eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Nicole Hynson

Available Survey Results

BOT202, Fall 2013
BOT202L, Fall 2013
BOT454, Spring 2013

Nicole Hynson: BOT202, Fall 2013

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Botany
Course: BOT 202 - Plant Ecology Crn (Section): 78121 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.5 14 1.02 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 6 (43%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.93 14 0.27 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 13 (93%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 14 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 7 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 14 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 7 (50%)
6. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
3.86 14 0.66 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 8 (57%) 2 (14%)
7. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.07 14 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 9 (64%) 3 (21%)
8. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.21 14 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 9 (64%) 4 (29%)
9. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.71 14 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 7 (50%) 2 (14%)
10. I reconsidered many of my former attitudes.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 14 1.09 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 4 (29%) 4 (29%) 3 (21%)
11. I try to relate what I learn in this course to my own experience.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.21 14 0.8 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 8 (57%) 5 (36%)
12. This course was helpful in developing new skills.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 14 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 10 (71%) 3 (21%)
13. I generally understood the material presented in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.92 14 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 8 (57%) 2 (14%)
14. I learned more in this course than I expected to learn.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.69 14 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (43%) 5 (36%) 2 (14%)
15. Ten years from now I'll probably remember this course most by ...
How interesting some concepts were but also by how lost I felt sometimes as far as what to study or focus on for exams and quizzes.
The mandala circles that we had to place out in nature and study through observations or manipulative experiments.
how much I learned that Ecology was not the field for me.
I will remember the interesting and sometimes heated discussions of the books
How hard I worked to earn my grade, and the new perspectives I gained from learning the material.
helping me get into botany and learn more on how to improve Hawaiian Ecology
the hula hoop experiment
Being able to lecture in front of the class for more than 10 minutes. It was a good experience giving a longer presentation. Also, learning the different kinds of testing questions. The Problem with Wilderness. and being able to speak with Haskell, the author of one of our required books.
Carrying a hula hoop around
Hoop project.
the hoop project, the lectures, the dimly lit room and the intense midterms/final
16. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
The general information was great
Learning how to conduct valuable research out in the field.
The general ideas, principles and hypothesis of Ecology.
I think the emphasis on synhesis of material rather than memorization was very valuable.
Lectures & guests
The layout was very good. It kept up the pace while being slow enough to learn everything.
the power points and other students in the class
Discussion questions/roundtable conversations on Thursday mornings. It was interesting to talk with my classmates about current issues in ecology and our ideas about conservation and ecology. The inter-disciplinary questions and discussions were enlightening.
lecture and tests
Powerpoints being posted online. Some teachers refuse to post power points even when tests have basis in the teacher presentations, but having powerpoints before class (so that students may acquaint themselves with material beforehand) is very helpful.
learning about ecology and how the environment works around us
17. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
-- snipped --
Learning equations about water conduction seemed a little irrelevant.
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
the supplemental readings
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
* Showing 2 out of 9 survey responses.

 

18. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 14 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 7 (50%) 6 (43%)
19. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.07 14 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 9 (64%) 3 (21%)
20. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.54 14 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (43%) 7 (50%)
21. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.07 14 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 7 (50%) 4 (29%)
22. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 14 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 8 (57%) 5 (36%)
23. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.07 14 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 9 (64%) 3 (21%)
24. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.21 14 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 6 (43%) 6 (43%)
25. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 14 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 7 (50%)
26. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 14 0.66 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 8 (57%) 4 (29%)
27. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.54 14 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (43%) 7 (50%)
28. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.64 14 1.01 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 4 (29%) 5 (36%) 3 (21%)
29. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Passionate and positive
Knowledgeable, approachable, helpful
-- snipped --
amusing, honest, enthusiastic
Knowledgeable & Passionate
Relates to Students
intelligent, determined, tough
-- snipped --
prompt level focused
Enthusiastic, intelligent, level-headed
-- snipped --
* Showing 8 out of 11 survey responses.

 

30. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.64 14 1.01 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 7 (50%) 2 (14%)
31. Reading assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.21 14 1.53 Freq(%) 2 (14%) 4 (29%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 4 (29%)
32. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.71 14 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 3 (21%) 6 (43%) 3 (21%)
33. Lab assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.79 14 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 2 (14%) 7 (50%) 3 (21%)
34. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.93 14 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 9 (64%) 2 (14%)
35. The course is highly recommended if it were taught by this instructor.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 14 0.78 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 6 (43%) 4 (29%)
36. Exams are creative and require original thought.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.21 14 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 6 (43%) 6 (43%)
37. The examinations are graded very carefully and fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.79 14 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 6 (43%) 3 (21%)
38. My grades accurately represent my performance in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 14 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (43%) 6 (43%) 1 (7%)
39. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.64 14 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (43%) 4 (29%) 3 (21%)
40. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Getting to go out in nature and observe/study/experiment with it in real time. The helpfulness with the professor, the experiments, and the discussions were also very likable.
The incorporation of ecological studies brought relevancy to the material being presented. It helped make difficult concepts easier to understand.
I liked the student run activities.
The lectures
Student activities as well lectures
the presentations and the hula hoop experiment
Discussion questions/roundtable conversations in person on Thursday mornings, the Forest Unseen supplemental reading, the supplemental reading The Problem with Wilderness, student presentations, Barton's guest lecture, having powerpoint lecture slides available in advance of the class,
tests and quizzes
Powerpoints. They're organized, easy to follow, and could actually have more detail and still be fine.
the lecture slides and real life examples haskell's book
41. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
Some of the subjects were packed into long lectures, which drew on my patience, and how much I needed to study for the tests.
-- snipped --
The tests were challenging, which made them unpleasant to take, but I believe they were fair and helped me actually learn the material.
-- snipped --
Assigned books for discussion/reading
The exams and the lab
Having purchased the textbook.
reading and discussions, especially online ones
-- snipped --
the hula hoop project exams labs
* Showing 7 out of 10 survey responses.

 

42. What changes would you make in the readings?
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
* Showing 0 out of 9 survey responses.

 

43. What changes would you make in the discussion sections?
Make it very clear what is expected to receive full credit for the on-line discussion posts. The smaller discussion groups produced more discourse then the whole class discussions, which felt forced and typically involved only a small number of participants.
Have people raise hands or go arround evenly so the people who talk a lot don't dominate and not allow polite people to speak.
better grading style. she gave me a low score when i did talk and i dont know what else she expects from me.
More time talking about the subject of the week rather than the books
Omit them, go over lecture more clearly
Change deadline to midnight. Have a rubric for the grading of the online posts.
In class ones run as smoothly as they can, although I don't agree with using them as a teaching tool. online discussion should either be eliminated because we do it in class, so we get graded for the same thing twice. If online questions remain part of the course, I would make then due at midnight rather than noon simply because I have classes at noon.
I advocate having fewer discussion sessions, especially if the online-posting portion of the class will persist through future semesters. Students will end up discussing the same 6 questions at least three times for the class alone (not including running into fellow students outside of class and talking about the questions with them), with the online discussion, small group discussion, then class-wide discussion. This seems very extraneous.
play some back round music to set the mood
44. How can the laboratory be improved?
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
Make Mandala more group oriented.
The lab was pretty good, I enjoyed it even if i felt like i didn't get a lot out of it. I think that using more modern methods of ecology would be useful
Laboratory was fine.
-- snipped --
* Showing 3 out of 9 survey responses.

 

45. Other comments:
Well done
Great class. It should be taken by other majors as well because it gives basic principle of ecology.
-- snipped --
* Showing 2 out of 3 survey responses.

 

Nicole Hynson: BOT202L, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Botany
Course: BOT 202L - Plant Ecology Lab Crn (Section): 78122 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.47 15 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 6 (40%) 6 (40%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 8 (53%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 15 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 9 (60%) 5 (33%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 15 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 9 (60%) 3 (20%)
6. Other comments:
Some of the quizzes seemed to be based on memorizing the material rather than learning it. Other than that, the lab had some fun activities and interesting projects.
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
very good lab manual.
Need some revisions on lab manual. Maybe homework check on blogs so students are more obligated to do it.
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
* Showing 3 out of 7 survey responses.

 

Nicole Hynson: BOT454, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Botany
Course: BOT 454 - Vegetation Ecology Crn (Section): 88587 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.33 6 0.52 Freq(%) 4 (67%) 2 (33%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (83%)
6. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
7. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
8. I learned to identify main points and central issues in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
9. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
10. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%) 2 (33%)
11. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
12. I developed more confidence in my ability to communicate effectively through writing.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%) 1 (17%)
13. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
14. I learned more in this course than I expected to learn.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
15. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The group research project allowed us to practice working with others as well as gain more experience in doing research in the field. Weekly discussions also allowed is to interact with different ideas about invasive topics.
The most valuable aspect of this course was being able to produce our own research projects from the ground up. This was one of the very first classes that I was able to do this. Usually, we have to follow labs out of a lab manual, this was a great experience.
Instead of using memorization to base scores on tests, the actual incorporation of facts and understanding were used to base test scores, which really makes you think and know the material.
Our research projects. The opportunity we had to discuss problems in our class discussions (thanks to small group size). The fact that the teacher is very well organized helps the students get organized and achieve the goals set out at the beginning of the semester.
The lab/experiment part was something I'd never done and don't know of any other classes I would get to do it in. I'm really glad that I had a chance to take a class like this one.
16. Ten years from now I'll probably remember this course most by ...
The research project.
Creating our own research projects and how helpful Nicole was.
The mamaki planted in lyon arboretum that our "ours."
My very first original research project!
The main ecological topics that I was first introduced to, and already have applied to the things I do everyday.
17. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
18. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
19. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
20. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
21. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
22. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
23. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
24. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
25. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
26. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
27. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Passionate, helpful, knowledgeable
Helpful & passionate
calm, helpful, fungi-enthusiast
Organized Knowledgeable Approchable
She is a great communicator and very encouraging.
28. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%) 2 (33%)
29. The group work contributes significantly to this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
30. Reading assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
31. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
32. Lab assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
33. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
34. The course is highly recommended if it were taught by this instructor.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
35. The field trips were useful learning experiences.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
36. The guest lecturers were interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
37. Exams are creative and require original thought.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
38. The examinations are graded very carefully and fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%) 2 (33%)
39. My grades accurately represent my performance in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 6 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%) 0 (0%)
40. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%)
41. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Field work
I really enjoyed the lab portion of this class because I really love being hands on.
Group Project
I really enjoyed having such a small class. It really allowed for some one on one interaction between the teacher and the students. I felt like my teacher was involved in my learning and really cared about my success. The research project was very enlightening and the discussions were relevant.
I enjoyed the discussions, it was interesting to hear about issues from other's view.
42. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
I wish we could have been able to conduct our experiments over a longer period of time.
I wasn't a huge fan of the book. I learn a lot through books and I felt like this one wasn't optimal for this class. I liked the discussions but sometimes I felt like we had too many of them.
I did not like the exam format. Many of the questions were open ended and required you to think more interpretively than factually, which I am either not used to doing, or maybe just not good at, but I found them difficult. After getting tests back I found that I commonly misunderstood what kind of answer was acceptable or desired to get full credit. We also only had 2 exams of this type to 'practice' for the final, and I am worried that I still won't be adjusted to this type of exam question.
43. What changes would you make in the readings?
Some were a bit hard to understand. But I don't believe tht thy should be changed for that reason
Have a different book... if possible of course.
None.
44. What changes would you make in the discussion sections?
None, they tied in with the lecture very well.
Have fewer discussions throughout the semester.
Maybe if there was a really short pre-designed activity that was to be completed during every discussion (for the leader to begin with) to get everyone involved and thinking about the paper, people might have been a bit more enthusiastic.
45. How can the laboratory be improved?
Maybe add a few more visits with our TA or professor to our work sites...
If there was a way to get students thinking about their experiments earlier, like before they have even visited the arboretum, that would give more time for data collection or experimental designing. I felt like could have used some more time to run our experiment. Maybe a list of examples or past student projects to get people thinking about it earlier.
46. Other comments:
I enjoyed this course over all and loved the opportunity to be hands on and greatly appreciated how helpful Nicole was.
Thank you to Nicole Hynson for a great semester. Your organization skills really made a difference and I really enjoyed this class!