eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Andrew Taylor

Available Survey Results

ZOOL631, Fall 2014
ZOOL631, Fall 2014
ZOOL631, Fall 2014
ZOOL632, Spring 2014
ZOOL632, Spring 2014
ZOOL652, Spring 2014
ZOOL631, Fall 2013
ZOOL631, Fall 2013
ZOOL631, Fall 2013
ZOOL631, Fall 2012
ZOOL632, Spring 2012
ZOOL631, Fall 2011
BOT652, ZOOL652, Spring 2011
ZOOL691B, Spring 2011
ZOOL631, Fall 2010
ZOOL490E, Spring 2010
ZOOL632, Spring 2010
ZOOL691B, Spring 2010
ZOOL631, Fall 2009

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2014

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 75194 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (71%) 2 (29%)
6. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
7. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
8. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (57%) 3 (43%)
10. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 7 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 3 (43%) 3 (43%)
11. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 7 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 3 (43%) 3 (43%)
12. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 7 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 1 (14%) 4 (57%)
13. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%)
14. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%)
15. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.71 7 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (57%) 1 (14%) 2 (29%)
16. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 7 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 2 (29%) 3 (43%)
17. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%)
18. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (57%) 3 (43%)
19. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Increase connections between lecture, discussion, and homeworks as they seemed somewhat disjoint. Often, students did not understand the expectations of grading in the discussions or homework.
sometimes it feels like he is being condescending when he speaks to you in discussion - if it felt like a more open space to speak, people would participate more - the goal of the midterm should not be to destroy self esteem and morale - the grading was way too harsh and left students feeling discouraged - give a break from homework somewhere in the semester to give people a chance to breathe
Probably not. His instruction is excellent. What he might improve on is his expectation level. He is notably disappointed that students do poorly on the midterm exam. The course is difficult, there is a tremendous amount to learn and no one has the level of understanding of the material that he does. His expectation seems to be that we understand it like he does.
20. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%)
21. Any comments about the TA?
Kirill did a great job of being available and trying to help explain the concepts. At times, communication between the TA and instructor seemed lacking.
he was very patient and helpful - he went the extra mile to help students
Kirill is quite good. Patient, available, everything you could want in a TA for a challenging course such as this.
Great help in the HW sessions. Easy to talk to, and very knowledgeable about the topic.
Kiril on almost always returned comments that were helpful especially given any wrong answers submitted.
22. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%)
23. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 7 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 2 (29%) 3 (43%)
24. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 7 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 2 (29%) 3 (43%)
25. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.86 7 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 4 (57%) 1 (14%)
26. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.57 7 1.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 1 (14%) 2 (29%) 2 (29%)
27. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I enjoyed the classroom discussion in which we could problem-solve using the tools we learned about in class.
practical application of discussions and data sets
I learned a LOT.
Andy and Kirill provided ample extra material to supplement the lectures Discussions and homeworks, making subjects approachable. This was a very useful and much appreciated component of the class
28. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
I did not enjoy the homework assignments because they often did not relfect the classroom material well or did not help to increase my understanding of the subjects.
tons of homework and very harsh grading which leaves students feeling discouraged and stressed
The grading is harsh, although it is a graduate level course...it can be disheartening at times because great effort often goes unrewarded.
29. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.29 7 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 3 (43%) 3 (43%)
30. Other comments:
N/A
While I may find the grading a bit harsh and the expectation from the instructor a bit unrealistic, the course is well done. These are not criticisms, rather, just the reality of the situation.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 75195 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.2 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%) 1 (20%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
6. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
7. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
8. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
10. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
11. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
12. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
13. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
14. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
15. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
16. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%)
17. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
18. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
19. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Dr. Taylor offers us so many resources to aid in our understanding, knowledge and application of the subject that I have a hard time finding how it could be improved upon.
20. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
21. Any comments about the TA?
Props to the TA for all his hard work, time and availability for help.
Kirill reviews our assignments very carefully. The effort this must take is impressive.
22. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
23. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 5 1.1 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%)
24. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 5 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 2 (40%)
25. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 5 1.1 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%)
26. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
27. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I appreciate the patience and sincerity of the teacher and TA.
I learned a lot in the discussion assignments.
28. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
Nothing wrong with the course itself, the teacher provided us with every tool we could need and then explained clearly and patiently the material, ... It was my own trouble understanding and connecting the material
29. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
30. Other comments:
Dr. Taylor is old-school in a great way: handwritten lectures and well-prepared lessons, with assignments that emphasized both intuitive understanding of the material and effective computation. This has been the most demanding class I have taken at UH and also the class I learned the most in, hands down. I appreciated being able to pick my software and being expected to figure things out on my own, while knowing that support was available if I needed it. This is definitely a great class for anyone who wants to really learn about statistics.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 75196 (003)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
6. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
7. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
10. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
11. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
12. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
13. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
14. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
15. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
16. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%)
17. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
18. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
19. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
I think the course can be improved by running through multiple examples in the lecture that mirror what will be on the upcoming homework assignment. Maybe this can be accomplished by spending more time using examples from the handouts or by going over examples from the textbook. I think students could benefit from in-depth step-by-step explanations of one or two examples that incorporate what will be covered on the upcoming homework. This way we know how to go about doing the homework instead of learning how to do the homework after we receive our grade. I feel like the discussions are not enough to cover what will be on the homework as well as the discussion assignment. Also, I think writing down every step of the examples he gives is important, especially where he gets certain t-statistics or other statistical values found in Tables. Sometimes he breezes over those steps. That's where I get confused and it only gets worse from there. I think repetition of important concepts is important because it is sometimes hard to write down an important note when it is long, especially if he doesn't write it on the board.
The material definitely felt rushed at times, I would've preferred a slightly slower pace
Sometimes topics felt rushed, however mostly that was a result of answering questions from the class. So not sure how that could be fixed....
20. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
21. Any comments about the TA?
The TA is always helpful and approachable. He never made me feel stupid for asking a question.
I found the TA to be relatively unhelpful during the study sessions
Very helpful and patient! Was good at directing us in the correct direction without simply giving us the answers.
22. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
23. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
24. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
25. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
26. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
27. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I liked the discussions because they provided valuable one-on-one time with Dr. Taylor to ask questions with enough time. Given that the lecture is only an hour and it's easy to tangent off on answering questions, the discussion is beneficial to ask the questions we thought about asking in lecture. I love that Dr. Taylor let's us think through our approach to every discussion assignment. Though we sometimes go in the wrong direction, we learn by doing and remember why that is not the appropriate way to go if we come across a similar situation in the future.
Discussions were key to being able to apply what we were learning
28. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
I don't like how long some of the homework assignments are. It took me all Sunday to write up long homework assignments plus the discussion assignment.
29. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
30. Other comments:
I learned a lot and Dr. Taylor is very approachable and always willing to help. I never got any condescending remarks from him and I sincerely appreciate that because it encourages me to ask questions when I'm confused. I feel like I can learn more because of the way he listens to our questions and tries to answer them as clearly as possible. I like how Dr. Taylor always relates what we are learning to the handouts he gives us. It is always really helpful to have an example. There are never too many real-life examples to give.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL632, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 632 - Advanced Biometry Crn (Section): 88990 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 2 (40%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%)
7. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%)
8. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 5 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 1 (20%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The lecture part of the class is most valuable. And the substantial homework practice also help me understand the principle of multivariate models.
Applying concepts and methods to real studies and real data
Broad exposure to a variety of advanced statistical techniques, study/experimental designs and a variety of software packages.
homework forced us to learn... It was a lot of work but there also was a lot of learning.
Lecture periods with notes written on the board were most helpful to supplement the book, especially when study designs were sketched out to help us visualize these complex studies. The typed out datasets were also helpful for having good examples to follow, and of course, the discussions are very helpful for learning how to run these commands in the software (and learning new methods from classmates). I'm sure that study sessions with Thomas would have been very helpful, too, but I did not take advantage (mostly for time reasons).
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
I don't think there was anything covered in the course that was not valuable.
The structure of the course at the beginning set me back a bit this semester. I felt lost for the first few sections because it went very fast and I did not understand the important sections from the book that we were supposed to focus on. The remainder of the semester has been much better, but I could still use a bit more step-by-step instruction on some of the software steps in discussion...sometimes it goes too fast when a few people already know how to run it.
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 5 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%) 1 (20%)
12. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
13. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%)
15. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
17. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%)
18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%)
19. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
20. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
21. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%)
22. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
23. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Talk more about how to use the method in real situation, instead of keeping talking the diagnosis of the models.
I had more than a few frustrated/confused/wasted time moments during this course trying to figure out how to get the software to do (and match/interpret output to) what we learned from the book or lecture. Written step by step tutorials for the more popular/recommended software packages would be extremely useful. ie. to do this type of analysis in JMP do this, the results look like this and this number here is what the book/lecture calls this... Reference materials (book chapters, articles, ...) for topics not covered in the text (Mixed Models, Likelihood, etc..) would have also been helpful.
I think by laying out clear expectations, especially on what discussions should be like, we could/would have more vibrant discussion. Also more structure in discussion and designation of a group leader could facilitate more interaction. The more quiet students didn't seem to be comfortable in stepping forward, although I think they knew more than they let on.
A bit more organization in the notes would help me...some sections are great and have a heading to organize topics, but other times I don't catch what is said verbally, and when I look at my notes I have a hard time following them.
24. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 2 (40%)
25. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 5 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 2 (40%)
26. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 5 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%)
27. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
28. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Lecture
Discussions and lectures were interactive which helped me understand these complicated topics. Using examples from a variety of fields exposed me to experimental designs that I had not seen before. Exposure to a variety of software packages was useful to see the strengths and weaknesses of each. Andy and Thomas were always available and more than willing to answer questions.
I really appreciated not having a midterm in this course. For me it is much more important to focus on just learning the material, which the homework and discussion assignments helped me with. This is an elective course and I care much more about understanding the material, not about grades. I also really enjoyed how many different types of datasets we used as examples. This helped me because I don't have any personal data right now that needs these analyses, so it can be hard for me to personally relate to these studies, but having lots of examples helped.
29. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
30. Other comments:
The biggest take aways from this course: I can now read more complicated papers and actually understand the statistical results. I have a good enough understanding of the more advanced analyses to find more information on my own. Also I learned that unbalanced data makes your life way more difficult than it needs to be so balance it out if possible and that statisticians cannot agree on how to best do mixed models so if I need to use them then however I decide to approach it is possibly correct.
This course has given me the statistics skills I was looking for. I feel comfortable working with multiple linear regression, and have been exposed to generalized and mixed models.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL632, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 632 - Advanced Biometry Crn (Section): 89254 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
7. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
8. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
I really appreciated the discussion session as we work through real data and experimental designs.
Small discussion group made me more concentrate on investigating appropriate statistical analysis.
The handouts and the discussions using actual data sets to see how you would tackle a problem to start to finish. The handouts with the software output are also useful.
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
Homework from the book was helpful in terms of concepts but in conjunction with the discussion assignments, the workload was very heaving.
Sometimes the lecture ended up with discussiong how to use statistical software. This type of issue should be addressed in another way (provide user guide etc...)
Some of the book problems were a bit tedious or repetitive.
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
12. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
13. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
15. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
17. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
19. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
20. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
21. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
22. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
23. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
I believe small study groups within the study sessions would be helpful. Also, creating groups based on software we are using.
It would be great if I could have another opportunity to learn how to use statistical software before or during taking this class.
I found the last few discussions more helpful than the homework in the beginning. Perhaps more time gong over interpreting the different software outputs.
24. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%)
25. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 3 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
26. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
27. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%)
28. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I really enjoyed this course as it helped me learn the appropriate models to analyze my own data.
Discussion (lab) class further my understanding about statistical concept and when to use.
The discussions both in lecture and in class about how to approach data sets
29. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
30. Other comments:
No survey responses were found.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL652, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 652 - Population Biology Crn (Section): 88991 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
6. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
7. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
8. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Discussion of homework problems in class.
I found the lectures the most valuable.
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
I really did not like the text book. I realize some authors speak to people, and some don't, and maybe that was the case for me, but I feel like the text jumped around, didn't adequately explain concepts or define variables in equations, and asked questions in the homework that weren't covered in the text. It was very frustrating to try and learn from this text book.
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
12. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
13. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
15. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
17. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
19. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
20. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
21. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
22. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
23. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Maybe not spend as much time on discussions of papers. So much material is covered in the course, I would have benefited from more lecture time, or discussion of concepts, as I feel I wasn't able to fully grasp most concepts.
24. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
25. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
26. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
27. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
28. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Andy was open to taking questions and never made a student feel that their comment was off-base or wrong, so thank you. I appreciated that he encouraged discussion of concepts in class. I also appreciated that Andy gave a reasonable amount of homework, and when material wasn't covered in lecture, he changed the homework assignments to reflect that.
29. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
30. Other comments:
I appreciated when Andy posted the lecture notes before class. I find it easier to absorb information and follow along when I have the notes in front of me and I can add to them.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 75516 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.57 8 0.53 Freq(%) 3 (38%) 4 (50%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 1 (13%) 6 (75%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 8 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 4 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.88 8 1.13 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.38 8 1.06 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%) 1 (13%)
7. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.25 8 1.16 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%) 1 (13%)
8. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
Professor Taylor was very prepared and helpful and respectful. He answered all my questions and knows everything. I learned a lot of statistics and the methods of ANOVA, nonparametric statistics was probably the most valuable parts.
The discussions on real experiments and what statistical analysis are useful/valid in different situations
I liked sitting in discussion and going through hwo to do operations in the software.
The discussions and the example Datasets
One-to-one discussion.
Most helpful were the discussions, the available resources, and help outside of class.
9. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
The least valuable was the first half, because that should be lower division undergraduate statistics. It made me lazy and not focus as much, a bad habit for the harder sections later and new material.
I know its hard to get grading done on homeworks within a week, especially when there are 40 plus students, but there are weeks where we don't get homeworks back until three weeks later and in the mean time we are still turning in assignments that we can't really learn from our mistakes on previous assignments, so we generally have a hard time improving on them from week to week.
I thought much of the homework was busy work.
Lack of headings while notes were written on the board.
I couldn't attend Sean's study session because I had to work and was constantly lost when trying to do homework since nothing similar to the homeworks was ever covered in lectures...
Homework was not useful, and the lecture were not helpful either. Spent most of the time in lecture copying notes and not listening because I was copying notes.Learning from the text was difficult for me because I do not like read long abstract passages.
10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.88 8 1.13 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%)
11. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.88 8 1.25 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 3 (38%)
12. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%)
13. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 8 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 4 (50%) 3 (38%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 8 1.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%)
15. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 8 1.04 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%) 2 (25%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.13 8 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 5 (63%) 2 (25%)
17. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 5 (63%)
18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 8 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 4 (50%) 3 (38%)
19. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 5 (63%)
20. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 4 (50%)
21. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.13 8 1.13 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 4 (50%)
22. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 8 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (63%) 2 (25%)
23. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 5 (63%)
24. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 8 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%) 5 (63%) 2 (25%)
25. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
The discussion sections were not that great. They would only help if students were prepared. I found that when I wasn't prepared, I didn't know anything compared to when I was actually prepared, and this is a big portion of participation points. To be honest I hated these, especially when I was unprepared. Of course that's on me, but it's just some feedback of what people like me think about discussions. They were a bit competitive (to talk and yell out stuff) and was geared towards prepared students.
perhaps demonstrations of statistical software during lecture course time, but I understand that the time we have there is limited
Try to find new ways of explaining some of the concepts. And please please use more examples, or any really.
Provide an outline of each Chapter to put what we learn into a structural context.
Go over homework examples in class
By adding more visuals.
Maybe provide computer programs to help with learning the course material.
26. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Professor Taylor is a good professor and he's very helpful. He knows a lot and uses great applicable examples.
He is a great grad level professor, really knows his stuff, relatively easy to talk to, and not afraid to point out the flaws in your ideas as well as the things you get correct
Great guy, loved talking to him in discussion, but getting quality information out of the lecture was really difficult.
He's a great teacher but it would be helpful if he somehow found a way to help students more with the homework
Average
Great and knowledgeable instructor.
27. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 8 1.2 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%)
28. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 8 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%) 3 (38%) 1 (13%)
29. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 8 1.04 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%) 2 (25%)
30. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.25 8 1.28 Freq(%) 1 (13%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%) 1 (13%)
31. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.38 8 1.3 Freq(%) 1 (13%) 1 (13%) 1 (13%) 4 (50%) 1 (13%)
32. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 8 1.04 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%) 2 (25%)
33. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
The lectures were very focused and almost everything was very well explained.
The discussion and talks about ethics behind statistics and research designs
Discussions
The discussions were great because we could see how all the concepts we learned in lecture could be applied in real life
The discussion seemed most helpful although I get lost as to what people were talking about.
34. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.75 8 1.04 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%) 2 (25%)
35. Other comments:
It's very useful and Professor Taylor did a good job.
Other than the lecture, the text, and the homework, I think the course is valuable in learning biostats.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 75517 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%) 2 (33%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 6 1.21 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%)
7. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%)
8. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
Prenty of exercise and howmwork is hard, but worth to do to understand deeply.I think this class is worth to take if the student major biology (or related discipline) because he used biological or ecological experiments as an example.
Discussions were very helpful but at rather inconvenient times, would have preferred a morning class.
Andy and has applied statistics in many situations, so he is able to give relevant examples for almost every topic we cover. His examples combined with his knowledge of the subject makes it easy for him to communicate the material to the students. The assignments he gives are very useful for understanding the concepts, which is the most important part of the course in my opinion.
Discussion section and learning to apply principles and tests through software to research.
Overall this course offers a very useful method to analyze data collected from different fields of science. This course can be a rewarding course.
Ability to ask questions in lab.
9. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
Discussion (lab session) is sometime just talking, and couldn't find the answer of discussion topic clearly.
Lecture, No examples are given. Writing paragraphs on the board doesn't help me to learn anything.
N/A
Lecture, definitions and concepts I can read in a book.
This course is possibly one of the most difficult course I have ever taken in my life. The demand is usually unknown in every assignment, and the opportunity for asking questions is very limited.
Lectures were often very difficult to follow.
10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 6 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%)
11. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%)
12. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
13. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 6 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%)
15. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 6 1.17 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%)
17. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%) 1 (17%)
19. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
20. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
21. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%)
22. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
23. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
24. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 1.51 Freq(%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%)
25. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
I would appreciate if he could finish contents that was required for study or exam before hand so that we could catch-up the subject ahead.
Needs to ad more examples. Would prefer to work through problems and actually implement what we are learning in the course. It would really help with the homework assignments.
I think he is doing a great job at teaching biometry.
Move to a more discussion and practical style. Dicussion section twice a week to go over that weeks lesson and go through examples and practice. Then normal discussion section for assignment debate without guidance.
Possibly more assistance since this subject is far from easy in any sense.
There is just too much material for one semester. We were going over new material the same day we were handed the take home final and that does not give us sufficient time to try to understand it.
26. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
He is easy to talk and if I ask a question, he would ansewer very kindly. This class is actually useful and meaningfull for my own research.
Think that he has been teaching the course for to long. He has lost his enthusiasm for the topic. he is just going through the motions. Doesn't seem to like what he is doing, is very set in his material. Overall he is a knowledgeable and easily approachable person.
He is a great instructor. He is very approachable, and will give you advice if you ask for it. He truly does care about students learning the subject matter, and stimulates critical thinking. He is definitely an asset to the university, and I plan on taking more classes with him.
Very helpful and understanding.
It is a very useful and powerful subject that is also difficult to catch on.
27. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%)
28. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%)
29. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%)
30. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%)
31. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 6 1.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%)
32. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 6 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%)
33. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Lab session and write-up assignment (it encouradged me to understand how to do stutistical analysis).
I really like all of the aspect as the helped me to learn the subject and apply what I learned.
Going through using software and actual research examples in discussion.
The subject itself.
34. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.67 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%)
35. Other comments:
Andy has a great sense of humor!
While I would kind of understand the concepts from the book or lecture, the only time I felt like I was actually learning something was in discussion.
All students should be required to use the same statistics software. It makes lab difficult when you are switching between three different types of software.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 75518 (003)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.7 10 0.48 Freq(%) 3 (30%) 7 (70%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (70%) 3 (30%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.2 10 1.23 Freq(%) 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 4 (40%) 1 (10%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 10 1.08 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 2 (20%)
7. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.6 10 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 7 (70%) 0 (0%)
8. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
Weekly Disscussion assignments
Help sessions, discussions, textbook
Instructor and TA were both willing to offer help outside of class time at all times.
I appreciated that this course focused on particular biological examples of the application of statistical methods. I also thought that the limitations and common mistakes of these methods were well addressed.
I think the datasets were helpful guides to follow the application of the course content. I also appreciated the prompt return of homework answer guides so that I could go back and better understand the assignments.
Discussion sessions; working through problems with other students at the study sessions
The discussions were most valuable and practical. I particularly liked that the examples we used were from previous graduate students. The discussions allowed us to use the software in conjunction with theory for better application purposes which is the reason I chose to take this course.
9. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
Weekly HW assignments which proved irrelevant to lecture material.
Homework assignments were very challenging, went very beyond material presented in lecture;
The theoretical nature of lecture does not match up well with the practical application in assignments.
Lectures were incredibly repetitive and insultingly rudimentary. Concepts were explained in the most convoluted way possible, with so many caveats, addendums, and tangents that the points were often entirely lost. Discussions were also poorly structured. Part of this was due to the group, but if a group is not participating, or is wildly off the mark, the instructor should keep things relevant and strive to utilize time appropriately.
It was sort of frustrating that homework assignments and discussion write-ups were due the same week as the midterm exam and after the last day of class (during finals week). I felt doing homework assignments at those junctures were the least valuable use of my time. I would rather have more time reviewing notes, rereading the text book, and making study guides. Although the homework assignments were not terribly difficult, they did take up a good amount of time in order to do them well, and I think this was not the best focus during those times. I also think that the expectations for the discussions were not made clear early enough in the semester. I felt I got points deducted for frivolous things (like including graphs and having it in bullet/outline form). The first few discussions that were graded had significant points docked with almost no written feedback as to why. I think explaining in more detail what is expected at the beginning would be better. I also think it would be better if all students used the same software since having several different kinds of software being discussed was very confusing at times.
The lectures were great for learning theory, but didn't help me at all with homework or discussion assignments.
The homework pertaining to the first half of the semester (theory) was probably not as helpful as the discussions. The assignments took quite a long time to complete and were difficult to complete even with the textbook and lecture notes.
10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.6 10 1.07 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 4 (40%) 2 (20%)
11. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.4 10 1.07 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 1 (10%) 5 (50%) 1 (10%)
12. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%)
13. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (70%) 3 (30%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 10 1.41 Freq(%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 4 (40%) 1 (10%)
15. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.4 10 1.26 Freq(%) 1 (10%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 2 (20%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.7 10 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%) 2 (20%)
17. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 10 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 6 (60%) 3 (30%)
18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (90%) 1 (10%)
19. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 10 1.2 Freq(%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (50%) 4 (40%)
20. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 10 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 6 (60%)
21. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.2 10 1.48 Freq(%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%)
22. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 10 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 6 (60%)
23. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%)
24. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.7 10 1.06 Freq(%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 7 (70%) 1 (10%)
25. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
A more seamless integration of homework assignments, lecture notes and discussion would be great. Lectures are hard to follow and determine relevance as they are not outlined very well.
Could have had more examples in lecture that were better applied to figuring out homework/discussion set-ups
The textbook does not always sync well with his lectures. I think he has the knowledge and command of clear expression to write brief lecture packets that are more relevant, which would be more helpful than the current data set handouts.
The amount of time spent on each subject and the order in which they were taught make little sense for the teaching of statistics at the graduate level. It should be expected that students have a basic understanding of concepts like bar charts and mean, median, and mode. We learned these things in elementary school, so it is uncalled for to devote five lectures to them. If Dr. Taylor were to take a more direct approach to explaining topics, the course would be much improved. It makes much more sense to introduce the topic, give an example of when it would be useful, and clearly and concisely explain its limitations. Concision. Concision would help a lot.
It was mentioned that Dr. Taylor is considering changing the format of the course (something like an "inverted classroom" or something like that). I took a course before at another university in which the lectures were narrated PowerPoints (between 30-45 minutes long, some of the more complex ideas were broken into smaller 20 minute segments). The students in the class were expected to watch these lectures on their own time and instead of in-class lectures, there were two discussions/labs per week. In these discussions, the professor would guide the students through homework problems from the book and theoretical/practical application of the statistical procedures (as well as software issues). I think that format was more helpful for actually grasping the content and application of the course material since students were able to print off the PowerPoint slides and take notes as they listened to the online lectures, but they could also refer back to old lectures later in the semester when they needed to review/clarify. I also noticed that the attendance at the discussions were more willing and less "dragging their feet" because students felt prepared for the discussions and had a better idea of what was expected. Even the homework seemed less taxing because students were able to really tie it all together in the discussions rather than feeling lost/confused or spending hours upon hours trying to figure out what is expected. I would strongly encourage Dr. Taylor to give this idea more thought. I think he is an excellent professor and is very knowledgeable about statistics, but I do not think the course's current format is the best means of conveying the material.
The discussions were painful sometimes (although, they are necessary and valuable to the course. I do not have a clever solution on how to improve the discussions but sometimes they were like nails on a chalk board. Perhaps just be more direct with students and explicitly state (multiple times) that they are graded on participation in the discussion and that you are taking notes on who speaks and who says what. This may facilitate discussion/participation from more individuals, as I felt only a couple of people were talking every week.
Adjust homework assignments so that they match up with what we've covered in lecture.
It's a minor gripe but I don't think that homework should be graded the way that it is (on an actual point scale). Rather a series of checks, check- minus, or minuses. From what I've heard about the study sessions, you can essentially go there, get your homework done and have a good deal of the correct answers. It seems almost unfair to those that are not able to go because of another conflict and subsequently spend hours doing it some other time.
26. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Fantastic professor and very knowledgeable, though I feel that the course should strive to better prep students for graduate work, not cover the basics/theory behind it all.
Very nice guy, unclear lecturer at times;
An incredibly knowledgeable instructor with a methodical teaching approach.
Dr. Taylor exhibited a clear understanding of the material and is very willing to help. Unfortunately, questions were not answered clearly, to the point where it was honestly better to quietly hold our confusions and teach ourselves the material. I do see that Dr. Taylor is putting in the effort and cares about his students, so it is hard for me to say, but this course needs some serious restructuring.
I give him high marks as a professor. However, I do think the course could be improved (per my comments above).
I have a lot of respect for Dr. Taylor, for he is a true scientist. Always careful about the words he chooses to describe things, practices good ethics and is never afraid to question someones logic and flat out tell them they are incorrect.
great professor who definitely knows the subject matter. I just don't like the course organization.
27. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 10 1.14 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%)
28. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 10 1.08 Freq(%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 5 (50%) 1 (10%)
29. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.56 10 1.13 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 3 (30%) 2 (20%)
30. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.7 10 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%) 2 (20%)
31. The exams reflected the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.6 10 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 0 (0%) 8 (80%) 0 (0%)
32. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 10 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 6 (60%) 2 (20%)
33. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Discussions, learning of new stats. software, which I feel is critical
Discussions
Professor Taylor had extensive knowledge of his subject and was dedicated to ensuring our understanding of the material
I felt that the mid-term was fair and I appreciate that grading was done quickly.
I appreciated gaining a better understanding of the statistical software. I also think the discussions were helpful overall.
34. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.5 10 1.2 Freq(%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 4 (40%) 1 (10%)
35. Other comments:
If asked, I will advise future students not to take this course. Please note that this evaluation reflects neither bitterness nor spite about a course grade. I write this because this class needs to change.
I think the initial grading of assignments were not as fair/clear as they could be. However, later in the semester, the grading seemed to be more fair (I think this was due to communication between Dr. Taylor and the TA).
This has been the most useful class I have taken in grade school. I would be completely lost without a basic understanding of statistics in which this course supplies. I would make this a requirement for all incoming students who are interested in assessing quantitative biological data.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 76041 (001)     76042 (002)     76043 (003)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 12 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.17 12 0.39 Freq(%) 10 (83%) 3 (33%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (78%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 7 (78%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 5 (42%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.11 9 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (42%) 5 (42%)
7. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 12 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 3 (43%)
8. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
This course was the most practical course I have taken in grad school. I began using the statistics I was learning in class immediately in my own research. I gained a valuable wealth of knowledge.
That we use real data from researches. This helps understanding not only statistics but the way a scientific investigation needs to be planned and done. Discussion sessions are great.
using real world examples and going into a lot of detail on what the analyses really mean
I learned a great deal of practical information in this course that I am sure I will utilize in my current and future academic career. This course was taught in a way that was easy to follow, especially considering statistics can be difficult to understand. The homework study sessions were of great use to me. I felt that they were very helpful to solidify the concepts we were learning during the previous week.
Writing down notes every day was much more helpful than following along on a powerpoint.
The general linear models, the sample datasets, and the software requirement.
The study sessions would have been helpful if I had had a laptop I could bring to the sessions. The lectures were informative and the discussion aided in exploring concepts given during lecture.
The use of so many different types of datasets was very helpful, in discussions and homework assignments. I think the structure of the discussion section during the last half of the semester is extremely valuable because we are given data and have to analyze it based on everything we've learned (not just the new technique we learned that week). It is much more realistic this way, and even though it is more difficult, it makes us apply our "toolkit" in very useful, realistic ways.
This to be a very thorough introduction to statistics. I found the discussions to be incredibly helpful in understanding the material.
The lecture was extremely valuable as it effectively introduced me to statistical methods that can be applied in graduate research.
I found the combination of lectures and homework assignments most helpful in demonstrating the concepts of the course. The discussions were also excellent assignments, allowing development of some of the judgement calls involved in evaluating data sets, particularly those related to the field of biological science. The degree to which the course as a whole is well planned makes the challenge of doing well well worth it. I found the weekly study sessions very useful, and am very grateful for this opportunity.
I think the "real-ness" of the examples for handouts and discussions are great and really interesting.
Designing the a good study and an experiment. Data desription
learning how to properly analyzed data sets
A basic understanding of statistics is essential for understanding of and publication in peer reviewed journals. I believe 80% of the class gained this ability during the course.
I think that the discussions were helpful, as well as the lectures. I think that it's refreshing to have a teacher writing on the chalkboard! And not just giving a powerpoint. I really liked that we used real life case study biological research examples in our data analysis.
The discussions were helpful because we are actually using things learned in class to answer questions about real data.
I found it valuable to use real data to explore the different statistical tests (from handouts and discussion).
Having a time and place where students can meet with the TA to get help on the weekly homework assignments.
9. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
Some of the discussion sessions were not very productive. Very few students participated and the discussion moved very slowly. I feel a lot of students did not prepare for the discussion ahead of time and had no idea what was going on. I'm pretty sure half of them were working on their write ups in class instead of participating. I got something out of it for sure but it could have moved faster and students who do not participate could have been encouraged to do so.
All the homework, sometimes I felt more worried about giving the work on time that even learning and understanding what I was doing. They should be every two weeks maybe.
At times it was unclear what was expected on homework and discussion assignments. I did not like being marked off on "little things" I didn't know needed to be included, or were just not reported in the "correct" spot. So perhaps more specific directions in reporting our results would be useful.
Large discussion sections made it difficult to find a time to say something someone didn't say.
The amount of busywork was frankly ridiculous. Discussions were excruciating.
The lecture topics were sometimes very confusing and seemed like they could be presented in a clearer way.
Discussion sections. Weekly assignments are tedious.
I found the discussion and homework very useful, the lectures were the "least valuable" to me, but still important for understanding concepts.
While I feel the homeworks and discussion assignments are useful in implementing lessons learned in class, they are very time consuming.
There were no moments where I felt that any course assignments, materials or otherwise were not useful. Though challenging, it has been an excellent course.
I would have liked more examples to be covered in the lecture portion that were directly related to some of the textbook problems. I struggled with connecting the concepts introduced in lecture and applying them.
Everything was okay for me
anything related to minitab
The labs and Homework both being due on Monday, killing all chances of a decent weekend.
I think that the discussions are a little too long sometimes. I think 1.5 hrs might be more appropriate.
The length of time we spend in the beginning discussing distributions, considering we were only really looking at Normality (or non-Normality).
Having such a large workload lead me to be, at times, very turned off by and frustrated with the course.
10. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.78 9 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 12 (100%)
11. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.11 9 1.27 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 4 (57%)
12. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.22 9 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 5 (42%) 3 (43%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Stand up guy who takes pride in what he does. He is doing a service to this University by teaching such a practical course. I will recommend this course to anyone studying physical science.
He is a very good teacher, and tries hard to involve the students and show us how important is accuracy in science research. He also forgets that Biometry is not our only class.
Good teacher
He's a pretty interesting professor. I really like how he learned all our names and knew what we were working on or were going to work on. It makes it more personal.
Glad someone is teaching this course.
Very knowledgeable instructor who is obviously an expert in his field. At times he is approachable and understands the difficulty students have with a topic. Other times he seemed less patient with student's difficulties.
Good
He is extremely willing to answer questions and help apply class concepts outside of the classroom (to my own data). He is an excellent resource to discuss these topics with, and the organization of the course was thoughtful and set at a good pace. I really like his style of teaching (writing on the board vs. powerpoint style is much more effective).
He is a very affective lecturer and leader in discussion. He is accessible to students and always makes sure our questions are answered.
GREAT! He makes it easy to pay attention and learn about the sometimes daunting subject of statistics.
He is an excellent teacher and clearly has a wholehearted commitment to the art and science of both teaching and speaking well. He also clearly enjoys teaching this course. It is clear that over the years he has been planning his course and making the right adjustments, which is reflected by the performance of the course this term as well as the reputation the course has as an excellent one. It has been an excellent experience for me, which is highly appreciated.
Good Professor. Is very knowledgable about the topic and is open to students' inquiries.
He is a passionate and humble teacher. He tries his best to make sure we understood. He was available any time I need his assistance. When you send email to him he responds immediately.
well-spoken professor.
He is a great teacher, that really knows the subject, and he provided us with a thorough overview for real life analysis in our own research.
good teacher and helpful. he is available after hours for one on one learning and provides help from his TA.
Very nice professor and always willing to discuss statistics or studentâ??s projects. Itâ??s obvious that he is very involved with grad student research at UH and supportive of the students.
He is very knowledgeable and passionate about what he teaches. He has high expectations which is good but the work load was a bit much.
14. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.89 9 0.78 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (44%) 7 (58%)
15. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 9 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (50%) 5 (42%)
16. Other comments:
Yes the assignments were a pain in my ass this semester but they really helped to nail down the concepts learned in class. I think the work load was a little unreasonable toward the end of the semester. I haven't taken the final yet but I'm preparing for the worst. Maybe you should consider a mid semester break week for the assignments just so students can catch up on various other things they have going on. This class was like a part time job if you want to get the most out of it. All said and done it was really a great experience! I sincerely thank you!
Especially at the beginning, I feel like going over more real life problems/equations during lecture would have aided in better understanding how to do some of the assignments. Either from the book or other.
I wish we had been able to cover the more complex topics (or that advanced biometry was offered next semester), but I feel like I have a very thorough understanding of these fundamental topics and this course has been extremely valuable for me. I'm very glad I took it!
I liked the class and learned a lot!
Although the course was very hard to me but i liked it because Taylor started from scratch (beginning) assuming that we all have the same background of little knowledge on statistics. I truly liked his teaching strategy.
One of the better teaching professors in the University in my experience. Thanks Andy.
I would have liked to learn the probability/mathematical theory behind statistical tests that were discussed in the second half of the semester. It is easy to look up how and when to use the different tests, but I think Andy has the knowledge to provide the background theory, which would strengthen this class and provide students with something that is more difficult to explore individually. I think discussions are too long and it is possible to analyze the same assignments in a shorter amount of time and still allow each student to gain sufficient knowledge about the topic of the week.
I think the work load was a bit much for the amount of credits we're receiving, especially as a graduate course where we are at the same time, applying for grants, doing our own research, teaching, and taking other required courses. I think that students would be able to gain just as much from the course with less of a work load. Most classes and some discussions went over time which was, at times, frustrating and inconvenient.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL632, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 632 - Advanced Biometry Crn (Section): 89136 (001)     89137 (002)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 8 (100%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 6 (86%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 6 (86%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 8 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
5. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%)
6. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The use of actual research projects as examples of concepts.
Discussions where we could figure out our software issues and discuss the different ways to approach the problem at hand
Discussion sections. Reading through homework and discussion solutions was very very useful. I will definitely use these solution sets to guide me in my own analyses. I hope that solutions from the midterm and final will also be shared.
Discussion was very helpful and also the second half of the course on multiple ANOVA and mixed models
It's good to understand the mechanisms behind the analyses we need for our research. This is the most valuable aspect of the course.
lecture handout and discussions
I believe the discussion section definitely helps the most in order to grasp the concepts presented in lecture.
Outside class room support through after class discussion, office hours and e-mail conversations.
I learned different study designs as well as statistical methods to analyze them correctly.
The discussions were the most valuable because we could apply what we were learning in a group setting.
The actual lectures were very helpful, and the discussions were useful because it allowed us to try to use what we'd learned, synthesizing everything from looking at the raw data to answering the question at hand.
Multiple Linear Regression. Homework and Discussion Assignments.
model selection data transformation
The discussion part of the course, where I learned to use the knowledge in real time cases.
7. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
I know it is important to know the background behind the stats, but sometimes I feel like this took away from time to actually apply the stats. But, I don't think this should be changed!
I found the text quite difficult to read - I wonder if there is another book that could have been used. The second half of the semester (after spring break) felt very rushed. Maybe more of this material can be moved to the first half?
Lectures about the Matrices behind the calculations were tough to follow and to link to the actual understanding of the statistics
My grades.
Mid term
everything was great
Nothing that I can think of.
For the most part, I actually feel like all parts of the course were useful. Homework reinforces what we've gone over in class, and discussion, as I stated earlier, synthesizes everything we've learned. It is quite a lot of work for one class, but all parts are actually helpful and necessary.
The specific textbook used was difficult to understand.
The long and time taking homeworks (from text book).
8. The instructor gives clear explanations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 7 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 2 (29%) 4 (57%)
9. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 8 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (43%)
10. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 5 (63%)
11. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%)
12. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 8 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 8 (100%)
13. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%) 7 (88%)
14. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.88 8 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 7 (88%)
15. The TA grades paper (exams, homework) fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
16. The TA's comments on written work were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.57 7 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
17. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 7 1.07 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 3 (43%)
18. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (63%) 5 (71%)
19. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%)
20. The exams gave students an opportunity to demonstrate what they had learned.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 7 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 1 (14%) 4 (57%)
21. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%)
22. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
Andy is great and he's been doing this for a while, so there's not much room for improvement. Maybe, he could dedicate more time in lecture to actually doing the stats in software. Sometimes it took me a while to figure out how to do the homework because of software issues. This being said, I probably learned more figuring it out myself!
Maybe reduce homework load a little, but overall I think the course was good. Would have liked more time for linear mixed models, and it would have been nice to touch on some multivariate statistics.
Perhaps we could spend some time on using different distributions for our models, like a poisson distribution. I understand that this would most likely be towards the end of the course, and need to be based on likelihood as opposed to least squares type stuff, but understanding our options for the analyses we actually are going to do in our research is important. However, there may not be enough time to cover that type of thing through this course.
I totally satisfied with the course, no more comments.
I think it would help a lot more if the discussion section and the homework questions were aligned a little bit more. It seemed as though for some weeks what we were doing in discussion had nothing to do with what we were expected to do on the home works.
More frequent discussion sessions, like twice a week instead of once.
The course was done excellent. Maybe there were only some issues with using software for mixed models.
Nothing really that I can think of. It would have been nice if I could have made it to the help sessions that Matt did but the time schedule didn't work out.
I think it would be useful to summarize what we've gone over in discussion at the end of the period. It would helpful to lay out the steps that we've taken just to reinforce what we've done and why. This would be more helpful for some discussions rather than others, though (I'm thinking of discussions were there were multiple ways to evaluate what model to use or other discussions where the question may have been more unclear...sorry I can't think of specifics!).
Maybe use a different textbook.
1. to many instructions at different time for exam. trying to help students, it created some confusion. so, for next time provide all the instructions in exam sheet at one time 2. the homeworks are not worthy of what times it takes to do. focus on real questions as in discussion.
23. Other comments:
I may not have a perfect understanding of advance biometry after this class, but I know that Dr. Taylor will always be there to help if I need him in the future. The knowledge that I gained from this class, while maybe not complete knowledge, has greatly improved my understanding of the literature in my field.
This course can feel overwhelming, as can the first biometry course, but if we expect to do anything but the simplest statisical analyses in our research we need this and probably much more.
Great course, really learned a lot from this course and Andy is a great instructor! I think Matt did a good job TA'ing as well.
Overall I think you're a great professor, Andy. I especially appreciate the fact that you realize how much work and effort we put into your class, and yet you also realize that we have other obligations to fulfill at the same time and try to accommodate those. You also explain things well and I understand why you assign the amount of work that you do.
Professor Taylor is one of the best, I have studies with

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 76700 (001)     76701 (002)     76702 (003)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (77%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 4 (100%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 9 (69%)
5. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 13 0.91 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (14%) 6 (46%) 1 (25%)
6. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
The applicability of the method provided by the course to future study and research.
All the different types of statistical tests that can be used.
The discussions were helpful when we discussed/practiced running tests that we would then do on our homework.
Dr. Taylor is incredibly knowledgable in this field. He's also very easy to talk to and approach with questions. Instead of answering your questions, he'll often give you the tools you need to answer the question yourself. I was unable to attend the course study session because I had another class at the time.
ANOVA applies directly to my research.
The regular homework assignments were the best way for me to learn the material and also to keep up with the coursework. I also appreciated most of the discussion sections, as the collaborative atmosphere contributed to understanding of how the different tests could and should be used. Lectures were clear and well taught and the material was presented at a good pace.
It was nice that Andy followed the textbook because if I didn't understand or missed something in class, I could always look through the textbook to get a better understanding.
discussion, approachability of the instructor
Not having powerpoints. Andy's board skills are above par. It was the proper mix of writing and discussion; I never sat twirling my pen nor was I scribbling furiously trying to keep up. There was enough time to digest the presented material while having acceptable notes for review outside of class
Andy Taylor is thorough and always willing to answer questions students have about the subject material. He has the students apply what they learn (almost too much) in weekly discussions as well as homeworks, which helps us learn.
The focus on conceptual use of statistical methods
Discussions are a great place to practice the theory that we are learning
The discussion section. Listening to how others approached the same problem set improved how I assessed the exercise.
Clear and thorough explanations of complicated concepts. A clear willingness to answer any and all questions.
I thought the weekly discussions were nice because it covered the material we were learning in class at the time and allowed us to ask any questions at the time.
the practical application of concepts offered by assignments
I really like the discussion format. It was very helpful to throw out a bunch of random ideas and hash out what was relevant and useful to use for different data sets. Also, the random tangents were interesting.
The 8 data sets provided useful examples of the material covered in the course. I found the homework and discussions useful although the discussions, at times, tended to be long and sometimes confusing due to meandering topics and digressions.
The discussion sessions are definitely very important in helping you wrap your head around the ideas you present in lecture. Also, the most helpful part of the lecture is when you do the recap. at the end of a chapter- just so we hear all the important stuff one more time.
The discussion section of the course does a wonderful job in bridging the theoretical parts of the course to real world applications of the statistical procedures.
The study sessions helped me a great deal.
I thought homework was appropriate for applying concepts and discussions were a very valuable learning opportunity. I also found the real life example handouts to be useful.
7. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
None
The study sessions
The discussions were not helpful when Andy used them as extra time to lecture. Discussion should be for discussing problems, learning about Minitab, etc.
Nothing.
I felt that a couple of the discussion sections were frustrating in that we didn't seem to come to a definitive conclusion at the end, particularly the discussion about bats.
the difficulty of the tests
I can think of no way to improve my learning experience in biometery. My concern is the exclusive use of minitab. I know that it is used because of its ease, power, and cost but I question how useful it will be beyond the course, many schools and departments use other packages like SciPy or R and I feel that this may put UH students at a disadvantage when moving on beyond the classroom.
While repetition is great for learning, there was too much homework for a graduate level class where graduate assistant students are usually expected to spend half-time in lab and half in class/doing homework, excess homework takes away time from necessary lab work.
Handouts are very useful but maybe elaborate more on them in class.
n/a
The discussion section did provide valuable time to work out problems, my only additional comment on them would be that it took a little bit of time to realize what was really expected in the discussion write ups. I originally believed that most all comments and topics broached in discussion should be included in the write up, as opposed to simply a way one chose to solve the problem. Making that abundantly clear in the beginning would have lessened the stress involved in writing the first few write ups.
na
The explanations of material in lecture. The concepts are very complex and learning in lecture can be confusing due to how the concepts are presented. A bit more clarification as to what we're learning and why would be helpful. The mathematical underpinnings of the concepts that is taught is helpful, but better clarifying the important ideas when presenting all the equations would prevent being overwhelmed, lost and confused. Sometimes its not clear what is to be gained by the equations or how they relate to understanding the application of the methods as there is so much tossed out on the board and we go through the material so quickly that it is difficult to grasp the ideas without more explicit clarification.
I am hesitant to state something that has the least value, because everything had value. Just because it had the least value, doesn't mean that it should be omitted. All the material was useful.
I don't understand why you go into such detail on the derivatives... We never have to use them and they really just confused me.
Andy's accessibility.
I was unable to attend the optional review sessions with the TA because I had another class during this time. I would have liked to try them out.
8. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (92%)
9. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%)
10. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 2 (67%)
11. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
I satisfy with the course material and lecture delivered by Prof. Andrew Taylor.
Good teacher
A great, easy to get a hold of teacher.
Andy is an excellent teacher. His lectures make it easy to understand the material and important points are revisited multiple times. Andy expects a reasonable amount of work from the students as well.
Andy is one of the best professors I've had at UH. He is a very good lecturer and he explains things in a way that is easy to understand.
Great professor, I never felt that there was any aspect of him/the class that needed improvement.
Great. I appreciate his knowledge of the subject and enthusiasm for teaching the students how to properly apply statistics to data.
great teacher
He demonstrates knowledge on the topic, is happy to help outside the class and is always prompt in responding to questions.
Great instructor that wants his students to succeed.
A truly excellent teacher. Managed to make topics engaging and understandable. Great ability to communicate with students and clearly willing to address any confusion without prejudice. I look forward to taking my next class with him.
He is a very great teacher, I think that he makes him self very accessible to students which is very nice and he seems to care about the students. Something that can be hard to find in many universities.
great teacher, very helpful and available for students.
Great, made sure to present the statistics in a structured format that kept some of the more confusing concepts from being even more confusing.
Am I describing my evaluation of Dr. Taylor? In which case, I feel that my evaluation is true and fair. I state nothing disingenuous or false.
Super helpful and genuinely wants students to understand useable application of the concepts he presents.
very positive. He understands the material well. He has organized the progression of topics in the course in an ideal way. He is extremely patient.
Dr. Taylor is a good instructor. He is helpful with questions students pose and is thorough in answering them.
It is obvious how much Dr. Taylor puts into the course. He is very accessible to his students and really wants them to learn. He is also very open to feedback and making the class optimally useful for his students.
12. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 1 (25%) 1 (14%) 8 (62%)
13. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (46%) 7 (54%)
14. Other comments:
I would have liked Andy to derive some of the formulas. I like the math (i.e. probability) behind the statistics. I think the derivations would have also helped me understand the tests more thoroughly and remember the assumptions better. It's a lot of work writing up the discussion and having homework due every week. Maybe only some of the discussions should be handed in.
Everything was very relavant to the subject.
This is a minor quibble, but I at times found it frustrating that there were so many emails sent out regarding the course but that the attachments contained in the emails were not included in the subject. For example, if I was looking for homework 5, I'd have to search through my inbox for all emails from Andy and then open them all to see which one contained the proper attachment. This could be easily remedied if the attachments contained in the email were included in the subject line. I also would have appreciated a mid-semester evaluation of participation performance in discussion to gauge whether the amount I was participating was satisfactory. Participation makes up 40% of the grade in the class, so it would good for students to make sure they are on the right track halfway through the semester.
Sometimes I got a little frustrated that class went over a few minutes because I have a class right after biometry clear across campus but I didn't want to leave biometry until Andy was done because I didn't want to miss anything.
Great job
I understand the usefulness of a discussion period for this sort of class, but I think it would be less painful if it were not almost 2 hours long. I also think that the current way of post-discussion write ups (instead of pre-discussion write-ups) is useful, but seems redundant if we all are present in the discussion and saw what was done and what worked or didn't work, writing it up afterward just seems un-necessary most of the time. Would you consider no discussion write ups? What if the discussion became more of a session in a computer lab, where every student was expected to individually play with the data during discussion and could ask questions or make comments? and everyone printed their results afterward (so wouldn't have to go home and regurgitate what was done). Otherwise, Thanks for a great semester Andy.
Maybe more emphasis on refining concepts in discussion

Andrew Taylor: BOT652, ZOOL652, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Botany
Course: BOT 652 - Population Biology Crn (Section): 88748 (001)    
Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 652 - Population Biology Crn (Section): 88505 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.33 6 1.63 Freq(%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.17 6 0.41 Freq(%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (67%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 4 (67%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 5 (83%)
6. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%) 1 (17%)
7. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 1 (33%)
8. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 6 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 1 (33%)
9. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
10. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
I think the course could benefit from a discussion section. This would be time apart from lecture to learn how to use new programs, work through problems from the book, and share approaches. Another idea (that would probably be a lot of work for the professors) would be to send out homework solutions so students could have a document to compare their own work to.
I thought Andy's lectures were great. He was flexible if someone had a question and needed further explanation of a concept. His lectures on the chalkboard were generally well organized, though when paired with the notes provided it was sometimes difficult to follow the lecture. This is because Andy's lectures skipped around in the notes, so I was simultaneously trying to listen and also flipping frantically through the notes to try and figure out where we were. I also appreciated the opportunity to get homework help from the Friday study sessions, though I rarely started the homework before the weekend so I didn't often take advantage of them.
The broad introduction to a number of useful models, and reading classic papers on each. The papers and reading discussions were actually the most useful part.
I thought the range of topics covered in the course were useful and made the course worthwhile. I appreciated the handouts provided by Dr. Taylor. The handouts allowed for the professor to cover the topic at a nice pace in class while not going over every detail. I think the handouts will be useful as a reference for future work.
The lecture provided by Dr. Taylor provided the most insight and greatest understanding.
This class helped me to learn how to design and to use different models for analyzing populations. Moreover I found that these models also can be applied to different fields of biology including phylogeny that I work with.
11. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
I felt that many of our homework questions had a conceptual approach rather than a mathematical approach. A combination of the two might help to reinforce the concepts covered in class. For example we never used any calculus in our homework assignments. The textbook was very difficult to follow. Is there another text that could be used?
I did not care for the textbook. I felt it did not have enough examples of how to solve the types of problems we were asked for homework. In addition, it was hard to follow when trying to read it. I do not think it added to my understanding of the material.
HOMEWORK. Doing homework in graduate school. Readings and short essays would have helped me learn the material much better.
My biggest criticism of the logistics of the course was the lack of clear expectations for the students. There was a large amount of variability when it came to grading homework, and what seems to be an arbitrary "attendance and participation" grade. As far as course material, I think that the subject matter is difficult to cover at length due to the wide range of topics. I would suggest (a) using a different book or rely more on handouts (b) cover fewer topics.
The book. It was not helpful in explaining material and did not assist in preparing students to address homework problems.
I think some parts of the course were taught very briefly because of the time limits. And therefore sometimes it was hard to make connections between one idea and another.
12. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
13. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
14. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
15. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
17. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 4 (67%)
18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 3 (50%)
19. The instructor has an interesting style of presentation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
20. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (33%)
21. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (33%)
22. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
23. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
24. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
25. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
I think many students were confused by what was expected for the final project. In the future maybe an outline of deadlines and expectations could clarify any confusion.
I feel that the weekly homework assignments took longer than they should have. I ended up spending 4 or so hours on each homework assignment, only to receive a 3/5 or 2/5 on them. This was frustrating, especially because Curt said earlier in the semester that he only intended us to spend 1-2 hours outside of class on each homework assignment. I'm not sure if this was also Andy's intention.
New textbook. Less HW. More reading. More value placed on analyzing models from papers.
Change the book and dedicate the first week providing background info so that the students will be on the same page. I feel that a problem with the course is that half the class had a strong background in the subject matter while for the other half it was a brand new way of thinking. I felt at times that it was difficult for the instructors to teach to both sides without compromises the understanding of the material.
I think that course is very intensive (that is very good) with a lot of homework assignments, but the discussions sometimes were poor organized. Sometimes homework questions were very unclear.
26. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
27. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 1 (33%)
28. Reading assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
29. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 1.21 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%)
30. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (67%) 3 (50%)
31. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%)
32. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%)
33. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 6 1.52 Freq(%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%)
34. Team teaching provided insights a single instructor could not.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%) 0 (0%)
35. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I liked the in-class discussions of papers. Sometimes I felt that in combination with homework assignments, though, that I was not able to read them as in-depth as I would have liked. I thought lectures were interesting though sometimes they were at a bit of a faster pace than I would have liked.
The team teaching was probably necessary since this course would be hard for one person to take on, but the two instructors have very different teaching styles. In some ways this can be good, but it made it hard to switch back and forth.
The lectures. Although the material was difficult to follow at times the instructors made general concepts easier to follow compared to the book.
I like the handouts that were very helpful to understand the textbook.
36. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%) 1 (17%)
37. Other comments:
I gained a lot from this course and am glad that i took it. It seemed like there were students who had prior experience with course material and students who had little to no experience. I wonder if there should be stricter prerequisites in order to take the course? It sounds like the mathematical modelling course provided some students with a good framework to place pop bio concepts into.
I was intrigued by this course. I liked to learn about all the different models and what they were originally designed for. However, I felt that this course could be cut in half and explained more completely and clearly to have a more permanent result. If the ultimate goal of this course was to offer the students a sampler of population models, then it was a success, but if the ultimate goal was to give students a complete and lasting knowledge of all the different models presented, then I would say it was not a success. Make two courses: intro to population biology, and advanced population biology. Make three courses: matrix models in population biology, a intro to meta populations, and population genetics. So many subjects we just scratched over, this class could be split into many in depth courses.
Good job!!!

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL691B, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 691B - Seminar: General Zoology Crn (Section): 89483 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 6 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
7. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
8. I participated actively in class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%) 2 (33%)
9. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
10. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
It was great that my classmates and I could look at our own datasets/models in class and have helpful discussions with the group. I definitely made progress on my analysis.
Dr Taylor goes out of his way to help students to solve their problems. I appreciate that he looks at students' data and brings up alternative ways of looking at the problem.
Working with our own data.
11. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
No complaints!
Nothing.
12. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
13. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
14. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%)
15. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
17. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%)
18. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
19. The instructor has an interesting style of presentation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
20. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
21. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
22. The instructor has been helpful whenever I have encountered difficulties.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
23. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
24. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
25. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
26. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
27. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Just keep teaching it, hopefully!
Great the way it is.
28. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 5 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%)
29. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
30. I feel that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
31. The course has significantly increased my knowledge and interests.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
32. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
33. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 5 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%)
34. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
35. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
See above
Greatly appreciate Dr Taylor analyzing students' data.
36. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.4 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 2 (40%)
37. Other comments:
No survey responses were found.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 77544 (001)     77545 (002)     77546 (003)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.27 11 0.47 Freq(%) 8 (73%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 7 (88%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 11 0.81 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 1 (13%) 3 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 2 (25%) 1 (17%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
7. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 1.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%)
8. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
The discussion session, the use of the software for analysis, and the data sets. Previous courses that were more "survey of statistics" did not allow the opportunities to "play" with the software for the analysis. Also the lectures that focused on the constraints of different tests and the options when assumptions were not met. This is very useful tool as I proceed with my graduate studies.
The details and time given to first half of course, such as randomization and experimental design
applying statistical techniques to actual data
Discussions and discusson asigments. Also the study cases.
I appreciated the discussion sections because they allowed us to talk about the issues we had and the way we approached each data set without any criticism. We were also able to see other ways we could use the data and were forced to actually think about why we did certain analyses. Talking through the procedures was extremely helpful.
The course was so intensive that I spent almost all my time outside the class working with Dr. Taylor's assignments. I like that. He taught not only theory of statistical analysis but also how to use it on many good examples.
Classes. I found that I could get by through interactions in class. Reading the book was helpful, and gave a separate perspective on the analyses, but being in class and participating was by far the most important part of learning. Experimental design.
Andy Taylor is the best teacher I have had at UH, both in undergrad and grad school. He is smart, effective at communicating, open to questions, good at steering discussions, and all-around awesome! He should get a raise! I still am not great at statistics, and I still don't love it, but he changed my attitude completely, as I HATED stats before taking his class.
Discussions were good. Solutions provided for all assignments were very helpful
I think the most valuable part of the class was gaining knowledge about when you should and should not use particular tests (ANOVA,regression etc.). I think that it will be very helpful later on in my career to have that basic understanding.
The discussion time was valuable in deciding the best ways to analyze data as a class. I generally learn a lot better in a setting where we are allowed to discuss the PROCESS behind some of the overarching concepts and found discussions valuable for that reason. Of course Andy himself was nothing but helpful either after class or though emails.
The help sessions with the TA and discussion sessions. However, I think the discussion sessions were a little drawn out and could have been condensed into a shorter time period.
Homework and discussion sections. It was helpful to apply the points covered in class through these assignments.
Dr. Taylor coupled direct instruction and homework well.
Professor's availability outside of class.
The discussion sessions were really valuable in understanding the material.
TA assistance
I thought the discussions were a good opportunity to explore the subject and gain a better understanding of the topics.
The discussions were very helpful in letting us try different methods and deciding whether or not they were valid. They were also very useful in exposing us to various real-world scenarios, where there is often no single right answer, and we have to decide what works best.
learning how to use the statistical software.
9. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
Some of the definitions provided during lecture. In the effort to fully explain a specific topic, the definitions often became long and confusing, sometimes appearing to have a circular logic. The definitions would benefit from a more straight forward description with caveats or constraints being provided separately.
cd in the text
Some parts are not easy to follow, like there is a lack of connection at certain parts. Maybe it'll be interesting to create a tree structure about the logical relation of the topics and distribute it early in the semester so everyone follows. The homework is a waste of time. Better learning in the discussions. The exam should be more predictable. More related with homework or itâ??ll be even better if it is like the discussions
I did not find explanations of how to use a program or a statistical test in class very helpful because I didn't have access to the program. I think I really liked the discussion because I could do the tests while we talked about them. Just talking about them in class was not helpful for me when I tried to run the tests later.
The midterm, screw (because I don't think they will let me curse in this evaluation) the midterm. Perhaps that is a bit strong, but I do have hard feelings toward that test. Experimental design.
Perhaps a little too much emphasis on the details of the equations we were using
Nothing
I think my only potential gripe would be the amount of homework assigned. I know that i need to know biometry. But for me, the constant assignments given (discussions and homework) were at times a little tedious.
All of the distractions in lecture, wasting time going over little details of students' questions that should have been discussed outside of class.
Handouts (data sets)-I rarely used them.
Sometimes Dr. Taylor gets too deep into the theory and loses the listener on the practical applications of the material.
Midterm from hell ;)
It was hard to stay focused sometimes because the pace was really slow. I would drift off and start to day dream.
I thought that the book supplemented the lectures, but was not really needed to understand the material.
I felt the course could have moved at a quicker pace. I feel like the professor could have left out some of the subject in lecture and expected the students to learn them on their own time. This would allow the class to cover more topics.
The homework and discussion assignments.
10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 5 (63%)
11. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 5 (63%)
12. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 8 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 7 (88%)
13. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 4 (50%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 4 (50%)
15. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
16. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%)
17. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 1.17 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
18. The instructor has an interesting style of presentation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 1.21 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%)
19. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
20. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
21. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 1.55 Freq(%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
22. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 5 (83%)
23. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
24. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
25. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
26. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
I would have enjoyed and benefited from some activities that involved research design in addition to analyzing someone else's research design. The class would also benefit from a little more control over questions that may send discussions off track reducing the time available for lectures or discussion. The examples and analogies in the 2nd 1/2 of the course was much clearer than the 1st 1/2 of the course - especially the probability section.
He could implicitly state the connection between lectures/topics. Some lectures are hard to localize in the general context of the course. It will be a great improvement to find a logical line connecting all the lectures.
I think that an in class example of contrast test where we all have calculators and work through the problem would be really helpful, since the majority of us had to do it by hand.
I think Dr. Taylor can improve teaching by encouraging students to read the textbook beforehand(He told us at the beginning of class it is up to us to decide whether to read the textbook or not, so I did not see the importance first, but after few weeks, I started to read before going to the class, and reading the text book really enhanced my understanding of the lecture, and by very much, so I think he can encourage that at the beginning of class.) I have appreciated all the assignments given in the class, which helped me review concepts taught during the lecture, but I was also taking three other courses this semester, so it was very difficult to balance the amount of time I can spend on other classes. I would have appreciated if assignments are given less often, particularly towards the end of semester when all of us have to spend time on assignments given in other classes as well as on biometry.
He is so professional. So I think nothing needs to be improved.
Encourage students to interact more (I'm not sure how to do that), but I found that interactive learning was the only way. This class moved so quickly that I had to stop everything, multiple times, and ask for clarification of one thing or another. Andy, when you come to a part of the course that you know will be difficult to understand (contrasts, perhaps the transition to simple linear regression from ANOVA, residual analysis, etc.) make sure the students understand. When they nod their heads, ask them questions to be sure they're not just giving you the automatic response. Experimental design.
Less focus on the details and more on application, thus leaving time to cover more material
The one thing that I think might improve the teaching of the course is to have two slightly longer class periods a week rather than 3 shorter ones. Often it seemed that just as we got into the bulk of the material class ended and then we had to slightly backtrack the next class period.
I found Andy to be a very knowledgeable instructor for the course! I know he genuinely wanted us to understand the material! I think my lack of understanding of some of the concepts is more a lack of any freetime whatsoever on my part to review notes ect than a lack of teaching ability on the part of Andy! Biometry is just tough and I've never really been (or will be unfortunatley) a math person
I think a little more guidance in the discussion sessions would be helpful. We often went off on a tangent about useless information. Some students would suggest a way to analyze data that was obviously not correct, and they should have been guided in a proper direction.
I thought that the jar of numbers was a really great example to illustrate the points that we were covering in class that week. More examples and visuals would be helpful. For example it would be great to see how graphs change as you apply a transformation.
* maybe have students who need help with past hw come to discussion early, and shorten required discussion time.
Condense the math manipulation part of the course into a few worksheets and focus more on study design and analysis.
I think he should try to discourage discussion from students during the lectures and ask students to reserve their questions for the discussion section or after class. I know discussion is a good thing, but too often I felt some of the student's were trying to discuss or even argue a topic that was just introduced. I think it would be more productive for those students to research the topic and then ask questions during the discussion section. This would allow for more topics to be covered over the course.
Material covered seemed rushed at the end, especially the chi-square distribution. Some more homework problems (maybe optional problem sets) would be helpful in making sure students understand how to use the different analysis. I disliked the textbook, there were too many examples.
Although I did learn a lot in this course, I still feel unable to utilize statistical analysis in practical application. I think more time should be spent on explaining the practical application of statistics in data analysis. While I recognize that the aim of the discussion sections is to accomplish this, I feel like time was wasted on listening to the failed approaches of other students when we all would have benefited more from examples of how to do apply concepts correctly. The lecture material on the theory behind the analyses was not sufficient in explaining how one can apply these theories to real data.
27. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
This course was very challenging - allowing me to learn statistics at a much deeper level that previous courses. Often this resulted in points of increased confusion but in the end, it was very beneficial.
Great teacher. Deep knowledge of the course. Great
Great! I really found the class helpful in my understanding of the course material and how to start the process of thinking about how to analyze data.
Dr. Taylor knows and understand the subject very well, and at the same time he knows how best to communicate with students. His lecture was very organized and clear, and I was very glad to take this class this semester.
professional and skilled teacher and scientist.
I like Andy's teaching style, and his willingness to discuss with students and clarify things during class. Andy is very clear, for the most part, and if he's not somebody usually questioned him. I'm also impressed with Andy's memory for what may seem like trivial information, but I think it means a lot to the individual, about the students in his classes. I can also see that Andy controls himself, and doesn't put himself into dangerous positions, which is certainly a good quality to have (I am not this way). Experimental design.
He is the best teacher I have had at UH. I am sad that his class is ending.
Great scientist and person
good!
A wonderful educator!
He is a great teacher, but I think the lecture style could be made a little more interactive and entertaining. Discussions were helpful, but I think more of his involvement would benefit the course.
Ive had no prior coursework in statistics and felt that this class prepared me well to use statistical tests and data in the future.
Smart and funny
Overall, great instructor who is very knowledgeable and concerned about his students understanding his material. I just don't think his lecture style matches my learning style, but that's no reflection on him since he makes adjustments when we meet one on one. I think he takes the lecture approach that he does to try and meet the needs of as many students as he can in the class. Great job overall, but we could do with a little less assignments. Thanks.
Knowledgeable professor and great course. Highly recommended.
I think he is a very knowledgeable teacher, and clearly knows the subject matter well. I learned a lot from the course and would recommend it to others.
Very good, teaching style is engaging and class format especially discussions are very useful.
Some improvements to course and lecturing style could be achieved. I found the lectures to be painfully slow and could not stay engaged for the entire hour. The course itself could be revised to focus more on application in a real-world sense. Also, the amount of busy work that accompanied the course was unrealistic, and frankly, infuriating. At the graduate level, no one has the time to complete so many mundane and un-helpful homework and discussion assignments.
28. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%)
29. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 1.21 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%)
30. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 6 1.17 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%)
31. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 1.21 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%)
32. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 6 1.47 Freq(%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
33. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%) 1 (17%)
34. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.91 11 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 4 (36%) 3 (27%)
35. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Discussions / discussion asigments
I really liked the discussion section.
I like discussions and homeworks where I could check my knowledge of the course.
Not the midterm. The subject matter, I feel like this has been the most important class I have taken. Experimental design. Andy, emphasize experimental design to the point that students are annoyed with it. Experimental design is definitely the most important part of this course. In case you didn't read every one of these little boxes, I put experimental design in to them all.
The discussion session and outside help with the TA were very helpful.
Learning how to interpret data through minitab
HW's helped me understand lecture content
Discussion section, although they could be shorter. Professor availability
I enjoyed the discussion and discussion assignments the most.
I really liked the discussions, the study sessions with Megan were also very useful in clarifying what we covered in lecture.
I did not enjoy this course, but I do recognize that Andrew Taylor is very capable in the field of statistics. I feel that if I approached AT with questions about my own data analysis he would be very happy to help and a valuable resource.
36. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.0 11 1.18 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 5 (45%)
37. Other comments:
Good class. Lots of info. I know that your teaching style doesn't work for everyone (I heard a lot about that). I can only hope that my grade will reflect the amount that I have learned, which is impressive. Experimental design.
Thank you Andy for being such a great teacher and scientist. I wish there were more Professors like you in this school.
It was excellent, but I am incredibly grateful that the semester is almost over so I can go to sleep at night without worrying about the next biometry assignment!!!!!
I think the amount of homework given was excessive and there should not have been three assignments due every single week. We are in graduate school, not undergrad.
Maybe more opertunities for reinforcement
I would rate the course between good and excellent, a goocellent. In the areas where it is very effective it's excellent. The areas where I have concerns about the class are not bad, they are good but could be better. Thanks Andy.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL490E, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 490E - Ecology Crn (Section): 88812 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
2.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
6. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
8. I participated actively in class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
9. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
10. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
11. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
12. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
13. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
14. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
16. The instructor has an interesting style of presentation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
17. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
18. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
19. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
20. Students in this course are free to disagree and ask questions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
21. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
22. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
23. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
24. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Although I appreciated that we were given the freedom to choose any topic to research relating to climate change and ecology, I would've liked if the topics each person chose were more related. The course could be improved by creating a linking factor, maybe a summary presentation or paper, to tie together everything we learned.
I thought it was excellent to begin with!
I really enjoyed Dr. Taylor and do not have any recommendations for him. The seminar was great.
25. Reading assignments make students think.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
26. Reading assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
27. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
28. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
29. The course has significantly increased my knowledge and interests.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
30. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
31. The guest speakers contributed significantly to this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
32. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
33. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
34. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
The casual learning environment allowed me to feel comfortable discussing the topics freely.
The open forum atmosphere.
I really enjoyed the material.
35. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
The meeting time, but that couldn't be helped.
None
There was a bit of disorganization at the beginning and I feel as though the paper that was required shouldn't have been assigned.
36. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
37. Other comments:
No survey responses were found.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL632, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 632 - Advanced Biometry Crn (Section): 88796 (001)     88797 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 5 (100%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%)
7. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%)
8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Discussions
statistical theory combined with practical applications and examples. the discussion sessions were very helpful in learning how to approach and analyze a wide range of data
I think I really learned the most and was able to really put the ideas together in Discussions.
Practical applicaiton and hands-on data analysis using ecological and biological data examples.
learning how to take "textbook statistics" and apply it to real world ecological data sets. practice with data sets when we didn't know the "correct" tools for analysis - having to figure it out ourselves
It is all integrated and I needed to be able to hear the material in lecture before understanding what I was reading in the book while trying to do the homework exercises and then apply what we were learning and use our critical thinking skills in the discussions. I needed all aspects together.
9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
cant think of any
I feel like the long discussion write ups were a lot of busy work, particularly since we did not get any feed back on them.
None
Discussions often got very off-track. Would prefer to either do more in these, or make them for less time.
None-see above.
10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
11. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 3 (75%)
12. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
13. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
14. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
15. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
16. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
17. The instructor has an interesting style of presentation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%)
18. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
19. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
20. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
21. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 2 (40%)
22. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 4 (80%)
23. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
24. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Instructor is very effective. Logistically, the instructor should be more scrupulous with time constraints
Since students from different departments like the class, it would be nice to include various examples from their area of study for easy understanding. Perhaps, if possible the formulas given in class could be substituted by numbers (or show numbers after the formulas for students to see what it is like).
Encourage even more examples of student's own research for use in discussion sessions
I really appreciated that the instructor was willing to tailor the course to meet the student's needs/interests. I found his teaching style to be very effective.
I dont really know its complicated material. I think he does a good job.
25. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
26. The TA grades paper (exams, homework) fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.2 5 1.1 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
27. The TA's comments on written work were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.75 4 1.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%)
28. The recitation section is a valuable part of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 5 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 3 (75%)
29. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (25%)
30. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
31. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 5 (100%)
32. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 5 (100%)
33. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%) 2 (50%)
34. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
35. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Discussion sessions
All aspects, i.e. lectures, homeworks, and discussions. I was able to understand concepts and applications of contents better than when I started the course.
Would have been more helpful if the TA knew the material. Grading of Homeworks and Discussions would have been greatly improved by constructive comments
I like reading papers and seeing the stats in the methods sections and knowing what the authors did and why.
36. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
37. Other comments:
great course, like stated above, instructor just needs to be more aware of time constraints, simply because students have other commitments. class ran over 5 minutes almost each session. discussion was routinely 20 minutes over
Responses on #6 & 7 are due to my slow understanding of the contents. Noone to be blamed. Otherwise the program is good and I think for students to understand the stuff more clearly, the program has to be taught at least in two semester. There are so much for students to learn in one semester. If possible separate, Regression and ANOVA each to be taught in different semester.
Very well taught course! Also the other students were very knowledgeable and contributed alot to the course.
Very useful and integral part of my research. It was worth spending time and effort.
I got more out of this course than I had in the 7 semesters worth of statistics that I'd taken previously. The use of real-world data sets was immensely useful. Instructor was fantastic at explaining material clearly and allowing for lots of questions/discussion.
I think Dr. Taylor is an excellent teacher and has a really good grasp on the material and presents a very difficult subject clearly. He also makes himself available to his students whenever he can. He has a really good teaching style, is very patient and tries really hard to explain things in different ways when we dont understand something. He goes way out of his way to help anyone who is struggling with the material. Dr. Taylor is one of the best teachers Ive ever had. He obviosly really cares about his students and the learning process.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL691B, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 691B - Seminar: General Zoology Crn (Section): 89735 (003)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 2 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.0 1 0.0 Freq(%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 2 1.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
6. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
7. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 2 2.12 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%)
8. I help classmates learn.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 2 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
9. This course was helpful in developing new skills.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
10. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
Small group set-up and discussion-based
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
12. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
13. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
15. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
16. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
17. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
18. The instructor has an interesting style of presentation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
19. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
20. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 2 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (100%)
21. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 2 1.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%)
22. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
23. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
24. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
No survey responses were found.
25. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 2 1.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%)
26. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
27. Audiovisual materials (or computers) were adequate and used appropriately.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
28. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 2 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
29. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 2 1.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%)
30. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
No survey responses were found.
31. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.0 1 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
32. Other comments:
No survey responses were found.

Andrew Taylor: ZOOL631, Fall 2009     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Zoology
Course: ZOOL 631 - Biometry Crn (Section): 78908 (001)     78909 (002)     78910 (003)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.33 6 0.52 Freq(%) 4 (67%) 2 (25%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (75%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.7 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 4 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 10 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 4 (50%) 5 (50%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree