eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Won Geun Choi

Available Survey Results

POLS316, Fall 2014
POLS110, Spring 2014
POLS110, Fall 2013

Won Geun Choi: POLS316, Fall 2014

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Political Science
Course: POLS 316 - International Relations Crn (Section): 79720 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.52 29 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 5 (17%) 7 (24%) 15 (52%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.14 28 0.36 Freq(%) 24 (86%) 4 (14%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 30 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (37%) 19 (63%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 30 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (7%) 10 (33%) 18 (60%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 30 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 10 (33%) 18 (60%)
6. Why did you choose to take this course? (It fulfilled a focus designation (WI, E, OC, HAP, etc.), POLS major/minor requirement, major/minor requirement for another department, time and day(s) of the week it was offered, instructor, subject matter, etc.)
I want to work in international community organizations.
POLS major elective
I am in between changing majors and wanted to take a POLS class to see if I enjoy that specific major.
It fulfilled a Political science upper level elective.
Elective for a major requirement
It fulfilled a major requirement, I was interested in the subject, and the time fit my schedule. Also, after the first day of instruction, I knew I would enjoy Professor Choi's teaching style. So, I wanted to stay in the class!
needed an upper division elective class
Because my major is political science and I enjoy those classes. and even though i've fulfilled my requirements I feel that this class would be interesting.
Elective met requirements.
To fulfill major requirement
International elective
Because I'm planning on majoring in global politics at my transfer college next semester, so I'm interested in the subject material.
Time of the class is perfect with my work schedule
it fulfilled a focus designation
Just part of my preparation for my Masters in Public Administration. I can do any course I like but just chose this one to gain knowledge more about International Relations and major issues of states within themselves and with other states.
This course is an elective requirement for a POLS degree and is related to the subject matter I plan to study in graduate school.
Had him for a prior class
The subject matter looked interesting to me and it fit well into my schedule
It was directly correlated to my intended major, international relations.
I decided to take this course because I was interested in the subject.
I could not take any of the other IB Elective courses I wanted due to time conflicts.
Interest in political science and the specific course content.
I am interested in pursuing Human Rights Law in the future and this class gave me a lot of great information to think about.
I needed an International upper division elective course
I needed an elective in the 300/400 level and it fulfilled a requirement for the business school.
Expand knowledge on International relations and forced migration theories
IB elective
Certificate requirement
7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 30 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (27%) 9 (30%) 13 (43%)
8. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 30 0.56 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 10 (33%) 19 (63%)
9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 29 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 7 (24%) 7 (24%) 14 (48%)
10. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 30 0.87 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (30%) 7 (23%) 14 (47%)
11. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.37 30 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (23%) 5 (17%) 18 (60%)
12. The instructor was thoughtful and precise in response to questions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.37 30 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 4 (13%) 8 (27%) 17 (57%)
13. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
He's the Korean Jackie Chan and very funny. Good man.
Good teacher who enjoys teaching students. Tries hard to structure the class so that student will enjoy the topic even though forced migration is a difficult topic to grasp. Very nice and pretty flexible, tried to be of good help to students.
He's able to lead effective class discussions and answer clarifying questions clearly.
He had extra credit points.
Willing to help and extremely friendly
He is obviously very intelligent and seems to enjoy teaching. He is very helpful and always answers our questions effectively. I looked forward to attending his class due to the ways in which he ran class. He's approachable, encourages us to learn more, keeps his lectures interesting, and makes sure students are involved in class discussions.
very flexible and understanding
He is really understanding when it comes to the class. He goes over the information in class until everyone understands the material.
His youthfulness and overall positive presence.
He knew what he was teaching about International relations and human rights.
Very kind and understanding
He is a great professor, who introduced me to forced migration/refugee material within international politics.
He explained study guide for quiz clearly and helped us get good grade.
is effective use of emails/communication.
Have passion of teaching in making sure students understand each concept and mostly being open to informally talk to individual students which is very helpful especially those with shy nature and language barriers.
* All readings and deadlines available online * Convenient office hours for make-up of tests
Humor
Won is a nice and upbeat guy which allowed for the entire class to always have a happy and joyous vibe.
His openness to the students opinions and his flexibility in his lectures.
I can tell Won is passionate about forced migration and international law. He made sure he was prepared for each lecture and assigned us readings that helped us understand the topic even more. Instead of straight lectures, he mixed in group projects and discussions. By doing so, he encouraged us to get to know our classmates which made the learning environment more comfortable.
Willing to accommodate to student issues with class, homework, presentations, etc.
He is knowledgable about the subject matter, and is very good at building a rapport with his students.
He was very knowledgable about the course material and I enjoyed his lectures.
That he really like the subject matter
It was helpful that he would put the powerpoints on laulima so that I can look at the material learned in class to see if I missed anything or just to look back to it. His extra credit opportunities were very helpful.
He demonstrated that he was the expert in the subject matter, and expressed it positively in the classroom
He seemed very educated in his subject which thrilled me as a student.
He was very kind
14. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?
He is not teaching enough classes. Remedy this.
Some difficulty when communicating what he wants. However, when considering his background, better than many other teachers, despite English being his second language.
Sometimes his instructions were unclear.
His grading system is terrible. He gives us many chapters to study and only gives us 5 question quizzes and the answers are based off of the SMALLEST detail. Halfway through the class he mentioned the class average was a D.
n/a
N/A
N/A
Changes syllabus.
His slides were not as interesting. Too much information, should be explained and showed in a simple way for students to be more engaged and understand the topics covered in class.
Slightly hard class in confusion
Nothing, he's great.
Quizes...
Helpful in a way that he respects the class's opinions making students feel involved in the learning process.
N/A
Power Points
Nothing
Some of the readings.
none.
Sometimes he was hard to understand because of his accent
It wasn't helpful that he would give us vague guidelines for presentations. Also, not providing a short review before an exam or quiz would have been helpful not just for the exam or quiz but just so that we'd just have an overview on what we just went over.
Certain portions of lecture were dense but understandable that it is a necessity in academia
Due to the broad subject, some of his teachings were a bit unclear and very hard to differentiate, I felt like he could have added something to make the teaching materials a little less close and a bit more differentiated
Sometimes his directions were confusing
15. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.3 30 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 3 (10%) 12 (40%) 14 (47%)
16. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.28 29 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (17%) 11 (38%) 13 (45%)
17. The course challenged me to think critically and historically about power and the political.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.23 30 1.01 Freq(%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 6 (20%) 7 (23%) 16 (53%) 0 (0%)
18. The course improved my ability to craft and defend evidence-based arguments.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.28 30 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (27%) 5 (17%) 16 (53%) 1 (3%)
19. Other comments:
Mr. Won Guen Choi is a good teacher and I am happy to have him.
Enjoyed the class activities
n/a
Awesome Professor! I hope to take his class again.
none
Great teacher and person.
mahalo for a wonderful very first semester at UH.
N/A
none.
none
Great course!
Great professor!

Won Geun Choi: POLS110, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Political Science
Course: POLS 110 - Intro to Political Science Crn (Section): 82050 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.22 10 1.56 Freq(%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.5 10 0.53 Freq(%) 4 (40%) 4 (40%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 10 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 6 (60%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 3 (30%) 5 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 10 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%)
6. Why did you choose to take this course? (It fulfilled a focus designation (WI, E, OC, HAP, etc.), POLS major/minor requirement, major/minor requirement for another department, time and day(s) of the week it was offered, instructor, subject matter, etc.)
I have never taken a poll sic class and wanted to see what it was like. I also want to go into law and thought the course would be useful.
I thought it would be an interesting class to take
I needed the credit
just to see if I was interested in political science
Was interesting in political science and wanted to learn more.
It fulfilled a requirement I needed.
It fills one of the general requirements
Political Science major requirement
Requirement
7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.1 10 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%)
8. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 10 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 6 (60%) 3 (30%)
9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.9 10 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%)
10. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 10 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (50%) 2 (20%) 3 (30%)
11. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.9 10 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%)
12. The instructor was thoughtful and precise in response to questions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.9 10 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%)
13. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
He seems genuinely interested in teaching. I could tell he was passionate about the material. I also liked how there were various ways to learn (ted talks, posts, readings, presentations, in-class voting). I like how the final had options about various films, a very different way to learn while still challenging me to make real-life connections.
He showed TED talks which were my favorite part about the class
How he was always helpful and there when you needed him. He also was very approachable and knew his subject matter very well.
He clearly explained the issue and went into depth about each topic he taught.
He always seems to be prepared for everything. There isnt a time when it seems like he doesnt know whats going on or when he doesnt know what hes talking about
He is very genuine and nice, and is very thorough and knowledgeable when it comes to his lectures.
Cares about his students
14. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?
Nothing! Great class!
The accent he had but i believe that it wasn't that bad. I understood him just fine.
Sometimes I find the lectures to be a bit boring, and I tend to zone out. However this is mostly because I am not very interested in the subject, and no matter what Won Geun Choi does, it always seems boring to me. Though at times he can make it interesting, but its mostly the subject's fault that I dont feel as engaged.
Many of the lectures were boring
15. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.9 10 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 5 (50%) 2 (20%)
16. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.4 10 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%)
17. The course challenged me to think critically and historically about power and the political.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.78 10 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%)
18. The course improved my ability to craft and defend evidence-based arguments.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.13 10 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 4 (40%) 1 (10%) 1 (10%) 2 (20%)
19. The course gave me opportunities to practice communicating effectively in public settings, with attention to and appreciation of diverse cultural contexts.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.6 10 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 2 (20%) 0 (0%)
20. The course increased my ability to cogently explain the interconnectedness of local and global dynamics of power within the context of the political and cultural specificities of Hawai'i nei.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.5 10 1.07 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 4 (40%) 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%)
21. Other comments:
I like that the material of the class was not over complicated. The information was presented in a very straight forward manner which allowed students to understand material. Highly recommended instructor and course!
Great Class and very good teacher
I was able to learn a lot of new information in this class, and I really enjoyed instructor Choi. In the future I would recommend that Instructor Choi try to gain more in class participation through in class group assignments, or perhaps calling on students individually. Another way to get students to pay more attention might be to assign homework on the articles he would like us to read, so students wouldn't be able to skip the work entirely. I very much enjoyed instructor Choi, and I would take another class of his!

Won Geun Choi: POLS110, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Political Science
Course: POLS 110 - Intro to Political Science Crn (Section): 73487 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
1.57 14 0.94 Freq(%) 9 (64%) 3 (21%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.57 14 0.51 Freq(%) 6 (43%) 8 (57%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 8 (57%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 14 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 7 (50%) 4 (29%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 14 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 3 (21%) 4 (29%)
6. Why did you choose to take this course? (It fulfilled a focus designation (WI, E, OC, HAP, etc.), POLS major/minor requirement, major/minor requirement for another department, time and day(s) of the week it was offered, instructor, subject matter, etc.)
instructor and subject matter
gen eds
POLS major requirement
I chose to take this course because I was interested in American politics and how it originated. Also, I wanted a stronger understanding of what "political science" entailed and how it was implemented in other parts of the world.
I needed one more class in my a certain time slot and this was the only class open and I have an interest in political science.
I wanted to learn what political science was about because my friend's major is political science.
I am POLS major.
I chose this course because I am interested in a possible political science major and it fulfilled a core credit. It wasn't available by any regular teachers, but only offered by teaching assistants from other countries. The language barrier made it difficult to learn. It was offered MWF.
It satisfied one of my elective requirements for civil engineering and I was possibly considering a minor is POLS.
I am thinking of minoring in political science
I am thinking about majoring in Political Science and this fulfills one of its requirement.
Interest in learning about politics
7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.57 14 1.22 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 2 (14%) 6 (43%) 3 (21%)
8. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.21 14 0.8 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 5 (36%) 6 (43%)
9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.86 14 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 7 (50%) 3 (21%)
10. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.71 14 1.14 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 7 (50%) 3 (21%)
11. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.93 14 1.0 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 9 (64%) 3 (21%)
12. The instructor was thoughtful and precise in response to questions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.93 14 1.07 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 5 (36%)
13. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
He try to communicate and understand student. And his lecture is well prepared.
good power points
His lectures would combine information from the readings along with current events and it really helped me to put things into perspective and to always think about how things in the world happen with a political point of view.
I didn't find anything valuable or helpful about Won's class. I took an Advanced Placement United States Government course in my senior year of high school and absolutely loved it which is how my interest in political science began. I competed in state competitions dealing with the foundations of constitutionalism and how politics played a role in American society. In Won's class, most of the concepts he taught didn't seem to relate to political science nor did they interest me at all.
He wants to help and he really cares about what he teaches.
Willing to help.
He is an extremely kind and caring teacher.
His passions about political science.
He is invested in a lot of the subject matter and he is quite knowledgable
He is always trying to engage the class into discussing the material of the current lecture he had given.
14. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?
Sometimes because of time limitation, Choi skipped some part of the lecture.
none
Since Won is originally from South Korea, I expected him to have an accent and since I am of Asian descent I can easily discern and understand most accents, but for a subject as meticulous as Political Science, his accent made it very hard to understand or grasp any difficult concept because his knowledge of English was on such a basic level.
At times he is hard to understand and sometimes his lectures were boring.
His accent.
Language barrier.
The language barrier seemed to get in the way at times.
He can be too quiet sometimes
Everything he assigned helped me gain the necessary knowledge for this course.
15. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.86 14 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 7 (50%) 3 (21%)
16. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.79 14 1.19 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 3 (21%) 5 (36%)
17. The course challenged me to think critically and historically about power and the political.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.79 14 1.19 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 6 (43%) 4 (29%) 0 (0%)
18. The course improved my ability to craft and defend evidence-based arguments.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.5 14 1.22 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 3 (21%) 5 (36%) 3 (21%) 0 (0%)
19. The course gave me opportunities to practice communicating effectively in public settings, with attention to and appreciation of diverse cultural contexts.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.07 14 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 6 (43%) 5 (36%) 0 (0%)
20. The course increased my ability to cogently explain the interconnectedness of local and global dynamics of power within the context of the political and cultural specificities of Hawai'i nei.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.57 14 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 5 (36%) 3 (21%) 0 (0%)
21. Other comments:
Thank you for your lecture!
none
Won is really good at making the information understandable and enjoyable! I also liked the movies and shows that we watched.
If Won can improve his English to explain difficult concepts using broader vocabulary, then this course wouldn't have been so poor. Furthermore, if he had conducted some in-class activities (since the class was so small) my interest would've been kept. Unfortunately, he simply came to class and rambled on about miscellaneous political concepts that didn't seem to relate to each other.