eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Renee Dela Cruz

Available Survey Results

ELEC24, Fall 2010
BLPR30C, Spring 2010
ELEC22, Spring 2010
BLPR30C, Spring 2008

Renee Dela Cruz: ELEC24, Fall 2010

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Electricity
Course: ELEC 24 - Interior Wiring Crn (Section): 17491 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.95 19 0.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 18 (95%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.95 19 0.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 18 (95%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.95 19 0.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 18 (95%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.95 19 0.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 18 (95%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.79 19 0.54 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 16 (84%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.84 19 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 17 (89%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.95 19 0.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 18 (95%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.84 19 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (16%) 16 (84%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 19 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 17 (89%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 19 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 18 (95%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.58 19 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 14 (74%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.89 19 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 18 (95%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I enjoyed the class projects we did because it allowed me to get a glimps of the kind of i will be doing in the future.
I enjoyed everything about this class she really helped me learn alot about the field of electricity and she gave us alot of fun hands-on type of work and to me thats what makes students learn more faster and it keeps the students interested in the major theyre in. well ms. dela-cruz if u get to read this its me your favorite student KAULANA hahahaha....thanks for teaching me all that you could it really helped me....
What I like about the course, was the hands on experience also the field trips that Mrs.D put together was vary useful towards this type of traid.
she made it fun and easy to learn.
The hands on is crucial. Physical demonstrations far more effective than just reading. The project that had us bringing our homes up to code was eye-opening and a great way to have us apply this course to our lives.
I enjoyed this coursre. It was challenging in a good way that it helped me become more responsible attendance wise and turning in assignments on time etc. Mrs Dela Cruz covered the course material very well and in a way that was easy to understand. She used a variety of teaching methods such as written assignments videos demenstration excursion and hands on labs. These all helped me to apply what i was learning and develop an easier understanding of concepts and the principles behind what she was teaching. The labs that we did were also enjoyable it helped me to develop good thinking in figuring out how to apply the code compliance into our labs and also Mrs. Dela Cruz stressed the importance of safety and workmanship. Overall i enjoyed this semester and i have benafited greatlty i look forward to next semester with her and learning more and furthering my experiance.
I liked that we got to use the knowledge that we learned in the class and actually use what we learned in our class projects. actually using what we learned from the books and applying it to lab was very helpful in helping understand what the book was trying to teach us.
i liked that she was always there to answer any questions i had about installing and general knowlege of EIMT.
I liked the hands on experience, and Mrs. provided a lot of visual examples to better understand the subject matter.
I believe our field trips helped me understand what I learned in class and put it in a "real life" perspective. I enjoyed doing lab projects, again, it helped me understand what the EWR and NEC was teaching.
i like how i entered into this course not knowing anything about electricity but gained the basics of how it works. Its fun and challenging because its hands on and you think a lot.
i realy liked the hands on and lab time we had. I catch on alot quicker by physicaly doing things
I liked everything about this class.
course was very imformative. all lectures were very well thought out and intsructor was always prepared. Class activities were helpful in testing our abilities as well as helping understand the material. labs were very helpful in giving us a hands on approach into what we were learning in lecture. Class had a good balance of lectures and labs and tests.
The hands on work, the care provided by the teacher when it came to safety, working with tools, making sure we fully understand the tasks and or work that is handed out and given to us. i really appreaciate that renee dela cruz was with each student on the different levels of work and task and that she was understanding that each student learned at different paces
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
I wouldnt change anything about this class aslong as ms. dela-cruz is teaching it cause she's GRRRRREAT......like frosted flakes cereal.....hahahhahaha
I was really bummed to hear about the electrical class not being part of the model home, but hopefully later on in the future it would be a really good idea to be part of it. Haveing to use all the code knowledge,class labs and put it towards the house will not only benifit us physically but menatally also.
longer lunch break
I think treating us as students wanting to learn a valuable trade and paying for it versus employees would be an improvement.
i think that it is good the way that it is.
i think haveing a model home to wire up would be beneficial to us students who can put what we learned in class into a real job sight
I feel Safety could of been taught in about half the time. I felt a lot of repetition of topics in safety videos and worksheets. I understand the importance of safety and that you have to make sure that the young students don't horse play, but I would've prefered to cover more material, and get more hands on experience that I would use out in the field. My complaint about the class is with the students. I'm an older student and alot of my classmates are just out of high school, so I felt the class could move at a faster pace. If students were'nt dragging their feet on certain assignments like reading. Also,other immature behavior would divert our instructor's attention from instruction to dicipline, so that was frustrating as well, to get lectured for poor behavior. That's just the way it is, you have to teach to the middle, and I think our instructor did a great job juggling her responsibilities.
I think this course is difficult for someone like me who has no clue about residential wiring. I've never thought about how electricity works or how receptacles and switches are wired and operate. During this first semester, I can say that I've gained valuable information on the basic do's and don't's of wiring and what the NEC requires. There are so many codes regarding what is permitted and not permitted in residental wiring. Stategically, Mrs. Dela Cruz goes over (and over) the codes in class and believe it or not the codes are actually starting to stick in my brain!! It is my opinion that Mrs. Dela Cruz is very competent in teaching this course and she gives enough support and discipline to keep all her students engaged and motivated.
none
i feel if we could actually wire up a whole house or participate in the modle home we would have gained a lot more knowledge
None
15. Other comments:
I feel that I learned alot from her teachings and the way she was willing to help without hesitating alot made me comfortable with taking this course.
MS. JUS KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK......GREAT JOB.....and have a good and safe winter break........and be good.....haha.....
Mrs.D I like your teaching habits because you dont just push the knowledge you let us go on our own pace and work from there. I hope to see you next semester.
Great teacher!!!!!!!!!!!!
I appreciate this program overall i think its an excellent program I am learning a lot and also learning to be more responsible as a student. I feel that Mrs Dela Cruz is doing a very good job and i have no complaints.
ms. d was very helpful in completing my first semester. She helped me understand alot of things that i believe will be helpful for me in my future career
i really enjoyed Ms.delacruz class and i would refer my brother and freinds to take this course in college. It was easy taking in all the information she gave to me and apply it into different aspects of my life, not only for school purposes but also in everyday life
I enjoyed our instructor's method of teaching. You could tell she really cared about doing a good job, and making sure we understood the material.
I had thoughts (when I first started this semester) that maybe this course was too hard for me. But now I feel that I can approach Mrs. Dela Cruz with any questions or concerns and she will do her best to help me understand the information. I feel now that my chances of success are high!!
i feel that i have learned a lot this semester and i look forward to next semester.
MRS Dela Cruz did a awsome jod with us this semester. She made learning fun while maintaining a safe and healthy work environment. I enjoyed my class with her and look forward to next semester with her again.
Mrs. Dela Cruz was always prepared for class. Everyone was treated fair and equal. from the start our goal was to turn us into vialbe assets in the work force while learning basic residential wiring techniques and i feel this class exceeded all of its goals. While being a very strict instructor class was always fair, and rules were set inplace. we as students always knew what was expected of us and although alot was asked of us we all are better because of it. Also while keeping strict class rules (for saftey reasons) the instructor always motivated and pused us to become better. I think that this class was a great success and our intructor is a big part of that. it was a great first semester in the eimt program and im looking forward to next semester with the same instuctor.
N/A

Renee Dela Cruz: BLPR30C, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Blueprint Reading
Course: BLPR 30C - BLPR for Electricians Crn (Section): 16287 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.41 17 0.94 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 2 (12%) 3 (18%) 11 (65%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.65 17 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (24%) 12 (71%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.59 17 0.87 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 2 (12%) 13 (76%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 17 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 3 (18%) 13 (76%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 17 0.99 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 15 (88%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 15 0.56 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 13 (87%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.94 17 0.24 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 16 (94%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 17 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (29%) 12 (71%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 17 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 15 (88%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.76 17 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 15 (88%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A  
4.88 17 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 15 (88%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
so far classes and lectures has been good and helpful.
If i was to teach this course, I think i wouldnt change anything because it is good as it is
keep the same teacher for the whole program!
explain the model home project more clearly and start on it earlier.
Good
n/a
nothing
I wouldn't change anything. This course worked well with our Electricity class and labs.
more showing and doing
nothing
i wouldnt change anything about this course.
nothing it was all gravy
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
I think ms.D has a great way of teaching. she has patients and she takes her time in showing the students how to do their projects correctly and teaches us the right way of doing things.
good
Its been easy to understand.
Renee Dela Cruz is a very good teacher explains things very well. her teaching method is also good
Good
Awesome
they are very good
Mrs. Dela Cruz is an execelent teacher. She makes learning easy and fun.
good but has room to add.
it was good
very easy to follow and very informative.
This teacher is good, she knows alot about the subject and knows how to teach it to the students and brings it up in ways where we need to use our minds.
Mrs. Renee Dela Cruz has very excellent teaching ability she motivates her students to always achieve for success...
they were really good because things that weren't really clear were layed out and explained to us till they were clear and understandable
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
yes
Yes all the assignments and projects has been helpful to me to understand.
yes
good
Of Course
yes
Yes
good did learn somethings
yes
yes a whole lot
YEs!!!
Yes she has contributed to a lot of knowledge and job skills right for the job she has good training skills.
all of what i know about electrical work was contributed by the instructor
22. Other comments:
Its been good!
best teacher!!
Good Class glad I took it
none
grades should be on what the student can to with the info. from that class. not if he or she is there.
n/a

Renee Dela Cruz: ELEC22, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Electricity
Course: ELEC 22 - Electricity II Crn (Section): 16291 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 17 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 15 (88%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 17 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 1 (6%) 14 (82%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 17 0.94 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 2 (12%) 1 (6%) 13 (76%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 17 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 3 (18%) 13 (76%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 17 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 15 (88%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.81 16 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (19%) 13 (81%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 17 0.99 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 15 (88%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 15 (88%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.94 17 0.24 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 16 (94%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 16 0.34 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 14 (88%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 17 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 15 (88%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 17 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 15 (88%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 17 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 15 (88%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.76 17 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 15 (88%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 16 0.34 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 14 (88%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A  
4.88 16 0.34 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 14 (88%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
I wouldnt change it too much because its been going good.
If i was to teach this course i would improve it buy getting more electrical supplies for the class and for the lab
nothing
i felt the EWR was hard which made it stressful to find answers and overall i just felt frustrated with the worksheets and did not learn from them as much.
Nothing very Good
n/a
I would have the students wire-up the model home that the carpentry class is going to build. But I'm aware that there is some liability issues, so that can't be allowed. Other than that this class was excelent!
more feild trips
nothing
i wouldnt change anything about this course.
nothing. its all gravy
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
I think mrs.D has a great way of teaching. She knows what she talking about as an electrician instructor and as a electrician business owner. she's very helpful and understanding when students need help. I would consider and recommend anyone who is looking to become and electrician that mrs. Renee Dele Cruz is a smart and awesome instructor and also teaches you the right way of wiring and understanding your codes.
Ive learned a lot from the teachings, considering i didnt no anyting wen i came into the program.
renee Dela cruz is a very helpful teach explains the work that need to be done.
she is the perfect teacher
Very Good
Awesome
Mrs. Dele Cruz's teaching methods is very good. I like how she can explain complex concepts in a very easy to understand manner. I also like how she makes learing easy and fun.
good w/room to add.
there good
very helpful and easy to follow.
Good teacher... knows alot about the subject. Teaching methods are very good.
Mrs. Dela Cruz has excellent teaching methods she uses her personal experience to teach some of the techniques needed for the job skills required
really good. unclear subjects were made clear and understandable
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
Yes ive learned a lot from doing projects and our labs in class.
yes
yes i have
I learnd plenty
Of Course
Yes.
know more then I did when I started the year.
yes. very much so
yes a whole lot
YES!!!!
yes she has i have learned a lot from her this year and the skills needed to complete the job
all of what i know bout electrical was contributed from her
22. Other comments:
none
I dont like the text book we used (EWR) it was very confusing and I did not think it was helpful at all. This book jump all over the place. Usally when you read the book you can get the answer but this one it was very difficult to follow and comprehend. Two Thumbs Down
n/a
Knowing how to do the job I think is more important then attendance. becacse a person can change be on time faster then not knowing what to do and getting other hurt. Plus its our money were using to pay for the class so we shouldnt be graded on our attendance if we can pass the test and do the work.
this was the best class i have been in yet! it went by really fast
n/a

Renee Dela Cruz: BLPR30C, Spring 2008     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Blueprint Reading
Course: BLPR 30C - BLPR for Electricians Crn (Section): 16241 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (26%) 14 (74%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 19 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (37%) 12 (63%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 19 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (37%) 12 (63%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (26%) 14 (74%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 18 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (44%) 10 (56%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (26%) 14 (74%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 19 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (42%) 11 (58%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.68 19 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (32%) 13 (68%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (26%) 14 (74%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 19 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (37%) 12 (63%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.89 18 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 16 (89%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 19 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 15 (79%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 19 0.68 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 3 (16%) 14 (74%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 19 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (42%) 11 (58%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 19 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (47%) 10 (53%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 19 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 15 (79%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.72 18 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (28%) 13 (72%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   A   B   C   D   F  
4.89 19 0.32 Freq(%) 17 (89%) 2 (11%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
Nothing, she is a very smart teacher
have a model home project.
Thumbs up !!!
nothing
Nothing, the class is easy to understand and you learn a lot based on the instructors knowledge.
none`
n/a
longer class would be better since blueprinting is so precise
none
more group work
I won't change anything.
nothing.
i wouldnt do anything to change this teachers method of teaching
nothing it's all g
nothing
The only thing if anything I would have changed would be to spend less time reviewing the basics that we had learned in our previous blueprint class.
nothing.
There should be more instructional days. Meeting two days a week didn't seem to give more time to cover more subject matter. I would have liked to do more blueprint drawing in regards to electrical installations. Less time should be spent on basic idea
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
Very understnadable
Mrs. Dela Cruz is really nice and always willing to help you if something is unclear to you.
Good teacher, Easy to catch on....
excellent
Great....
excellent
Very well and to the point
she is very thorough and always knows exactly what she is talkning about
good
she was very polite helpful
i feel that taking those field trips were very useful because i got a look at some houses that i could be wiring in the future.
Mrs. Dela Cruz is an great teacher. She is always willing to help. She is very knowledgable and really seems to enjoy teaching.
great teacher. makes sure you understand concepts and always has a positive attitude.
i think her teaching method is perfect for the program
good
good, easy to understand
Mrs Dela Cruz is an excellent instructor. She's always enthusiastic and her experience as a contractor brings practical knowledge of the industry that you cant get other wise.
Great. She knows a lot about the electrical field so it was great to have her as an instructor.
Mrs. Dela Cruz is an excellent teacher. Her methods are refined as is her knowledge from working in the field. She incorporates and shares her experience with the class, which helped in motivating the class. She can relate to her students because she i
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
Yes
yes in a big way. she gave us perception and visualization.
Yes, understanding blueprints is a much more clearier field now than just looking at a bunch of lines.
yes
I have more knowledge of houses and wiring methods..
yes
Yes
yes
yes
yes
yes, she helped me with the general knowledge and technical situations. Also the importance of certain situations on the job.
Yes. I learned a lot in this class. Every subject she taught us was gear to what we will encounter when we go into the field.
yes.
yes
yes
yes very much so
Absolutely. Her allowing us to accompany her on her jobsites was most beneficial.
She knows a lot about the field so her knowledge and expertise helped out a great deal.
She has contributed a lot. She does things a certain way but I can see why. She is methodical in her work and I feel that her dedication to her trade will rub off on me. Sharing her experiences with the class allows us a broader picture to the electric
22. Other comments:
None
more funding for model home and field trips. The field trips gave us a better vision of things instead of just seeing things on the blueprints(Very helpful)
none
Very good class and helpful to the working field.
non
none
she was very nice
i love it!
It was a huge dissapointment not to have the model home project this year. I believe that would have been most valueable to our real world experience. If Mrs. D hadn't taken us on her jobsites we wouldn't have had those kinds of learning opportunities at
23. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (26%) 14 (74%)
24. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 19 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 15 (79%)
25. The field trips were useful learning experiences.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.95 19 0.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 18 (95%)