University of Hawai'i eCAFE

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

Instructor: William Sharkey

Available Survey Results

SP 380, Summer II 2012
SP 455, Fall 2011
SP 455, Fall 2010

William Sharkey: SP 380, Summer II 2012

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Communicology
Course:	SP 380 - Family Communication	Crn (Section):	92051 (701)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
4.0	6	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (100%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
1.4	5	0.55	Freq(%)	3 (60%)	2 (40%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	6	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (100%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	6	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (100%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	6	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (33%)	4 (67%)

6. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	6	0.41	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	5 (83%)

7. I gained a better understanding of myself through this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	6	0.82	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	2 (33%)	3 (50%)

8. I improved my abilities to revise my rough drafts and to make my writing more effective.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	5	0.55	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (40%)	3 (60%)

9. I try to relate what I learn in this course to my own experience.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	6	0.41	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	5 (83%)

10. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	6	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (33%)	4 (67%)

11. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?

The availability of the professor at office hours for assistance.

I loved this course, the lectures were entertaining and helpful.

communication techniques and coping mechanisms when dealing with stress

The lecture material was full of information. The material was over and beyond what the book could have provided for me and was also a point of clarity when the book was confusing. Also, going back and making corrections on my papers helped a lot. I had many common mistakes in my papers that I would often make so it helped me realize how often I misuse grammar.

12. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	5	0.55	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (40%)	3 (60%)

13. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	6	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (33%)	4 (67%)

14. The instructor acknowledges all questions insofar as possible.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	6	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (33%)	4 (67%)

15. Students in this course are free to disagree and ask questions.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	6	0.41	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	5 (83%)

16. The instructor's feedback about my writing helped me become a better writer.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	6	0.41	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	5 (83%)

17. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	6	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (100%)

18. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	6	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (100%)

19. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

Nothing

more detailed notes on power point lecture slides

I had a hard time with the tests, and maybe try a podcast so students will be able to look back on lectures. Lectures are very detailed, and sometimes it is hard to write down all of the information.

Sometimes he gets a little carried away and talks fast (not so much fast, but spitting out a LOT of important information and it gets difficult to keep up)

20. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Encouraging, helpful, and meticulous

knowledgable helpful

knowledgeable, educated

Enthusiastic and knowledgable

organized, knowledgeable

21. Assignments make students think.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	6	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (33%)	4 (67%)

22. The assigned readings significantly contribute to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	6	0.82	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	2 (33%)	3 (50%)

23. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were an asset to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	6	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (33%)	4 (67%)

24. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	6	0.84	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	1 (17%)	4 (67%)

25. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.67	6	0.82	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (17%)	0 (0%)	5 (83%)

26. Other comments:

No survey responses were found.

William Sharkey: SP 455, Fall 2011 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Communicology
Course:	SP 455 - Conflict Management	Crn (Section):	76170 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	37	0.31	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (11%)	33 (89%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.78	37	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	8 (22%)	29 (78%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.86	37	0.35	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (14%)	32 (86%)

4. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.78	37	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	6 (16%)	30 (81%)

5. I gained a better understanding of myself through this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.84	37	0.37	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (16%)	31 (84%)

6. I try to relate what I learn in this course to my own experience.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.84	37	0.37	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (16%)	31 (84%)

7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

The material that we learned was very useful and interesting for future conflicts.

Everything. I found the whole course to be really interesting especially since I was able to actually apple what I learned in my daily life. The way he used examples of his own life and related it to where it was easier for us to understand was really awesome.

When he using his personal experiences as examples

everything

Personal examples from his own experiences

Very good professor. His teaching style is very easy to learn and understand. Keeps me interested doing class and also take the time to know his students. Really good public speaker and lecture.

being able to use what i learned in my own relationships

almost everything

I appreciated the reviews before the opportunities. It showed that Dr. Sharkey wants his students to do well and prepares them effectively.

it helped me to deal with conflicts

Learning about anger management.

Conflict behaviors and tactics that I consistently see myself and my conflict partners engaging in.

Learning the different aspects of conflict and how I can better manage the conflicts that I experience.

All the materials in this class can be related to our actual life both inside and outside of school. It is very nice.

Prof. Sharkey seemed very knowledgeable about the course material.

Providing personal examples and journals for us to connect with and see within our own lives.

Dr. Sharkey uses personal examples and relates the material to our own personal lives. This not only helps me understand the subject matter better, but also allows me to use what I learn in the classroom and apply to my everyday life situations. By writing about our own personal encounters with conflicts, I am able to use the concepts to improve my management skills to better my relationships.

EVERYTHING!!! This course was SUPER awesome and I am truly grateful I took this course. The information that I obtained throughout the semester has helped me in present conflicts and I know that going into social work, the knowledge I have gained will definitely help me. It has also helped me resolve past issues that was never resolved and it has given me greater sense of how problems occur. I am more aware and conscious as to how approach conflict and how to deescalate it.

Learning different ways that people deal with conflict

The skills section

Dr. Sharkey did an excellent job when it came to explaining the course content. He used lots and lots of examples to make it easier for his students to understand.

The personal stories that attached to the lecture made the concepts easy to understand

All of the theories and concepts we learned along with the examples Dr. Sharkey gave us, made our class a valuable skills based lesson.

everything

all the material was very applicable to real world situations

EVERYTHING! This class has helped shape me into a better person. I feel like i have gained tools in this class that i will use for the rest of my life! This class should be a requirement!

This is hard to say because individual elements of the course, by themselves, don't make sense. The value of the course was the integration of all the theories and concepts into a theme that could be internalized...applying them practically to our lives.

The journal entries were valuable because they got me to apply what we were learning to my own life.

I thought everything that was covered throughout this course was valuable and I will efinitely apply the knowledge that I have learned.

The most valuable aspects of the course to me were the examples that Dr. Sharkey provided to the class when he explained certain concepts/theories. By giving these examples, it helped me view him as a more credible source on the subject matter.

8. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

Too many things were based off of tests and papers. It would've been more useful to work through actual live examples and be graded on that rather than stuff we just memorized.

N/A

The online notes. They should be more extensive.

n/a

The powerpoints were too vague. I don't necessarily think everything should be written down but they were presented in too much of a broad outline form

None.

nothing

n/a

Don't know

N/A

None.

Sometimes Prof. Sharkey would go too fast so his students would be confused about the material being covered. It would be good if he made sure time to time that everyone was on the same page.

I didn't really feel that there were any aspects that were least valuable. Everything that I learned in this class could be applicable and used during my conflicts.

I like everything. Though something that I does need improvement on was class engagement. He should include class activities so that everyone is more engaged. I get a greater grasp of the subject and topics.

Having to hear the same set of stories Sharkey uses during the entire semester. If I have to hear about "squeezing the tooth paste from the bottom" one more time i might go insane.

Theories for Understanding conflict

There were no least valuable aspects.

I have yet to find an aspect of this course that was not needed

Nothing. Everything was important! Dr. Sharkey would teach us a theory/concept, and his personal examples or videos would help create an idea of how we'd apply it to our conflict situations.

none

not being able to access the power-points from class on laulima.

I don't think multiple choice tests are the way to go for a course like this. There are many definitions that I will not explicitly remember 6 months from now, so why test them specifically? It was nice that the questions were wrapped in application scenarios, but it was still testing Vocab a lot. The scores on the 2nd test may have been lower, but I think essays are better mode assessment given the course topic.

None

The least valuable aspect of the course were the surveys. They played a small role in the subject and kind of lost its place as soon as we finished discussing about it.

9. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	37	0.65	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	1 (3%)	5 (14%)	30 (81%)

10. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	37	0.31	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (11%)	33 (89%)

11. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.84	37	0.37	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (16%)	31 (84%)

12. The instructor acknowledges all questions insofar as possible.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	37	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	9 (24%)	27 (73%)

13. Students in this course are free to disagree and ask questions.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.76	37	0.43	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	9 (24%)	28 (76%)

14. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.64	33	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (15%)	2 (6%)	26 (79%)

15. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.91	35	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (9%)	32 (91%)

16. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

More grading by showing that we learned rather than just being tested on it or writing about it.

I think he should have less opportunities aka test I think he should of had us actually use the material more in our own life and maybe came up with a project of some sort. I really didn't like how our grade was just based on the opportunities and the journals and there wasn't other ways to get points.

Better powerpoints

repeat things more, have definitions on the powerpoint along when speaking

Switch up the lecture style more. Make powerpoints more interesting.

Maybe have more questions on the exams

not much to improve upon

multiple choice-only exams

My only suggestion would be to do more class discussion versus lectures.

Talk a little more about conflict management with coworkers, talking about how to come to a resolution in a conflict.

I don't believe I can make any suggestions that would improve this course beyond its current exceptional standing.

The power points can get a bit confusing and the professor isn't always clear. For instance, we would learn five different things but it would not be clear that all of these things fall under a certain category. It would be more helpful if concepts and all of the factors within that concept were better labeled in the power points and if the professor clarified this better during lectures.

I am a very visual thinker and I also learn well by doing, not just by lecture, so maybe incorporating more interactive activities may help me learn the material better.

As mentioned earlier, I just would like for him to engage the class more by utilizing group activities and maybe perhaps class projects.

come up with more examples for lecture. You claim conflict is everywhere but you sound like a broken record with your go to stories.

Less redundancy during lectures

He's doing a great job with how he's teaching this course.

I dont always like how the sides are set up

Make sure he keeps hydrated so he does not feel dizzy!

none

I honestly can't think of one thing he should improve, this class was well planned out.

The course is set up to be a typical lecture style course. However, the content makes it perfect for doing a lot more collaborative learning and discussion based approaches. I think just about everyone in the class had several moments where they thought, "That sounds just like me and my relationship!! I never realized!!" Giving students the chance to discuss concepts with each other (in a highly facilitated and structured manner), would better allow them to take ownership of the knowledge and deepen their understanding of the material. Lecture is still an important part, but it could be intermixed with some more collaborative learning methods every so often.

Dr. William Sharkey was one of the best instructor's I have thus far

The participation of the class slowly died after two exams. He should continue to call on people at least three times in every class.

17. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Interesting, fun, frustrating

Funny, Intelligent

very enthusiastic

amazing funny easygoing

Enthusiastic, animated

Funny, public speaker, vocalic.

Jersey, Knowledgeable, Blunt

organized clear bald

Jersey

lively

Thorough, organized and available.

Knowledgable, quick-witted

Smart, interesting, fun!

Enthusiastic, Knowledgeable, and Helpful

knowledgeable, passionate, humorous

FUNNY, ENTHUSIASTIC, KNOWLEDGEABLE

compassionate hard working

Approachable and Knowledgeable

Approachable, funny, and intelligent.

energetic, engaging and fun

Professional. Hilarious. Amazing. Educated. Experienced. Wise.

funny, approachable, and helpful

Friendly, funny, intelligent.

Engaged Funny Knowledgeable

intelligent, fun, helpful

Patient, Understanding, Resourceful

Enthusiastic and knowledgeable

18. Assignments make students think.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.49	37	0.8	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (5%)	1 (3%)	11 (30%)	23 (62%)

19. The assigned readings significantly contribute to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.27	37	0.8	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	5 (14%)	14 (38%)	17 (46%)

20. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	37	0.45	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	10 (27%)	27 (73%)

21. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.62	37	0.55	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	12 (32%)	24 (65%)

22. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.62	37	0.49	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	14 (38%)	23 (62%)

23. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.67	36	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (3%)	0 (0%)	9 (25%)	26 (72%)

24. Other comments:

I really enjoyed this course but I just think he should provide his students with more ways of gaining points because his opportunities where really difficult at some points and for those who don't do good we didn't have other ways of making up points.His teachings where really great but I felt he went a little to fast and it was really hard to just process what I learned in the previous class because we would just keep moving on and on. Besides that he's an awesome teacher and I love his examples.

one of the best courses i have ever taken. can lead to a happier life

Thank you for always being available to talk. :)

Great class.

PROFESSOR SHARKEY IS THE BEST!!! RECOMMEND THIS COURSE TO EVERYONE BECAUSE IT HELPED ME IN MY CONFLICTS =)

Really enjoyed this course.

This course is the one class at UH Manoa that has changed my life and truly given me skills I will continue to use through out my entire life.

great class

The readings felt more supplementary rather than something that was assigned to the class as 'mandatory' readings.

William Sharkey: SP 455, Fall 2010 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Speech
Course:	SP 455 - Conflict Management	Crn (Section):	76783 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.95	19	0.23	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	18 (95%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.84	19	0.37	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (16%)	16 (84%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	19	0.96	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	15 (79%)

4. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	19	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	17 (89%)

5. I gained a better understanding of myself through this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	19	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	17 (89%)

6. I try to relate what I learn in this course to my own experience.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	18	0.51	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	1 (6%)	16 (89%)

7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

Learning how to handle conflicting opinions and manage disagreements with people.

Indepth aspects of conflicts.

Dr Sharkey's lectures and use of examples to explain lectures.

What we learn in class all ties to what we do in our daily lives. Very interactive class.

the journals were really valuable

The powerpoint slides were a valuable tool for note taking.

He taught more about how to think of situations in a sense that made it possible to then turn a situation full of emotion to a situation that can be resolved.

everything i learned could be applied to my everyday situations

Learning different ways to deal with conflict from both sides. Also recognizing real conflict and distinguishing the different types and cycles of conflict. I think this whole coarse is important because we deal with conflict everyday.

Although it may seem obvious, being taught to "slow down" during conflict has a whole new meaning for me now. Mostly, because of the concepts of HOW to slow down and what "tools" to use to prevent conflict escalation. Also, just as obvious, learning the dynamics of how perspective really does drive behavior in communication. Learning your own skills approach is imperative in doing your part as an effective communicator.

all aspects

I really liked when Sharkey used real life experiences to explain concepts. It really helped me to understand,especially when I could relate to the example. Also, the self-analysis, journal entries, and final paper really helped to tie the class together and let us take a look at how the information in this class can help us.

I thought the section on competant conflict managment was the most valuable. In that section you learn how to turn conflicts into productive conflicts. It was easy to apply to your own life and it was interesting section because there was a lot of self thought and self reflection when covering the material.

Sharkey is the man, great communicator and speaker

8. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

Too much content for one semester

None

-none

none

His journal entries. I did feel that he gave enough feedback on the journals to help up see if were improving in our own personal conflicts. I would have liked him to have made that part of the course more individualized, so that we could incorporate the new tools learned in the course with actual real life conflicts.

He used a lot of videos that made sense, but could have maybe used a few more current references.

I think everything is valuable because you can apply it to your life.

I am not sure how to follow the class. I would read the material beforehand but sometimes we weren't on time w/the lecture being given for the next class. Just felt off kilter w/the lecture and readings coinciding.

none

I can't think of anything.

I thought the sections on thoeries, styles, and tactics were all mashed together too much that made it hard to learn the individual material. Not to get it confused with that the material wasnt valuable, just how it was taught it was.

all the lectures.

9. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	19	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (21%)	15 (79%)

10. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.89	19	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	17 (89%)

11. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	19	0.84	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	1 (5%)	3 (16%)	14 (74%)

12. The instructor acknowledges all questions insofar as possible.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	19	0.54	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	2 (11%)	16 (84%)

13. Students in this course are free to disagree and ask questions.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	19	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (21%)	15 (79%)

14. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	19	0.54	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	2 (11%)	16 (84%)

15. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.79	19	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (21%)	15 (79%)

16. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

Test questions were not worded in a way that you could understand what was being asked. Very vague and had multiple answers for each question.

More detailed writing on power points for important definitions.

it was good the way it is

His test questions can be a little less vague and unclear. He uses alot of scenario questions for his testing, but during his lectures he is mostly quoting definitions. If he were to incorporate more definition questions then ask the student to give and example...I think we could learn more that way. The essay questions were also tricky...If you did not quote the definitions word for word per say...he would dock points. I think he should be a little more flexible and understanding allowing the wording to be in the students voice...not a quote from his lecture.

He could make the examples a little more up-to-date, for example using a clip from family guy or any of NBC's thursday sitcoms that people will feel more strongly about because they are more familiar with them. However I do like the ones he uses, just maybe it could be better if he did things that were more current to our situation. He could also post more detailed notes on his lectures online.

I think it might be me, but I found myself lost throughout most lectures. I tried to catch up as I typed in the information he'd be explaining into the powerpoint slides. For example, the outline format is great. But during transition, some information he gave didn't indicate a segue into the next point. So sometimes I wasn't sure if he moved onto the next topic or if he was still giving an example for the prior point being made.

its great already

I can't think of anything. He was very effective and interesting.

If he could seperate the sections he taught more, maybe by teaching less but expanding more on the remaining subjects. It is mainly to allow more time to distinguish between the different theories and the differences between them.

keep on keeping on

17. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Friendly, Intelligent

Well knowledgable

Intelligent Engaging Friendly Thoughtful Experienced Optomistic Caring Organized

enthusiastic, entertaining, kind

outgoing and patient

Obessive Compulsive Disorder. LOL!

Entertaining, energetic, eccentric

helpful, encouraging

Clear and encouraging.

Knowledgable, confident, approachable

ooooh good question there Prof. hmmmm, let's think about this... Fair and helpful.

great teacher

organized, clear

energetic, knowledgable, funny

educated, intelligent, respectful

knowledgeable humorous sharp

18. Assignments make students think.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.63	19	0.68	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	3 (16%)	14 (74%)

19. The assigned readings significantly contribute to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.32	19	1.06	Freq(%)	1 (5%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	5 (26%)	11 (58%)

20. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	19	0.84	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (5%)	1 (5%)	3 (16%)	14 (74%)

21. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.84	19	0.37	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (16%)	16 (84%)

22. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	19	0.69	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	4 (21%)	13 (68%)

23. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.67	18	0.49	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (33%)	12 (67%)

24. Other comments:

N/a

I will be forever grateful for Dr. Sharkey shared knowledge. THANK YOU!

I really enjoyed Dr. Sharkey's teaching method and would recommend this course to anyone interested in conflict situations.

nope