eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Brandy McDougall

Available Survey Results

AMST220, Fall 2014
AMST220, Fall 2014
AMST220A, Fall 2014
AMST220, Spring 2013
AMST220A, Spring 2013
AMST620, Spring 2013
AMST220, Fall 2012
AMST220A, Fall 2012
AMST381, Fall 2012
AMST220, Spring 2012
AMST481, Spring 2012
AMST455, WS445, Fall 2011
AMST480, Fall 2011

Brandy McDougall: AMST220, Fall 2014

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 220 - Intro to Indigenous Studies Crn (Section): 79565 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.73 11 1.01 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 7 (64%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.42 12 0.51 Freq(%) 7 (58%) 5 (42%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 14 0.27 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 13 (93%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%)
6. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%)
7. The instructor presented concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 14 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 10 (71%)
8. The grading system was clearly explained.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 14 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 9 (64%)
9. Assignments were returned in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 14 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 4 (29%) 7 (50%)
10. The instructor provided specific meaningful feedback.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.46 13 0.78 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 3 (23%) 8 (62%)
11. What did you like best about the course?
The presentations that we had to do (PSA).
everything
I really enjoy the small group discussions
Discussing the readings in class.
I really enjoyed the discussion classes that made us think and question our thinking.
Meh, the course was alright, in that it wasn't really my cup of tea. However, I did get a different understanding of indigenous peoples and the issues they face. I accept and respect that differing views exist.
Learning about all these different indigenous cultures.
I like the opportunity to deeply analyze issues in Hawaii.
The ethical nature of the class. I like social analysis also.
I liked how we all could communicate freely with each other in the classroom.
I enjoyed learning about the injustices that take place in Hawaii and the United States. It put things into perspective that there is still much work that needs to be done before all indigenous peoples have equal opportunity and the recognition they deserve.
Interesting topics
12. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
More group discussions.
N/a
brandy did very well
Review our blogs with us. Send us information.
I'd like to see the arguments reconcile with one another, and how one, cohesive nation - a Hawaiian nation, for example - would look, theoretically.
I dont know
N/A
Mainly cosmetic aspects of the syllabus and web-site. It's not necessary, but little things like being able locate the assigned reading on the web- site a little more simply. Perhaps something like page numbers for assigned readings in the book.
Nothing
The only thing I would recommend, is to have more in class discussions. I felt that it was really difficult for many students to open up in front of the class. Maybe if we had smaller groups for discussion, then people would be more willing to come back to larger group. So maybe begin class with a discussion question for small groups, and then groups can debrief. Then, a spokesperson from each group could respond back to the group.
13. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.5 14 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 8 (57%)
14. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.64 14 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 9 (64%)
15. Why did you choose to take this course? (It fulfilled a focus designation (WI, E, OC, HAP, etc.), POLS major/minor requirement, major/minor requirement for another department, time and day(s) of the week it was offered, instructor, subject matter, etc.)
It fulfilled my WI and HAP credit.
fulfilled a focus designation
core class and the class seemed interesting
I wanted to learn about indigenous people and their culture
WI and HAP
It was the only WI course that fit my schedule.
Fulfilled HAP.
requirement for WI and HAP
My friend told me to take an American Studies class because it is better than history....So I decided to take this class since it revolves around Indians/Hawaiians.
WI 'and' HAP.
It fulfilled a WI.
I took this class to fulfill the HAP and WI requirement. However, I would take it again if I didn't have to because I learned a lot.
Gen Ed requirement
16. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 14 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 10 (71%)
17. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 14 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (43%) 8 (57%)
18. I learned to identify main points and central issues in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 8 (57%)
19. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.46 13 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (54%) 6 (46%)
20. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 13 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (31%) 9 (69%)
21. I enjoyed this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 14 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (43%) 8 (57%)
22. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (50%) 7 (50%)
23. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 14 0.43 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 11 (79%)
24. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 14 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%)
25. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 14 0.43 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 11 (79%)
26. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
27. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 14 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 9 (64%)
28. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%)
29. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
A great teacher who understands what she's teaching and teaches it in a manner that everyone can easily understand.
great!
She was well prepared to class. She made class very interesting and made the material interesting to learn.
Awesome
Very good teacher with effective teaching methods who cares for her students.
Dr. McDougall is an excellent instructor.
She was an awesome teacher!
She is a very kind teacher that motivates everyone to do their work and pass.
Very considerate in regards to the topic. Has a personal attention to the topic, and presents it as an area of study, giving practical insights to key issues and attitudes.
Very friendly. Always avalabile for discussion. Open to new ideas.
Excellent teacher! One of my favorites since my time being here at UH. Very approachable and has a great deal of passion and knowledge in the topic.
30. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 14 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 7 (50%)
31. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (50%) 7 (50%)
32. Reading assignments seem carefully chosen.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 14 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 9 (64%)
33. I feel that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 14 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 10 (71%)
34. Online communication with class members and the instructor helped me to learn course materials in an effective manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.0 14 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 6 (43%) 3 (21%) 2 (14%)
35. Upon entering the online course I felt welcomed, and knew where to go and what to do to get started.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.36 14 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (50%) 4 (29%) 3 (21%)
36. The instructor provided timely feedback to my course work.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.36 14 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 5 (36%) 3 (21%)
37. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
It was a WI credit course but it didn't feel as demanding because the bigger assignments were given out in advance giving us plenty of time to work on it.
I like how we discussed the materials as a whole class and further break down the material in smaller groups and shared. I like learning about the history of the indigenous people.
Group discussion
I really liked learning about Hawaii and other indigenous nations. Learned so much I didn't know about Native Americans.
Group discussions are always fun. I enjoyed activities.
sitting in class and listening
I liked the group PSAs because we can do it in a video form.
Student reflections.
I liked how it was in the renovated Sakamaki classroom. Thing were much more open and therefore helped me learn better.
That is very difficult to decide. I really enjoyed all the units.
38. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
Nothing, the course was all enjoyable.
N/a
readings
The PSA because they are last minute projects.
Lectures are boring - but it's like that in every class. Some days are just going to be more interesting than others. At least she broke the monotony with in-class activities.
reading and writing
That the midterm and final, I can only find evidence within the given articles.
Homework due the night before.
The papers were at times, difficult.
39. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.38 13 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (62%) 5 (38%)
40. My overall evaluation of this course is...
A great course where you can learn a great deal of indigenous issues that you might already know about but it will make you think deeper into it.
This is a very good class to take because it was interesting and it made me see the world differently
Fun
Really good. Learned so much in a short semester.
It's everything I thought it'd be.
Glad i took it
I had fun in this small environment that I got to make new friends in my labs. Also, we learned as a group.
I feel tired. However, any of my other classes and the classes of others seemed to move rather expediently this semester.
Good. I am glad I took this course. Before this, I did not know all of hardships indigenous peoples went through/ are still going through. I am much more educated now.
EXCELLENT
41. The course challenged me to think critically and historically about power and the political.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.57 14 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (43%) 8 (57%) 0 (0%)
42. The course improved my ability to craft and defend evidence-based arguments.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 14 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (50%) 7 (50%) 0 (0%)
43. Other comments:
n/a
Very innovative class structure/outline. I liked the division among the class, and felt that there is still room for ideas on how to utilize that aspect.

Brandy McDougall: AMST220, Fall 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 220 - Intro to Indigenous Studies Crn (Section): 79566 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.75 12 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 5 (42%) 5 (42%) 2 (17%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.09 11 0.3 Freq(%) 10 (91%) 1 (9%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
6. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
7. The instructor presented concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
8. The grading system was clearly explained.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%)
9. Assignments were returned in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.62 13 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (38%) 8 (62%)
10. The instructor provided specific meaningful feedback.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 13 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 10 (77%)
11. What did you like best about the course?
A variety of medium was used in this course. The topics were interesting, relevant and stimulated thought.
I liked the content learned in the class, and that I felt comfortable in the class setting.
I liked the conversational tone to the class. In the beginning of the semester I felt as though introducing us to the topic of indigenous studies was rather abrupt. However at the end of the class I feel as though our class mates really bonded.
The way that it makes you think about issues most people wouldj ust look over. It was a very eye-opening course.
The Info/readings
Group work to communicate with each other in class more
The subjects were very compelling and varied. The readings were (mostly) excellent. I liked how there were distinct themes of the class, from history to pop culture to sovereignty. There was a good mix of lecture, discussion, small group activities, videos, and guest speakers. I especially liked the small group activities. The class Facebook page encouraged students to post outside information that the wanted to share. I appreciated that there were many extra credit opportunities, and that they increased my awareness of cool community events which I could attend.
The elaborate explanations of each topic and ideas presented
One of the best teachers I've ever had.
The take home exams
I liked that the class was very engaging. The group discussions were very interesting and I feel like I gained a new perspective on the world because of this class.
Each discussions was very informative!
12. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
She's great already.
I actually didn't really like the introduction readings in the beginning of the course. They were very weighty and full of law concepts, which I can see why one would use these as an introduction to the course, however I feel as though I could appreciate those more later on in the year once I was more emotionally invested in the course. It just made the course seem really hard in the beginning of the year.
N/A
By making the students do more activities on different struggles Indigenous people face
N/A
Less readings
Perhaps more guest speakers? Overall, this course was organized and very informative. There's always room for improvement, but for this class, it doesn't really need to fix anything.
Maybe teach more about the cultures of the indigenous peoples so we can understand more about the effects of colonialism, etc.
Create games that relate to the topic, it might make it more memorable.
13. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.77 13 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 11 (85%)
14. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%)
15. Why did you choose to take this course? (It fulfilled a focus designation (WI, E, OC, HAP, etc.), POLS major/minor requirement, major/minor requirement for another department, time and day(s) of the week it was offered, instructor, subject matter, etc.)
It fulfilled a focus designation.
I chose at first because of the WI,Hap,DH focus, but I stuck with it because it was an interesting course.
I needed a writing intensive and it looked good.
Fulfilled focus designations but also was a topic I was interested in learning about. Heard great reviews from my adviser who recommended the course to me as well as other students over the years.
To learn
Writing Intensive
The subject interested me, and it fulfilled two requirements - HAP and WI.
It fulfilled a focus designation
It fulfilled WI and Indigenous Issues are important
I needed a writing intensive and thought the course would be interesting.
I took this class because it fulfilled the WI and HAP requirement. Also, a friend of mine recommended Kumu McDougall's class so that influenced my decision of taking this class as well.
Fulfill focus designation.
16. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.77 13 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 11 (85%)
17. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%)
18. I learned to identify main points and central issues in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
19. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.77 13 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 11 (85%)
20. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.77 13 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 11 (85%)
21. I enjoyed this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 10 (83%)
22. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
23. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.77 13 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 11 (85%)
24. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
25. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
26. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
27. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.62 13 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 3 (23%) 9 (69%)
28. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%)
29. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
The instructor was very informative and is very articulate. Overall a good instructor.
that she's a very understanding, and amiable professor. I felt like she knew exactly what she was talking about, and she portrayed the content in a way that helped me learn better.
I really like her teaching style. I also enjoyed her warm and welcoming personality as well.
She is very sweet and an amazing professor. She is well qualified to teach the course. She wants you to do well and makes the material very relate-able and makes you want to learn more.
Passionate
Easy to talk to and listen to, class isn't boring with her as the teacher, and she explains and breaks things down well :)
Kumu McDougall is a fantastic instructor. She is clearly very passionate and enthusiastic about the subject, and really seems to care about her students. She was always encouraging, and a lot of positive feedback. She has such a broad knowledge base that she was able to choose the best readings and videos. I enjoyed her class very much, and she motivated me to do my best. She encouraged us to find ways of incorporating our outside interests into the class through group projects and individual papers.
Great! She was very passionate about teaching and always encouraged students to do their best
Fabulous kumu... I wish she taught more classes.
That she is a very ood teacher.
a great Kumu! She is very engaged in the subject matter and she is very supportive of students opinions. She is very eloquent when she speaks even about the saddest topics. I really enjoyed having Kumu McDougall as my professor for this semester :)
Great class!
30. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.31 13 0.85 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 3 (23%) 7 (54%)
31. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 13 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 4 (31%) 7 (54%)
32. Reading assignments seem carefully chosen.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 13 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (31%) 9 (69%)
33. I feel that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.46 13 0.78 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 3 (23%) 8 (62%)
34. Online communication with class members and the instructor helped me to learn course materials in an effective manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.31 13 0.75 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 5 (38%) 6 (46%) 0 (0%)
35. Upon entering the online course I felt welcomed, and knew where to go and what to do to get started.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.38 13 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 4 (31%) 7 (54%) 0 (0%)
36. The instructor provided timely feedback to my course work.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.31 13 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 7 (54%) 5 (38%) 0 (0%)
37. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
The topics were interesting. I did appreciate the efforts made to stimulate thinking in group activities.
I liked the discussion parts of class!
The discussions and relevant group activities done in class relating to the lecture material.
Videos, readings, everything
Learning about Indigenous people and historical events that were not taught in high school
The focus on Native Hawaiian issues
I liked listening to PSAs.
I really liked that this course wasn't so much about "meeting standards," but instead it encourages students to think about how the subject matter affects their lives and how it's relevant to the world around them. The course really challenged my thinking and made me realize how the society around us shapes who we are and who we become.
All the new informations that I learned was very intriguing.
38. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
This may not be too bad, but the reading materials/ lectures are reiterations of each other. Though the lecture is a bit more than that.
Mid-term and final exam somewhat confusing.
n/a
I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the amount of writing, and frequency at which it was due (every class session).
Readings that were due every other night
The daily blogs
I didn't like having to read so many articles.
I didn't enjoy the fact that most of the subject matter we learned about was so depressing, but I mean Kumu can't change history or what actually happened to the indigenous people in North America and the Pacific. There really is no way to brighten up tragic stories of American history regarding indigenous peoples.
Nothing
39. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.69 13 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 10 (77%)
40. My overall evaluation of this course is...
Overall this course is good. I'd recommend this course to others.
Good intro to indigenous studies.
It is a course that broadens your horizons and is definitely worth taking. You learn a lot of new things in it and the quality of the course is very good.
Should be mandatory for life
Interesting class, kumu is easygoing, and isn't too difficult. I learned a lot with Kumu!
I enjoyed this class very much, and I learned a lot!
I discovered a new way of thinking and developed a different perspective of people
fabulous
That it is a very interesting course that should be required.
great! I liked how it was organized, graded, and the content. I think people should take this class to find out the other side of America's past that most people aren't aware of.
Great class!
41. The course challenged me to think critically and historically about power and the political.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%) 0 (0%)
42. The course improved my ability to craft and defend evidence-based arguments.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%) 0 (0%)
43. Other comments:
Thank you for being awesome, Kumu! Have a great winter break :)
Would recommend friends to take this class!

Brandy McDougall: AMST220A, Fall 2014     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 220A - Intro to Indigenous Studies Crn (Section): 79568 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
1.71 7 0.76 Freq(%) 3 (43%) 3 (43%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.43 7 0.53 Freq(%) 4 (57%) 3 (43%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
6. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (100%)
7. The instructor presented concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (100%)
8. The grading system was clearly explained.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
9. Assignments were returned in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%)
10. The instructor provided specific meaningful feedback.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
11. What did you like best about the course?
Classroom experience
The course had a very nice routine and environment. The teacher and the TAs were so supportive and helpful!
I liked learning about the various indigenous issues becasue i have never been taught about much of it any classes I've ever taken
Being able to recognize certain concepts we learn in class when in the outside world.
Kumu McDougall helped me have a better understanding with so much.
12. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Bring baby more often
Go over some of the readings in class? Sometimes they are not easy to understand.
I think Brandy was great. No improvements.
The classroom made taking notes difficult.
N/A. Kumu did everything very well.
13. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
14. Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Very Good  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
15. Why did you choose to take this course? (It fulfilled a focus designation (WI, E, OC, HAP, etc.), POLS major/minor requirement, major/minor requirement for another department, time and day(s) of the week it was offered, instructor, subject matter, etc.)
WI requirement and interesting subject
W, HAP, DH
Fulfilled a lot of focus requirements (WI, HAP, DH). It also looked very interesting and different from other classes I've taken in the past. It also had an A section (Honors course).
It fulfilled requirements and I thought it would be interesting to learn about indigenous peoples.
It fulfilled many requirements that I needed to graduate.
It fulfilled the focus of W and HAP.
16. I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (100%)
17. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
18. I learned to identify main points and central issues in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
19. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
20. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
21. I enjoyed this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 7 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%)
22. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
23. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
24. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (100%)
25. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
26. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
27. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
28. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
29. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
good
She is so sweet and cares for her students. She is also very knowledgable about history. She seems very professional in the way she teaches and encourages students to participate.
I think that she is a great professor and she is very passionate about the work. She knows a great deal of information about the issues.
Very involved with the class material and was easy to approach.
Kumu came very organized with a certain plan everyday. She explained everything very clearly so there were no surprised on exams and was clear on what was expected of us. She was very understanding and helpful.
30. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 6 (86%)
31. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
32. Reading assignments seem carefully chosen.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%)
33. I feel that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%)
34. Online communication with class members and the instructor helped me to learn course materials in an effective manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 7 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (71%) 2 (29%)
35. Upon entering the online course I felt welcomed, and knew where to go and what to do to get started.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 6 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%)
36. The instructor provided timely feedback to my course work.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 7 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
37. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
the movies
I liked the positive learning environment and bonding with my peers.
I liked learning about the issues becasue I never did learn about this in previous years or classes.
Gaining knowledge on where I live.
The content was interesting and relatable.
38. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
writing essays
Reading articles and writing blog posts every other night for homework.
Writing responses three times a week was a bit too much. As the semester progressed and other classes were assigning more homework it was very hard to keep up with. Especially considering that there were multiple readings each night.
How assignments seemed to be bunched together.
N/A.
39. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.57 7 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 1 (14%) 5 (71%)
40. My overall evaluation of this course is...
good
This course really changed my perspective on the world. I feel more aware of my surroundings and how I treat other people. I know not to make assumptions about other people.
I think it is a great course and should be mandatory becaue this information is very important and never thought about or taught about becase american culture focuses so much on entertainment and celebrities. This is a great eye opener for people who have never experienced indigenous issues before.
I learned a lot and gained a fair amount of knowledge.
Very good. I really enjoyed taking this course.
41. The course challenged me to think critically and historically about power and the political.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 7 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 0 (0%)
42. The course improved my ability to craft and defend evidence-based arguments.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.43 7 0.98 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 0 (0%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%)
43. Other comments:
Thanks for broadening my perspectives and teaching me about different cultures in the Americas. I really got a lot out of this class, which I never thought I'd end up truly enjoying.
I think the classroom was way too small for our class size. it disrupted my learning becuase of the lack of being able to see the powerpoint lectures at times. I think if the class were only 20 students or less it would;ve been perfect but with the amount of kids we had, it was just to cramped. I didn't like it.
Thank you for the great semester!
I'm grateful for all that I learned this semester.

Brandy McDougall: AMST220, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 220 - Intro to Indigenous Studies Crn (Section): 88932 (001)     88933 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.59 18 1.12 Freq(%) 3 (17%) 5 (36%) 3 (17%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.41 18 0.51 Freq(%) 10 (56%) 7 (50%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.78 18 0.43 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (22%) 11 (79%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.72 18 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (28%) 12 (86%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.72 18 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 13 (72%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.61 18 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (39%) 11 (61%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 18 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 10 (56%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.76 18 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (22%) 12 (86%)
9. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 18 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 6 (33%) 11 (79%)
10. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 18 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 11 (79%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 14 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 9 (50%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Great at knowing the material and I could tell that she really knew a lot about the course by the way she discussed things in class.
She is a great teacher who demonstrated thorough knowledge of the class material. The only aspect I did not like was the amount of material that got presented via powerpoint slides, it seemed that the material got extremely dense at times.
She was a great teacher. Very passionate about her work.
I really enjoyed Professor McDougall because she was always willing to work with your schedule especially if you had a sports absence. It's always nice when Professors are understanding of that because you don't find very many that are willing to work with you. She also taught me a lot of Hawaii and governmental issues that exist on the island!
Brandy is an excellent professor and encourages her students to do their best
Brandy is a very enthusiastic lecturer who knows a lot about all aspects of indigenous peoples. While the class could be pretty depressing at times, she delivered all of the material in a well thought-out manner and I was interested to learn every day in the class.
A terrific professor who has a real passion for her field of study, and who extends that passion on to her students.
Wonderful teacher! My favorite class to go to this semester
Awesome teacher...learned much more in this class than Hawaiian studies 107 about issues in Hawaii along with Native Americans.
She is very passionate about what she does, which is seen in the class room. Great prof
Class was interesting and Professor McDougall facilitated critical thinking about indigenous peoples.
10/10
She is a relatively easy grader, and easy to listen to. I would recommend her to another student.
Awesome teacher and a great person. I would and will recommend this class to anyone. She knows so much about what she is teaching and presents it in a way that makes you want to learn.
Professor McDougall is a very well-read and passionate professor that manages to effectively lecture on a subject that can be sensitive and difficult to digest.
i liked learning about other peoples points of views
Maika'i loa o kÄ?ia kumu! He 'olu'olu, 'akamai, a maika'i 'o ia! Mahalo! Aloha, Neidene Titcomb
Prof. McDougall is extremely helpful and willing to teach. One of the best professors I've had here at UH Manoa so far.
Excellent. Know what she is doing and well organized
Very enthusiastic and knowledgable professor! Clearly wants students to succeed in the course.
This class is excellent, not only in the core credits associated with the course, but the information was relevand and the instructors were very informative.
Very good! She is so sweet and passionate and I learned a lot in this course! Definitely changed my view about a lot of things.
14. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 18 0.77 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (17%) 6 (33%) 6 (33%)
15. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I liked that we discussed things with other classmates regularly because we were able to see others perspectives on subjects.
I really enjoyed group discussions during Friday sessions, it allowed us students to finally talk together and collaborate ideas as well as voice our own disagreements/agreements with what was covered in that week's lectures.
I enjoyed the Friday group discussions.
I actually really liked the labs because that is where we got to have an opinion about certain topics!
I really enjoyed learning about the different indigenous groups, their cultures and traditions in the United States.
I enjoyed the discussion board posts as a way to make the class writing intensive. I would much rather do that than write a bunch of papers. I really respect Brandy and the TAs for going through all of the posts and looking at what everyone had to say. Most teachers I know would just give points based on who did the post on time and not bother to read them.
The opportunity to view multiple perceptions of our topics of study, from authors, our instructors, and other students as well.
I loved the lectures and group presentations. The extra credit events were also great to attend I learned so much.
Issues in Native Hawaiian communities along with issues with Native Americans and American society
I liked learning about all the different indigenous groups
Learning about the injustices that have been done, and what can be done in the future to make sure these type of things do not happen again.
I loved the diversity of learning that took place. media, journals, books, guest lecturers. It was great.
I liked the discussion portion of the course, not only for its diversity of its members, but also for the diversity of the topics discussed.
power points were awesome. Lectures were great, and her communication with the students were top notch.
I liked the use of various media the best (i.e. movies, video clips, music, etc...)
The discussions are very stimulating and conducted in a vet academic and culturally respectful way.
I liked watching the videos and interviews that we watched in class and saw how these people were and are still effected today.
Discussion group. It is more in depth and helps us talk about things we know and dont know.
-Videos and guest lecturers were great! These usually are the best method in delivering information about topics.
For a writing intensive course, the online assignments make it feel loke a regular class.
The opportunity to learn about the "other side" of history.
16. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
I least liked doinh presentations just because i dont really like talking in front of classes.
I realize that this is a writing intensive course, but there were several articles that were extremely dense and thus, quite hard to analyze or even relate to.
I disliked posting online. It was sort of a hassle to remember.
The blogs were kind of a pain because of the time they were due by. If they could have pushed that time back to like midnight, I would have had a 100% in that portion of my grade, but since some practices went to like 7, I would be starving so I would go get food and by the time I would be done, the blog would be late.
My least favorite aspect would have to be discussions
I felt like the exams were really tough. We do a lot of reading in the class and there were a lot of details from the readings on the exam that I wasn't really prepared for. The study guide and cheat sheet didn't do much to help me because I didn't know what to focus the most on for the multiple choice. I went to class every day (minus a couple sick days) and I studied all the powerpoints thoroughly before the test, and I still did not do very well on it. A friend of mine said that when he took the class last year, there were online quizzes for each reading. I think that would be very helpful for me to be able to pick out the key points in the readings.
I didn't dislike any aspect, but the one that I liked the least would have to be the writing.
I didn't like learning about all the negativity.
n/a
Understandably so this course utilizes a lot of literature from divergent, sometimes radical, points of view. And while I certainly feel that reading this literature is necessary to understand the core message of this course, I would advise that adequate time be given either in class or in discussion sections to discuss the content of the material. At times this literature, without an opportunity for discussion, can be overwhelming, confusing, or misunderstood. Given the sensitivity of the subject matter, I would advise that literature should either be balanced or provided discussion time.
i felt uncomfortable most of the time when we would watch videos or discuss about how much America has done and how much it is hated.
The daily posts are set at a very odd time, but that is understandable. Unfortunately, it didn't work in my favor this semester.
I didn't really dislike anything about the course, but the writing every night was tedious.
LOL like all students, the midterm and final.
-Most of the readings were very lengthy and it was difficult to remain connected to the topic.
I would have liked the online assignments, especially those due on the Sunday before class, to be posted as early as Friday and as late as Saturday. Working and constaatnly checking the site for when the assignment goes up on a Sunday was a little stressful at times, but otherwise prefer the online assignments.
Everything was good!
17. My overall evaluation of this course is...
That it is very interactive and gives different views of the subjects.
This is a great course to gain knowledge on Indigenous Peoples, their history, struggles, and modern trials. Although it focuses on Native Hawaiians for the most part, but it still allowed room to learn about all Native Peoples under the American umbrella.
It was a great class. I enjoyed it a lot. I would take another class with this teacher.
this class is really good to learn.
It was interesting for the most part!
Even though there were written responses almost every night and a couple papers, this class wasn't that bad. It was very enjoyable and I learned a lot.
I really liked this course and I learned a lot from it. It got to be pretty depressing sometimes because of the dark past of the United States with Indigenous peoples but it's material that more people need to know about.
I signed up for the course expecting to disagree with the majority of the information that was offered, and ended up learning and agreeing with much of what was taught.
Everyone should take this corse in their life.
AWESOME. Loved it. Wish I could take it again if I had the room in my schedule!
Good course to get focus requirements.
A good course that one learns a lot in.
Great course. I learned so much. Loved it.
Excellent, I enjoyed this course.
Great Class!!! Learned alot!
Over all this course was very enjoyable and eye opening. Attention to indigenous issues too often is lost in translation, and it is refreshing that significant academic work is being conducted in these fields.
very interesting topics, have a better understanding and have more awareness
Maika'i loa!
I loved this class, I would defiantly recommend my friends to take this course because it is interesting and I learned a lot, not to mention it was "easy" (mainly because it got me so interested)
Awesome.
Good course, definitely a very interesting class. Provides a different perspective to what we think we "know."
I was overall impressed with the layout of the course topics and the media and other materials used throughout the course.
I loved it!
18. Other comments:
I feel as though the required book was a waste of money. In all of my other classes, I use the book on a regular basis, but for this class- I only used it three times. All of the articles outside of the book were scanned to online PDFs, so why not take those three from the textbook and put them online as well?
I really liked this course overall. The workload was not overwhelming but I still learned a lot. Brandy was an excellent lecturer and Angie was an awesome TA.
A great class that I would urge any student interested in sovereignty, or really just in the real history of America, to take.
I think if you could move the discussion post time back to around 10pm that would be perfect . For me i know that sometimes i don't get back to my room till around 8 so it would be hard to keep up with the posts.
Awesome teacher and awesome class!
No additional comments.
N/A
I recommend other students to take the class; it is much closer to campus if you are going for the HAP credit, but it also engages you into the various topics covered.

Brandy McDougall: AMST220A, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 220A - Intro to Indigenous Studies Crn (Section): 88934 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
1.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
9. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%)
10. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Good
Brandy did a good job of teaching the course to me.
She's a good teacher and I enjoyed having her. Her ways of teaching are effective
She knows how to lecture with out getting to boring, which is vital to a class like this with long lectures about something we have already read!
14. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
15. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
The in class activities
I liked the presentation part of the course and the paper assignments.
I liked a lot of the video presentations that were shown.
Her passion for the subject!
16. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
Too much info in too short a time
There were a lot of blogs to do, usually 2-3 times a week. For a writing intensive course, I would have rather written an extra paper and had one blog per week than 2-3 times. But, the blogs were a great tool for getting the students to read the materials and form an opinion. I also felt that sometimes (mainly in the beginning of the course) Brandy only presented one side of the issue, or shed another side in a more negative light. While everyone does have an opinion, I do think it is important to remain as neutral as possible.
Presentations...even though i know it's inevitable it's just nerve racking
Blog posts being due at 8, I think they should just have to be in before class starts.
17. My overall evaluation of this course is...
Good
I enjoyed this course a lot and have gained a greater understanding of issues and concepts relating to indigenous people. I also feel like I still don't have a defined opinion on some of the issues, like Hawaiian sovereignty, but that has only encouraged me to research and gain more knowledge so I know how I feel about an issue that affects me greatly.
Good! I wouldn't mind taking another class from Brandy
Very enjoyable!
18. Other comments:
No survey responses were found.

Brandy McDougall: AMST620, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 620 - Indigenous Identity Crn (Section): 88943 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.2 5 0.45 Freq(%) 4 (80%) 1 (20%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
9. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
10. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Brandy may be one of the best teachers I have ever encountered at the University of Hawaii. She's up there! I think what I appreciated most was her ability to integrate material from the students into the larger discourse of the class. She was accepting of different world views, yet still effectively communicated an indigenous perspective that was politically informed, culturally relevant, and theoretically flexible. She was able to capture the nuanced nature of a subject matter that is all too often "claimed" by a particular stakeholders and portrayed as black or white when in fact the material is more gray than anything else. In this sense, Brandy is a true scholar whose knowledge base is broad and deep. She is rooted like the Ko'olau mountains behind our campus.
She is a great instructor. Always encouraged us to share our thoughts and reactions to readings. Provided a variety of material for us to think about critically.
(I'm sorry if my evaluation isn't as articulate as it could be--I had to start again after my last form was erased). Dr. McDougall/Brandy is a skilled teacher and mentor. She is able to balance encouragement and critique of individual and the collective; she manages the balance between facilitating class dialogue and lecturing, leaving a lot of room for student-led discussion and group-teaching; she brings so many resources, knowledges, experiences and networks with her to the classroom and is very generous in her sharing of these. Her course design, chosen texts and assignments all demonstrate her ability to coach graduate students towards the fulfillment of their own goals as well as towards developing graduate/professional academic skills.
she is a wonderful professor who is very knowledgeable and passionate about this course and her field. She is always available and willing to help students with their individual projects. Professor McDougall is great at providing context, helping the class make connections, and facilitating discussion.
14. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%)
15. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
While Brandy's leadership was critical, the class was incredibly strong. This is a testament to both the University (which is unbelievably underrated) and Brandy'a ability to attract the very best students. Still, every cohort is different and I would not be surprised if the next cohort would be as strong. The quality of the classroom discussion was unparalleled.
I enjoyed the open dialogues of each class session with each student taking on a text. Reading of various poetry that coincided with text. The videos were great. I also appreciated our guest speakers and authors of the texts we read. Crucial to get author's insight into process and purpose.
I was drawn to the course by the text selections in addition to my desire to work with Brandy. The course did not disappoint. We got to discuss salient theories and bodies of work central to Indigenous studies and Pacific Indigenous studies, and discuss new texts in the field with their authors (Aikau, Tengan, Sommerville, for example), which really enriched our understanding of the material and our ability to engage with the themes of the course and texts. I also enjoyed that her classroom/syllabus utilized film texts in addition to our readings, and the combination of creative and critical texts. Finally, I enjoyed reading my colleague's blog assignments, and learned a lot from their engagement with texts according to their own research interests online and in the classroom. This was a diverse classroom, which greatly facilitated my learning.
I really enjoyed the class discussion and most of the texts that were chosen for the class, especially the creative works. I liked the blog posts as weekly responses as well. It was also helpful that we were able to choose our own research projects. It was interesting to have students present their projects and present during a week of discussion facilitation. Overall this was a really great course.
16. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
Nothing
Although I enjoyed every text we read some were hard to finish the text and additional readjngs in a timely matter, especially with a fully loaded schedule. Also there was never enough time to discuss all the parts a of text for often we would get side track by other often related but side side stories to text.
The only thing I would change is our (student) decision to move O'Brien's _Firsting and Lasting_ to the semester's end and replacing it with Andrea Smith's _Conquest_. The move disrupted the flow of the readings.
There were some moments when the class felt tense during discussion and communication did not seem as great as it could have been in the classroom. Also, it was difficult to hit the 10pm deadline the night before for the blog post.
17. My overall evaluation of this course is...
Awesome. I will take the next course Brandy offers!
We briefly touched upon indigenous people's beyond the Pacific and the continent, however I would have loved to have talks or read texts about other indigenous people's- purely as a cross look at what they are doing: in accomplishments and struggles. Perhaps a comparison to the Pacific and the continent.
This course was excellent, and I would definitely recommend it, and Dr. McDougall to other students.
it is a very engaging course that asks important questions. This course helped me to reflect on my own scholarship and projects, and it introduced me to a great amount of new material. It was wonderful to have some of the scholars who wrote the books we read come to our class.
18. Other comments:
Mahalo, mahalo, mahalo.
I would like to see more classes like this grow, develop or thrive from this initial class.
Just thank you very much for a rich and provocative semester of learning.
Mahalo!

Brandy McDougall: AMST220, Fall 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 220 - Intro to Indigenous Studies Crn (Section): 79014 (001)     79410 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.33 16 0.72 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 5 (33%) 4 (25%) 2 (13%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.47 16 0.52 Freq(%) 8 (50%) 8 (53%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 16 0.34 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 14 (93%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 16 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (25%) 11 (73%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 16 0.34 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (88%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 16 0.34 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 14 (88%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 16 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (63%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.81 16 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (19%) 13 (87%)
9. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 16 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (19%) 12 (80%)
10. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.88 16 0.34 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 12 (80%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 15 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 5 (33%) 10 (63%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Kumu Brandy was a wonder Professor. She was very interested in the topic and it showed through her teaching. She organized the class very well and it was a manageable writing intensive credit. She was very enthusiastic and extremely kind. Kumu was very approachable and easy to talk to. I would definitely recommend her class to other UH students.
She was a great teacher. I enjoyed her course.
She is a wonderful and knowledgeable teacher who loves to teach her subject. She is passionate and enthusiastic towards all her students and gives numerous opportunities to succeed in her class
Excellent professor! learned a lot, more so on the aspects of reality to just be more open minded to what is actually going on out there with indigenous cultures and every other culture in general.
Fantastic professor and a blast to hear lecture and learn from.
She is an amazing professor. The course was very interesting. I liked the things that I learned here.
that she is a magnificent teacher. She is very knowledgeable about Indigenous Peoples and who they are situated then and now. She encourages the learning about Indigenous People and provides the class with very valuable readings that could shape and create how we view the world and the individuals living among us today.
I really enjoyed learning from the lecturer and the section leader. Brandy did a good job better explaining the readings during lecture. Angie did a good job in sections coming up with critical questions for us to answer. I really enjoyed both paper topics in this class. Being a shy person I am also grateful that presentations was done as groups and not as individuals. We all got to learn, but we did not have added pressure and standing up in front of the class alone.
she is a great teacher and knows the materials of the class. You can see that there is a kind of passion that no other teacher has.
Great teacher
great! Although the class was early in the morning, I learned a lot through class discussions, power-points, and presentations.
Great Kumu I wish more Kumu taught is similar ways that she did i changing things up
She is a wonderful teacher.
She is a great teacher and shows great passion into her teaching. All lectures are well spoken out and the main objectives are easily known once they are talked about.
she has her own ideas
Exceptional and dynamic of Indigenous Studies.
very informative and keeps material fresh
Brandy is a kind and intelligent person. I loved hearing what she had to say and her take on the topics presented. She never made you feel like you needed to have a certain opinion and that is something I appreciated very much, especially since the course can have very controversial topics.
Brandy is awesome and passionate about what she teaches. She shows videos in class too, which help in lecture; she switches things up a bit.
A great instructor whom take great pride in what she teaches.
She is a great professor and very well informed on the class topics and enjoy teaching the subject on indigenous cultures.
Professor McDougall was able to bring in works that helped explain the different issues and bridge the past to show how contemporary problems stem from historical events. I found her class insightful
She's a great teacher. I really enjoyed and learned a lot from her class.
She is a great teacher. Her teaching style is reflective of her personality, a very warm person to walk up to and talk about ideas, homework, or anything.
Most likely one of the nicest people, great character and above all great professor.
great! It was a treat having her teach the class because since it was so early in the morning, her enthusiasum was alwasy appreciated! It was a very interesting class and I actually enjoyed it.
14. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 16 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 6 (38%) 7 (44%)
15. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I liked how enlightening it was. Many public schools keep us in the dark to the topics that Kumu helped us uncover and understand. I feel that I know a lot about the history of Indigenous peoples and all of the atrocities.
I liked the discussions and the group presentations.
I liked how we learned about different types of indigenous people not just one group. I also like how we looked not only at the past but the present as well and the many issues that are part of our daily lives.
The interesting and conventional topics discussed in the lectures.
The PowerPoints, readings, and extra credit opportunities.
I really enjoyed the class post every night before class. It got the class openly expressing their views as well as our fellow classmates understanding the topic being discussed more efficiently when getting to know how others think (reading each others' post).
I liked the paper topics that was given to the class. First looking at the assignment, as any typical college student would, I was relieved to see that the page amount was not a huge number. When it was time to actually sit down and write the papers, I found it easy to surpass the page amount which made it difficult to summarize, which if you ask me is a very good problem to have. This forced students to get straight to their main points that they were trying to get across through their papers.
Class discussions, group projects and the papers.
Learning the history of Native people.
I liked watching the documentaries and films. It made me understand the issues we went over in class.
The lectures that where really true and the ones where we had a speaker come visit the class
The movies.
I really like most of the readings. They are eye openers and maybe the only way to sometimes learn the material/concepts of the topics being covered in class.
the movies
All of it! it inspired me to pursue more knowledge of Native American people.
studying the demographics of Native Americans
So many opportunities to succeed!
I liked the discussion posts a lot, they really allowed for our opinions to be voiced and it was interesting to read how others arrived to their conclusions as well.
The class discussion.
I really enjoyed the films that was presented as a educational tool because they were very informative, it got the point across, and it related to the topics that was being presented.
I enjoyed doing the analysis papers a great deal as it allowed for me to look at the issues discussed in class from different perspectives
Learning about Indigenous Americans.
I liked how it was contemporary and that the things we learned in class (Honolulu rail) was very relevant to our lives today. I know some people dislike history, but I find it very interesting. This class can bring in people that dislike history, to like it.
movies were pretty interesting.
The way the information was presented. I liked the powerpoint and videos that were used to teach the class the curent topic.
16. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
I originally thought the course would teach more about the religion and culture of Native American peoples. I signed up for the class for that reason and to my surprise it was much different. A better course description is necessary just so there is no confusion.
I just didn't like that the class took place so early in the morning. It was often difficult to be lively in that class because it took place so early.
The early time slot.
The generally negative image painted of White People.
Online writings posts.
NONE! Everything was very informative and if not, it was a learning experience.
Sometimes I felt my TA was babbling on about things, she had either never experienced or completely understood...
overall I really enjoyed the corse
Nothing! I liked everything in the class because there was a lot of class discussion.
I did not like having to do the post before 8PM. I don't get off of work until 6 to 7PM and rushing onto the computer was a hard thing for me to do.
the timed readings XD
The writing. It is very difficult to find time to read everything and then write about it.
I didn't like the way she would bring up the team/group assignments one before it is due. It's pretty difficult to meet up or have time to see other group members because of outside factors such as work, family business, etc.
everything seemed to be very one sided
None
how early it was
The mandatory attendance. Getting docked points sucked.
The online discussion post.
None.
I did not like how there were some troubles in Laulima. I missed a couple of assignments due to the Laulima not submitting my response questions. If this were fixed earlier, I would've gotten a better grade. The blog was a very good idea.
post reading with a certain time which deduct points.
I didn't like how the test were set up, meaning the study guides. I didn't feel like it was an efficent way of preparing for the test because the study guid had all this information that she wanted us to know and when the test came, the questions weren't even directly related to any of the information that was on the study guide. The one page, front and back was helpful for the essay mostly, but not for anything else on the test. Not for me, anyways.
17. My overall evaluation of this course is...
It was very well-rounded and I learned a lot. The issues that were raised are often pushed aside and I found it very interesting to look deeper into the history of the U.S. I feel as though everyone living in America should learn about the things that Kumu addressed in the course.
I really enjoyed the course.
Excellent course to take and gain knowledge from.
9/10... 10-being best
I may have misunderstood the course description but I wasn't prepared for the course to generally focus on the negative histories of the Indigenous Peoples of America. I was expecting some or about half the course to cover these topics, but I feel that maybe a deeper look into the culture of some for a better understanding of the current and past problems, and how advances or shortcomings have been made on those fronts to solving or resolving the current issues at hand would make the class more pleasant.
This was a great course. If another course like this one is offered again, I would take it. I learned a lot here.
Just....EXCELLENT! Highly recommended.
I recommend this course to all students that are interested or curious about american History through a different lens then taught in most high schools across America. I would actually recommend this course to every student because of its uniqueness in comparison to a typical American Studies course.
I would say I loved this class because the teacher was great and class discussions were great.
Great
excellent! I came into this course knowing nothing about the indigenous people of the "Turtle Island", but now I truly learned a lot about their struggles and life before the changes occurred.
This is a great class i would take it again
Very positive.
It's a great course to take!
I would have like to learn more about the people's history we were looking at
Excellent,very pleased with taking this course.
great course
Very interesting. There is a lot of reading and discussion, but it is usually very stimulating and thought provoking. It opens your mind to new ideas, not matter what side or opinion you take on the topics. It is a great class to take, especially if you want to learn things not commonly talked about.
It was a great, enriching course! I already recommended it to my friends.
The overall course is a good course I would recommend to anyone to enlighten them with new perspective on U.S history.
this is a very good course to learn about native american cultures because what was being presented i had not known that it had occurred.
Excellent!
Great teacher, enthusiastic on topics, and very relevant to everyday learning.
Great must take.!!!
probably a 7 out of 10. It was very informational and exciting at some parts, but some of the methods of teachings and the overall content I don't believe was effective really. If I didn't do so well on the essays on the test and throughout the semester, I probably wouldn't have passed because the discussion boards were graded pretty randomly. I mean this because at first they were graded a certain way then throughout the semester the requirements kept changing. I found this unfair and difficult to keep track of really. Also the due time for the board posts were unreasonable too. It was just at a random time.
18. Other comments:
Thank you for opening my mind to other cultures and seeing things from different perspectives rather than just one your taught growing up.
Overall, I really enjoyed the class. Loved the course topic and the discussion classes as well. I also the student presentations...I'm always open to learning new things! :) In general, this class was magnifical!!
I like the course and the material we learned, but the class is too early in the morning :(
None.
I would like to see more Indigenous studies courses offered at UH
The class discussion were great and allow interaction of opinions.

Brandy McDougall: AMST220A, Fall 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 220A - Intro to Indigenous Studies Crn (Section): 79013 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
2.25 4 1.5 Freq(%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.25 4 0.5 Freq(%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
9. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
10. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
positive
Brandy McDougall is my FAVORITE!!! YAY!! :) Dr. McDougall is the reason I took this course and I am so glad that i did!
Fantastic professor, she is easy to talk to and really knows her material. She is also very clear about what she wants from the students so there is little confusion about assignments.
14. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%)
15. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
learning about a whole range of topics that I never considered to be as important as I do now
The aspect I love most about the class is that it reminds us that indigenous cultures are not a thing of the past to be studied from the top down and indigenous peoples are not merely passive subjects to be studied! By reading material written and produced by Native artists/ authors/ historians/ educators/ activists, etc. we see that Native cultures are fluid and active and powerful, not passive and ahistorical. That change in academic perspective lifts out Native voices and allows them to contribute to their own identity formation.
The discussion sections
16. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
the presentations
Although I respect the effort and understand that this was a first attempt, having a group member from another island was a bit challenging, and did prove to be more time consuming when working on group projects, etc. Hopefully the University will one day be equipped with the infrastructure and technology to support video-conferencing/ Skype/ Facetime attendance, but I donʻt think itʻs is a fair arrangement for the rest of the students who are required to accommodate that burden at this moment.
Nothing
17. My overall evaluation of this course is...
positive
This course is so important!!! This is what college education is all about: exposure, discovery, critical thinking, politicizing, and reading against the grain.
I enjoyed this class a lot, I learned a lot and it really opened my eyes to new ideas and arguments about many different topics.
18. Other comments:
There were so many things that I learned in this class that made me go "WHY AM I ONLY HEARING ABOUT THIS NOW?" SO, what I appreciate most about this class is that the knowledge I gained poured over into my 11 year old daughterʻs life and sparked a critical discussion with her about her nationality. I am so grateful that she has an alternative perspective to the indoctrination of the US public school system, rather than feeling like she has been lied to or in the dark for the majority of her childhood once she reaches college.

Brandy McDougall: AMST381, Fall 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 381 - Junior Seminar Crn (Section): 70026 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.72 25 0.54 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 5 (20%) 19 (76%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
2.0 25 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 24 (96%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 25 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 7 (28%) 16 (64%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.48 25 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 9 (36%) 14 (56%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 25 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 8 (32%) 16 (64%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 25 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 2 (8%) 6 (24%) 14 (56%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 25 0.87 Freq(%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (40%) 14 (56%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 25 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (36%) 16 (64%)
9. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.72 25 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (28%) 18 (72%)
10. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.76 25 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (24%) 19 (76%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.72 25 0.54 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 5 (20%) 19 (76%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 25 0.87 Freq(%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (40%) 14 (56%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
very good instructor. Knows and is excited about course material, encourages class participation, & there to give assistance when needed.
Professor McDougall organized the class very well and her enthusiasm for the material really encouraged students to participate and engage in the material.
She is a wonderful professor with a great, positive attitude!
I really liked her and this class. This class is one of four absolutely required courses for my major and I'm glad that it was required. Brandy is a great professor.
She is a very great professor because of how she encourages class discussion and also she is very easy to talk to. McDougall also takes people's opinion and views and tries to understand them.
There is only one word to describe her. AWESOME!
Great teacher who really cares about what each student has to say. She respects everyone's opinions and encouraged the class to engage in thoughtful discussion. Her expertise in indigenous studies really helped with the content of the course too.
She is great. Very knowledgable and allows for plenty of class discussion.
Brandy is a wonderful instructor who knows her material and is fun, open, easy to talk to, and overall a great professor. She gives off a relaxed attitude, which puts less pressure on us as students (in my personal opinion), which in turn encourages a better space for more class discussion.
She set up the class well. She seemed extremely enthusiastic about indigenous studies and that made her perfect for this class.
Amazing professor. She really makes the class a safe space for discussion, and she cares about all her students!
I really liked Professor McDougall. She's always so energetic and happy.
Great!
She is an enjoyable teacher. She loves teaching and has a passion for american studies. She hold great discussion topic, and instigates interesting class discussions. She is understanding and approachable.
She is attentive, easy to approach and well versed in her field. Her style of teaching encourages her students to reflect on important ideas. Kumu McDougall is awesome. I enjoyed the dialogue that the chosen books provided. It has been a learning experience that has provided me a different perspective on what America means to me.
Professor McDougall is incredibly passionate about the subject matter she is teaching in the course.
14. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 25 1.2 Freq(%) 1 (4%) 3 (12%) 4 (16%) 7 (28%) 6 (24%)
15. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
class discussions, to hear different thoughts & perspectives of the readings
The assigned readings were interesting and made me think of the past in ways that I've never thought about before. I liked the discussions that we had. I also liked the creative project. I felt that as a class we really came together at the end and became a sort of a family.
The open discussions.
I really liked our in class discussions. I also like the fact that there are no daily quizzes or "busy work."
I enjoyed all class discussions because everyone had their own say on various topics.
The discussions and class participation. This class was one of best classes I have ever attended and loved every facet of it. The teacher was amazing at communicating with her students. I could go on and still not be able to say enough about her ability to teach, INCREDIBLE!
I liked how we learned about American history from the perspective of the underdog. We were taught the other side of history that which was eliminated in secondary history classes.
The class mainly consisted of student presentations and class discussions which were very engaging.
The Class Discussions.
I liked having the room that we were in, being able to sit in comfortable chairs for such a large class in a small room. For the course I liked some of the reading material that she assigned, really opens up the mind to different possiblities.
I liked the discussion in this course
Class discussions. At times it felt like a lot of reading, but every reading has a purpose!
The ideas of the books we covered were very interesting, and I think worth reading. I also liked the class discussions, as everyone brought interesting ideas, many that I would not have thought of myself.
The discussions.
Class Discussions
The concepts. Most of the readings. Well put together presentations by my peers. Thoughtful ideas presented by my classmates.
I enjoyed the library visits and the assigned readings.
16. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
Having the discussion post due at 8:00 was a bit of a challenge
None really. Everything was good or great.
The blog post deadline. I know that we're supposed to have read stuff early and get things done early, but really who do you know in college that gets things done early....it's a very small pool of people. If the deadline were say 10pm or even better of Midnight that would have been so much better.
A few of the books that we read were very hard to read and understand but on the positive side to that, we got to read different kinds of readings and point of views
How we were all able to talk about the subject for almost the entire class and the comradely of the students.
I would have liked a little more teacher presentation than student led ones. Sometimes the teacher has more knowledge about subject matter and a broader historical context than a student.
A LOT of reading.
The Heavy amount of Reading.
I did not like some of the choices for the readings, and the fact that we had to read a large amount of pages and only getting maybe one day to read them. I wish there were a little more time for that, as well as some of the book choices. For example, "In the Devil's Snare" by Mary Beth Norton is a provocative book giving a detailed account of what the Salem Witch Trials were really like, but the book is almost impossible to read. That, and only having a day or two at the most to read it creates a stressful experience in reading the book, even though its enjoyable. Other than some of the reading choices, I feel like we did not reach the exact time period we were supposed to end in, so im not sure where we are ending as a course.
I was pretty fond of this class. Liked my classmates and teacher
None.
Most of the early books were difficult to read. I hated especially "The Many Headed Hydra", even though I feel like that set the tone for the rest of the course.
Some of the books.
Some of the books were boring and dull.
The book Violence Over the Land. Poor peer presentations. People who babbled without thinking.
Truthfully, I did not entirely enjoy the student presentations. While it is a useful tool to see who read the material and who didn't. It's difficult for them to conduct discussions without further research in order to fully present the material in a historic context. Without presenting further research, it is rather easy for misinformation to be spread.
17. My overall evaluation of this course is...
great
It was great! Learned a lot and had fun!
A great course that I'm glad was required for the AMST minor.
Awesome!!
Excellent
AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :) :)
It was a great course in which I learned something new every session. It was an upbeat and enthusiastic class that was a great atmosphere to learn. Brandy did an awesome job facilitating and teaching the class.
Great course, especially for a required one :)
Good.
Everyone in the American studies major (and even those who are not) should take this course if Brandy McDougall is teaching it.
Good course over all some of the texts read could be looked over but over all good readings.
Great course with great professor. Take if you can. At first, I thought I wasn't interested in Pre-Civil War History but after learning it through Brandy's lens, I find it an invaluable course.
I can kinda see why it's important for the majors and minors, but I didn't like it. I felt like I had to work so hard for a class that I'm not sure I'm going to be using a lot (because I'm only a minor). But I suppose it could be worse.
I loved the course. Everyone in class got along and it was great chance to make friends and learn from others. I liked some of the books that we read about I would have liked to learn more about the creation of America's government. I think that is the thing we did not cover. I understand that America has done a lot of problems in the past but I just feel like this class covered everything problematic about America's history. Learning about problems are important but it is physically and emotionally depressed as I would go home crying about why our country was so f-ed up. Some books about America's achievements would have been good so that everything was not so negative.
It was an interesting class.
It was a great experience. I liked hearing what certain people had to say. Disliked people taking too much time talking about the same idea by people who just babbled. Most topics were really interesting. I definitely learned a lot.
18. Other comments:
AWESOME!
none.
I wish there was more assignments with variety. I feel like the entire semester of just writing discussions posts through Laulima was really boring. I wish we had more writing assignments so that we could improve in our writing skills. I know this was not a writing intensive class but I believe all classes should at least have 3 papers to write throughout the semester.
I learned more about American history. I would recommend the class to other students, even though it is a requirement.
Mahalo nui Kumu

Brandy McDougall: AMST220, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 220 - Intro to Indigenous Studies Crn (Section): 89250 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.26 19 0.93 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 8 (42%) 7 (37%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.11 19 0.32 Freq(%) 17 (89%) 2 (11%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 20 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (25%) 15 (75%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 20 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (25%) 15 (75%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 20 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (20%) 16 (80%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 20 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (20%) 16 (80%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 20 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (15%) 17 (85%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 20 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (15%) 17 (85%)
9. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 20 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (15%) 17 (85%)
10. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.9 20 0.31 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 18 (90%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 20 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (20%) 16 (80%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.65 20 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 5 (25%) 14 (70%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Brandy is an excellent teacher. Not only is she passionate about what she teaches but she is very knowledgable of the content and stimulates very interesting conversation. There wasn't a question she couldn't answer!
Good teacher but she should feel more confident when she teaches, sometimes it sounds like she is uncertain of some topics
Brandy has a warm and positive ora that makes students gravitate to her. She has a really mellow attitude and she is very approachable. If you need help with anything, she is always there and willing to help us.
She is a great instructor that loves what she teaches.
I learned so much from Brandy. She always taught us new ways to look at things. She opened so many peoples eyes. she is very smart and has great knowledge of what she is talking about. She is super prepared and organized and very professional. At the same time able to talk to the students without acting smarter than us (which she very much is) She is so intelligent and is so happy to share her knowledge with others. It shows nad she is a very effective and wonderful teacher. I wish I could take more of her classes but there is no more room. I hope she gets promoted if there are teacher promotions. She came to every class knowing what to say, on time, providing interesting material and showing us so many new things. I cant write enough about her. She is a very wonderful teacher.
Really good! She expressed her knowledge and interest over her course work and was an amazing kumu!
love her!
Made the course material interesting, presented info in a clear way. Handled sensitive issues well.
she is awesome! Iʻve had the privilege of being in her Eng100 class for my first semester here at UH, and now iʻm taking this class from her right before I graduate this semester.Though she was always great, Itʻs been nice to see how she has grown as an instructor from then till now. Sheʻs very approachable, non-threatening, and has a humble soul. She teaches with a quiet strength that makes for a comfortable environment to share our thoughts.
She is an excellent instructor. She loves the material and that is clearly relayed in class.
She's a great professor. A little heavy on lecture but she self corrected that without any input needed. This shows how well she critically evaluates her own course without aid.
that she knows her stuff and is passionate to spread her knowledge to others.
She is a very knowledgable teacher that is always prepared for class.
very good. she knows her material and she makes it easy for us to understand. she encourages her students to think critically about what we read and discuss in class. she makes it easy for us to ask questions like she wonʻt put us down when we ask questions or give our own opinions.
Brandy is very knowledgeable of the subject of indigenous populations and I am amazed at all the issues that she brought to class. I am grateful for the opportunity to learn about all these native peoples.
Professor McDougall is an excellent educator and the University of Hawaii is lucky to have her. I really enjoyed her class as she made the topics interesting and manageable. She helped students see varying view points and I appreciated her passion for the topics she taught. I could tell that she was excited to teach everyday and that is a rare quality in my opinion. I thoroughly enjoyed her assignments as they were eye-opening and thought-provoking. She is very easy to follow when she is lecturing and I like that she really takes the time to explain concepts thoroughly.
14. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 19 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 15 (79%)
15. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I loved how I learned something new everyday in this class. There wasn't one day I felt like I had wasted.
interesting films, class discussions, guest speakers
The videos gave a great visual understanding of the material
the small assignments - i.e. cutting up brochures or watching films and doing an analysis of how it might be problematic to indigenous population. I also liked the films that we watched in class.
The assignments and readings are very interesting.
As a person from the east coast of the united states, Brandy taught me so many things I had never known about. every day I was excited to come to class and learn what new things she had to teach me. it was always presented so well and she made it so interesting. She does not push her personal biases, because i have no idea what her's are, but rather she shows you the facts and lets you decide what you want. very hard to do for such sensitive topics! Even if someone said something that was completely out of line for the topic,Brandy always let people have thier personal opinions without showing hers or pushign them onto someone.
Talking in class, of course! Kumu made the readings come alive!
I loved the films and lectures-- they were so interesting!
Finding out that I have been brainwashed my whole life.
I loved that there were lots of movies and films watched through out the semester. I am a visual learner so to hear a lecture from kumu Brandy that involves a certain issue, and then to see it played out before my eyes is very great!
I like that we weren't learning straight from a text book. We watched films and videos and had speakers come in that really helped relay the information first-hand.
She was entertaining and helpful throughout all aspects of the class.
I liked how straight forward and well organized her course was. She teaches exactly what you need to know and is open minded towards others beliefs and views.
Native issues presentation
i like watching the different videos she portrayed in class. the assignments she assigned were interesting and fun. it made us think about things we normally see every day and how those images are portraying indigenous peoples and what that image says. class discussion were good because we got to hear everyoneʻs opinions
All the different populations we learned about and her knowledge of the subjects at hand.
The assignments really made you think about what you learn in class and how you can apply it to everyday topics. I feel that classes that can make you think even outside the classroom are the most rewarding as you learn to apply educational topics to everyday life. I liked the different indigenous populations that we learned about as I felt it helped me understand multiple cultures which made me more well-rounded as a student of similarities and differences between cultures.
16. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
There is a lot of reading, but not too much to complain about.
-
Nothing
The class discussions were often large. I feel as though the class size should be smaller so that more intimate discussions may take place.
Nothing* maybe the quizzes hehe
n/a
Finding out that I have been brainwashed my whole life....
I enjoyed all aspects of the class. But I do think that having more directed discussions about certain issues would help to make it even more exciting! Classroom discussions, maybe sitting in a circle, and everyone bouncing ideas off of one and another would probably make for an eye opening class environment! The course is full of interesting topics, opinions and viewpoints.
Sometimes the readings were a bit tough, and I found that some of the discussion topics were not very engaging.
She was certainly biased toward a certain view, though she was quite open minded to hear the other side of things.
AMST is not my major so I am not too interested in it but she was such an amazing professor that there was nothing I did not like about the course.
nothing
I'm not a huge fan of presentations in front of the class but other than that, I liked everything about the class. I recommended it to many students already.
17. My overall evaluation of this course is...
Everyone should take this class! I learned so much and feel like the knowledge I gained is something I can use everyday in my life. There's too much good stuff to learn to pass this class up.
excellent course, one of the best ive ever taken, would recommend to anyone
Good
Great. I really learned a lot about things that normally did not bother me before, but with this new insight that I gained, I'm finding myself getting involved more and more into narratives that usually was not there before.
Great course.
Recommend it to everyone!
Amazing, enlightening and educating!
My favorite class. I would recommend others to take this course. It's very informational for a introductory course.
Interesting content. I will definitely look at things much differently from now on.
excellent. It was very eye opening for me and emotional. There were countless times in the classroom, either while we were watching a certain film clip or having a group discussion, the issues faced are so heavy that I would tear up!I would recommend this class to anyone!
Its an excellent course that everyone should be required to take. I learned a lot of new information, and it really changes your perspective on society, and life in the US in general.
The course was pretty interesting. I took a course similar back home but it didn't transfer properly so there was a bit of overlap. But the course of its own volition was well structured and informative of important, rarely talked about issues.
that it is an important course that covers vital issues in society and professor McDougall did a wonderful job of teaching non-biasly regarding these important topics.
A great introductory course that presents a lot of useful information in regards to Hawaii.
i like this course. it made me aware of indigenous cultures and how they are sometimes portrayed through media and other types.
AWESOME CLASS and I already started to recommend it to other people.
I thought the course was awesome and I am glad I decided to take this course. Professor McDouglall made the class even more enjoyable. I highly recommend this class to anyone who has interest in indigenous populations. If I wasn't graduating this semester, I would definitely take another class from her.
18. Other comments:
TAKE THIS CLASS.
professor mcdougall is excellent!
Thank you for making this class so enjoyable! :)
Thank you for a great semester !!
great teacher!!!

Brandy McDougall: AMST481, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 481 - Senior Research Seminar Crn (Section): 83346 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
2.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 11 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 9 (82%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 11 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 9 (82%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 11 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 9 (82%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.82 11 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 10 (91%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%)
9. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%)
10. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%)
11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%)
12. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%)
13. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Brandy is awesome!
I really enjoyed having Brandy as our thesis professor. From the beginning she was always nice and helpful with every step of the research and writing process.
Liked this class a lot and found Brandy to be super helpful and available if you needed the extra help.
Very friendly, very nice.
I think that Brandy McDougall is a very nice and understanding professor and she really encourages us that we can accomplish writing this research paper even though it has been really stressful to complete it this semester. I think that she is very helpful also with our research papers she gives excellent feedback and she is really supportive of all of our projects.
Professor McDougall is the epitome of what professors should be. She is very encouraging and is always willing to help students whenever we need it. Her personality is awesome, I always felt comfortable to talk to her.
awesome leader was bummed vernadette wasn't going to be my teacher but her replacement was turned out great. brandy is friendly very approachable. the only thing she wants is for your project to be a success and shes there with awesome advice to make it happen. i was worried i would take any criticism bad and was so relieved when her suggestions made me feel good, like i was going in the right directions never negative. i was so amazed because i was really really concerned.
DR. McDOUGALL IS AWESOME!!! She is the most compassionate teacher I have ever worked with. She is helpful, patient, funny, approachable and kind. She is extremely knowledgeable on a variety of topics and I look forward to working with her in the future.
AWESOME AWESOME PROF!! :) She's always there to provide you with the constructive criticism and innovative ways to improve your senior design project. Very welcoming and always will greet you with a smile. Never turns her back on any student, no matter how great or little amounts of work they do in the course. Very compassionate! :)
14. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 9 1.01 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 6 (67%)
15. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I liked the spacing out of the paper so that we turned things in as installments to the final project. It really helped in the end and prevented things from getting too stressful because of procrastination.
I liked the peer-review workshops where other students in the class got to read our research paper and give feedback on it, this was very helpful because your getting other people's perspective on how to make your paper better in ways that you would of not thought of yourself.
I really enjoyed the peer review workshops. We were able to support each other by giving feedback on each other's research papers.
the peer review
The flexibility of the project topic selection allowed our class to approach the senior thesis project from a multitude of perspectives. My classmates selected a wide variety of topics and presented them in a wide variety of styles.
Everything. Brandy is a fun and easy going prof!! Would and have recommended her to all of my other friends in American Studies. :)
16. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
All of the assignments. Many of them were useless of just busy work. Honestly peer reviews are not very helpful when working on a project of this size. I want the professor's opinion, not that of my class peer who knows nothing about the subject I am working on. Where I understand how peer reviews and comments can be helpful, they did nothing for me in this class.
I think that I liked everything about this course because it actually sets up a timeline and makes you turn in things instead of just letting you do things on your own, which is not a good thing for me. I think that if we were just allowed to do things on our own that we would just try to do everything last minute and we would be in a lot of trouble because this type of project is something that you can't just do all last minute.
None, everything we did in this course helped me to write my research paper.
the grammer quiz day i didnt do bad but i still am horrible not her fault i just fail at grammer. see.
N/A
17. My overall evaluation of this course is...
Fun class good people
Sad it's done!
The course is necessary, but it could have done without so many peer reviews and assignments like primary source analysis, which we are not even really using in our papers. I learned much of this in high school and felt that much of the course was a waste of my time.
I liked this course because it's very helpful in actually setting deadlines for you to do a little bit of your paper and turn in things instead of being on our own and trying to get everything done at one time. I think this process makes it not as stressful as if we were just on our own and wasnt given any guidance or help with this research project.
Overall, this course was excellent. Being a required course for all AMST majors, everything that we did throughout the semester made sure we were on track so that we would not fall behind.
well its required but it is a good class keeps you on track. doesnt let you try and write it all the last week.
This class has really helped me to improve my organization when tackling a writing project. The way the class is structured helps to make a daunting project manageable. I will take what I have learned in both 480 & 481 and use it my future academic endeavors.
AWESOME! :) Stimulates you to think creatively and not just about writing a paper. Although making a documentary is hard, it allows students to have more flexibility when it comes to making a project. :)
18. Other comments:
I think that Professor McDougall is the reason why this course was as great as it was. She is available to help her students whether in class, during office hours, or through email. When I felt unsure about my research, she found ways to help me regain my confidence.
Brandy McDougall RULES!! She should get a raise!

Brandy McDougall: AMST455, WS445, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 455 - U.S. Women's Lit and Culture Crn (Section): 79059 (001)    
Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Women's Studies Program
Course: WS 445 - U.S. Women's Lit and Culture Crn (Section): 79504 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
2.0 1 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 1 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (83%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 1 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 4 (67%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%)
9. The instructor was enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
10. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
11. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
12. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 6 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
13. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
14. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 6 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 5 (83%)
15. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
4.67 6 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
16. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
very good professor: organized, knows a lot about the material, has a lot of heart for what she teaches, very compassionate and understanding
She is a great teacher. Really excited and passionate about teaching. I really liked her as an instructor. However I think the class was a little slow and boring, maybe the 480 and 481 classes can be combined? Its not the instructors fault because she was using a syllabus from the previous teacher. Brandy made the best out of the class though, always encouraging us and giving great insight when asked for help. Im really glad she is part of the department. She is very knowledgeable and fun to be around. Thank you Brandy for this semester!!
Passionate about the material, and a very effective instructor.
17. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 6 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 4 (67%) 0 (0%)
18. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 6 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 1 (100%)
19. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 6 0.82 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%)
20. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
Films/video clips watched in class: "The Real L Word" & "Slaying the Dragon" & "Joy Luck Club" Small group discussions before entire class discusses Presentations Jeopardy
The library presentations, helped me learn how to use many library and online sources.
I enjoyed class discussions
21. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
A lot of reading--the essays and materials in the beginning of the course were hard to read and understand but really preferred and liked the novels and collections of poems better Weekly laulima assignments--1 response a week is not too bad, & doing a discussion question in class is okay, too, but having to type 2 discussion questions per week on laulima is hard to remember to keep up with when we are thinking about the responses
How slow it was made me question the point of the course sometimes.
A bit heavy on the coursework
22. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor   Poor   Average   Good   Excellent  
3.0 1 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (50%)
23. My overall evaluation of this course is...
really enjoyed this course, very interesting material and learned a lot
The professor is great but the course needs to be more stimulating.
Awesome professor who is easy to talk to, and strives for healthy discussion of assigned materials, and creates an environment of intellectual safety. However the course was a little misleading and personally left a lot to be desired. It would have been better if assigned materials would have included a wide variety of different perspectives of women in U.S. literature, and authors of different backgrounds and different ages.
24. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
Maybe instead of having students come up with discussion questions ourselves, pose a discussion question(s) for students to think about before we come to class so we have key things to think about during our reading assignments and then we come to class ready to discuss. For responses, maybe clarify what to write about, such as respond on a passage or quote from the reading.
It can be improved by having more assignments due, maybe by the end of the course we can have half of the paper written instead of just the introduction.
25. Other comments:
Professor really well rounded on course material and compassionate about the subject. A small class setting also sets up well for discussion.
Brandy is an awesome teacher! Really like her, she should teach more classes for the department!

Brandy McDougall: AMST480, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: American Studies
Course: AMST 480 - Approaches to American Studies Crn (Section): 76856 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.95 19 0.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 18 (95%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
2.0 18 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 18 (100%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.84 19 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (16%) 16 (84%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (26%) 14 (74%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.56 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 15 (79%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (26%) 14 (74%)
7. The instructor inspired me to be critical of ideas and materials.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.78 18 0.43 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (22%) 14 (78%)
8. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.89 19 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 17 (89%)
9. The instructor was enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.84 19 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (16%) 16 (84%)
10. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.84 19 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (16%) 16 (84%)
11. The instructor encouraged class discussion.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.72 18 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (28%) 13 (72%)
12. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.89 19 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 17 (89%)
13. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 19 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 15 (79%)
14. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Great Teacher. Always came to class prepared. Presented the material to the students in a way that best allowed me to relate to and learn.
she's friendly helpful close to finishing her own so has good memory of her own fear so a feel for ours
great professor!
great person/teacher. always prepared and ready to get our class going with assignments. looked out for her class
Excellent thesis advisor, She is doing such a great job in our department and always has a lot of advice for my project.
Great instructor, passionate, knowledgeable, encouraging, enthusiastic.
Good and responsible.
she is one of the nicest teachers i have had yet. Although, we focused more on our projects this semester, i learned a lot of ways to appraoch research. Thank you Brandy for a great semester.
She is an excellent instructor. It is evident that she is very knowledgable in her area. She has a very friendly and approachable personality. When I needed help, she did her best to accommodate me into her schedule.
Professor McDougall is a very kind and accommodating professor who truly has every student's best interest at heart. More than that, though, she is a very knowledgeable educator and it's clear that she has a lot of experience conducting research and writing proposals. I would definitely recommend others to take her courses.
Brandy is an amazing teacher who only wants to best from her students. As a new teacher I was worried that she might let students walk all over here or she might not really know what she was talking about it. However, that was not the case, she was a great teacher who knew how to teach the class at an effective level.
Very good professor, may underestimate student's knowledge though. I almost felt like I was in a high school classroom at times the way she talked to us. She is always very prepared however and very nice and enthusiastic about class. She cares about students but does not always communicate what needs to be done for each class. Is also hard to contact via email.
Brandy is extremely approachable and knowledgeable. She is an enjoyable teacher with a pleasant demeanor.
great professor. Sheʻs really nice and very organized. I like her teaching style and am glad she is in charge of our Senior Seminar class. Her commitment and dedication to the students is very evident and allows us to feel comfortable in coming to her for questions and feedback.
Great! Understanding and smart.
good teacher, interesting excercises
She is a great professor who is willing to work with her students.
Even though she was new to teaching the course but I think she did an excellent job of helping us with our project when we had an questions and she pointed us on the right track and she taught me a lot of things I did not know how to do before I entered this class souch as a primary source analysis and an annotated bibliography
15. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.17 18 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 11 (61%) 5 (28%)
16. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
The library visits and presentations from other professors on different material and research methods.
they all aimed us toward next semesters hard work
all the help from library sessions etc.
meeting with the other AMST faculty to discuss their works.
The instructor and the help from the library research classes
The steps to writing the project paper. Opportunities to improve the grades through extra credits.
I liked the guest speakers. The course was very organized. I enjoyed doing the small papers compared to longer ones.
I like every aspect of the course. I found the library vists very useful. I now know where to find sources for my research project.
My favorite aspect of the course was having speakers come into class to share their experiences with research and writing their various dissertations and books. There is an incredible wealth of knowledge in the American Studies department and it's great that they're able to share some of it with the class. I also thoroughly enjoyed the research aspects of the class. Going to Hamilton and learning about the different resources that are available to us was fascinating. I didn't realize how extensive Hamilton really was until I took this course.
reading other professors work for each methodology. It should us different way to conduct research
I liked the preparation for writing a thesis paper / project for the next semester. It will really help and give us a head start. I really really like touring the library and going there weekly to learn about the different aspects and how to use it. No other class has ever done that before and it was beyond helpful. Probably the most valuable aspect of this class.
The format at the beginning of the course (when read an article by a member of the AMST faculty, then we have full access to them) is by far my favorite part of the course. It is helpful to realize the potential areas of study available with an American Studies degree.
She broke down the Senior Capstone Project awesomely!!!!!! Because we did the project in parts it wasnʻt overwhelming and allowed us to work on bits and pieces of our project to better focus on what we wanted to actually cover in our project.
where we get to choose our own subject matter to investigate.
The peer reviews were extremely helpful.
written examples of steps, also rubrics
I like the fact that instead of just letting us work on things ourselves we have a set date to turn everything in by so that we dont procrastinate on anything and that we just turn things in a little at a time I think that is more better than just having everything thrown at you and you have to get everything done at one time
17. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
There were no aspects of the course I did not enjoy.
they all aimed us toward next semesters hard work
the weekly assignments. i like to do my projects by my own pace, not something set for me by someone else :(
hour long meeting with the writing center.... :/
How slow the course progressed
It is the presentation I like the least.
Wish some people would appreciate class more and come to class.
I think Professor McDougall did her best to make the course interesting, however, it was a course learning how to research which to a certain extent can only be interesting.
The peer work shops. I am not quite comfortable with critiquing other students.
Reading articles and talking to speakers at the beginning of the semester, I am not quite sure of the point of it. I wish we could have focused more on their research methods than the articles themselves. I would have liked to talk to the writers about how they did their research and writing, not necessarily about the subject/topic of their writing. Also it would have been nice to have been informed earlier that we have to keep all of our assignments for a final portfolio. Was not informed of this until the end of the semester. Also we did MANY peer evaluations in class. I did not like these. Perhaps doing a couple is okay. But I would much rather have feedback from the professor who knows more than my peers do about researching and possible topics. It gets tedious constantly correcting others work in class and simply answering questions about the content of their papers. Saying what is and is not in someone's paper is not beneficial. They know what they did and did not include in their writing and do not need me to tell them that. Could be better use of class time. Also we went over many things in class that were not beneficial at all, like how to do a PowerPoint presentation of organize a short paper. I learned all of these things years ago and do not need to be taught them again in my senior year of college. Perhaps focus more on research aspects than the simple things that we all should / do already know.
The text assigned for the course, "The Craft of Research" was my least favorite part of the course. The colloquial style and the format/ organization of the book made it difficult to read.
N/A
the format was somewhat awkward. i feel like it was backwards. it could be tweeked so that we get more self exploration done in the first month. then learn about the types of methodology and research tools to use to investigate our interests.
While I think it was awesome to have the assignments spread out, I felt that it made class time kind of pointless at times.
role playing
I dont really like doing presentations because I get nervous talking in front of the class but Im surprised at myself when I did my presentation it was not that bad because I did not even look at my cards once I remembered what I had to say
18. My overall evaluation of this course is...
Helpful in preparing my research and gathering research methods for my research project.
i would take it even if i didn't have to
gets you prepared for your thesis!
good course. sets you up well for the second part of the class.
well organized and put together, I cannot wait until next semester !!
Great instructor but the course itself can be a little better
Good. It gives a step-by-step approach to write a research paper.
very well executed Brandy. Even though it was your first semester in the department great job.
I think that this course was very helpful to guiding me in my research project.
This course is perfect for preparing students to complete their capstone projects. It gives students all of the tools necessary to not only choose a topic, but explore it to it's very depths. I look forward to taking the second part of the course and working on my project.
I was scared of this course because its a thesis class, but Brandy made the class fun andy entertaining.
It is an okay course. Could be improved on, but does it's job in preparing for the next semester's course.
This is an excellent course. It really shows the AMST majors the level of support and care offered to them in the AMST department. This course makes it easy to be successful with our senior theses.
Great, as long as Brandy is the prof!!!
please restructure format for next year.
good prep for capstone project
I think this course is needed because it teaches you how to prepared to write your paper and gives you research skills such as how to use the library and what is the differences between a primary and secondary source and it also helps us to start working on our actual paper a little by little, which is a working process but at least we get some things done this semester and we might use it in our paper next semester when we have to acutally write it
19. Other comments:
N/A
Brandy is an amazing instructor, glad you guys have her in the department
None for now. Waiting for the next semester to finish the research paper.
I had fun!!!
Would definitely recommend this class to others!!! Brandy inspires everyone to try their best and to not be afraid to outstep your boundaries to achieve your goals.
thanks ah.