eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Leslie Sponsel

Available Survey Results

ANTH345, PACE345, Fall 2012
ANTH415, Fall 2011

Leslie Sponsel: ANTH345, PACE345, Fall 2012

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 345 - Aggression, War, & Peace Crn (Section): 78585 (001)    
Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Peace & Conflict Educ Program
Course: PACE 345 - Aggression, War, & Peace Crn (Section): 78624 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 3 (75%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 2 (20%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.7 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 7 (70%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.7 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 3 (75%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 10 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%)
6. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 10 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
7. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%)
8. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%)
9. I learned to identify main points and central issues in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
10. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 4 1.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 5 (50%)
11. I developed creative ability in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 4 1.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%)
12. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
13. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 3 (30%) 1 (25%)
14. I developed the ability to evaluate new course work content in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 1.06 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%)
15. I learned to recognize quality work in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
16. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
17. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
18. I was stimulated to do outside reading about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.75 4 1.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (40%)
19. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 1.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%)
20. I developed plans to take additional related courses.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 4 1.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%)
21. I developed a set of overall values in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 4 (40%) 1 (25%)
22. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.7 10 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%)
23. I participated actively in class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 4 1.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
24. I participated actively in the small group sessions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 1.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (10%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%)
25. I developed leadership skills in this class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%)
26. I developed new friendships in this class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%) 3 (30%)
27. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
28. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
29. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Guest and instructor lectures.
the panel discussions were the most valuable because i got in depth knowledge about a specific ethnographic case study. we then got to teach the rest of the class about it. I also liked hearing about other case studies from classmates because we got to ask them questions and get to know them better.
I really enjoyed and valued this entire class. Dr. Sponsel made me raise questions that I had never even thought about before. I see the world a little differently after this class.
I would say that it's a tie between the "Global Nonkilling" books and the guest lectures.
I liked the panels that the class had to organize with each other. We learned how to be initiative with heavy material and we all took part of being responsible for our own assignement.
I thought learning about ways to prevent non-killing were most valuable in this course. I think the group discussions were more valuable than straight lecture
The ideas and the arguments presented in this class are extremely important and Glenn Paige's visits were great because we had the opportunity to hear and opinion completely different from the mainstream opinion.
I think just the knowledge and experiences of the Professor were most valuable to me.
30. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
-
N/A
The journals.
I would have liked more guest panels that focused on current international issues. I really liked the Palestine guest panel that showed up in class from the Olelo channel. They talked about the current issue about the dibacle between Iraq and Palestine.
I still do not believe that America or any other major powers in the world will become nonkilling societies.
N/A
31. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 7 (70%)
32. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 4 1.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (20%) 1 (25%)
33. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 10 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%)
34. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.7 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (30%) 1 (25%)
35. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.7 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
36. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
37. The instructor was able to stimulate and lead group discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 7 (70%)
38. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 5 (50%)
39. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 6 (60%)
40. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%)
41. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.9 10 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (75%)
42. The course objectives were clear.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 10 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 2 (50%)
43. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 10 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
44. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
More films and case studies. Also allowing students to have the option of working on panels independently or in a group.
I don't really see how, he's a great teacher
I think maybe picking case studies that are more up to date would make for much more interesting analyses, since the case studies that were used have already been heavily exhausted in terms of the amount of research that's been conducted. For example, maybe do a case study on the "human terrain system?"
Maybe instead of a final paper he can assign mini quizzes on each panel we have from the class and from our guests presentors.
I took this class expecting to learn more about war and aggression. I think there could be more focus on war and aggression instead of peace
I am more interested in America that small societies outside of the United States, maybe provide more examples and arguments that prove America can or cannot become a nonkilling society.
Maybe with more class involvement during lectures.
45. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Insightful, accessible and tolerant of alternative views.
intelligent
Passionate, understanding, and knowledgable
Passionate, realistically optimistic, and sensible.
He is very educated, humble, and passionate.
great teacher!
Peace Activist Enthusiastic about subject REally cares and wants to make a difference in students lives
Educated, pacifist, cultured
Intelligent, dedicated, inspiring
46. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
0.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (90%)
47. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
0.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (90%)
48. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 10 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 5 (50%)
49. Directions for assignments are clear and specific.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 10 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 1 (10%) 7 (70%)
50. Reading assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 10 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 5 (50%)
51. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (80%)
52. The grading system was clearly explained.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.78 10 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 8 (80%)
53. Other comments:
Valuable course for students of all disciplines. Thanks.
I absolutely loved this class. It confirmed my thoughts on majoring in anthropology. Teachers like Dr. Sponsel make me excited to learn and come to school.
Keep up the good work.

Leslie Sponsel: ANTH415, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 415 - Ecological Anthropology Crn (Section): 79115 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.0 14 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 12 (86%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.25 12 0.45 Freq(%) 9 (75%) 3 (25%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 15 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 12 (80%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 6 (40%) 8 (53%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 10 (67%)
7. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 8 (53%)
8. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 8 (53%)
9. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 15 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 5 (33%) 9 (60%)
10. I enjoyed this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 15 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 2 (13%) 10 (67%)
11. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 15 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 6 (40%) 6 (40%)
12. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The professor was rather enthusiastic and demonstrated a vast knowledge of the material.
There's an ethical outlook on the course knowledge, and I held that valuable as I learned about ecological anthropology throughout the semester.
Guest speakers and videos were valuable.
I believe the way the course was laid out was in a logical and made learning easy. The way that each section had a lecture, video, and guest speaker made it easy to follow along.
The overview of the different approaches and the major thinkers/theories within each approach. The powerpoint presentations were a good way to convey this.
Wealth of resources and knowledge that he made us aware of.
I learned the most from the course readings.
I think this was a very well ruonded course wiwth very good material presented by Dr. sponsel. The powerpoints were a very nice plus. The material for the class was enhanced by the four guest speakers. I also found the 65 page syllaabus which included pages of optional readings to supplement the required readings, to be of great value.
Learning about the anthropological aspects of ecology was interesting for me since I'm a student focusing my studies on the behavioral ecology and population dynamics of animals.
Dr Sponsel was knowledgeable about so much that wasnt even expressed in the course, that he really gave a thorough understanding to the class. It was interdisciplinary.
Review of specific ethnographic and field work allowed us to see the practical and applied aspect of Ecological Anthropology. I enjoyed the guest speakers and think they complemented the material to allow for the students to grasp key concepts.
Aspects in climatological relation to human beings and how closely the two are intertwined was very interesting and has even swayed me to rethink what i should pursue as a masters. I would have liked to hear more about spiritual ecology and believe it didn't get as much time as it deserved, but considering the broad amount of subjects to cover it was understandable.
13. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
Lack of direction in assignments. Digressed at a few moments during class. Overall, not too bad though.
Attendance sheet.
The readings and powerpoint lectures were too general for my taste.
I believe that the pop quizzes were least valuable. I found that when the quiz was take home, I learned a lot more from it than if it was a pop quiz. This is because I could go back into the lecture material or the reading material and reinforce the information that I have learned previously. It was much valuable as a take home than as a pop quiz.
Personally I found that the books were less interesting than other aspects of the course.
The videos and lectures of this course reinforced what I learned in our course readings. However I felt what we did daily in the course could have made more connections to the course readings and utilized the readings more. As a student I learn more and am more engaged when I learn actively. I would have preferred that we discuss the course text and do large group discussion rather than viewing videos and lectures, which I feel is a more passive form of learning.
At times some references in the power-points were unneeded, also the quizzes could be designed or would be a better benefit as reaction papers for each section of the course instead of a true and false quiz.
Laulima would have been a nice resource.
There was a lot of material that I wish we could have covered more thoroughly. Lectures were often so rushed that it was hard to explore any one topic very in-depth through class discussion, something I find very valuable to comprehension.
The class review on the the Climate Change book, i am not saying it was completely invaluable... It's only me, but somehow i feel none of the students even tried to read the passage they were assigned nor did they put any effort to summarize it. Only a few bothered to do this and some even feigned ignorance, opting for more chapters they had already taken because of their nonchalant arrogance in the matter. I found that act of behavior amongst the undergrad students disgusting even if this portion did not account for a major portion of our grade (note that boy with the skateboard...). Handing out the passages should be a bit stricter in my opinion.
14. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 10 (67%)
15. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 15 0.94 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 5 (33%) 7 (47%)
16. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 12 (80%)
17. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 14 0.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 13 (93%)
18. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 10 (67%)
19. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 10 (67%)
20. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%)
21. The instructor was enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%)
22. The instructor is friendly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%)
23. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 10 (67%)
24. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 15 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 12 (80%)
25. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 10 (67%)
26. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%)
27. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Be more direct in what he wants us to gather from the assigned readings.
More class discussions
I believe that he can improve his teaching by adding more words to his powerpoints especially with descriptions to his pictures. This way, students are able to recall what was said about that picture when they go home to review the powerpoint.
I would have liked more varied readings provided on the Laulima site as .pdfs, rather than having to find the articles ourselves. The books were not as interesting as I expected; I would have preferred more varied, shorter articles daily.
Dr. Sponsel's passion about Spiritual Ecology was apparent when we covered this component of Ecological Anthropology. However, Dr. Sponsel seemed less engaged when discussing the other components of Spiritual ecology. The course could be improved and we could learn more effectively if Dr. Sponsel seemed as excited and passionate about the other subject material that he was teaching, rather than just Spiritual Anthropology. This course could also be improved if Dr. Sponsel tested our comprehension of course readings by doing more than quizzing us on them. For some students, these quizzes are the only incentives to read the course material. If we did more graded large group discussions and presentations I feel people would be more engaged in the course and more apt to do the readings.
The course reading tends to get a little confusing, just because throughout the course we jump around between readings so frequently, if their was a way to read an entire work and then comment on its aspects of Cultural, political, Historical, and Spiritual per work.
Laulima
Dr. Sponsel spent much time grazing outside reading material. Although I appreciate suggestions for further research, it used more class time than I would have liked and seemed to detract from main points within the required material.
Nothing much, if the core of the students had been like the proactive red head girl who usually sits in the back I believe the class could have been much better! The pop quiz was good, I think it was the only "intellectual curiosity" that was making those students read the books thoroughly. I would like more guest speakers, they make the class very fun, although that one grad student with his presentation on Japanese country-side was sketchy.
28. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Knowledgeable, friendly, relaxed
Enthusiastic, Wise & Respectful
Enthusiastic, knowledgable, and helpful.
Friendly: Dr. Sponsel is very friendly and approachable. He does not use scare tactics on students to instill fear in them. This is very important especially for professors because you want to encourage student learning rather than making learning a miserable experience. Enthusiastic: I can tell that Dr. Sponsel is very enthusiastic and passionate about the material that he teaches.
Understanding, enlightened
Enthusiastic and knowledgeable
Accomplished, intelligent, aware.
Very knowledgable and sincere
Inspiring teacher
Caring, enthusiastic, and informative.
Enthusiastic
Passionate, Well-informed, Helpful
Spiritual Ecology, Yes!
29. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Good professor, lacks specific intent for what he want's the students to get out of his course though.
Awesome teacher, he knows his stuff well.
A great professor!
I believe that he is one of the best professors that I have taken a class from because of the class structure and how he teaches his students. I would definitely take another class from him.
He is extremely knowledgable and is able to pass on knowledge gained from many years of experience and connections with organizations and research happening now. He is very aware of the different approaches within Ecological Anthropology and his multi-varied approach made the subject matter interesting and dynamic.
Dr. Sponsel is knowledgeable about Ecological Anthropology and has accomplished many interesting things in his research on the subject. I found the structure and way the course was instructed to be too passive for the way I learn. This is unfortunate because the material we covered is interesting and is relevant outside of the classroom.
Dr. Sonsel very knnowledgable and enthusiastic about the subject taugh. He enjoys teaching and sharing his knowledge with his students.
A very informative and caring person, who truly shows interest in the subject matter of this course and in the success of his students.
Great job
A good teacher who knows his stuff (retired?), its too bad the students didn't take theory very well. If anyone even bothered to do this ecafe thing and gave him a bad review to spite him they should get a slap in the head.
30. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
0.0 13 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 13 (100%)
31. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
0.0 13 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 13 (100%)
32. Other comments:
I would recommend this class to others.
No t/a?
I enjoyed this course very much. Dr. Sponsel went out of his way to provide assistance to his students, and did so on several occasions for my personal development. He is a valuable member of the department- I have yet to meet a professor who is so invested in his students' ability to succeed within the profession. Every student appreciates this kind of encouragement.
Kokua should be more flexible with how notes are written for their students, for instance the conflict with recommending extra readings...