eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Darrell Miyashiro

Available Survey Results

Darrell Miyashiro: WELD41, Fall 2007

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Welding
Course: WELD 41 - Advanced Welding Crn (Section): 15527 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.25 4 1.5 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.25 4 1.5 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.25 4 1.5 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 4 1.41 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.25 4 1.5 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 4 1.41 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.75 4 1.26 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.25 4 1.5 Freq(%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 4 1.41 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.75 4 1.26 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   A   B   C   D   F  
3.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%)
19. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
ok
20. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
yes