eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: R Aune

Available Survey Results

COMG371, Spring 2015
COMG371, Fall 2014
COMG371, Spring 2014
COMG371, Fall 2013
COMG371, Spring 2013
SP302, Fall 2011
SP371, Fall 2011
SP302, Spring 2011
SP702, Spring 2011
SP302, Spring 2010
SP370, Spring 2009
SP702, Spring 2009

R Aune: COMG371, Spring 2015

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Communicology
Course: COMG 371 - Message Processing Crn (Section): 85998 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.5 20 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (50%) 10 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.84 19 0.37 Freq(%) 3 (16%) 16 (84%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.65 20 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (35%) 13 (65%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 20 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%) 8 (40%) 9 (45%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.05 20 1.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 4 (20%) 2 (10%) 3 (15%) 11 (55%)
6. The instructor presented concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 20 1.32 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 3 (15%) 4 (20%) 3 (15%) 9 (45%)
7. The instructor was accessible to students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.35 20 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 3 (15%) 3 (15%) 13 (65%)
8. What did you like best about the course?
Gained a better understanding on how to process messages better
everything it was a great course.
I liked the content of the course and how interesting the concepts are. I just wish the knowledge was articulated in a more clear, organized, and effective way.
learned the concept of communucation
n/a
Aune encouraged the class to discuss and collaborate with eachother to hear everyone's views on certain topics.
Podcast and Friendliness of the professor
We cover so much content.
Nothing. I hated it all.
I liked the maxims and conversational implicatures. That information is so fascinating.
I really like Aune. He is really funny and makes class interesting.
I liked how "fair" the tests were. They were written to accurately test our knowledge and covered the material correctly.
His will to see his students improve in the classroom all while learning the subject in which he teaches.
9. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.75 20 1.25 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 5 (25%) 3 (15%) 4 (20%) 8 (40%)
10. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.9 20 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 4 (20%) 8 (40%) 6 (30%)
11. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 20 1.32 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 4 (20%) 1 (5%) 6 (30%) 8 (40%)
12. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.7 20 1.34 Freq(%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%) 6 (30%) 3 (15%) 8 (40%)
13. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
This course gave me a whole new understanding about communication and helped me gain a totally new perspective on communication as a whole.
Lectures
I like learning about what stimulates a thought it was very interesting! I also liked when he would give relatable examples of a situation that we could understand and connect with.
The information and concepts were very interesting. I really liked learning about communication in a different light.
understand the human conversation and the stimulus between it.
n/a
-Thinking outside of the box. -Questioning why we operate the way we do.
Humor. Time flied really quickly in his class
The most valuable aspect of the course was the information on common ground understanding, it was a theme that resonated through out the course.
Class discussions and examples helped me to grasp the concepts of the class lessons better.
The overall coverage of all the theories and how many of the communicative interactions demonstrate theories beyond our understandig.
Learning about the different ways in which humans interact and communicate with each other.
14. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
The research paper was extremely useful to me as a student. Have a much better understanding of how to wright a research paper because of this class.
Getting help when sick on a test
Dr. Aune helping us on exams.
that I understand how the medium travel
n/a
-MEMES
New insight about communication. It changes how you see communication
I found the teacher was the most valuable resource in the course probably because he kept insisting on talking with each student both in and out of class.
Even though the project was a little difficult, I appreciated the independence of the assignment because it helps strengthen our research and writing skills.
Being able to take these theories and apply them to communicative events in our lives.
His approachability.
15. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.35 20 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 9 (45%) 9 (45%)
16. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 20 0.91 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 4 (20%) 7 (35%) 8 (40%)
17. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.45 20 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 7 (35%) 11 (55%)
18. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 20 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (30%) 6 (30%) 8 (40%)
19. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 20 0.66 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 10 (50%) 8 (40%)
20. Other comments:
Great class
Good teacher
Dr. Aune is very professional and intelligent. There is a suggestion I have for this course to be improved. There are people like me who don't really understand when people are speaking fast and using huge vocabulary.I would love it if professors explained things in simpler form and made sure everyone is on the same page as them. Other than that, Dr. Aune looks like hes very passionate in teaching message processing.
Dr. Aune has the ability to teach the course well and fascinate students with the content. But I feel that he needs to be less opinionated (he has offended quite a few students in my class), more organized in his lectures, and refrain from getting off track in his lectures. It is difficult for me to follow his lectures as he goes off track and talks about something else that are sometimes irrelevant to the subject. Dr. Aune is an intelligent man and I enjoy learning from him but his disorganized lectures and offensive opinions made quite a few people in my class refrain from attending his class. I really hope Dr. Aune can improve on his lecture structure so future students will not go through the same frustration my classmates and I have experienced.
n/a
Good content, just get lost after like the first ten mins of class.
Group work sucked. He did not clearly state what format for the data he wanted us to use and was never available for help. Need to have SET office hours. Never responds to emails.
Dr. Aune is a great teacher, i would definitely take him again. The topics we talked about in class were intriguing and informative. Dr. Aune provides great insight into each topic. The difficulty comes from the open dialogue, when opening up to the class and allowing student to talk about their understanding there is a clash of ideals that come out. This can lead the rest of the class to lose focus and understanding about the point of the lesson. I struggled with understanding the point of the research project. I didn't see direct relevance and think that in the future it would be prudent to help students understand the correlation of the project to the class not just the gaining of life skill.
Aune is a great teacher, he just goes off topic so much! D:
This was a very beneficial and well-organized course. I enjoyed the teaching style and coverage of the material very much.

R Aune: COMG371, Fall 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Communicology
Course: COMG 371 - Message Processing Crn (Section): 76699 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.5 20 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (50%) 10 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.89 18 0.32 Freq(%) 2 (11%) 16 (89%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.81 21 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (19%) 17 (81%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 21 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (33%) 14 (67%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 21 0.78 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (19%) 7 (33%) 10 (48%)
6. The instructor presented concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.24 21 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (24%) 6 (29%) 10 (48%)
7. The instructor was accessible to students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 21 0.81 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (19%) 1 (5%) 16 (76%)
8. What did you like best about the course?
Your availability to help us outside of class. Many students had to come in and talk to you about their group projects and you were always available to help out.
I liked that I learned a lot more than I had anticipated I would. I had the preconception that this class would be like other communication classes I have taken but I was very wrong.
Aune is so flexible with anything, you can stop by his office for questions at anytime
I really enjoyed learning about the different mediums in communication and how we are able to convey messages. I am also so grateful that Aune made himself available when it was convenient for me.
His way of being able to relate his content to things that are simpler to understand.
I enjoyed Dr. Aune's examples because it helped me understand his concepts.
Informative
Professor Aune was a fantastic instructor showing detailed knowledge of the course. He was friendly and respectable. Definitely the reason I made an effort to come to class and stay awake.
It taught me so many things that I took for granted.
It was good that Professor Aune recorded his lectures.
His examples were really great; it's almost as if he's taught this course many times! (Purple elephant) It helped me a lot with learning.
Everything, Dr. Aune made the class very interesting
How relatable Professor Aune made it.
Aune
9. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 21 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 3 (14%) 9 (43%) 7 (33%)
10. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.05 21 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 5 (24%) 7 (33%) 8 (38%)
11. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.1 21 1.04 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 4 (19%) 5 (24%) 10 (48%)
12. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.14 21 1.01 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 3 (14%) 6 (29%) 10 (48%)
13. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
I liked that this particular course is something different from what we are used to learning about. It really makes you think about things you wouldn't normally.
Everything, Aune's course is the one where you need to listen and absorb everything you hear
I believe that the lecture slides were the most valuable, because it really allowed to see what Aune was talking about in a bigger picture. Also, the fact that many references were used so that we could picture and imagine the concept in order to remember it later on.
N/A
Working in a group for the final project was most valuable because we helped each other understand the concepts in class and get our work done.
The amount of time, though it may seem long, allowed for classroom discussion and understanding of the material. If the class met more days a week, with more time, I feel that the material would have enough time to make an impact on those interested in the field.
How everything was connected to real life.
Recorded lectures.
The way he explains things, the way the powerpoints were represented, and how he managed his tests.
The research project.
14. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
I found the research project the most valuable because even though it was not easy, it was good knowing we could conduct research and report it in a professional manner.
The fact that he makes you learn
I would answer this question the same way I did number 13
I liked how he allows us to ask him questions during the exams because he cares more about us learning and passing the class than most professors.
Dr Aune was always available to help whenever we needed him.
Professor Aune allowed discussion which helped students to understand the information.
Same as last...
This course makes you look at what the possible definition of what communication could really mean.
Thinking about everything may be the most valuable thing. Everything has little components; everything we take for granted such as memes exist and it's a shame no one thinks about them.
The research project.
15. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 21 0.87 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 2 (10%) 5 (24%) 13 (62%)
16. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.48 21 0.81 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (19%) 3 (14%) 14 (67%)
17. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 21 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (14%) 3 (14%) 15 (71%)
18. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 21 1.1 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (14%) 1 (5%) 4 (19%) 13 (62%)
19. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 21 1.02 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 6 (29%) 12 (57%)
20. Other comments:
A bit confusing on if we actually do need SONA credits or not. I was unable to find it in the syllabus. But it was stated in class that we need 2 credits of it. Though not to worry about it because we should have been participating in our fellow classmates research projects?
Difficult but very interesting class and Dr. Aune did a great job teaching it.
Thank you for such a great opportunity! Wish there were more classes I could take that Aune taught!
2-1/2 hours is too long of a class. The normal time range for the day is good enough. I think I would've retained more info and understood it better if it was in a shorter class.
Went of topic a little too often. I'm glad he was friendly with students, but having side conversations or allowing people to speak up and put us on different topics made it hard to stay focused in class
This class has to be one of the best classes I have taken in my college career. Professor Aune has been one of the most understanding and helpful instructors who takes time so that his students know the material and requirements. On top of that, the course material is interesting; and with Professor Aune's experience in the field, the course brings new light and interesting perception to how we process messages. I enjoyed coming to class so much and learning this incredibly interesting information that I wish the class had met more throughout the semester to cover the material in more depth.
I'm glad I'm finally done with that project! We kicked ass though. Can't wait to see our score!

R Aune: COMG371, Spring 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Communicology
Course: COMG 371 - Message Processing Crn (Section): 86641 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.64 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (40%) 7 (47%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.92 15 0.28 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 12 (80%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 9 (60%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.13 15 1.06 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 7 (47%) 6 (40%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 15 1.25 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 7 (47%)
6. The instructor presented concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 15 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 3 (20%) 8 (53%)
7. The instructor was accessible to students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 8 (53%)
8. What did you like best about the course?
I liked that we moved to the new room. The Grover activity was also really fun because it reinforced the concepts we learned about vocalics, etc. in a fun way that you could easily see.
The life examples to describe certain items
Interesting concepts
Novel concepts were interesting.
Exams were a fair test of knowledge.
that you can come up and ask him questions in regards to his tests
The interactiveness of the class
Aune was very funny and made the course interesting even though the material is kind of boring.
I like Dr. Aune he's very knowledgeable but I thought that the course could have been executed in a more clear manner. I thought that I should have learned a lot more. Yes, I can't blame everything on him but if he made class more organized and didn't go off on tangents I'm sure the whole class could take more away from it. But, what I liked best was that the class
The informative yet entertaining lectures.
N/A
9. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.8 15 1.08 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 1 (7%) 7 (47%) 4 (27%)
10. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.07 15 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 6 (40%)
11. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.07 15 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 5 (33%) 6 (40%)
12. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.6 15 1.35 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 5 (33%)
13. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The lectures were the most valuable. Though they were dense and heavy at times, they were important because they contained practically all of the content we were being tested on. They also contained all of the examples that brought the concepts alive.
Message processing
Projects
Learning about memes is what I remember most.
Specifically had a great lesson on data analysis with my research data from our group project.
the research project
I finally know was a MEME is
The lectures.
14. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
Same question as #13!
The switch of classrooms to interact with other students
Group projects
Concepts were connected to real-life examples.
Exams were hard but tested knowledge.
the teacher helped us with our project and our statistics.
I think this course is important for understanding why things are said and what they imply, in scientific terms
15. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 4 (27%) 8 (53%)
16. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 15 1.2 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 6 (40%)
17. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 6 (40%) 7 (47%)
18. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.07 15 1.1 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 6 (40%) 6 (40%)
19. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 15 0.68 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 8 (53%) 5 (33%)
20. Other comments:
COMG 302 should be an official prerequisite to this course.
None
It is very common for him to go off on a tangent which can be bothersome when trying to stay invigorated and attentive to the subject matter. Made it difficult to want to attend class after the first month. I also didn't feel comfortable with him finding it funny that someone of a previous semester had once spoken up about Mr. Aune's usage of swearwords. I think that if someone found it important enough to approach higher staff about it is something to be considerate of and take in as constructive criticism. It doesn't seem professional on his part to talk about it that way when our comfort and safety as students should matter. He's made several rude comments in class which makes him come off arrogant.
N/A

R Aune: COMG371, Fall 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Communicology
Course: COMG 371 - Message Processing Crn (Section): 77282 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.35 17 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (65%) 6 (35%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.88 17 0.34 Freq(%) 2 (12%) 14 (82%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 17 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (29%) 12 (71%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.59 17 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 5 (29%) 11 (65%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 17 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 3 (18%) 11 (65%)
6. The instructor was accessible to students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 17 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 14 (82%)
7. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.35 17 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 7 (41%) 8 (47%)
8. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.71 17 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 3 (18%) 13 (76%)
9. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 17 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 7 (41%) 9 (53%)
10. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 17 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 8 (47%) 7 (41%)
11. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Learning how to write a proper research paper although it was extremely difficult.
The lectures were very interesting!
Examples in lectures helped SO much!
I thought it was very interesting to learn about the way that messages are processed.
This course made me think outside the box.
Dr. Aune has created a learning environment where one can be critical about aspects of communication that they are already familiar with
Lectures were interesting and engaging.
R. Kelly is knowledgeable about his subject and passionate which makes it easier to learn and understand
Having podcasts recorded so you can listen to them over again to get a better understanding or listen to them if you missed class so you know what was convered
Our research project
The research paper
I thought the most valuable aspects in this course were interpreting utterances and their true meanings: when people say something that they think is the right description but it actually has nothing to do with their desire/intentions (Wanna grab a bite to eat?) but we are able to interpret it anyway.
All content was very interesting and needed, to fully understand what was being taught.
12. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 17 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (24%) 11 (65%)
13. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.41 17 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 6 (35%) 9 (53%)
14. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 17 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 4 (24%) 11 (65%)
15. The instructor's presentation of abstract ideas and theories was clear.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.41 17 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 8 (47%) 8 (47%)
16. Other comments:
Aune is a very good professor and gives very good examples. His lectures can be very intellectual and hard to follow at times but he has great examples and explains things multiple times to avoid confusion. The final project is extremely difficult if you have not taken statistics or research methods in the past. The criteria to the final project was all stated clear on Laulima but was still hard to follow. I suggest advisors informing students that the course may be difficult if the student has not taken Research Methods.
Love this class! Very informative
I liked this class a lot, especially because R. Aune is a great professor. He is really friendly and funny and he has the ability to make class fun. He is also very helpful, because he will always find a way in helping students out.
Dr. Aune is very knowledgeable. He is funny and makes the class interesting. It's hard to take notes in his class because he goes off on a tangent in every topic.
Hard to study for your class even when you show up all the time and pay attention to the lectures. Though slides are available online with audio compliments it is so much to sift through and hard to grasp at times.
I noticed that Aune tended to use big, ridiculous words when sometimes they weren't needed. I know though its just his style because of his big, ridiculous brain.

R Aune: COMG371, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Communicology
Course: COMG 371 - Message Processing Crn (Section): 88423 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.32 26 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (12%) 11 (42%) 11 (42%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.83 26 0.38 Freq(%) 4 (15%) 20 (77%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.81 26 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (19%) 21 (81%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 26 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (31%) 18 (69%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.46 26 0.81 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 7 (27%) 16 (62%)
6. The instructor was accessible to students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.81 26 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 3 (12%) 22 (85%)
7. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.23 26 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (23%) 8 (31%) 12 (46%)
8. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.62 26 0.57 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 8 (31%) 17 (65%)
9. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.23 26 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 3 (12%) 8 (31%) 13 (50%)
10. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.08 26 0.98 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 5 (19%) 8 (31%) 11 (42%)
11. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The original research was the most valuable.
Learning how to write a research paper.
The most beneficial part was Dr. Aune's ability to articulate the theories and make the lectures easily understood by all.
The course was dependent on the lectures, which were open to discussion and malleable.
The group project
It was relatable to the students from his tangents... however, I lose track of what we were talking about after going on a tangent...
The help and lecterns to understand the information
The research project
Not sure
ability to do research
The research project
Lectures
It was a radically different perspective of Communicology, and for that it added depth to my understanding of my major.
Creating my own research study was the most valuable.
Learning about the field itself gives you more insight to how you view our social world.
podcast
Individual meetings with him.
Aune's teaching style is requires the students to used higher level thinking. He uses more logic and reasoning than facts and figures like many other classes.
Everything.
12. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.54 26 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 1 (4%) 7 (27%) 17 (65%)
13. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.42 26 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (12%) 9 (35%) 14 (54%)
14. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.46 26 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 11 (42%) 14 (54%)
15. The instructor's presentation of abstract ideas and theories was clear.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.15 26 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (12%) 3 (12%) 7 (27%) 13 (50%)
16. Other comments:
Professor Aune had extensive knowledge on message processing, but here was no textbook, and information wasn't clear.
DR. Aune is one of the best professors at UH. He goes to great lengths to ensure that the students are grasping the material. He is always giving multiple examples, inserting humor, and nudging the students through the lectures. Next, he is always available for meetings and more than willing to take time out of his day to help if needed.
Slides could be a little more interesting, we needed more time for the group project, and maybe have more of the class be interactive instead of lecture for so long.
He is an amazing teacher very helpful
GREAT CLASS!!! i love Dr. Aune!!!
great teacher!
COMG 302 should be a prerequisite for this class, since prior knowledge of research methods is needed for this class. A lot of students hadn't taken 302, so had a difficult time for the group project.
I wish there was a textbook for the class.
None.

R Aune: SP302, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Communicology
Course: SP 302 - Research Methods Crn (Section): 74682 (001)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
4. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%)
5. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
6. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
7. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
everything
Conceptualizing.
Dr. Aune is genuine and puts forth effort that goes beyond the classroom to ensure that his students do well in his class.
Collecting real-world data and analyzing it using the concepts learned in class.
9. Ten years from now I'll probably remember this course most by ...
how difficultly interesting it was
Inductive reasoning in every day life. Using null hypotheses to question life.
my confidence in understanding numbers and statistics. i will not be intimidated or lost.
The constant back and forth discussions Dr. Aune and I had in and outside of class.
10. What things did you get from this course that will benefit you personally?
how to analyze things statistically
A feeling of understanding numbers better.
surviving. the material is tough.
The ability to read a journal article competently.
11. The instructor gives clear explanations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
13. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
14. The instructor tailors this course to help many kinds of students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
15. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
16. The instructor has been helpful whenever I have encountered difficulties.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%)
17. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
18. Other comments:
Dr. Aune is one of the few professors I'm sure I will remember long after I graduate from UHM.

R Aune: SP371, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Communicology
Course: SP 371 - Message Processing Crn (Section): 79045 (001)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 25 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (20%) 20 (80%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.32 25 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) 9 (36%) 13 (52%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.48 25 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (16%) 5 (20%) 16 (64%)
4. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 25 0.91 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 2 (8%) 10 (40%) 11 (44%)
5. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.16 25 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 5 (20%) 8 (32%) 11 (44%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.16 25 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 5 (20%) 8 (32%) 11 (44%)
7. I learned more in this course than I expected to learn.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 25 1.08 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (12%) 5 (20%) 6 (24%) 11 (44%)
8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Kelly's lectures were great. Since this is the first time this course has been taught it's difficult to lecture on it. But Kelly did a good job of explaining what was certain and what was still up for debate in the new class material.
Shared memes, meme activation potential and the grounding process
The understanding of communication as primarily geared towards achieving understanding was particularly novel and interesting.
People have Mirror neurons as well as U and S types of learning.
Dr. Aune's insight on message processing. Very interesting point of view.
The examples given to help understand the concepts of communicology
The midterm was valuable because I actually had to interpret the lectures and answer questions about them.
The way Dr. Aune presents theories is a interesting approach.
opened my eyes to the extensive ways of communication. Aune's examples helped A LOT !
Class discusssions!
The lectures
N/A
Working on the empirical research project and the powerpoint slides.
everything
His powerpoints
Having the Power Point to study, and time in class to work on the group project.
9. Ten years from now I'll probably remember this course most by ...
The discussion of course material between the instructor and the students during lecture.
the interactions I had with Dr. Aune in and outside of class.
Crazy things I bring up in conversations with others that leave their expressions puzzled.
I probably will not. it was mostly a lot of side tangents.
Dr. Aune's sense of humor.
If I start to analyze the subtle interactions with others
MAP and stimuli. Those were repeated so much the first 3 weeks, it seems that it would be impossible to forget them.
the examples will aways stick with me
Changing my way of speaking, giving directions, and articulating.
Meme activations.
It's lectures
research project
N/A
thinking about how much effort I had to put in to complete the empirical research project.
the professor
Aune's unique vernacular
Memes and all that it entitles. Also, Ester Robot.
10. The instructor gives clear explanations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.24 25 0.88 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 4 (16%) 8 (32%) 12 (48%)
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 25 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 7 (28%) 15 (60%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.32 25 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (24%) 5 (20%) 14 (56%)
13. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 25 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 5 (20%) 18 (72%)
14. The instructor encouraged out-of-class consultations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.68 25 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 4 (16%) 19 (76%)
15. Other comments:
Best professor in the Communicology program!!!!
Dr. Aune is very enthusiastic and fun. But he also knows his material very well and can explain it in simple terms for his students. I think very highly of him.
I think there is potential in this class. However it was still pretty rough because its such a new class.
Good Course
When students ask me about this course, I am indifferent. I do not recommend it, nor do I tell my peers not to take it. The final paper seemed a bit irrelevant to the course content...therefore causing my indifference.
New and exciting course
Proud to be one of the first Communicology graduates in the world! Hope to see this program grow! Learned lots!
I know this class is your baby Dr.Aune but rememeber to have flexibility with the class material. You are a wonderful professor and chair- you have made learning exciting again. I have learned invaluable lessons. I apply ComG theories all the time- to the point where it elicts eyerolling from my friends. It just means you have taught me well. Only area that might need some improvement is the paper- it is heavy duty stuff! Some students are not as versed in the terms and techniques of crafting a literature review and experiment. Most of my teammates did not take research methods yet. All the reason more why I'm not fond of team projects- although I understand your logic of why it might be easier to split the work and that's how it is in the "real world", I know. I would rather do it on my own, it is much less stressful. I hope you continue to teach this class- we need it!
Great teacher for this new course
N/A
It would be helpful to have an evaluation form for the group members to fill out for the research project.
none
Great class, the course material was very interesting and I feel better knowing the principles behind our attitudes and actions.

R Aune: SP302, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Speech
Course: SP 302 - Research Methods Crn (Section): 85664 (001)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 20 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (20%) 16 (80%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.65 20 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (35%) 13 (65%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.45 20 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 6 (30%) 12 (60%)
4. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 20 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 4 (20%) 6 (30%) 8 (40%)
5. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 20 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 4 (20%) 4 (20%) 11 (55%)
6. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
I found that Professor Aune was very knowledgable and because of that he was able to express concepts and ideas very well. The powerpoints were well done and when coupled with the repitetion of concepts the class seemed easy.
The use of statistics and how to apply it
He taught us how to better understand statistics, that's valuable.
The research we had to do.
Truthfully the whole course in general is a course that I will never understand, and it is completely confusing from start to finish. He was a very good teacher tho but this course in general is something that when i signed up for speech my whole aspect of speech had nothing to do with this course.
The repetition of the methods his uses and the visual examples that he provides (graphs, charts, concert numbers, etc..) during lectures.
Strong examples and repetition of difficult material.
Kellys epic sense of humor, no but honestly Dr. Aune is one of my favorite professors
Everything that I had learned had great value, but I feel like I won't ever use it again unless I went to graduate school, which I will be not.
the material taught
he applies to real life situations
the entire course was very useful
Learning how to understand journal articles
7. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?
Professor Aune. He is always will to take extra time to listen and explain anything you do not understand. He also took the time to use multiple examples for the concepts so that more people could comprehend the topics.
The most valuable thing Professor Aune covered in class was the explanation of statistics and how to use the formulas. He explained it over and over again in clear detail so that everyone in the course would understand.
He taught us how to better understand statistics, that's valuable and helpful.
I don't know
Nothing I really disliked the course
The concert examples of the statistics to help illustrate how the formulas work.
Sometimes too redundant on some subjects...but this is most likely due to the different levels of the students.
I found the concepts of deviation to be quite interesting
how to analyze numbers
Learning how to read and understand research articles.
he applies real life situations
i felt like the course was good and made u think outside the box
going over information over again so we can understand it.
8. The instructor gives clear explanations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 20 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 5 (25%) 13 (65%)
9. The instructor slowed down when discussing complex and difficult topics.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 19 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 6 (32%) 12 (63%)
10. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 20 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 4 (20%) 4 (20%) 11 (55%)
11. The instructor was able to clarify difficult course topics.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 20 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 2 (10%) 7 (35%) 10 (50%)
12. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 20 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (25%) 15 (75%)
13. The instructor adjusts to fit individual abilities and interests.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 20 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 6 (30%) 12 (60%)
14. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.65 20 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 3 (15%) 15 (75%)
15. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 20 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (20%) 16 (80%)
16. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (26%) 14 (74%)
17. Other comments:
This class is really hard.
I love Dr. Aune he is a great teacher !~~~
I enjoyed his teaching but research methods i really dislike. I don't think this should even be part of speech. If i wanted to learn more on how to do a research i would of signed up for another major.
Great instructor, great dept. chair one of the best at UH Manoa that I have had.
Thank you for everything Dr.Aune
He made himself very available to helping outside of the classroom. He wanted us to succeed and that is not something you see in a lot of teachers nowadays. He gave everyone a chance to succeed, and I saw that in his teaching. Great teacher.
hope he grades leniently, it is not a course that should be under 302. it should be a 500 level class
The test was way too hard. Need to break down the information more if it's going to be on the test. Please consider study guides

R Aune: SP702, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Speech
Course: SP 702 - Researching Relational Com Crn (Section): 85669 (001)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%)
5. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
6. I learned to recognize quality work in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
7. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
8. I developed a clearer sense of professional identity.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%)
9. The course made me think hard and carefully.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Applying the statistical tools by analyzing data ourselves.
Understanding how to read articles.
Learning different researching and analytical techniques for human communication research. Learning how to run SPSS. Readings output in SPSS
11. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
12. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 1.22 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (83%)
13. Other comments:
This class made me notice how "cool" it is to be able to understand statistics and actually conduct studies and analyze the data. Dr. Aune is a "true" teacher who deeply care about students' learning process, rather than giving them grades. I felt greatly motivated to learn more thanks to his passion!
Shows why he is head of the department.
I wish we had more homework assignments to practice doing SPSS runs. Then it would be great to read and interpret the results. I don't feel like I have a strong grasp on creating a valid study with good measures. Perhaps reading method sections in other studies with explanation would benefit the students.
Dr. Aune is always available to help with any questions whether it is related to class or not. He takes the time to explain each concept until all students understand it. This was a challenging course.

R Aune: SP302, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Speech
Course: SP 302 - Research Methods Crn (Section): 86211 (001)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%)
4. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.09 11 1.14 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 1 (9%) 6 (55%)
5. I developed the ability to evaluate new course work content in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.18 11 0.98 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 4 (36%) 5 (45%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 11 1.27 Freq(%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 2 (18%) 7 (64%)
7. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 11 1.01 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 6 (55%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 8 (73%)
9. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 11 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 2 (18%) 6 (55%)
10. The course made me think hard and carefully.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.45 11 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 2 (18%) 7 (64%)
11. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
to be able to understand the numbers mean on journal articles.
the examples given with each section covered that allowed us to understand the material.
how Aune elaborated and took his time on each concept/idea-this helped greatly to understand the material better.
the repetition of the material (it was necessary)... and the podcasts
podcast, and lecture notes
Learning how to understand statistics.
Dr. Aune records his lectures. I found this very valuable because Dr. Aune understands that this class is difficult and requires more than class time allows to grasp each topic. Dr Aune is also very willing to help students outside of class.
The material itself is proving to be very useful.
12. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
the lack of a text book to refer to.
Sometimes run-off tangents lead to distraction from learning material and focus.
n/a
None. Everything that was taught in the class was relevant.
Occasionally the material and examples would be a little confusing.
13. The instructor gives clear explanations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 11 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 6 (55%) 4 (36%)
14. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%)
15. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%)
16. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 11 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 6 (55%)
17. The instructor was able to clarify difficult course topics.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 11 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 6 (55%)
18. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%)
19. Other comments:
Thank you so much for the lecture!! It was one of the hardest class I've ever taken in college but learned a lot!!
Knowledgeable professor with insightful ideas. Wanting his students to thoroughly understand the material-genuinly great professor.
I am grateful for Professor Aune's time. He made himself available to help outside of class, above and beyond what I feel should be expected of him.
very intellectual professor.

R Aune: SP370, Spring 2009     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Speech
Course: SP 370 - Verbal Communication Crn (Section): 86401 (001)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 33 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (21%) 26 (79%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.48 33 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 12 (36%) 19 (58%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 33 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 2 (6%) 14 (42%) 16 (48%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.24 33 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 4 (12%) 14 (42%) 14 (42%)
5. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.12 33 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 4 (12%) 15 (45%) 12 (36%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 33 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (18%) 11 (33%) 16 (48%)
7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.45 33 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 6 (18%) 22 (67%)
8. I learned more in this course than I expected to learn.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.06 33 1.09 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (9%) 9 (27%) 4 (12%) 17 (52%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
I think everything was valuable and gave me a different look at communications.
The concepts of all the non verbal cues males and females do
I feel that the most valuable aspects of this course was being able to learn how to apply concepts from this course into real world context. I am enjoying working on the research paper; i have never done my own research paper such as this one that is assigned in SP 370.
The examples that Professor Aune used to explain the material really helped me grasp the concepts we learned.
The lectures were all interesting.
Dr. Aune's personal examples given for the concepts were very useful to grasp.
To have powerpoints during the lectures so that we are able to follow along and take notes.
All the theories, because I was able to apply them to real-life situations.
the daily lectures
The most valuable aspects of the course were the material and the professor. The material, although dense, was very informative and interesting and the professor "communicated" it clearly.
The material presented in class was easy to relate to the real world.
the research project
The Final Research paper
the message code of communication
- cost friendly - the lack of a text book meant that there was more need for the student to go to class to get a better understanding of the material. - the professor was personable, allowing for students to ask questions outside of class as well as during class. - gave multiple examples of a given idea, which made learning new ideas easier.
I found the real-world examples and lectures to be the most informative and valuable materials in class. The professor provided excellent insight and information concerning the practial use and application of the information taught in class. Accordingly, the information seemed more relevant and useful.
Creating our own empirical research.
Learned how to give survey/analyze data and write a research report Understanding the basic level of human verbal communication was very helpful
the fact that the teacher knew everything that he was talking about and that he had genuine enthusiasm toward the class
using real world examples to explain different theories
The information about nonverbal messaging perceptions and memes. Research project also helped with Speech dept. in general
The group presentation allowed us to do independent research on a variety of subjects that all members had some interest in.
Course material.
The course did a good job of challenging my preconceived notions regarding the field. the course took everything I had learned in past speech classes and put a new spin on it.
Prof. Aune relates concepts to really life and gives many examples to help you better understand the materials presented. He also post his lecture notes prior to class which allows you time to review the material before attending his lecture.
10. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
Nothing, everything was useful.
The tangents
nothing...i'm really enjoying this class
None
The group projects were more of a hassle due to uncooperative group members.
Too much lecture material in one day gets us dozing off.
N/A
the research project
The aspects of the course that I found the least valuable and least helpful were the breadths between speaking, although that time did allow me to digest the material. I would like more time for the class since the material is very dense. I'd only like more time with the teacher, allowing him to expand on the content in a classroom setting since the allotted time is not enough.
Not having a book. It was good financially, but i felt like there was nothing for me to fall back on in terms of information.
There should have been activities or assignments to not only help our grade but to help us understand the course material more
The slides were a little wordy and hard to understand without lots of explanation
Not having a text book for this class. There were some things that were hard to understand from this lectures and referring to a book would have clarify things better.
nothing much
N/A
Tangents
The teacher gave some irrelevant examples which turned into tangents and I got lost.
the powerpoints. they were very brief.
the research paper was to long
Least valuable-there was so much info that is was hard to intensely understand every concept Helpful-when the key concets were explaained and applied to everyday examples
Some of the lectures were a bit long winded.
The group research project.
Challenging my notions led to confusion, but that confusion was easily allayed by the instructor.
n/a
11. The instructor gives clear explanations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.28 32 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 13 (41%) 15 (47%)
12. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.48 33 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 2 (6%) 10 (30%) 20 (61%)
13. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 33 0.57 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 5 (15%) 26 (79%)
14. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.81 32 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (19%) 26 (81%)
15. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 33 0.56 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 13 (39%) 19 (58%)
16. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.21 33 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 14 (42%) 14 (42%)
17. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.61 33 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 13 (39%) 20 (61%)
18. The instructor adjusts to fit individual abilities and interests.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.3 33 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (18%) 11 (33%) 16 (48%)
19. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.52 33 0.57 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 14 (42%) 18 (55%)
20. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
Willing to put in extra time to make sure you have a clear understanding of whats going on.
How much he knew about the course
I liked the way the instructor used real life examples to get us to understand the material that was being taught. He was also very knowledgeable. I think it is awesome when professors can talk so clearly and know exactly what they are talking about and teach it to us in a way that we understand the information that they are trying to get across. He is a verbal communication professor, but not all teachers have the ability and intelligence that he does.
He is very approachable and helpful when it comes to teaching the students. Also he always seemed to push us to do better than what he expected of ourselves.
Prof. Aune is a nice mix of laid back and professional. This made it easy to get involved in the class. He also made me feel like he was a professor I didn't want to disappoint.
He was always willing to meet during office hours and help.
He is very easy to talk to and would answer any questions that a student may have.
Dr. Aune was also willing to lend a helping hand- even if his schedule was jam-packed.
He is very approachable outside of class. This allows any unanswered questions to be figured out. He is also very responsive to e-mails which save me as a student time and is very helpful.
The professor was very knowledgeable about the topics covered in class. His presentations were well prepared and contained valuable information pertaining to more than just the class, it pertained to actual life experiences. He related the material to real life situations through personal stories and examples.
I felt the examples professor Aune used in class really helped me gain a greater understanding of the knowledge presented. His use of real life examples made it much easier to grasp the material.
interested in students' understanding
He is always available for discussion and help in regards to not only the class at hand, but any other questions we may have.
If I didn't understand a concept he was good at finding examples that made it clearer.
Always available to students needs, replies back to emails on a timely manner, and is easy to talk to/approachable type of person. He always tried to make class interesting and fun using personal examples.
the data analyze
- he was accessible outside of class for consultation about the project. infact he encouraged it as he wanted people to see group's data prior to writing their final papers.
The instructor was very charismatic and informative. I enjoyed his sincere interest in the subject matter. It really allowed for a more entertainting and equally informative class. The teacher was very approachable and willing to help.
Enthusiastic, Knowledgeable
His ability to make things simple and comprehendable
He was avaailable all the time and cared about the questions we had in class or after.
open office hours and friendly
Most valuable-he was so nice, smart, understanding, and just funny. Most helpful-he was always ready to help explain anything and take time to help students anytime
He was willing to answer any question, even on exams, thoroughly.
He was always available for extra help outside of class if something was not understood. Always made time for students. Very funny teacher who is relaxed and tries to make the class fun.
Dr. Aune definitely knows what he is talking about. His depth of knowledge greatly helped me understand very complex ideas and theories I might not have otherwise understood.
Prof. Aune is very helpful and encouraging. He also is more than willing to work with you, outside of class to review concepts, answer questions, and help in any way that he can. He is one of the most flexible professor that I have worked with as far as accommodating students and their schedules. Whenever I needed help, he was willing to work around our schedules to make time for us to meet. He is truly interested in his students learning and increasing knowledge!
willing to help you anytime and explain things.
21. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?
Nothing, great instructor everythings he does is helpful and valuable to the class.
N/a
nothing....
None
Prof. Aune did make a lot of references to another speech class as if everyone in class already took the class. However, I, and a bunch of other students, did not. So, I know I felt I bit left out when he'd make the references.
Sometimes he would go off subject in class for a while and that makes us lose track of the current lecture materials.
N/A
Sometimes examples would turn in to stories, which were entertaining, yet it sometimes seemed like we were wasting time.
He has a tendency to go off on tangents while lecturing - while at times these were helpful, they were often unrelated to course material
Nothing.
the powerpoint
N/A
Tangents
n/a
The powerpoints were not very helpful unless you went to class all the time. Sometimes he would go off on tangents not relevant to the topic and I would lose concentration and my train of thought
amount of work we had to do into the research paper
The only "Complaint" i have with him is he is so smart and sometimes gets off topic. BUT, he's funny and I love him
Sometimes he would get agitated and then begin embarassing or showing aggression to specific members of class. It wasn't often, but it happened a few times.
Sometimes he will go on and on about something and it is hard to get a clear answer about a topic, theory, term, but he always give examples so it isn't too bad. Expects you to work hard! Hard exams! Need to go to class to understand material.
he has a tendency to go on tangents that seem random, but they tend to give the mind a break from wrestling more complex ideas.
N/a
22. Exams are creative and require original thought.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.24 33 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 4 (12%) 14 (42%) 14 (42%)

R Aune: SP702, Spring 2009     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Speech
Course: SP 702 - Researching Relational Com Crn (Section): 86993 (001)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 1.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
5. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.33 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
8. I learned more in this course than I expected to learn.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Learning statistics! I liked the sample data sets.
10. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the course?
With more organization or direction on our project, perhaps we could have covered more material in class.
11. The instructor gives clear explanations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
12. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
13. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
14. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
15. The instructor defined new terms, concepts, and principles.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%)
16. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
17. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
18. The instructor adjusts to fit individual abilities and interests.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 1.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
19. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
20. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
Willingness to meet out of class; Interest in student learning
21. Exams are creative and require original thought.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 2 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)