|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.77 |
22 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
3 (14%) |
18 (82%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.77 |
22 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
3 (14%) |
18 (82%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.68 |
22 |
0.57 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
5 (23%) |
16 (73%) |
|
|
4. I learned a lot in this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.59 |
22 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (9%) |
5 (23%) |
15 (68%) |
|
|
5. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
22 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (9%) |
2 (9%) |
6 (27%) |
12 (55%) |
|
|
6. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
22 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
5 (23%) |
14 (64%) |
|
|
7. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
22 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (9%) |
20 (91%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
22 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (9%) |
6 (27%) |
14 (64%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
22 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
2 (9%) |
19 (86%) |
|
|
10. The instructor sets high standards for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.32 |
22 |
0.95 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
4 (18%) |
4 (18%) |
13 (59%) |
|
|
11. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
|
| very good!
she is always prepared for class.
she is a very nice person ^-^ |
| terrific |
| Great teacher and very respectful and encouraging of her students. |
| very nice, she has a lot of knowledge. |
| She is very knowledgable about the subject and a fair grader. |
| Keep up the good work |
| Mami is very informative and helpful. She responds readily to e-mails and questions. She makes learning easy and fun! :) |
| Very Good and fair.
She lets you turn in an assignment if you happen to have forgotten to do it or bring it to lab. |
| She is an awesome teacher! |
| Excellent. She is a really good TA, was helpful, and very nice to the students. |
| She is a great and patient teacher. She really cares about her students and is very knowledgeable. |
| She was sweet and approachable, and she always wanted to help us. |
| she was really nice. she was always available for help if we needed any. |
| Effective |
| she was a good TA and wanted us to learn and do our best in the class. |
| She was a great lab leader. She understood us as students and put in a lot of effort during the class. |
| she really knows her material |
| one of the most prepared TAs at UH |
|
|
12. The TA is friendly and accessible.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
22 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
3 (14%) |
16 (73%) |
2 (9%) |
|
|
13. The TA grades paper (exams, homework) fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
22 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
3 (14%) |
16 (73%) |
2 (9%) |
|
|
14. The TA listened to what students had to say.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.65 |
22 |
0.81 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
1 (5%) |
2 (9%) |
16 (73%) |
2 (9%) |
|
|
15. The TA stimulated students to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.45 |
22 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
5 (23%) |
12 (55%) |
2 (9%) |
|
|
16. The TA was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.7 |
22 |
0.57 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
4 (18%) |
15 (68%) |
2 (9%) |
|
|
17. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.41 |
22 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (9%) |
9 (41%) |
11 (50%) |
|
|
18. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| Oral |
| Class discussions. |
| presentations of other classmates. |
| The grading was fair and it was easy to uderstand. |
| TA's were nice and communicated with students effectively |
| The lectures by Dr. Ogawa were really fun. |
| N/A |
| The review sessions for the exams were very helpful. |
| lectures and videoes |
| everything |
| The trip to the Japanese Cultural Center |
| i liked the lab and its comfortable chairs. |
| The presentation of material by students. |
| the labs were more interesting than the lecture classes personally because i felt i learned more from
the labs with the presentations. |
| The chapter presentations and lectures. |
| review sessions for midterms |
|
|
19. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
|
| ***8 |
| none. |
| I was easy to pick up the lessons because the course was entertaining. |
| None |
| I disliked writing papers. The final group paper was especially difficult. Quite honestly, I didn't see a point in having it; the group oral presentation was good enough (especially since the class is not writing intensive). |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| papers |
| Having to write a paper |
| some of the lectures were boring. |
| The written assignments. |
| the group project. though i understand why group projects can be helpful, it's hard when people
don't do their share. |
| The group paper. |
| the presentations. |
| The fact that a major portion of the final exam grade is based on an book that wasn't mandatory to buy, yet is on the final exam. What's the deal with this? We weren't made aware of the fact until a week before the exam... |
|
|
20. My overall evaluation of this course is...
|
| GOOD!! |
| heaven |
| Great material to learn for both local residents and out of state students. |
| easy to understand and interesting, exams are easy. |
| One of the best courses I've taken. |
| Interesting |
| Enjoyable. The workload is reasonable (aside from the final group paper) and the teachers are very personable. |
| N/A |
| Excellent/Good |
| pretty easy |
| Great |
| i liked it. it was challenging but not impossible. |
| Its a very good course. Very informational. |
| it's good. |
| This was a good course filled with a lot of information and history vital to Hawaii's history. |
| it's a good course to take if you want to learn about Japanese Americans in hawaii. |
| one of the better classes to take. |
|
|
21. Other comments:
|
| none |
| none |
| N/A |
| Interesting course |
| none. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.58 |
19 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
8 (42%) |
9 (47%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
|
|
2. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.85 |
20 |
0.37 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (15%) |
17 (85%) |
|
|
3. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
20 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (20%) |
16 (80%) |
|
|
4. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
20 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (45%) |
11 (55%) |
|
|
5. I learned a lot in this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
20 |
0.6 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
7 (35%) |
12 (60%) |
|
|
6. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
20 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (25%) |
10 (50%) |
5 (25%) |
|
|
7. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
18 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
8 (44%) |
9 (50%) |
|
|
8. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
20 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
3 (15%) |
16 (80%) |
|
|
9. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
20 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (25%) |
15 (75%) |
|
|
10. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.7 |
20 |
0.47 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (30%) |
14 (70%) |
|
|
11. The instructor sets high standards for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
20 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (15%) |
10 (50%) |
7 (35%) |
|
|
12. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
|
| Mami was very knowledgable and nice. She taught us alot and made sure we understood what we were talking about and learning. She also tried to facilitate our discussions. |
| mami was a great T.A!! |
| she knew her material well and taught it in an interesting manner. it was a fun class and she made
it that way becuase of her own knowledge and enthusiasm |
| very good at teaching the labs |
| She was a good TA. A little timid at times but she was fair at grading and easy to talk to. |
| She is very helpful for students to ask her any questions about the exams and assignments. |
| Very nice and always willing to help. |
| Mami is a great instructor and knew her material well. She is especially good at engaging our class in discussions and relaying the upcoming assignments and information to us. |
| I enjoyed having Mami as my lab leader. |
| awesome!!! |
| Good Instructor with a lot of experience related to the title of the class |
| Mami is a very good instructor and she always expected high standards from her students. |
| She is a good instructor who knows the subject matter. She is also very nice and is more than willing to help you if you need it. |
| Mami was a very good and comfortable TA. |
|
|
13. The TA grades paper (exams, homework) fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.84 |
20 |
0.37 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (15%) |
16 (80%) |
1 (5%) |
|
|
14. The TA listened to what students had to say.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.9 |
20 |
0.31 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (10%) |
18 (90%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
15. The TA was well organized and prepared for each session.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.65 |
20 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (35%) |
13 (65%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
16. The TA was able to stimulate class participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.35 |
20 |
0.59 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
11 (55%) |
8 (40%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
17. The TA was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
20 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (25%) |
15 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
18. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.35 |
20 |
0.81 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
1 (5%) |
8 (40%) |
10 (50%) |
|
|
19. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| group presentations |
| I liked the reviews and how we went over the lecture lessons and how the books were really helpful since they matched with the lectures. It was also very itneresting stories and aspects. |
| I enjoyed the fact that everyone had to do their own research on each topic, and shared it with the class. |
| i liked how we each got to tell a story to the class of a time in history, like we were the ones
teaching for a day |
| discussions |
| The review sessions before the test was helpful |
| We can learn more about Japanese Americans by visiting the exhibition and listening to the group presentations. |
| Incorporation of the stories with concepts which made it easier to remember things. |
| Having class discussions and not feeling like what we had to say was incorrect or not viable. |
| I liked the oral presentations and the lectures by Dr. Ogawa. |
| The history of the Japanese Americans, things you don't learn in U.S. History in High School |
| Going to the JCCH and examining the exhibit and learning more from it. |
| I enjoyed the class discussions. |
| The group presentations were very interesting and the chapter outlines helped a lot. |
| Individual chapeter projects
Midterm review |
|
|
20. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
|
| The lectures were kind of disorganized and you had to read the books to know things for the test. |
| none |
| writing the paper |
| No. |
| nothing. |
| The group paper. It got a little frustrating. |
| Nothing |
| All the reading, it was hard to keep up when you have other classes to read for. |
| Nothing. It was a very good course overall. |
| The reading assignments were very long and the information in them wasn't on the tests. |
| I can't really think of anything I didn't like. |
| None |
|
|
21. My overall evaluation of this course is...
|
| interesting |
| I'm glad I took it. It was really interesting for me and I learned a lot. I learned a lot about Hawaii and Japan and their history together. I would reccommend it. |
| AMST 310 is a great course that teaches a lot about japanese-Americans! I think it is especially interesting because I am of Japanese descent. |
| excellent course, very fun and very interesting |
| it was good fun learning about the history of the japanese |
| Interesting and you learn alot. good course |
| I think this course provides enough information for students to learn about the stories of Japanese Americans and also helps students to think critically. |
| It's a good course and I learned a lot about Japanese and Japanese Americans and gave me a better understanding of what they went through. |
| Fun! I got to meet some really cool people and hear very interesting comments and stories from fellow students! |
| This course is great |
| Excellent |
| Very good course. Would highly recommend it to other students. |
| This course was very interesting and taught me a lot. |
| Good class |
|