eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Ronaele Whittington

Available Survey Results

FAMR230, Spring 2010
FAMR340, Spring 2010
FAMR492, Spring 2010
SW607, Spring 2010
FAMR492, Fall 2009
FAMR492, Fall 2008
FAMR340, Spring 2008
FAMR492, Spring 2008
FAMR492, Fall 2007
FAMR492, Spring 2007

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR230, Spring 2010

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 230 - Human Development Crn (Section): 88762 (003)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.77 22 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (9%) 6 (27%) 9 (41%) 5 (23%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.95 22 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (9%) 4 (18%) 9 (41%) 7 (32%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.82 22 1.14 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 2 (9%) 4 (18%) 8 (36%) 7 (32%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 22 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (18%) 11 (50%) 7 (32%)
5. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.09 22 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 5 (23%) 7 (32%) 9 (41%)
6. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.77 22 0.87 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 8 (36%) 8 (36%) 5 (23%)
7. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 22 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 2 (9%) 12 (55%) 7 (32%)
8. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 22 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (18%) 8 (36%) 10 (45%)
9. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.71 21 1.23 Freq(%) 2 (10%) 0 (0%) 7 (33%) 5 (24%) 7 (33%)
10. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.05 22 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (9%) 4 (18%) 7 (32%) 9 (41%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.73 22 0.94 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 7 (32%) 10 (45%) 4 (18%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 22 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (23%) 9 (41%) 8 (36%)
13. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
be more clear on the exam dates because one of the exams had two different due dates and i didnt know when it was really due and it was kind almost too late.
I would suggest grading the first few assignments quicker if at all possible. I wasn't doing the assignments entirely as expected but due to the slow grading process (which I understand there were many many students' assignments to grade) I did not see my mistakes until I had completed at least 3 assignments...meaning I did all three assignments wrong and received a lower grade on them. If at least the first one could have been graded before I made the same mistakes (which cost me quite a few points) on the second it would have been greatly appreciated
none
The exams chapters didn't match up with was actually tested on the exam.
The my virtual child is a nice and different tool/assignment, but it gets very repetitive and boring.
The course was great!
none
The only suggestion is if we can recieve our scores for the assignments sooner.
The online test structure was not well planned out yet. Although there was sections made on the test, since the questions were pooled and grabbed randomly, questions from a different chapter of the book would be use of another section of the quiz. Example: If the test was ch. 1-5, there would be questions from chapter 2-5 found in the section labeled chapter 1. I could also have an uneven amount of questions from each section, and once found the same question that was pulled twice within a few questions of each other.
This course is hard to rate because it is an online class. However, I did like the fact that whenever I messaged Professor Whittington, I would get a response the very next day, if not the day of. She was very helpful and it was also really nice that she gave us the last 4 papers off. I did learn from this class, I just wish the book wasn't loose leaf so we could sell it back :(
probably sending the responses back from assignments a little faster. Being in limbo about grades when trying to A the class is tough when the first five weeks we turn in homework and it isnt graded. Then all of the sudden not knowing if the work was being done correctly all the papers being turned in are wrong due to a 5 week period of not knowing if the paper is being done correctly.
Ronaele Whittington was very organized and allowed us a lot of time for each assignment. She assisted us with answering an question that we had as well as response to our request in a timely matter.
14. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
good class, the professor was always able to answer your questions quickly when you didnt understand anything such as assignmetns or grades.
Fair instructor/grader. Took too long to figure out exactly what was expected due to slow feedback at the beginning on homework assignments. *Fair as in unbiased
This is the second online course that I will complete and it was good.
She is a very respectable professor. She is very knowledgable and made me feel like she cares about me as an individual and not just another online student.
She corrected discrepancies in grading in a timely manner. Also, she did a good job spending time on weekly essays adding comments to help us improve our essays. Although she did get behind in correcting, I understand there were a lot of essays to grade, so she did a great job.
For taking an online class you have expectations that the istructor should be prompt with getting back to you. When I had questions and send emails, I rarely recieved a response. Also, she was extremely slow at gettting graded work back to me. It is ridiculous to complete assignments when you have not gotten grades back on the previous ones. How was I able to make any changes on new assignments when I didnt know what I was doing wrong. Overall, I felt she was very uninvolved and should not teach this as an online class again.
The course was great and very straightforward. I especially enjoyed getting personal comments from the professor on every assignment so I knew specifically what I needed to work on for the next weeks assignment. I loved having a virtual child and it was a very enlightening assignment.
Good, very clear in her expectations.
good
She is a great professor overall. she would reply to emails asap and she would emails us notifications on upcoming exams or quizes and its due date. In addition to assignments, she would give us feedback or comments which was very helpful
The course structure is there, but some of the online aspects of the course could be improved in the future.
good.
N/A, took the online course.
that she is a excellent teacher and i hope i will be able to take another class from her.
15. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.09 22 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (23%) 10 (45%) 7 (32%)
16. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.18 22 0.96 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 2 (9%) 10 (45%) 9 (41%)
17. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.05 22 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (23%) 11 (50%) 6 (27%)
18. Other comments:
The text book's index was very poor. I had a hard time finding anything in the book.
Horrible Teacher. If you cannot be in contact or answer questions from students do not teach an online class!
none

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR340, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 340 - Intimacy, Marriages & Families Crn (Section): 86323 (001)     85563 (002)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 17 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (43%) 8 (47%) 3 (21%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 17 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 3 (23%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.29 14 1.49 Freq(%) 3 (21%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 2 (14%) 4 (29%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 16 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (19%) 6 (38%) 5 (36%)
5. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 16 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (25%) 3 (21%) 6 (43%)
6. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.54 13 1.27 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 3 (18%) 2 (15%) 7 (41%)
7. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 14 1.24 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 5 (36%) 8 (47%)
8. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.65 17 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (24%) 6 (43%)
9. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.41 17 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 2 (15%) 9 (53%)
10. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 14 1.36 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (6%) 2 (12%) 1 (7%) 11 (65%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 13 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 1 (8%) 11 (65%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 14 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 8 (57%) 8 (47%) 7 (41%)
13. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
I thought some of Dr. Whittington's materials were a little outdated, and maybe provide some more class activities to get the class really engaged and interested.
I think the only thing I did not like was the attendance policy. Since there is also an online class, I do not understand why the students taking the in-class have to go to class for points, whereas there is no penalties for attendance online for the online course students.
Towards the end of the semester I felt like due dates came closer together, like the money ed assignment with the Dear Annie 2. Maybe just better spacing between due dates would be the only improvement. Other than that I think this course was fantastic.
I don't feel that there should be anything to change her teaching
I really liked the course, so o have no suggestions for improvements.
Nothing
I would suggest to not give as many projects outside of class. At one point, it seemed a bit overwhelming and I felt that it was too much work.
I didn't like how everything was run through laulima and all the projects due on the computer. I'm not good at figuring out how to turn things in on laulima so I prefer printouts and assignments due in class.
I thought that the course and teaching style was great, although there are some suggestions I have. One is that, the only difference between this lecture class and the online class is the attendance. I also want to add that coming to class was a benefit in better understanding what the assignments we asking for. I don't think that I would have known what to do otherwise.
I think for those who are not used to using laulima or dealing with online classes may have a difficult time because a majority of the assignments and quizzes/tests are all online, so it might be challenging, but since I used laulima before, I really enjoyed being able to do the work at my own pace and using the site as an aid.
Communicate with the online students a little bit more. Perhaps add a few more assignments so we stay occupied throughout the semester.
More consistent grading.
Very disappointed. Tried to contact the professor and was told to do it through laulima then never heard anything back. Feedback whether good or bad would have been nice. Just to get some kind of regular response would have been sufficient. Yet, I felt like I sent an email to a robot and got a generic response. I guess if you have the online class, the only way to communicate with her would be in person. Too bad for the students that are not on the island. I believe this was mentioned in rate my professor. Work load seemed a little overwhelming for this course.
I learned a lot from the reading material and I could apply that to my own personal life and everyday situations.
None
Her way of teaching was perfect for me.
Syllabus needs improvement. Very wordy which is intimidating. I sometimes felt lost, not knowing where and how to begin.
I am an online student and did not have interaction with the instructor of this course. However, the instructions online were great and were sufficient to communicate the instructor's expectations.
14. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Dr. Whittington is very approachable and easy to talk to. She's very patient and understanding. Her assignments weren't only educational, but also fun to do. I appreciated how Dr. Whittington tried to get to know each student personally and memorized everyone's name from the beginning.
I could tell that she has been teaching this course for a few years or more now. When I first saw the assignments for this course I thought it would be very challenging, but once she explained how to do everything and how the course works the assignments were not too difficult to complete.
She was very entertaining. I enjoyed attending class.
A wonderful professor. I will definitely recommend her to future students.
She is an amazing teacher, fair grader tells you what to expect up front and she is very funny. She makes you feel comfortable to share your experiences with her.
She is a very nice and friendly teacher and knows how to organize good lessons.
Very good teacher
She is a knowledgeable teacher and for the most part, nice and friendly in class and overall.
She knows a lot about the topic and has a lot of experience.
that she knows her subject and has a lot of experience in this area.
excellent. I really enjoyed the class.
unknown.
More consistent grading.
Overall, I have had difficult teachers before, even unfair but at least they would respond. If there is no personalization when engaging in learning, what is the point of assigning a professor to this class.
She's an excellent professor. She seems to be very interested in her subject.
N/A took the online course
Amazing
I really can enjoy your class. Thank you very much for teaching this semester.
n/a
she is an outstanding professor who is willing and eager to work with students in any way possible.
15. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.86 14 1.23 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 1 (6%) 5 (36%) 5 (36%)
16. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.93 14 1.07 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 7 (50%) 8 (47%)
17. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.86 14 1.35 Freq(%) 2 (14%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (43%) 12 (71%)
18. Other comments:
Happy retirement, Dr. Whittington!
I enjoyed this class very much. Thank you!
I really liked the topic of FamR 340. The guest speakers and even doing the moneyed project really helped. I look forward to learning more about the topics we discussed in class in the future. Thank you for a great semester.
I hope you will enjoy your life after this semester. I also will go back to my country and try to do best.
none

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR492, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 492 - Internship Crn (Section): 81446 (002)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
5. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
6. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
7. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
8. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
9. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 5 (83%)
10. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
13. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
I think it was pretty much good, except for the writing. I guess writing daily journals did help a lot for other assignment but it was not graded. so it should it be more of an option?
I wish class was longer because there was so much to talk about, and to learn from each other.
N/A
I really like the "group" setting of our weely lecture/meeting. By all of us interns meeting through out the semester, it was a way for us to come to a "safe zone" to work through any issues we may have experienced at our place of internship.
14. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Prof. Whittington was great, I enjoyed her class and she really gives everyone a chance to share their experiences and tries to give feedback about it. Also encourages peer opinions too.
She is a wonderful professor, very kind and informative.
I really enjoyed the class, it was very helpful to have this class to discuss matters in my internship.
Dr. Whittington is a dedicated, knowlegable individual who has committed many years of instruction at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Dr. Whittington did a fantastic job with getting our gruop to interact with one another and to share whatever we had on our minds.
15. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
16. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
17. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
18. Other comments:
Good luck after retirements!
I wish I got more help during the internship plan process instead of getting a bad grade on the assignment and then working off the comments after I got it back.
N/A
Thank you Dr. Whitiington for your instruction this semester! I will always remember you and your words of wisdom during our weekly group meetings.

Ronaele Whittington: SW607, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Social Work
Course: SW 607 - SW Practice w/Families & Grps Crn (Section): 83333 (001)     3203 (333)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%) 4 (50%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.13 8 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%) 3 (38%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%) 4 (50%)
4. I utilize all the learning opportunities provided in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 5 (63%)
5. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.63 8 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (63%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%)
6. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.13 8 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 1 (13%) 4 (50%)
7. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.88 8 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%)
8. The instructor was enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (63%) 3 (38%)
9. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%) 4 (50%)
10. The instructor has been helpful whenever I have encountered difficulties.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 4 (50%)
11. Students in this course are free to disagree and ask questions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (63%) 3 (38%)
12. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 5 (63%)
13. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 8 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 4 (50%)
14. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.88 8 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 1 (13%) 3 (38%)
15. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 7 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 4 (57%) 2 (29%)
16. The course has significantly increased my knowledge and interests.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 8 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%)
17. Exams and assignments were returned promptly so that learning was reinforced.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 7 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (57%) 3 (43%)
18. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.88 8 1.13 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 2 (25%) 3 (38%)
19. The classroom environment was free of distractions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%)
20. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.86 7 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 4 (57%) 1 (14%)
21. Other comments:
I learned more from the text than I did from the instructor.
I would like more clinical hands on practice/observation to go along with written and visual materials in the course and more depth into specific clinical skills to be utilized in facilitating groups
Thanks and congratulations on your retirement!
I missed 3 classes for the semester... One I had to testify at the legislature for another class and let professor Whittington know I would be missing class in advance, and the other two I was sick and provided her with a doctor's note. For being absent, my grade dropped significantly. Out of 150 points for attendence I was give 130 points... even though I had a reason for missing class. This is very unfair grading and I strongly disagree with her mandatory attendence policy, as it leaves no room for you to miss for any reason.
thought more experiential lessons would have reinforced learning. some material used was too dated.
Dr. Whittington, does not hold back on her knowledge, especially when it comes to group work and groups. She is always excited to tell the class about groups which I found very insightful and refreshing. I highly recommend other students to take her class.

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR492, Fall 2009     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 492 - Internship Crn (Section): 71784 (002)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 9 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 5 (56%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 9 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 5 (56%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 9 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (33%) 6 (67%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 9 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 5 (56%)
5. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 9 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 4 (44%) 4 (44%)
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 9 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 5 (56%)
7. I participated actively in class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.11 9 1.17 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 1 (11%) 5 (56%)
8. I reconsidered many of my former attitudes.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.78 9 1.2 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 5 (56%) 2 (22%)
9. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 9 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 5 (56%)
10. I improved my abilities to revise my rough drafts and to make my writing more effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.11 9 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 6 (67%) 2 (22%)
11. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.22 9 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 5 (56%) 3 (33%)
12. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The most valuable aspect of this course was that we were able to meet once a week to discuss our internship sites. It gave me insight to other's work and mine as well.
Experiences from other students.
The open discussions and the whole part of the internship.
The internship experience.
none
class discussion was the most valuable because i was able to get perspectives of my peers and professor
The case study helped me look into a situation in depth.
13. Ten years from now I'll probably remember this course most by ...
The experience I have gained and the people I have met.
One of my kids taking it.
My internship experience, and the support i was able to get from the instructor.
The exposure to the intership opportunity.
it being kind of a waste of time
my internship
All the journals we had to write.
14. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 9 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 5 (56%)
15. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 9 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 6 (67%)
16. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%)
17. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 9 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (33%) 6 (67%)
18. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.78 9 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 7 (78%)
19. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 9 1.32 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 4 (44%)
20. Assignments make students think.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 9 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (33%) 6 (67%)
21. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 9 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (56%) 4 (44%)
22. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.22 9 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 4 (44%)
23. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.78 9 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 3 (33%) 2 (22%)
24. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.89 9 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 3 (33%)
25. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
The discussions were the most helpful to me, so I found them to be the best part of this course.
Journals, good way to reflect and think of ways to better yourself.
I liked the fact that we were able to talk about everyones intern experiences. It helped me to see how other interns are handleing their issues and what it is like to be at a different intern site. It was also nice to be able to talk about my experience and my opinions in class.
The opportunity to intern with the military.
class discussions allowed me to hear what others were going through in their internship. it also gave me insight to other types of jobs
class discussion and my internship.
Being able to hear other people's experience while at their internship site.

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR492, Fall 2008     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 492 - Internship Crn (Section): 71922 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.0 15 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
2.0 15 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (40%) 9 (60%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (50%) 7 (50%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 8 (53%)
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (50%) 7 (50%)
8. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 7 (47%) 7 (47%)
9. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 8 (53%)
10. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 10 (67%)
11. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 8 (53%)
12. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 10 (67%)
13. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (40%) 9 (60%)
14. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (40%) 9 (60%)
15. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%)
16. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 4 (27%) 8 (53%)
17. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 9 (60%)

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR340, Spring 2008     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 340 - Intimacy, Marriages & Families Crn (Section): 86767 (001)     86768 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.07 15 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 10 (67%) 3 (20%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 15 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (47%) 8 (53%)
3. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 15 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (47%) 8 (53%)
4. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (50%) 5 (33%)
5. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 14 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 4 (29%) 5 (33%)
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.79 14 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 10 (67%) 5 (33%)
7. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 15 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (43%) 11 (73%) 5 (36%)
8. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.07 15 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 10 (67%) 4 (29%)
9. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 14 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 7 (47%)
10. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 14 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 9 (60%) 5 (36%)
11. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (53%) 9 (69%)
12. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (53%) 7 (50%)
13. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 15 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 8 (57%) 4 (29%)
14. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 15 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 9 (60%) 6 (40%)
15. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 8 (53%) 7 (50%)
16. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 15 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (60%) 8 (62%)

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR492, Spring 2008     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 492 - Internship Crn (Section): 81619 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.06 17 0.24 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 16 (94%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%)
2. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 17 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (71%) 5 (29%)
3. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 17 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (47%) 9 (53%)
4. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.35 17 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 9 (53%) 7 (41%)
5. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 16 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 10 (63%) 5 (31%)
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.12 17 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 9 (53%) 5 (29%)
7. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 16 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (50%) 8 (50%)
8. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.41 17 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (59%) 7 (41%)
9. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 17 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (29%) 12 (71%)
10. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.41 17 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 6 (35%) 9 (53%)
11. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 17 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 5 (29%) 10 (59%)
12. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.41 17 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (59%) 7 (41%)
13. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.19 16 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (19%) 7 (44%) 6 (38%)
14. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.59 17 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (41%) 10 (59%)
15. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.65 17 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (59%) 3 (18%) 4 (24%)
16. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 17 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 7 (41%) 8 (47%)

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR492, Fall 2007     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 492 - Internship Crn (Section): 78262 (001)     72055 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
3. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
4. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 1.1 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 2 (33%)
5. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (64%) 2 (33%)
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 11 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
7. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 7 (64%)
8. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 6 (55%)
9. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 2 (33%)
10. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (50%) 7 (64%)
11. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 6 (55%)
12. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (50%) 7 (64%)
13. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%)
14. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%)
15. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 2 (33%) 6 (55%)
16. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 6 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 6 (55%)

Ronaele Whittington: FAMR492, Spring 2007     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: FAMR 492 - Internship Crn (Section): 81789 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.0 10 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 10 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%)
3. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 5 (50%) 4 (40%)
4. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 10 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%)
5. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 10 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 5 (50%) 3 (30%)
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 10 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (40%) 4 (40%) 2 (20%)
7. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 10 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (60%) 4 (40%)
8. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (70%) 3 (30%)
9. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 3 (30%) 5 (50%)
10. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.9 10 1.2 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%)
11. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 10 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%)
12. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.6 10 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 5 (50%) 1 (10%)
13. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 5 (50%) 4 (40%)
14. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 10 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 5 (50%) 4 (40%)
15. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 10 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%)
16. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 10 1.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (30%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 3 (30%)