eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Suzanne Koan

Available Survey Results

Suzanne Koan: APDM320, Fall 2008

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Family & Consumer Sciences
Course: APDM 320 - Textiles I Crn (Section): 79419 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.89 9 0.93 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 5 (56%) 2 (22%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.89 9 0.33 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 8 (89%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.22 9 0.97 Freq(%) 2 (22%) 4 (44%) 2 (22%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.44 9 1.01 Freq(%) 2 (22%) 2 (22%) 4 (44%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.33 9 1.0 Freq(%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 3 (33%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.33 9 1.0 Freq(%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 3 (33%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.89 9 1.27 Freq(%) 2 (22%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 4 (44%) 0 (0%)
8. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.0 9 0.87 Freq(%) 3 (33%) 3 (33%) 3 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
9. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.56 9 1.24 Freq(%) 3 (33%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 2 (22%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.78 9 1.3 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 3 (33%)
11. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.78 9 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 0 (0%)
12. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.22 9 1.09 Freq(%) 3 (33%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
13. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.0 9 1.12 Freq(%) 4 (44%) 2 (22%) 2 (22%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
14. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.78 9 0.83 Freq(%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 6 (67%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%)
15. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.67 9 1.41 Freq(%) 3 (33%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 4 (44%) 0 (0%)
16. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.78 9 1.3 Freq(%) 2 (22%) 2 (22%) 1 (11%) 4 (44%) 0 (0%)
17. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.67 9 1.22 Freq(%) 2 (22%) 2 (22%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 0 (0%)