real life problems
Great all around course.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
It might help to change this to a pre-req with ITS-104 as two assignments involved work opening the computer. The teacher was more than willing to help with opening the computer so this is a very small suggestion.
Update the textbook.
not really
Books could be update some since this is the IT field and it is always changing.
Change up the assignments, book work is good but tends to be repetitive.
kinda outdated material that we covered.
no
15. Other comments:
Marjorie is great!!!

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS118, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 118 - Visual Basic Progmng Bus. Apps Crn (Section): 18220 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.88 8 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 7 (88%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (88%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
The textbook was better than average for ITS courses.
I enjoyed working on the course material. I think it was paced very appropriately.
Great programming course!
I liked the power point presentations, and how marge would go over examples of the algorithms.
Homework was challenging at times and the book we used was very useful and informative
The book was helpful and the assignments helped me grasp the material.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
no
Maybe show more way to do the programs. It seems like when we learn a certain way, we never want to change from that.
15. Other comments:
Marjorie is great!!!
Marge is a excellent instuctor, I have been privilaged to have her as a instructor for several years, her method of instruction and knowledge is a real asset to this school. I always share with other people that they shgould transfer to HCC to enroll in her classes. She obvoiusly cares about the students and their progress, although she gives a lot of work assignments I can now see how they are paying off.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS121, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 121 - Computing Topics Crn (Section): 18221 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.44 9 1.42 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.56 9 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 5 (56%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 9 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (33%) 6 (67%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 9 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (33%) 6 (67%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Enjoy the hands on activities of this class.
Nice intro to Linix and DOS
Course was informative.
Linux was fun.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
None
Get a different textbook. The current textbook is poorly written (unclear prose).
no
The computers used were dated and need to be changed out for newer technology. The lab environment was inconsistent between all lab computers even though the same software was used to create each virtual envirnment.
Change the book. It gave the wrong directions for assignments and the information was a bit jumbled with irrelevant facts.
Get a new book !!! The book we used sucked big time. The instructions for the activities were very vague. And the multiple choice questions were so frustrating and confusing at times.
15. Other comments:
Instructor very knowledgeable.
Marjorie is great!!!
Very helpful instructor, especially with all the challenges the lab hardware presented for both instructor and students.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS221, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 221 - Advanced Computing Topics Crn (Section): 18223 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 10 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 10 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.7 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 7 (70%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 10 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 10 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.78 10 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 7 (70%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
The most useful work involved online research (such as an activity requiring us to research different remote desktop applications) and hands-on activities (such as one where we layout and plan the different physical security considerations for information assets in a building).
I enjoyed the way Marjorie was able to present the information in different ways to the class. I enjoyed learning about Information Security but could have learned a lot more if they had a better book.
I like the study guides
Simply the best. Our instructor simply is the best there is. she goes out of her way regularly for her students and taugh us so much about a difficult subject.
I have learned much from this teacher in this subject and all the classes I have taken from her in the last year and a half. She has much work experiences to share that supplements her teaching of the subjects. I find these experiences shared to be worthwhile in combination with the topics of the subject. She is very helpful when I need help understanding a theory or action that is taken as being taught in the text. Her teaching style is better than any teacher in the IT major. I hope to have more classes from her over the next year.
The course information is interesting and I can apply what I was taught in my personal life and my career. Useful information that I can continue to use, modify and upgrade with the fast pace development of information technology.
What can I say, Marge has been a real positive asset in my life, she has motivated me even on my down days. I wish that every student could experience the teaching style and care she puts into her job
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
My main problem was with the textbook. The text was far too focused on unnecessary details about the history of different information security technologies, and not enough about the real-world implications of implementing them, about protection from an evolving set of threats, etc. Please use a different textbook, especially one that focuses more on research and hands-on activities. Also, please include more hands-on and research activities. Especially when it comes to information security, we will need to be forced to go beyond the text.
One suggestion would be to get a different book to use for the class. I found the book for the class contained to many errors. The group projects could also have been managed a little bit better.
change the book
Change the book maybe as it is a tad long winded and slightly dated material maybe another book in conjunction with this book.
Keep her as the instructor of this class. Students will learn more from her!
Longer lead times on group assignments.
Get a better book. Not very easy to understand, throws a lot of different concepts at you without explaining much. Try to read a chapter and more than likely you will fall asleep.
15. Other comments:
i like the instructor, she is nice and willing to help those who are struggling with the course and listen to our moans and complaints.
Wish I had More classes with the instructor.
Marjorie is an excellent instructor. She is always available to her students . She encourages students to stay on task and develop skills to prepare for our career. She helps students to build rapport with each other, team work skills and awareness of networking in the community.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ICS101, Fall 2012     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information& Computer Sciences
Course: ICS 101 - Digital Tools for Info World Crn (Section): 17030 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I liked that the work was very straight forward and Marjorie was able to help both in the classroom as well as at home (emails were answered promptly)
This class was great, Mrs fishmen is a good teacher, works hard to help students. Give her a raise!!$$
Marjorie Hale-Fishman is a excellent instructor. She really made the difference.
As long and painful as the assignments were, I can say that I learned a lot more than I would have expected.
I learned so much from this course that I will share it to everyone who is interested in it. Just the right amount of assignments and projects. Not overwhelming as I thought it would have been before I signed up. Great course!
I Really enjoyed doing the work thru for different types of programs in office. It really helped me to get a clear understanding of the program and was very helpful.
Wellpaced- spread out nicely
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
Everything was great this semester
no, every thing was perfect
Not really
None.
none
15. Other comments:
Mrs. Hale-fishman is a great instructor. She was always there to help in every way possible. She strives for us be be good in this computer course which is a very big plus to students.
Everything was really good. There was good communication skills and it was appropriate.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS103, Fall 2012     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 103 - Intro to Programming Process Crn (Section): 17032 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.45 11 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 4 (36%) 6 (55%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 11 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
she made the class interesting. Very helpful explaining each section.
I learned a lot in this class and I found it enjoyable mainly because this course is what I was interested in and because the instructor explained it in an understandable way.
Overall this class was a great experience. Marjorie made sure to give her students ample time to understand and complete assignments. She knows the topic well and uses teaching methods that support the texts used in the course. She was readily available by email to answer questions or offer advice on assignments.
This is my first class ever on programming and Marjorie made it it very fun.
I appreciated explanations that illustrated how concepts were applied to real world applications.
Marjorie Hale Fishmanʻs teaching techniques are excellent and I will retain more information from this class versus two of my other classes. I also appreciate how she was able to relate we were learning in class and how it will apply in a workplace setting.
Marjorie is an exceptional instructor and asset to the school, this is my third class with her and I look forward to taking the 118 class next semester with her.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
i really didnʻt like the visual logic book because the commands used is different from the visual basic book and i would confuse myself which commands to use at times
Not really
Near the end of the semester, in a lecture for a different class, Marjorie spoke about the importance of "segregating trainees by knowledge/skill level" and to "suggest enrolling in a hiher level seminar to trainees who ask advanced questions during a beginner-level session." However, having a student in this class that holds a higer-level degree in computer science, his advanced questions/comments/suggestions were not deferred to after-hours disscussion. These questions were instead discussed in class, potentailly confusing students with advanced topics that were not relevant to the subject matter for the course. My suggestion would be, attempt to cover only ITS-103 topics and realize that first-semester students may be unable to compartmentalize a 300-level course topic discussion in the middle of their 100-level course lecture. Also, try to engage students during lectures. Occasionally I felt that Marjorie would excitedly talk about the topic, not realizing that some students may have been left behind. A measurable example would be lectures that had been assigned two class days on the sylabus but were completed in less than one full class period. Later, assignement deadlines were extended due to multiple questions about the assignment, even though the second lecture date was used as a work-day. Also, when doing labs in front of the class, Marjorie would simultaniously plan, design, and type in the program code at about 15 WPM. anybody that types less than 20 WPM (by touch;never looking at the keys) canʻt keep up with the typing, let alone be listening to the logic-planning and explainations. [I donʻt remember what the typing requirement is for the IT Program but my point is that sometimes a professor needs to stop and let everyone catch up, and watch for blank "Iʻm typing what shes saying but I have no clue why" stares in the classroom.
15. Other comments:
I made plenty of suggestions to improve this course, but keep in mind these suggestions are to bring the class from its current 8.5 up to a perfect 10! Again, Marjorie was always happy to answer questions during class, at the end of class, during office hours, or by email.
Marjorie is the best at what she does. I want to be like her.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS104, Fall 2012     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 104 - Computer Hardware Support Crn (Section): 17033 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.45 11 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.55 11 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Marge was very helpful and very easy to talk to. She goes over assignments and makes it easier to understand.
I appreciated that the instructional content and activities were relevant to real work environments.
I enjoyed learning about hardware.
Assignments and such were simple and easy to do because of the instructorʻs effective instructions and help.
i liked the hands-on projects. I also liked how Marjorie tells stories that relate to what we are learning.
I liked the layout of this course. For example lecture first then some days weʻll have lab days. I enjoyed that a lot of the work was independent and we maintain our own work schedule. The hands on labs were fun and good because they were moderate and not to advanced.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
Use a better more up to date book
The required textbooks were a bit outdated. It would help if they were more current. It would be useful to be able to print out study guide questions. As it now stands the print outs students get to keep provide no context to the original material asked. This is of no use to aid us in our studies.
NEW UPDATED BOOK !!!!!!
Not Really
no
I honestly thought this course would have way more hands on labs. At the beginning of the course I thought we were going to learn how to take a whole computer a part then put it back together. So a way to improve this course is to have more hands on labs because it gives you more experience and also more enjoyable.
15. Other comments:
Marjorie made the difference on my understanding of the course.
Thank you Marjorie for a great semester. Thank you for your consideration and teachings. Also, thanks for the related stories.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS218, Fall 2012     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 218 - Help Desk Support Crn (Section): 17036 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%) 1 (14%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 7 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 1 (14%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 7 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 3 (43%) 1 (14%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 7 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 4 (57%) 1 (14%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 7 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 3 (43%) 1 (14%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%) 1 (14%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%) 1 (14%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 7 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 1 (14%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 7 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 1 (14%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.33 7 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 2 (29%) 3 (43%) 1 (14%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 7 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 1 (14%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 7 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 1 (14%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
none
very helpful teaching style, she is always willing to help you along.
group projects were spread out and even
The group projects were especially helpful in thinking critically about helping computer users in the field
Class involvement with activities and projects. Assignments also included solo and group activities. Learned alot from this class. Excellent style in educating the student. When I needed clarification on something not understood.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
none
none
Keep the instructor and her style of teaching
15. Other comments:
donʻt want to be a help desk support person
Do not let this instructor and her style of teaching go, terminate her from this major....She is an effective instructor and understands the topic exceptionally. She is the reason I am still in this major.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ICS101, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information& Computer Sciences
Course: ICS 101 - Digital Tools for Info World Crn (Section): 16457 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.58 12 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 3 (25%) 8 (67%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.58 12 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (42%) 7 (58%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.42 12 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 8 (67%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 12 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 4 (33%) 7 (58%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 12 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 8 (67%) 1 (8%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I learned an incredible amount of applicable information that I am estatic. Marjorie is a great teacher who is most earnest and goes the extra mile for her students. SHE IS THE BEST!! Without her encouragement and patient teaching style I would not have made it through the semester. Mahalos Marjorie
I liked that the course gave a a fundamental overview of microsoft programs so it made it easier for students to there homework or run a business or anything.
I liked how we got to work at our own pace when it came to the computer works.
Having hands on work and being able to get experience on how to work with the programs.
Not TOO difficult at all. I enjoyed the class.
This was my favorite class of the semester!
Everything was extremely interesting and I was suprised i liked the class as much as i did. I had a Great Instructor.
Too much work work thruʻs, and labs.
I liked this course because it thought me more about computers and the way around them.
everything was hands on and fun.
I enjoyed this class. It helped me learn more material about computers. I enjoy being able to do the hands on labs in the textbook. The textbook is very useful.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
The keys names and the words that are to be type should stand out by either italicizing or making them bold. Otherwise it is a bit ambiguous. I think that Marjorie could improve her teaching simply by demonstrating Excell and Access on the screen for everyone to see. Perhaps she could show us one function each day. That would be a big help.
I thought the course was good as it was.
No.
I feel like a lot of the tests had some questions that weren't really relevant like a lot of the abbreviations I didn't feel I needed.
None.
Too much work. Especially at the end of the year...
I feel this course does not need any improvments.
Too much work and little time. ease down on work.
15. Other comments:
Great teacher! Great class! Thank so much...............
Thanks a bunch Mrs. Marjorie Hale-Fishman.
It was awesome!!!
N/A
Overall good teacher who knows alot about subject.
Marjorie Hale Fishman is a great instructor that will teach you the basics and more about computers.
Best instructor i had so far.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS108, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 108 - Computer Software Support Crn (Section): 16035 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.78 9 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 7 (78%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.78 9 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 7 (78%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.78 9 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 7 (78%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I liked that the teacher gives feedback on all work done. I liked that the teacher helped whenever possible.
all of them
What I liked about the course was especially helpful when Marjorie tied into the assignment activities that helped to grasp the formulas that was presented in the textbook. By giving real examples in projects or activities for class involvement helped me to learn concepts and formulas much easier.
in this class i leard more than in any other class ive takin in the past.
The only problem was the poor condition of the hardware in the classroom. A great deal of time was wasted trying to keep the computers up and running.
great teacher, very well prepared and knowledgeable
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
None.
none
mybe start using google doc to share the files with the students. and that way they cant lose them or say that they didnʻt get them.
15. Other comments:
Keep up the good work!!
one of the few classes that actually teaches you something useful.
This is one of my favorite classes that was not a theatre class. i think that they should have more money for new computers and other things that they might need. for the IT classes that they teach.
I feel that we, students, never got our moneys worth. It wasn't the teacher's fault. Who to blame? That's not the focus. It's more of how we could implement what we have and what we could have improved. Nevertheless, Marjorie exucuted her work task by helping us understand the software program. I would have wish that we could receive the full potential of this class.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS118, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 118 - Visual Basic Progmng Bus. Apps Crn (Section): 16036 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 10 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 10 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Really enjoyed the different programming assignments we got to work on.
making programs that works
Everything
the exercises were very helpful and of course the teacher was so helpful that this class was great.
I like the way Marjorie teaches the course. I learned a lot from the information she provied the class and the examples. She is organized and on time and this helps me to be a better student. I like the visual basic book and be able to use the visual basic program at home.
learned a lot of programming knowledge. Awesome course
Labs were great practice and the opportunity to have lab hrs in class helped to get the help I needed. I appreciate the patience and understanding Marjorie has shown as she went over and beyond to help me accomplish my goals to complete the course. Thankyou. Marjorie has been very encouraging, and at the very end when i needed it most... she gave us a pep talk at the end to boost our energy from all the stress from the semester ending.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
None overall a great class
none
None
none it was great
I would like to take the third programming class from Marjorie. She has a style that I am comfortable with and so much information to offer the students with the added information from the books. I believe it would be a good idea to take the third programming class from Marjorie since there are 3 sections. Thank you.
need more time for final chapter on arrays
none... I'm very happy knowing she is scheduled to be here in the near future semesters while i'm planning on completing my courses needed. Thankyou , thankyou ;)
15. Other comments:
Overall I think I learned a lot in this class.
I would like to see other programming classes to help us get ready to enter the programing world
Marjorie is an excellent instructor. She has taught me so much information in the ITS 118 course. She provides good instruction and lessons with the course. She provides her students with a good foundation. She uses a variety of was to educate her class using universal design to provide a great education. Marjorie also brings with her years of experience and knowledge that she applies to her course that I would not find in a book. She motivates the class and keeps moral up, she knows the content of the course can be overwhelming and does not want us to give up.
Marjorie is an excellent teacher. She recognizes the individuals that learn things from a visual point of view and attempts to include that within her presentations of class lectures and actual live examples of the teaching materials. I have learned much from her as to other professors. Keep her in the computer technology instructor list. She is like a walking encyclopedia for programming knowledge and helps student learn with her teaching style.
God bless you for sharing, and thank you to the University for giving Marjorie this opportunity which has been an inspiration to us all.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS121, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 121 - Computing Topics Crn (Section): 16037 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.88 8 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 7 (88%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.38 8 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 5 (63%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 8 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%) 7 (88%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
none
great teacher love taking her classes look forward to more classes
Extra Labs in class on topics that were a little more challenging, helped me to feel comfortable enough to move ahead.
I really liked the ending where I was able to learn command line and linux terminal language. I feel like a geeky nerd being able to nagivate the computer the old fashioned way.
the ability of the Proffessor to adjust the required course materials to make the class work was greatly appreciated. She put a lot of extra work into this class just to make it work. This was needed since the lack of the proper hardware to run the software correctly made the class harder then needed.
poor classroom equipment, non-functional omputers.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
newer pc for labs
none
yes! NEW Computers!!! Most of the work was DELAYED due to computers that were not usable from running too slow to freezing up and going down!
Please assign workstations that are more capable of running Windows 7 and Microsoft Virtual PC simultaneously, or allow the class to set up the workstations for dual-booting. Far too much time was wasted waiting working with those with PCs which were largely incapable of doing what was needed.
NEW Computer hardware needed to run virtualization for two OS successfully. Please invest more money in more powerful computers to be able to handle virtualization. Beginning of class was trial and error learning process, but I was able to get my hands on a reliable machine, others in my class were not so lucky.
replace the exsisting computers to allow for the use of hardware virtualuization. This is needed to run any windows 7 computer in a virtual enviroment with Vitrual PC 2007. Or select a different Linux that will work with the present Hardware configuration.
15. Other comments:
school is lucky to have her
Thank you Marjorie for sharing your experience/knowledge. You are very appreciated and I'm looking forward to seeing you in the next semester!!!!
This class was a test in frustration and patience. The inability to be able to have computers that didnt work and you would try to run Virtual PC but after 22 attempts and still no sucess in any given day for one machine is really a ridiculous situation. This caused the class to spend and waste time, when we could have been using this time to learn. When a student walks into class the computers should work That is why we pay for these clases. Thankfully Marjorie put in extra work and really is the only reason this class was even able to be attempted. Those that read this should understand the extra hours and time she put in to this class just to make it work. She is a credit to the education community, since some professors would have just shrugged and not cared but she showed sincere dedication and commitment to her proffesion as well as her students. Thanks Marjorie for all your hard work.you will be missed.
I enjoyed learning the concepts from this class. I now have a virtual machine set up on my own laptop. Will keep trying to master Fedora with it installed on my machine.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: BUSN150, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Business Technology
Course: BUSN 150 - Intro To Business Computing Crn (Section): 15176 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.58 12 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.58 12 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.17 12 1.4 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 8 (67%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.25 12 1.29 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 1 (8%) 8 (67%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.25 12 1.29 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 1 (8%) 8 (67%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 1.21 Freq(%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 1.21 Freq(%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.58 12 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I really love this course because it taught me how to use all the office application such as words, excel, powerpoint and access. Marjorie was really helpful and fun to work with. Great job Marjorie :-)
where informative but could only do it in class
I liked working at my own pace and especially liked that we were learning Microsoft 2010.
I liked everything especially the project we did on Lisbon. We (group members) had never done powerPoint at all, and after learning how to do it in this class we all did okay on our project. Majorie is a super insstructor. She made enjoy this class instead of being bores. She was there 24-7 when I didn't understand the work. She took time to over with me the problems I was having. I recommend everybody to take a class with Majorie.
i really started college again to learn these programs. But while working my way up to it, i began to be scared to take the class because after learning that it was all 4 programs at once! But it was a great experience, and i'm glad i went through it! Marjorie was a very helpful && patient teacher with lots of knowledge on the programs. I have downloaded the programs at home && am very excited to play around && explore the many great things i can do with them!
Some of the things that I enjoyed most about this class were the daily assignments. I learned a lot about excel and access on Microsoft word that I did not know before. By learning these skills I am better prepared to work in a real life settings.
I learned power point and how fun it is to use this program, I learned that excel is very complicating however Mrs. Fishman did an excellent job assuring me that excel is a beneficial for my future for accounting or bills.
Marjorie was my favorite teacher. She helped everyone and was not fake. She had a great personality and is a genuine person who enjoyed her students and job. She returned emails promply Thank You!!!
doing the assignments online with my it lab was very useful and efficent
this course was very heplful to me, because it made me more sharp in my computer skills.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
get rid of the online type of work if i wanted to learn it on line then why am i here stiing in a class i could be at home
None.
Maybeb give a choice to the student to just take one or two program each... i know it'll take longer && need more teacher time that we are scarce of, but that wud be cool to break in half again just to get to concentrate on each program more with a teacher there...
N/A
Make the IT lab more understandable any user friendly. Also make it more compatible for home use.
yeah get rid of the IT Lab. Sometimes there is not enough time to do the skill based or grader in the IT and I would have to submit my undone. Furthermore, there are short cut's to exiting out of the program however the IT will mark me as "incorrect". Which I believe is ridiculous getting something marked wrong for doing it a faster way.
The testing techniques. It was the computers way or no way
none
15. Other comments:
I dont have any other comments besides can Marjorie continue to teach BUSN 151 next semester.. thanks
the instructor was very good with helping us... but the online aspect forced me to only do the work on line
I highly recommend this course to anyone who is interested about learning Microsoft word and its other functions.
Mrs. Fishman assured me that the book is self explanatory and that the tools the book provides will come in handy in the near future. Yeah keep her as an instructor for this course.
I am extremely sorry to not see her as an instructor for BUSN anymore. ?!
enjoyed the class learned alot

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: BUSN151, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Business Technology
Course: BUSN 151 - Intermed Business Computing Crn (Section): 15177 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.93 14 0.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 13 (93%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.93 14 0.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 13 (93%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.93 14 0.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 13 (93%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 14 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 12 (86%) 1 (7%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 14 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 12 (86%) 1 (7%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (85%) 1 (8%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.93 14 0.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 13 (93%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I liked learning all the different programs. It was very beneficial for me.
The fact that I was able to do some work from home!
I liked that I had set dates when assignments were due because it kept me on track. If for some reason I was unable to finish anything by the due date, I liked that I was still able to submit the assignment.
I like the myitlab program. It was fun.
That you could do it on line and not have to come to class to submit the work.
The ability to really apply myself and learn today's technology and tricks of the trade.
I enjoy working with computers so I like pretty much everything about this course.
Great class wonderful teacher the is easy to learn from.. Would take class from her again..
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
The only problem I had was that I clicked on a pop up and wasn't able to use the MyItLab anymore.
No
This course went pretty smoothly for me so no, I don't have any suggestions.
No improvements needed.
None
No Comments
No, everything is fine.
None
15. Other comments:
Mrs. Hale Fishman went above and beyond to help me. She was really great and I really liked her class.
She is a great instructor!!
I enjoyed having Marjorie Hale-Fishman as an instructor. She was very helpful in my succeeding in this class.
Very great insturctor.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ICS101, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information& Computer Sciences
Course: ICS 101 - Digital Tools for Info World Crn (Section): 15200 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 12 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 7 (58%) 1 (8%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.25 12 1.22 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 3 (25%) 7 (58%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.42 12 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 3 (25%) 7 (58%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I liked how the course was well balanced with lectures and hands-on work
I liked the general environment of the class. When I first walked in it was apparent that whatever we did it was going to be fairly computer intensive. Indeed it was, but not in the sense that I predicted. I assumed that it was all going to be rigidly planned and regulated, but while there were deadlines to meet and plans to comply with, myself along with all the other students were given the option of doing the work whenever we felt like doing so. As long as they got done on time there were no problems. I think that such a free flowing environment is an important goal for all teachers to stride for as it encourages students to think for themselves and accomplish things in ways that work for them; aka: self improvement and future preparation; letting students discover what works and what does not. Such is the definition of education.
The pacing of the class was spot on because it forced me to keep doing the work and to keep up with our assignments.
I found the ICS 101 course highly useful and informative for tasks that I can perform in and out of class. Professor Hale-Fishman is a great teacher and takes time to aid her students with whatever problem they may have. She gives adequate time to complete your work, and constant reminders when they are due. All in all I highly recommend that you take her class if you are interested in learning more on computers and the programs you can utilize on them.
The work was a good amount.
The most enriching part of this class were the lectures because Marjorie brought in so many current topics relating to the technological world today. It was eye opening and informative, I feel like I am a better computer-user because of this.
I liked the overall class. I would recommend it to anyone because the book is really clear on instructions and sheʻll help you figure out thing that you donʻt understand
I thought the text book, though expensive, was very good at walking syudents through the steps during the work through. Lacked a lot of explination for the labs. The assingments were fun, exciting, and challenging.
Very informative about Microsoft Office which is very important to know how to operate.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
n/a
I would have liked to see a little more emphasis on Excel and Access to help prepare for other classes which use them (such as Accounting and Database Programming).
Only that some of the due date are a little confusing.
The text book slacked off on explination for the labs making it a challenge to go back into the work through and determin how to connect the steps to the new material presented in the labs. The pace of the class was extreemly fast and covered way to much material for one class.
I have no ways to imporve.
15. Other comments:
Mahalo for being a great teacher!!
I really appreciate Marjorie. She was extreemly patient, understanding, and flexable with me - even when I was being a grump. I disliked the idea of two,or more, professors making-up the test and quizʻs. I sincerly feel that each class is different, and each teacher knows their class and what is appropriate for that class, therefore I feel that each professor should make-up the testʻs and quizʻs for their classʻs.
Very helpful class.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS103, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 103 - Intro to Programming Process Crn (Section): 15202 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 9 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
It was good to learn how to create and troubleshoot computer programs.
Loved the presentation AND the practice/examples given! Great work ;) Thanx for sharing your knowledge!!! xoxox's...!
well prepared teacher
Majorie is an excellent instructor. She is willing and able to assist me whenever I do not understand the lesson or need further explanation for an understanding of the subject. It was all new to me, but she helped me to acquire meaningful knowledge of this subject. I want to take more classes from her instead of from Mrs. Brown
programming part
I like everything about this course. it helped me understand the basic of programming. i enjoy doing it.
The course work is challenging but Marjorie is an excellent instructor and she breaks the process of programming down in order for her students to learn how to program and understand the complexity of programming.
that the teacher was very helpful and available to help us in a course that was very difficult. She was also able to make changes in the course to accomidate the class and students.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
...
I think the course needs a better book that gives more examples of programming, the syntax errors, more explanation of commands and usages. Sometimes I found it hard to do the labs because examples were not present in the course handbook or lab book. That would be a great improvement.
none
I wish Marjorie would teach all three of the programming courses. Her experience in programming is evident in the difficult components she teaches her students.
no, the only thing i would suggest is that Mrs. Hale-Fishman should be the teacher. she knows her stuff and is a great teacher
15. Other comments:
Thank You for offering this course and more! I appreciate it very much.
I love Majorieʻs teaching style. Keep up the good work.
good
Marjorie sets a high standard as an instructor that should be a model for excellence and ethics. I have been fortunate to have her as my instructor.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS104, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 104 - Computer Hardware Support Crn (Section): 15203 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.78 9 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 7 (78%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.78 9 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 7 (78%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
It was good to learn about the hardware of the computer and how to fix them.
great teacher
Hands on
the course was good. not great but then I am not a big fan of the CompTIA exams system
I liked being able to take apart a computer and do hands-on work with the hardware.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
more hands on
get more updated material
Please use a textbook that shows greater emphasis on topics that we as aspiring Techs will be working with in the future. For example, Windows 7 and/or 8, implementing and supporting hardware for Cloud Computing, less emphasis on obsolete technologies like floppy drives and old RIMMs (such legacy technologies can probably be looked up as needed in the field).
15. Other comments:
more hands on

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: BUSN151, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Business Technology
Course: BUSN 151 - Intermed Business Computing Crn (Section): 18188 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 13 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 13 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 12 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Learning the basics, for example, all the assignments we did in class.
What I liked about this course is the assignments and test...that may sound weird, but I did enjoy the work it.
It was very challenging, but I learned a lot during this semester. Mrs. Fishman is a very helpful, nice and a good teacher that helps you in every way possible. She seems to go way and beyond for her students and that is a good feeling that motivates me to do a good job in her class and get all the work done. Great Job! Mrs. Fishman. Have a great Summer!
I learned so much about the software with the assistance and instruction from Marjorie Hale-Fishman. She can explain in detail abouth why the a problem has occured or which application works best for a project. She also trouble-shoots errors in the book for students.
marjorie is a very well organized teacher which made my learning a whole lot easier.
This course is really interesting and will help alot in the future.
I liked how Marjorie always has an open mind and she cares for us as students because she makes assignments and quizzes easy for us to handle because we have more then one class were taking.
I was able to learn a lot with the book that we used for the course. Marjorie was also a huge help in my understanding. Anytime that I had a question she was always there to answer them and help with my work. She never said "I don't know" or "I'll have to get back to you", she was always able to answer my questions right away.
I enjoyed the pace. I didn't feel rushed.
The work is that you work at your own pace.
I liked the independence we had. We could work on our assignments at our own pace & Marjorie was always more than happy to help us when we got stuck on a section. I also like the fact that we had a choice to work out of the book or the MyIT lab program, because the book was easier for me.
You were on you own
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
None.
The only thing I can think of, but I know they are changing it for next semester, is that they should use the Microsoft 2010 version. It was kinda of hard to do my homework at home because in class they have 2007 version but yet it was a great challenge for me. I think that every time that Microsoft office comes out with a new version, the school(s) should change also, it would make things a lot more easier.
I think she covers it all. Great Job!
The course was taught well and look forward to taking more courses from HawCC with Marjorie Hale-Fishman.
none.
No
nothing
Allow her to teach more courses in business technology.
No.
none
15. Other comments:
Marjorie is a great teacher. She is very helpful and would explain at any time if I did not understand a question or assignment. I would be more then willing to have Marjorie as a teacher again.
Marjorie is one of the "BEST" instructors I had so far for in taking business classes. She is very helpful and patient when you ask for help with your work.
Does a Great Job, very pleasant teacher to have.
I have had many instructors during the course of my education and Marjorie Hale-Fishman stands out as an educator. She has high standards for her students as well as herself. She sets the bar high with the quality of instuction, teaching style and outcome for which students walk away from this course with a wealth of knowledge. If I were to grade Marjorie Hale-Fishman she gets an "A". We are fortunate to have here and I look forward to her return in 2011-2012.
I wouldnt recommend this course to anyone
I enjoy having Marjorie as a teacher and I would love to take any class that she would be instructing!
None

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ICS101, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information& Computer Sciences
Course: ICS 101 - Digital Tools for Info World Crn (Section): 18207 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.7 10 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 1 (10%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 11 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 2 (18%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 10 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Every thing. I like working on the labs.
I enjoyed the hands on learning in this class. It was easy to complete assignments on the computer after watching her lectures and presentations on the chapter by power point.
lots of repition to lear the application.
it was all relay good information to know. Now i can do a lot more stuff with all the Office programs.
I got to learn more about things on the comupters
I liked the prowerpoint presentations. and the textbook work was good to show you the programs.
I liked everything about this class. I learned so many new things about computer programs that I never knew. Marjorie was an excellent teacher and I would quickly take another class from her if I needed to take another computer class. She was always willing to help me whenever I needed to and was very patient and understanding in the way she taught and interacted with me.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
Perfect
None.
N/A
The class was great, i would not change anything about the class.
not really
have two points of view on the side of computers, have a Mac/Apple side and a PC side so students can do the course work regardless of the type of computer they have. I have a Mac/Apple computer and I was not able to figure out the different configurations of the programs that is was using.
I enjoyed the class just the way it is!
15. Other comments:
It is a great class!
I didn't like the fact that I needed to buy a $100 textbook for this course that will be obsolete next semester.
N/A
Cheaper books would be nice, I spent about 200 dollars one books for this class
Didn't like the proram Access at all!!! There are to many things to do in that program and didn't really understand the uses for some of the functions in access. but I guess it was alright. Overall I enjoyed the class and she was a great help with the programs when we had questions.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS118, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 118 - Visual Basic Progmng Bus. Apps Crn (Section): 18211 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Great instructor!
wonderful course and has sparked to my interest and desire to program
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
Keep this same instructor for all the programming courses.
15. Other comments:
No survey responses were found.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ITS121, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information Technology
Course: ITS 121 - Computing Topics Crn (Section): 18212 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.14 7 1.46 Freq(%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 4 (57%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Enjoyed learning about the different commands in DOS and Fedora Core 4. Also liked learning about how to set up Virtual PC and enable parallel Operating Systems.
This book was terrible. It was difficult to follow and the flow was terrible. The only good thing about it... the instructor went through the material prior to assigning it to students. She was aware of mistakes in the book and let us know where we would experience problems.
Learned a lot, despite a textbook that was not very well-organized and often not easy to use
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
May want to spend a little more time on batch/script files. Maybe some type of group project with them?? Really enjoyed learning how to create them.
Change the book.
Find a better text
15. Other comments:
Generally, I enjoyed this class a lot.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: BUSN121, Fall 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Business Technology
Course: BUSN 121 - Intro to Word Processing Crn (Section): 17149 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.83 7 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 1 (14%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%) 1 (14%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.57 7 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Helped me improve my skills
I liked that the course was online and i had a great instructor if i ever needed help.
I enjoyed this class with her. She is a wonderful instructor and I would love to have her again as a teacher.
I liked this class alot because I have learned alot from this class! I did not know not a thing about computer in my life. So, yes this class has a benifited me!
Well this course has helped get really familiarized with the keys on the keyboard. Now I can type pretty fast without looking at the keyboard by memorization.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
none
nope
N/A
This class need tutors to help students like me!
15. Other comments:
There are know more comments!

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: BUSN150, Fall 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Business Technology
Course: BUSN 150 - Intro To Business Computing Crn (Section): 17159 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I really enjoyed how easy it was to follow along with assignments, she always provided help to students and she always had alternative ways to complete assignments
I would think we need more time to finish all my work.
She was there to assist me with all of my questions and was able to answer them right away.
Marjorie Hale-Fishman is an excellent teacher. She reviewed each assignment and did it herself as well and came back to class and gave us her input on how it should be done. If the book went a longer way she taught us the easier way. She is an excellent teacher. Great job Marjorie!!!
Everything
I Like this course, because Mrs. Marjorie gave us great step by step learning to help us get through assignments.
I liked that it really helped me improve on my computer skills
What I like about this course that it taught me a lot more about Microsoft office. The assignments were good and pretty much self explainable. I can't wait to take BUSN 151 =0)
At first I didn't think I could handle this course, but Mrs. Hale-Fishman did such a great job I'm enrolling in another course of hers, for sure.She 's thorough and concise with the way she teaches.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
This course is fine the way it is
Overall, Great Job! Marj.
nothing you are doing good
N/A
None
Not at all, this course was well taught!
No
15. Other comments:
Great class i would recommend it to anyone
N/A
None
Mrs. Marjorie is one of the BEST teachers for Business

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: BUSN151, Fall 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Business Technology
Course: BUSN 151 - Intermed Business Computing Crn (Section): 17162 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
Very interesting subject matter, which Marjorie Hale-Fishman presents in a clear manner with real-life examples. Each quiz is tailored to stress actual work-related situations that we will experience. This is a great improvement over only following the publisher's on-line program.
everything was great!
i liked doing group activities and discussions that marjorie did to teach the material to us
Marjorie Hale-Fishman is an excellent teacher. She reviewed each assignment and did it herself as well and came back to class and gave us her input on how it should be done. If the book went a longer way she taught us the easier way. She is an excellent teacher. Great job Marjorie!!!
This course helped me further understand how to best utilize microsoft office 2007. The programs are quite difficult to understand by yourself, so as a student, I would recommend taking this class to any of my fellow students.
I like Ms. Fishman and the course helped me brush up on the stuff I already know. I learned alot from her. Very cool class.
The teacher plus learning new things from the class work.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
Nothing.
nope its great
None
not that I can think of
No
15. Other comments:
None.
Marjorie is a great teacher who helped me learn the course materials using the easiest methods possible. She made learning fun for me!
Do the course material on myIT Lab!!! It is much faster than doing it from the book.
not really
No

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: ICS101, Fall 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Information& Computer Sciences
Course: ICS 101 - Digital Tools for Info World Crn (Section): 17348 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.45 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (55%) 5 (45%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.4 10 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 4 (40%) 5 (50%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.27 11 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 4 (36%) 5 (45%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 10 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 6 (60%) 1 (10%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.18 11 0.87 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 3 (27%) 5 (45%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 10 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 6 (60%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
The course its self was rather basic and most of the basics I knew already, so I had expected to be bored with this class.I was not however bored and was surprised in how much more I know about the Microsoft office suit. Should I ever need these tools in the future I believe that I am sufficiently ready to tackle most tasks.
Good class all the way round. Ms. Hale-Fishman knows her stuff, and did an excellent job of sharing that knowledge with her students.
I enjoyed the exchange with the teacher and the lab work the most. The class was very enjoyable and would recomend it to others
there should be more help in understanding some of the course contents
I knew how to do most of the stuff, but mrs.fishman helped me to really understand and utilize the digital tools. Always very helpful wonderful teacher
Excellent course! I have used Microsoft Windows for years, but now I really know how to create quality products.
Vry organized course. Assigment due dates were fair and clear.
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
Perhaps a field trip to see some course related material in person..
None.
No, Not really. Everything in my opinion was spot on.
None.
15. Other comments:
I enjoyed this class very much.
Instructor very helpful. I highly recommend this course to anyone that may want to improve their computer skills.

Marjorie Hale-Fishman: BUSN189, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Business Technology
Course: BUSN 189 - Business Mathematics Crn (Section): 16316 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 12 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (42%) 7 (58%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 12 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 4 (33%) 7 (58%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 12 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (42%) 7 (58%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 12 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 3 (25%) 8 (67%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 12 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (42%) 7 (58%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 12 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (42%) 7 (58%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%)