|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 2.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
2 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
|
|
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
7. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
2 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
|
|
8. I create my own learning experiences in connection with the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
9. I help classmates learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
10. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
11. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
12. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
2 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
|
|
13. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
2 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
|
|
14. The instructor is permissive and flexible.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
2 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
|
|
15. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
16. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
|
|
17. This was my first online course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
True |
False |
N/A |
| 2.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
18. I believe I would have gained more knowledge and a better understanding of the course materials had the online course been conducted in-person.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| Learning about current changes in healthcare and how its impacting the whole nation. |
|
|
20. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
|
| Arranging meetings with the legislators |
|
|
21. Other comments:
|
| It was a great learning experience. |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
|
|
4. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
5. I developed creative ability in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
|
|
7. I developed enthusiasm about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (67%) |
1 (33%) |
|
|
8. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
9. I became interested in community projects related to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
|
|
10. I learned to value new viewpoints.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
3 |
1.15 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
11. I developed a clearer sense of professional identity.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
3 |
1.15 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
12. The instructor seems knowledgeable in many areas.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
14. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
|
|
15. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
|
|
16. Comment on the instructor's concern for the students.
|
| Dr. Casken was available to answer questions and responded in a timely fashion. |
| Dr. Casken is available to his students and shows genuine concern. |
|
|
17. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
|
| No survey responses were found. |
|
|
18. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
|
| Positive attitude
Kind-hearted
Fair |
| kindhearted, respectful, humble, genuine in character |
| Knowledgable
Experienced
Approachable |
|
|
19. Assignments make students think.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
20. I had the necessary equipment and technological skills required for the online course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
7 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
3 (43%) |
2 (29%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.29 |
7 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
3 (43%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
4. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.57 |
7 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
2 (29%) |
3 (43%) |
1 (14%) |
|
|
5. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
6. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.14 |
7 |
0.69 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
4 (57%) |
2 (29%) |
|
|
7. I create my own learning experiences in connection with the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.14 |
7 |
1.07 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
8. I help classmates learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
7 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
3 (43%) |
2 (29%) |
|
|
9. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.29 |
7 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
3 (43%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
10. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.79 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
1 (14%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
11. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
12. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (57%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
13. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
14. The flexibility of this course helps all kinds of students learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.29 |
7 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
3 (43%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
15. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
16. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (57%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
17. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| It is enjoyable for students to create their own learning environment, however, sometimes, for paper writing especially, it is difficult if there are no guidelines to follow. |
| Give students the option of working on a "real" or "virtual" project. |
| The deliverable my group & I struggled with the most, in terms of clarity, was the fiscal discussion
for our project's budget/management. Maybe a further clarification or expectation for this
deliverable would be helpful. A discussion on the Laulima forum about how projects are generally
funded is another approach. |
|
|
18. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| He is quite flexible. He really wants his students to practice self directed learning. He is a good
encourager. He has a sense of humor. |
| I really liked Professor Casken's accessibility and willingness to assist. |
| Gave good feedback. |
| He is a very supportive, intelligent, & passionate instructor. He provides a liberal approach so that
students can feel comfortable sharing their opinions. He is very fair in grading & upfront about
expectations. Whenever assignment descriptions were posted late or backed-up, he adjusted due
dates accordingly to avoid stress for the students. |
|
|
19. This was my first online course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
True |
False |
N/A |
| 2.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
20. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| The benefit of online courses is flexibility. I enjoy being able to address schoolwork when and where
I care to. |
| Working on my own time. |
| Working in a team. Like working in groups and incorporating others knowledge and experiences. |
| I enjoyed the general flexibility of having an online course. I think this particular course & required
assignments fit well with the online format. Dr. Casken was an effective communicator via email &
always welcomed phone calls & face-to-face meetings. I also liked that there was a combination of
individual & group work, which allowed balance & fairness. |
|
|
21. What did you like least about your online course experience?
|
| I miss the face to face interactions with other students, but mostly I miss the interaction with my
professors. Email as a primary form of communication (as opposed to secondary) is my least favorite
way to meet/work with people. |
| Difficult doing group projects because we do not know everyone in the class and it's difficult to meet when there is not an already set meeting schedule. |
| Nothing. I think the online format is appropriate for this course. |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| Unfortunately, I wasn't as pleased with my group in this class as I was in 609. I felt that the
communication was fairly poor, ideas were not exchanged in a timely manner and the whole thing
was just never really cohesive (different people, different ideas about how things should be done) It
seems that some just naturally end up doing more than others. But that is the luck of the draw and
in many ways, just like life. Overall, I enjoyed this class. |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
18 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
6 (33%) |
11 (61%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.28 |
18 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (17%) |
7 (39%) |
8 (44%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.11 |
18 |
1.08 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
3 (17%) |
4 (22%) |
9 (50%) |
|
|
4. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.78 |
18 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
5 (28%) |
6 (33%) |
5 (28%) |
|
|
5. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
17 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (18%) |
8 (47%) |
6 (35%) |
|
|
6. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.78 |
18 |
1.11 |
Freq(%) |
1 (6%) |
2 (11%) |
1 (6%) |
10 (56%) |
4 (22%) |
|
|
7. I create my own learning experiences in connection with the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.06 |
18 |
0.94 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
1 (6%) |
9 (50%) |
6 (33%) |
|
|
8. I help classmates learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
18 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
2 (11%) |
8 (44%) |
6 (33%) |
|
|
9. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.28 |
18 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (22%) |
5 (28%) |
9 (50%) |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Group work. I enjoyed working with others. It was extremely helpful to work with others who were familiar with the process and who had contacts in the community. Made the process effortless. |
| The content and learning about legislative processes. |
| I find mandatory group work to be frustrating, yet enriching! In the real world, one's ability to communicate effectively and work well with others are characteristics that must be developed as an APRN. |
| Having to research a legislative idea and interview stakeholders and government officials, working collaboratively in a large group |
| The project brought me into the political arena in a new way by looking at what it actually takes to get legislation changed or implemented. |
| The group project was extremely valuable. |
| THe extra readings Casken gave us to read if we were interested. |
| The requirement to meet with legislators and stakeholder. It forced us to start a dialogue about real
issues related to policy. |
| Absolutely loved the virtual project --thought it was a wonderful vehicle to take us through the actual steps of the legislative process --super, super appreciated that, because I didn't know much about it, but now I am stoked --We can spark change, we have the power, it really is a relatively simple system, and it doesn't take a bunch of money, it just takes the willingness to work together and push for what is right manned with the proper research. |
| Working with nurses of varying experience |
|
|
11. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| Individual assignments. I appreciate policy, but many of the aspects of policy are just to complicated for me to even begin to figure out- especially the finance part. I would rather write on an aspect of policy rather than create my own solution. |
| I did not enjoy the group projects.The group size was too big and only 4 of
us really worked on the material.Communicating with members especially when I
live on a neighbor island was extremely difficult.There should be some
accountability for those who pass this class on other people's work. |
| Too much people in one group. One group member did NOTHING throughout the semester
in group work. Which really angered me and other members in the group. They thought they
could just stand by and watch the assignment being turned in. The only responses they gave
through email was "sounds great to me". I mean seriously, this is a MASTERs program! I'm
just mad that nobody has said anything to that person except me. |
| the text books--could have read copies of selected chapters without getting the entire book(s) |
| Some of the reading material was least valuable to me. |
| There were none. |
|
|
12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
18 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (33%) |
12 (67%) |
|
|
13. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
18 |
0.86 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
1 (6%) |
3 (17%) |
13 (72%) |
|
|
14. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.39 |
18 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
7 (39%) |
9 (50%) |
|
|
15. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
18 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
6 (33%) |
11 (61%) |
|
|
16. The flexibility of this course helps all kinds of students learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
18 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
1 (6%) |
7 (39%) |
9 (50%) |
|
|
17. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.72 |
18 |
0.57 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
3 (17%) |
14 (78%) |
|
|
18. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
18 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (33%) |
10 (56%) |
|
|
19. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| Make groups smaller. 8 people in one group is too large and difficult. |
| Large working groups were somewhat challenging. Not sure if the groups could be limited in size... perhaps no more than 5 students. |
| Needs to have concrete examples of legislation and international approached to policy and assigned
readings |
| Continue to improve the timelyness of his response to deliverables, especially the individual ones. |
| I would not change the teaching of this course. |
| He can provide more resources on the topics of health policy: web-based resources, government
resources, texts links.
It is really challenging as a novice to wade through the information out in the world. His guidance is
always appreciated. |
| Thought it was great. |
| Improve on textbook selections. Would have been more beneficial to have been asked to purchase a "how to book" on writing health related legislative bills or on "political pearls" on gaining legislative support for one's bill so, in the future, I could have a book as a quick reference on my desktop. |
|
|
20. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Communication |
| Good communication |
| I love John's teaching approach and his positive, "can do" attitude. His love of learning is contagious, and his feedback is very helpful. I really appreciate the fact that he allows us to be creative, adult learners as we discuss new ideas and continue in our professional development. |
| He was quick to respond to e-mails and questions. He encourages exploration into the subject matter by balancing criticism with positive comments. |
| Feedback on assignments. |
| his insight and sharing of his own experiences |
| Dr. Casken had strong and helpful personal feedback. He was easily accessible and clear in his
expectations. |
| Excellent professor. Always available and willing to help out. Really appreciated his humor,knowledge and most of all encouragement to explore. thanks much! |
| He was always re-evaluating his courseload and if he discovered a more time-efficient manner to do an assignment, or a better learning opportunity, he would offer it to the class and not wait until students asked for it. His main goal was that we learned and did not waste our time doing "busy work". |
|
|
21. This was my first online course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
True |
False |
N/A |
| 1.88 |
16 |
0.34 |
Freq(%) |
2 (13%) |
14 (88%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
22. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| Flexibility. I enjoy not having to deal with traffic and parking to speak with the instructor. I appreciate the flexibility to communicate via internet. |
| We can get to it when we can. |
| I like the 24/7 availability. It allows students to access the system and coursework according to their own schedules. Really, the learning never stops! It is also nice to read other student papers, because I believe that learning should be shared. I learn a great deal from my classmates because they come with such a rich, diverse backgrounds. |
| Flexibility |
| The flexibility of my use of time since I work full time. |
| Being able to complete assignments on my own time. |
| The flexibility. It was very helpful to manage my time according to my schedule. |
| Very well set up....I actually prefer the online format as long as the professor is accessable and Dr. Casken was always --I think I get more individual attention through the online courses through email correspondance. I like having the ability to meet with our groups in the elluminate platform also. Dr. Casken made the format work as the assignements were well structured. Also enjoyed Dr. Casken's eagerness to have us explore. He gave us the framework, but then allowed us the freedom to explore and be creative with our projects --just great! |
|
|
23. What did you like least about your online course experience?
|
| Group projects!!!! |
| The difficulty in getting group members to do things. |
| At first, I wasn't sure which Laulima links we were responsible for checking. We only used a few features. I would recommend the instructor to "cleanup" the sidebar and get rid of the links that will not be used. |
| Prefer some face-to-face time |
| Being on an outer island I felt out of touch with the political scene and politicians. It is also very difficult to be a part of a group when it is an online course and takes more time to communicate. The online meeting was an improvement but still difficult as we communicated via typing and with several members it became rather disjointed at times. Did not flow smoothly. |
| I missed in class discussions. |
| Lack of face to face interaction and discussion |
| The impersonal nature. It was very challenging to work with a group of seven other people without
ANY face-to-face communication.
My ideal group would involve some face to face interaction, and majority electronic communication. |
|
|
24. Other comments:
|
| Mahalo! |
| Overall good course to make one think and look at the bigger picture of health care on a global scale rather than from the perspective of my work environment or personal experience. |
| n/a |
| Please keep emails to minimal or use them as announcements through laulima. The students are
overwhelmed with emails from other professors and classmates. Only email what is necessary. |
| I feel that the online courses provide less value for the money. I paid a large tuition and engaged in
mostly self-directed instruction. In general, more teaching resources such as lectures, links and
active discussions would make online classes more worth the price. |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
5 |
1.22 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
2 (40%) |
|
|
4. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
5 |
1.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
5. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
5 |
1.34 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
6. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
5 |
1.34 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
7. I create my own learning experiences in connection with the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
8. I help classmates learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
9. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
5 |
1.34 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Designing a project that will help with disease prevention. |
| The "field work" for the virtual health promotion project was the most valuable. We were able to talk to a wide range of community stakeholders to understand their concerns.
It was also helpful that Dr. Casken was flexible with deadlines and found it more important for us to have positive experiences interacting with members of the community, rather than trying to meet the deadlines. |
| The group work was the only valuable aspect of the course |
| The concise aspect of writing thoughts into a 2 page limit. It has honed my skills immensely! Making students reach out into the community - priceless! adjusting deadlines-appropriate. |
|
|
11. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| N/A |
| The "Introduction to Health Care Economics & Financial Management" text was not very valuable. I would look for a more applicable text for the financial portion of the course. (Sorry, I don't have a specific text in mind.) |
| I found this course offered no teaching whatsoever |
|
|
12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
5 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
1 (20%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
14. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
15. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
16. The flexibility of this course helps all kinds of students learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
17. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
18. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
19. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| Occassional live online discussions. |
| I would recommend more journal articles, rather than textbooks, for reading materials. |
| Dr. Casken can be more present |
|
|
20. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Regular feedback on performance on written papers. |
| He is very interested in the subject material.
He was very flexible and understood that community stakeholders could not necessarily meet with us according to the syllabus timeline and adjusted due dates accordingly. |
| He's approachable, reasonable, and kind. |
| availability by email & in person. |
|
|
21. This was my first online course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
True |
False |
N/A |
| 2.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
22. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| Flexibility. Able to work on my own time.
Working as a team on the group project. |
| I was able to work on my assignments and read materials on my own schedule. I didn't need to worry about being at a certain place at a certain time. |
| I can do work in my pajamas |
| flexibility in time |
|
|
23. What did you like least about your online course experience?
|
| N/A |
| I miss interacting with the instructor and classmates in person. Sending e-mail messages back and forth creates a time-lag and stifles discussion. I prefer the dynamics of in-person interaction.
Also, it was difficult to coordinate the schedules of the people for the group project to "meet" on-line. |
| There is a general lack of teaching that is done online |
| lack of human connection, however, it's made up through the introductions in the beginning of class. Also some students are very open to meeting off line. |
|
|
24. Other comments:
|
| None. |
| I really enjoyed the course!! |
| highly recommend this for all students so that we never lose touch with our community. |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.73 |
11 |
0.47 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
8 (73%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.64 |
11 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.36 |
11 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
5 (45%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
4. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.45 |
11 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
2 (18%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
5. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.64 |
11 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
2 (18%) |
8 (73%) |
|
|
6. I became interested in community projects related to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
11 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
1 (9%) |
4 (36%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
7. I create my own learning experiences in connection with the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.45 |
11 |
0.93 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
8. I help classmates learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.09 |
11 |
0.54 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
8 (73%) |
2 (18%) |
|
|
9. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| I enjoyed the freedom to think outside of the box with our group project. |
| The easy going nature of the course. We knew exactly what was expected of us and when it was required by. The assignments were engaging and encouraged us to think outside the box. I really enjoyed this course. Thanks John! |
| Lots of computer and email problems this semester. I hope these are worked out in future. I would also like to suggest that the instructor use the grade book option in Laulima to let students know the grades on their deliverables. I sent several emails but still do not know how I scored on two papers. Thank you, Dr. Casken for the individual feedback via email and also for the opportunities in creative learning. The deliverable topics were very enlightening! I loved this class! |
| the virtual team project. |
| instructor's input and constant communication |
| The instructor allowed us to be open of our ideas into creating interesting health care promotion
and disease prevention programs. I loved the class in that it allowed us to free our minds and
develop professionally. Allowing us to create our papers and projects in the ways we intend to be, is
a big deal in master's programs to allow us to be autonomous. |
| Most value aspects of the course is the group project. It was interesting to observe the communication styles in our group dynamics via phone and internet. Learned a lot.
Also, being challenged with communicating with and following up with individuals from the community. |
|
|
11. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| None |
| The group project was very difficult, because not all the group members participated equally and everyone had busy schedules. However, I think it is essential to keep this as part of the course requirement, because collaborative group work is how things get done in the real world. |
| I missed the face to face discussion with my classmates. |
| none |
| Nothing |
| Group work. At this level it is more problematic than beneficial. I don't like having my grade dependent on group members whose objectives are different than mine. I also dont like capitulating and allowing others to benefit from my hard work. |
| I feel that although group work has it's limited place in education, online classes don't work well for group projects. |
| I can not say if there were any. |
|
|
12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
11 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
9 (82%) |
|
|
13. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
14. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
15. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.36 |
11 |
0.81 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
3 (27%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
16. The flexibility of this course helps all kinds of students learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.55 |
11 |
0.69 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
3 (27%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
17. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
11 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
9 (82%) |
|
|
18. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.64 |
11 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
19. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| I had a wonderful learning experience! |
| This seemed to be an exceptionally large class; maybe they could limit the amount of students in the course. I enjoyed reading everyone's papers for creative ideas and perspectives, but 30+ students seems like a lot.
Could also improve on use of Laulima (i.e., utilize the student gradebook) |
| more frequent and timely feedbacks and comments. |
| a more detailed list of criteria of group project paper |
| Improve communications amongst the bookstore and instructor so we are not buying the incorrect
books. |
| Could have given a little more direction from the beginning for the course project. Difficult at times to ask questions when not sure what to ask. |
| When sending email to students - place course number on email so if you are taking 2 classes from the same instructor you know which one they are referring to... |
|
|
20. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Dr. Casken was always available for consultation on course work. |
| His understanding that everyone has a life and responsibilities outside of school. I really liked his philosophy on teaching/learning as well. |
| The individual feedback on course deliverables (via email) was very helpful and informative. I also liked how the instructor was always positive and encouraged us to be creative in our ideas and group proposal. |
| the feedback and comments. |
| instructor's feedback |
| He was organize but open to many possible ideas that was relevant to public health. The instructor
communicated very effectively by email and he is a quick emailer! |
| His interest and fairness was very helpful. He always provided outside info and perspective through email. |
| His flexibility and understanding. Also, his ability to empower us to think outside the box. |
|
|
21. This was my first online course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
True |
False |
N/A |
| 1.56 |
10 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
1 (10%) |
|
|
22. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| I had a great group to work with, which made the online experience easier. |
| The flexibility |
| That I can access the course work at my convenience, anytime of day. |
| the flexibility. |
| able to read other's work |
| Everything is online, you can do it at home or elsewhere. No driving from far west side of Oahu to
UH Manoa to save gas and time. Very green way to do distance learning. Laulima was effective tool
to communicate. |
| flexibility. |
| Ability to be able to work on course during own time. |
|
|
23. What did you like least about your online course experience?
|
| It is a bit less personal than in person meetings, and sometimes ideas and meanings can be misconstrued as emotions are not easily sensed over emails. |
| Missing classroom lecture-this is more applicable to the other course I was enrolled in. |
| The fact that Laulima often experiences unannounced downtimes. |
| lack human contact |
| none |
| No real-time chatting experience on Laulima. You had to wait for other group member's responses
to your messages on the discussion forums. Sometimes, it's difficult to experience other's behavior
when discussing the group projects. |
| Group work |
| Laulima technical difficulties. At times I would like to see the instructor face-to-face. |
|
|
1. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
2. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
3. I became interested in community projects related to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
4. I increased my awareness of my own interests and talents.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
5. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
6. I developed a clearer sense of professional identity.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
7. I create my own learning experiences in connection with the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
8. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Visit to a disaster agency, designing a communications piece, and assessments of our family and community. |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| No survey responses were found. |
|
|
11. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
12. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
14. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
15. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
16. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| No survey responses were found. |
|
|
17. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Dr. Casken's positive attitude and constructive feedback throughout the course! Deliverables were evenly spread throughout the course for self-directed study and time management. Thanks, Dr. Casken! |
|
|
18. Assignments make students think.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
19. The writing assignments helped me understand the course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
20. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| It allowed for self-directed study and improved my time management skills. I liked being able to read what my peers posted. |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
15 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
8 (53%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.73 |
15 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (40%) |
7 (47%) |
2 (13%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.4 |
15 |
0.91 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (20%) |
4 (27%) |
7 (47%) |
1 (7%) |
|
|
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.53 |
15 |
0.64 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
5 (33%) |
9 (60%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
15 |
0.93 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
3 (20%) |
6 (40%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
6. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.53 |
15 |
1.25 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
4 (27%) |
4 (27%) |
4 (27%) |
|
|
7. I increased my awareness of my own interests and talents.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.53 |
15 |
1.13 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
5 (33%) |
5 (33%) |
3 (20%) |
|
|
8. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.73 |
15 |
1.03 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (27%) |
7 (47%) |
3 (20%) |
|
|
9. I help classmates learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.73 |
15 |
1.03 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (27%) |
7 (47%) |
3 (20%) |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Developing the health promotion project and applying epidemiology to it. |
| 4 |
| Teamwork on group projects and getting to know others |
| learning how to write a proposal |
| Reaction paper deliverables, epi project, and health promotion project. The amount of drafts were appropriate. I really liked the deliverables because it allowed you to express your views and it wasn't like he was giving us a question to get the same answer from everyone. |
| The few meetings I had with John really energized me about my project. With any online course, the material is hung out to dry, and the students must simply rely on textbooks and the internet to learn. John is a very passionate person, and I probably would have really enjoyed hearing his lectures. It's too bad really. |
| I liked the way my group was able to come together and be one in our class project. I was lucky to have a great bunch of groupmates who were compliant and enthusiastic in contributing to the group. |
| the reflection papers made me delve deep into the material and enhanced my learning |
| The assignments were good and made me think about my opinions on important matters, and made me realize where I lacked knowledge. That made it easier to go out and learn more about issues that I was not educated on. Dr. Casken's mini lectures on the Word documents were enjoyable and informative. He is a very good teacher. |
| freedom to write my opinion |
| deliverables |
|
|
11. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| The textbook -- we never used it! |
| 5 |
| I felt confused about what was expected |
| Commentary assignments |
| reaction papers. I did not receive any feedback from them, so never knew if I was on the right track. |
| Online design. Again, students must teach themselves. This can relieve faculty of teaching responsibilities, but it leaves students in the dark. We suddenly have to motivate ourselves, and figure out what is important and what this subject is about alone. Online courses are not progress, they've taken the fun, appeal, and meaning out of a university. UH is trying to be lecture free it seems. |
| maybe a test of the core concepts in health promotion might have solidified what I learned from the papers. |
| As always, online classes are tough. I really wish I could have learned more from Dr. Casken b/c I know he has a wealth of knowledge and experience. I would say that the course could have been more structured, ie, less self-instruction and more instruction from the instructor. |
| course not structured enough, not clear directions
virtual project stressful, hard to do group project online without meeting people in group |
|
|
12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.29 |
14 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (14%) |
6 (43%) |
6 (43%) |
|
|
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.14 |
14 |
0.77 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (21%) |
6 (43%) |
5 (36%) |
|
|
14. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
15 |
0.86 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
7 (47%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
15. The instructor gives individual attention to students in the class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.07 |
14 |
0.92 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (14%) |
6 (43%) |
5 (36%) |
|
|
16. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.54 |
13 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (46%) |
7 (54%) |
|
|
17. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.92 |
12 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (25%) |
4 (33%) |
4 (33%) |
|
|
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| A little more structure in the learning part -- more (targeted, not necessarily lengthy) reading, current news articles, etc. |
| clear expectations for project |
| incorporate quizzes/exams with and without team effort |
| I thought there was going to be a community component to this class. was disappointed to learn that there was not. I never even touched the book--total waste of my money. |
| Improve punctuality of feedback. For 1st feedback, we got after we wrote our 2nd paper. No feedback for 2nd and 3rd and the drafts. We don't know what we need to fix and correct because we have an idea, but it may not be what the instructor is looking for. |
| Lecture, drop the online stuff. Distance people can watch on TV. |
| maybe a test of the core concepts in health promotion might have solidified what I learned from the papers. |
| I would have enjoyed learning about a greater number of topics. I am not necessarily saying I want more workload....well maybe I am. Everything I learned from Dr. Casken was great, but I really wanted more! So for question 17, when I disagreed that the course load was reasonable, it is because I wanted a little more depth. |
| present more effective learning materials. e.g. articles to be read and commented on, better books
more clear direction
timely feedback |
|
|
19. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| He is very fair, communicates well and genuinely cares about the progress and learning of his students. This made it a pleasurable class to be in. |
| Flexible, effectively communicates in a punctual manner, thoughtful feedback on assignments, very
open and considerate. |
| I appreciated his keen sense of humor. I wish I would've heard more of it. |
| Enthusiasm about health and his views and thoughts about the topics. |
| During those couple short meetings, I got feedback on my project. Turned out John loved my project, and my group members didn't even know it, because they never get to see John. |
| It seemed like the instructor personlized his response to my written work. He reflected on my work and infused a bit of his own. His comments were specific and he didn't make you sound stupid. Writing about commplex subjects in one or two pages is difficult. For some reason, the instructor made you do it well. |
| He was very understanding and you can tell he really wanted us to learn the important concepts of health promotion |
| He is a very nice person, and I can tell he really enjoys teaching and he likes students. I have found this to be the exception, as many professors teach because they have to. Dr. Casken is genuine and enthusiastic about public health nursing, and it makes me more excited about learning. He has a lot of knowledge and ties in the big picture with what he teaches. I liked having him as a teacher a lot. |
| knowledgable about public health |
| the respect he gives his students |
|
|
20. Assignments make students think.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.08 |
13 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (23%) |
6 (46%) |
4 (31%) |
|
|
21. The writing assignments helped me understand the course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.85 |
13 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (23%) |
6 (46%) |
3 (23%) |
|
|
22. The group work contributes significantly to this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.5 |
12 |
1.51 |
Freq(%) |
2 (17%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (17%) |
3 (25%) |
4 (33%) |
|
|
23. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| Schedule flexibility. Being online was appropriate for this course. |
| group work. I have experienced group work before, but this time it was a horrible expereince. |
| Allowed us to participate in a forum that resulted in awesome group dynamics and learning how to
communicate effectively to get the job done efficiently. |
| no final...easy to schedule. |
| Independence and doing things on your own time. |
| It is hard to answer that, as I feel like I took the course on the moon. The content was interesting, but I need more, I need interaction. That is what I pay for, interaction with an expert in an open forum. |
| I liked the Group work participation. The instructor made you think critically. |
| the teacher was very friendly and helped students to get to know one another. |
| Flexibility is the only advantage I can think of. Honestly I don't like online classes. I suppose you could tell that from my other answers. I think one day online classes will be the way to go, but right now, I do not think technology makes teaching online user-friendly enough for the same amount of teaching to be conducted. |
| freedom to work from home |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (38%) |
8 (62%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.38 |
13 |
0.77 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
4 (31%) |
7 (54%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.92 |
13 |
1.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (23%) |
2 (15%) |
1 (8%) |
7 (54%) |
|
|
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.46 |
13 |
0.66 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
5 (38%) |
7 (54%) |
|
|
5. I developed greater awareness of societal problems.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.54 |
13 |
0.66 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
4 (31%) |
8 (62%) |
|
|
6. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.23 |
13 |
1.01 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
3 (23%) |
7 (54%) |
|
|
7. I increased my awareness of my own interests and talents.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.46 |
13 |
0.66 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
5 (38%) |
7 (54%) |
|
|
8. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.42 |
12 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
5 (42%) |
6 (50%) |
|
|
9. I help classmates learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
13 |
0.91 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
6 (46%) |
4 (31%) |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| his commentaries |
| going to the legislature and meeting with reps was great - i'm glad casken made us do that.
however, the assignment of the "virtual bill" seemed redundant and was confusing. i would rather
have followed a real, current bill from start to finish instead of having to make up my own. casken
gave good, thoughtful feedback on assignments. |
| I enjoyed doing the reaction papers. These invoked the most thought. I also liked that the papers should be short, concise. |
| The legis. group project. Meeting political individuals and visiting the Capitol. I also enjoyed the book "Political Paradox." |
| Meeting with and conversating with legislators to gain a better understanding of the law-making process. |
| The requirement to actually attend a meeting with a legislator was valuable. |
| Dr. Casken helps me to THINK!!! |
| Most valuable aspects included meeting with a legislature, observing the legislative process, and
the textbooks were great! |
| open ended writing commentary assignments that allowed for personal opinions instead of research reporting. Ability to do hands on learning about legislative issues in the real world.
Opportunity to re evaluate concepts with a new focus. |
| Dr. Casken was incredibly supportive and answered questions promptly. I enjoyed the course, and would easily take another course from him. |
| The exposure to the implications of political involvement as it impacts the profession of nursing was foundationally shifting for me. The course 'supported' me embarking into a foreign arena for this I shall be forever grateful. It challenged me to broaden my 'world view' of nursing yet again! :) |
|
|
11. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| the book readings - this course could have utilized current policy issues |
| Communication was not always good for this course and I wish we could have had some way of
interacting online with our classmates more - it was a pretty lonely online course. |
| The virtual project was difficult to get into. Perhaps asking students to select a bill of interest and follow it through the process would have been better. After I chose a topic for my project, I found it didn't really interest me. Nothing more difficult than doing something that doesn't get you fired up. |
| Keeping track of the hours, but I do see the relevance of it. |
| General response papers on topics. The reading was interesting, but usually only the instructor responded to commentary. Minimal exchange with classmates. |
| I don't really understand where there was any teaching. |
| Lack of interaction with other students in some kind of forum setting/online discussion would have been nice. I would prefer to have a list of other students and contacts numbers in order to interact on email and share information related to the course, etc. |
| N/A |
| Group work is always a challenge especially when you encounter a 'weak link
and I find this very time consuming and frustrating. |
|
|
12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.77 |
13 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (23%) |
10 (77%) |
|
|
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.77 |
13 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (23%) |
10 (77%) |
|
|
14. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
13 |
0.91 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
6 (46%) |
4 (31%) |
|
|
15. The instructor gives individual attention to students in the class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
13 |
1.08 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
1 (8%) |
5 (38%) |
5 (38%) |
|
|
16. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (38%) |
8 (62%) |
|
|
17. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.54 |
13 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (46%) |
7 (54%) |
|
|
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| Use more of laulima's tools to make the class more interactive - maybe some discussions or sharing
of ideas... all we did was post assignments on it. Also, a clearer outline of the virtual legislation
assignment, as well as "how a bill becomes a law in Hawaii" or equipping us with some tools to get
started on that path would be helpful. |
| Perhaps do more reaction papers. These were the most interesting part of class. We could have done more of them. I learned the most from doing these. |
| Due to the cyber-bridge, I am unable to objectively stated how the instructor would be in the presence of the student. However, I can say that through observation of his responses and emails, he does appear very respectful and energetic.
Improvement, I do not have any suggestions. |
| keep in mind that not all students have a background in health policy and that topic need to be introduced in a way so that these students can understand. |
| Have it be an in-person class instead of online. The online aspect takes away from the discussion portion and decreases interest and motivation to cultivate our thoughts and ideas to share with the class. |
| A lot of frustration was from vague assignments which confused a lot of people. The forums in Laulima is horrible and the discussion section should be utilized for easier reading and posting. An additional source of frustration would be from unanswered emails. |
| I would suggest posting commentaries at least 2 weeks in advance of due date. |
| arrange for some discussion over the internet to allow engagement between students. This is especially helpful if you are outer island, and don't get direct contact with either the insructor or other students. |
| I can't think of anything in this moment. |
|
|
19. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| great on email |
| Casken is clearly very passionate and cares about his students. I liked that he encouraged us to
questions ourselves, our ideas, and our assumptions. He likes projects and readings to be "open-
ended" but sometimes this can be very frustrating for us students. |
| Seems very kind and enthusiastic about teaching. He sends us tidbits of what occurs in govt/the world. This helps to bring home the idea of how general/basic health care can and should be. |
| His feedback allowed me to improve in my writing and perception of events. |
| Flexible approach, willing to give feedback, focus more on understanding ideas than technical assignments, generally responsive to emails. |
| The instructor's interest in policy is contagious and encouraging. |
| Willingness to listen to other's points of view. |
| Dr. Casken puts students at ease. Reading his views/commentaries were extremely helpful. |
| A very wise and insightful person. Very gentle and willing to entertain alternate viewpoints. Encourages independent thinking and individual research and learning process. Tried to make the experience enjoyable and not stressful.Opened up lots of opportunity for new ideas. |
| His commentaries, and the uniqueness of the articles he shared with us during the course. |
| His willing to be understanding in the face of 'life events' was extremely appreciated. |
|
|
20. Assignments make students think.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.23 |
13 |
1.09 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (46%) |
6 (46%) |
|
|
21. The writing assignments helped me understand the course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.77 |
13 |
1.3 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (46%) |
4 (31%) |
|
|
22. The group work contributes significantly to this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.54 |
13 |
1.45 |
Freq(%) |
2 (15%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
4 (31%) |
4 (31%) |
|
|
23. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| easy and convenient |
| The ability to work in a group on the legislation project. |
| Flexibility of doing assignments on my time. |
| The freedom and autonomy. I felt that we were given sufficient time to turn in assignments. Thank you Dr. Casken for your work and input. |
| Nothing, except the schedule flexibility and not having to drive to Manoa and pay for parking. |
| The group assignment. |
| Freedom from class schedules. Ability to get the work done on my own schedule. |
| I could leisurely read the assignment submissions of other students. |
| Flexibility to do my assignments when convenient for me. |
|