eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii
eCAFE Home | FAQ | Contact

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Mark Watanabe

Available Survey Results

Mark Watanabe: ART 107D, Spring 2010

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Art
Course: ART 107D - Intro to Digital Photography Crn (Section): 16119 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.67 3 2.08 Freq(%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
1.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.5 2 2.12 Freq(%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 3 1.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 3 1.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.67 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.67 3 1.53 Freq(%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.67 3 1.53 Freq(%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A  
2.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
* Showing 0 out of 2 survey responses.

 
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
-- snipped --
* Showing 0 out of 1 survey responses.

 
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
* Showing 0 out of 2 survey responses.

 
22. Other comments:
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
* Showing 0 out of 2 survey responses.