|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
4 (57%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.79 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
2 (29%) |
4 (57%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| Jim is a great teacher i like all the guest speakers and activities we had , it help we learn, Jim projects were fare |
| projects were great very helpfull for when i open my resturant. |
| Course went into detail about other aspects of running a restaurant, that most otherwise would not have thought about. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| Nothing just let jim do his thing we is a great teacher and is very helpful , If you need anything in class or out of class he is willing to help |
| I thought it was great.Learned a great deal.Also liked the guest speakers
jim brought in very knoledgeable. |
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| No survey responses were found. |
|
|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.61 |
18 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (39%) |
11 (61%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.33 |
18 |
0.69 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
8 (44%) |
8 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.56 |
18 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (44%) |
10 (56%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
18 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
7 (39%) |
10 (56%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.44 |
18 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (56%) |
8 (44%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
18 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (50%) |
9 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.56 |
18 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (44%) |
10 (56%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.39 |
18 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
7 (39%) |
9 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
18 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
5 (28%) |
11 (61%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.12 |
17 |
0.86 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
2 (12%) |
8 (47%) |
6 (35%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.33 |
18 |
0.59 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
10 (56%) |
7 (39%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.56 |
18 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (44%) |
10 (56%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| i like this course because the activities is good,,,i always wanted to have a class like this because i love to work in a hotel |
| I like being able to learn more about the hotel systems & how they work. |
| good pace for reading, quizes and tests |
| even if i could not go to any of the field trips, i thought that it was a great way to learn more things. |
| I enjoyed the many aspects of learning the Hospitality and Tourism trade and understanding the many different concepts of the lodging operation. |
| I really enjoy the excursions that we attend. |
| The classroom experience and the field trips. |
| Mr. Lightner is a excellent instructor to learn by. |
| I liked that we remained on subject. We talked about material that was relevant and easy to understand. Jim was very right to the point and his was very clear and helped us understand the course. |
| I liked how Mr.Lightner made us be interactive with class discussions. We participated with hilo students and got to know them which is unusual in most vidcon classes. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| he should come and visit often.. |
| I think there should be a bit more "hands on" for this course. |
| more field trips and a be a little bit more strict on the homework assignments becuase when a teacher is a bit more strict on assignments i work to my best. |
| I believe more hands on would be appropriate for this course |
| NA |
| Bring Mr. Lightner to HILO! Update the video feed for this class. It should have been faster and clear! |
| Update video quality. |
| I have none. |
| No |
| We could have more guest speakers or visit other places for field trips besides hotels. |
| no |
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| his good.. |
| a couple of times, in reading the course book, it would state one thing and yet when that statement was given as an answer to a quiz question it was counted as wrong. was probably just a typo in setting up the quizes, maybe quiz answers could be double checked before next time this class is offered |
| NA |
| N/A |
| n/a |
| good job, I learned a lot! |
|
|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (38%) |
8 (62%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.54 |
13 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (46%) |
7 (54%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.31 |
13 |
0.85 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (46%) |
6 (46%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.38 |
13 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
6 (46%) |
6 (46%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.54 |
13 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (46%) |
7 (54%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (38%) |
8 (62%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (38%) |
8 (62%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.46 |
13 |
0.66 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
5 (38%) |
7 (54%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.46 |
13 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (54%) |
6 (46%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
12 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (50%) |
6 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (38%) |
8 (62%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (38%) |
8 (62%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| i like this course because i like to learned a lot more about customer service |
| I really like the excursions. |
| I Loved the simulation class work. it's helps me to prepare for my future job in the hotel industry. and helps me to understand the standard that i should be at when I reach the field |
| Mr Lightner is very fare and a great instructor, for a student like me,that
takes a little bit longer the normal students. |
| I liked that we remained on subject always and the material we went over pertained to the course. The assignments were easy, but I learned from them regardless. |
| I liked that Jim was very knowledgable about each subject and had a lot of job experience that could relate to the subject we were on. Assignments were kept to a minimum so we could learn and enjoy the course instead of rushing through it trying to get the work done. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| he should come and visit us often |
| NA |
| Need to upgrade the TV in the HOST class room. The video feed was poor, and the quality of the picture was junk! |
| We could have more hand on work, like visiting more places for field trips. |
| no |
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| having a small book was really refreshing and helpful I actually could read each chapter thoroughly instead of skimming through. With all the other work from other courses sometimes students don't read the chapters at all because each is 30-40pgs long! that's just ridiculous. our book for this class was only about 10pgs per chapter making it easier to read and retain. |
|
|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (50%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (60%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.3 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
5 (50%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (60%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.3 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
5 (50%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
4 (40%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (50%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (50%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
6 (60%) |
4 (40%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| I don't think that I could do anything to improve this course, Mr F. does a great job.......And I wouldn't change a thing!! |
| na |
| nothing it was all good ` |
| Nothing really, he does a great job at teaching two classes at once. |
| Mr. Lightner is an Awesome teacher, hes very fair and compassionate to each individual need. |
| Depending on the book and a bad microphone and blurry T.V. system made it hard for me in learning the material on this subject. |
| The course is good. It's just a shame he teachers from Kona. |
| I wouldn't do anything to improve or change |
| Nothing everything is fine the way it is. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| Mr. F is very knowledgeable about this course because of his various hospitality encounters. He is the most perfect person that you can find to teach this course......I am looking forward to taking his classes next semester.... |
| na |
| it was all good |
| Very good, he makes sure we all understand the subject. |
| Besides the fact that he is on video conference his teaching method is very thorough he followed his course outline to a "T". |
| His teaching method made were easy to follow. |
| He did a good job explaining the material. |
| I think he was great and enjoyed taking the class |
| Efficient and effective. |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| when I am in class listening to Mr. F, it is like I am there at the front desk or working with house keeping department. It's like I am on the job with my trainer.... |
| yes; i am able to undertand more people, and why they react the way that they do |
| yes |
| Very much so. |
| Absolutetly, I am more excited than ever to approach this work field!!! |
| Yes |
| A lot! |
| yes |
| Yes now I have a better understanding of the hospitality industry and its inner works. |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| I'm glad I have choosen this major, or I wouldn't have met Mr. F..... |
| na |
| n/a |
| I Look forward to my future classes with Mr. Lightner, Hes always remained possitive with a great smile. |
| thanks for great semester |
| None |
|
|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.36 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
5 (45%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.64 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.45 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (55%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.45 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
4 (36%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.36 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (60%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
4 (36%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.73 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
8 (73%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
5 (45%) |
4 (36%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
6 (55%) |
5 (45%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| I'm not sure what I would change to improve it. |
| Personally nothing, Mr Lightner was very thourough. |
| nothing |
| If there is something i would change, probably I wish the teacher is in Hilo at least few times a month. |
| I wouldn't want to change anything |
| a. have a more hands on teacher that was there in front of the class explaining more of the course. b. nothing really, it was a good class. |
| a] make the course a little more upbeat b]more group discussions |
| Nothing everything is fine the way it is. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| Mr. Lightner did a great job with what he knew, he used various examples in his teaching and was always open for dicussion on whatever we needed help on. |
| It was okay. |
| I think Mr. Lightner is an absolute gem, always displayed a possitively and professionally. |
| it was realy good he was very awesome |
| Overall he's good! |
| I enjoyed taking this course. He did a great job |
| i think that the teacher was really smart with the course materials and knew what he was talking about. |
| the teaching methods are very good; we all get in on the topic therefore everyone is on the same page. |
| Efficient and effective. |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| yes... |
| yes. |
| Absolutely, Now more than ever I am extremely excited to enter this work field. |
| yes |
| Yes he has |
| yes |
| yes |
| I leanred a lot more about customer service in general. It's very helpful. |
| i have learned so much during this course, i have gained much knowledge for future job skills!! |
| Yes now I have a better understanding of the hospitality industry and its inner works. |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| Mr. Lightner is a great Professor....too bad he wasn;t teaching us from Hilo..... |
| Im looking forward to my future classes with him... |
| n/a |
| NA |
| Thanks |
| =] |
|