|
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
3. The course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
12. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| truly care for the students and their well being. |
| Very patient with students and personality is really colorful -- perfect for teaching. |
| Professor Wehrman talks loudly, clearly, and have a lot of hands on experience which he shares with the students. He really puts a lot of time and effort into teaching. |
| Steve uses his unique personality and experiences to engage students in the subject matter. |
| passionate about RT and seeing the students succeed. |
| He made learning the subjects very interesting and because of his caring attitude it made for a great learning environment, the best environment that I have ever been in at KCC. |
| energetic and very informed about subject. If every teacher were like Prof. Wehrman no student
would get below an "A" in class. |
| Knows the subject matter well and makes learning the material fun and interesting. |
| His passion for teaching as well as the subject. |
|
|
14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| none |
| thought it was all great. |
| None at this time. |
| Try to not give excessive information or go overboard. |
| none |
|
|
15. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| always emailed updates so everyone would be on the same page |
| Allowed us to contact him via email, phone or even make appointments if we had questions or concerns about anything. His door is always open to us. |
| made himself very accessible to students. |
| Is there for us whenever and however he is need. |
| He always kept us informed about anything concerning the class, and he also always made time after class to meet students if we needed it, either in person or by other communication means. |
| Promptly got back to e-mail's and took time to answer questions during and after class. |
| Let students take breaks in between the long class hours and told students to always email or call if you needed help with the material. |
| Made himself available to students. |
|
|
16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| yes he is an amazing professor who is easy to learn from. |
| Yes, awesome teacher who really cares to see us succeed in this program -- It shows that he enjoys his job as an instructor. Plenty of Respiratory Care background and experience to share with us. |
| Yes, he is a great teacher |
| Yes. Very motivating and prides himself on producing successfulnstudents |
| Yes I would recommend him to other students, He is very interesting and most of all, very caring to all of his students. |
| Yes i would recommend Prof. Wehrman to other students. He is on punctual, passionate, and highly
educated in his field. |
| Yes, because he is an excellent teacher. |
|
|
17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| By far one of the best instructors I've ever had. I hope to learn more from him in the future. |
| I am very glad that I got the opportunity to meet and be in a class that he is teaching, he makes learning this new subject very interesting and easier for me. |
| Great teacher, doesnt like to see students fail and will try everything in his power to help student
succeed. |
| Great professor to learn from. |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| No survey responses were found. |
|
|
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
3. The course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
11 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
9 (82%) |
|
|
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
12. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
|
|
13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| Knows the material and is always lending out a hand for help. |
| He speaks in a positive way makes the students feel powerful. |
| passionate about the subject and teaching |
| passionate, knowledge, wants to see students succeed |
| His teaching style and his caring attitude towards all his students. |
| Highly educated in his field of study. |
| Showed concern for students and he knew the course material well. |
| Presented material in an interesting way. |
|
|
14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| No changes. |
| A little bit more hands on training to show new materials |
| nada |
| None at this time. |
| none |
|
|
15. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| He gave us quiz reviews when needed. |
| By actively |
| email and counseling |
| always available. |
| He always made time during and after class hours, communicating in person or by other means. |
| answered question during and after class and was reachable via e-mail |
| Told students to email or call him if they had any questions or problems with the work. |
|
|
16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| Yes! I thought Physics was going to be a killer subject to learn, but he made it a little bit easier to learn it and comprehend the subject. |
| Yes, he is a great teacher with a lot of knowledge. |
| Yes, he is the expert on Respiratory Care |
| Yes |
| yes, great teacher |
| Yes, I would highly recommend Mr. Wehrman to other students. His caring attitude which is integrated into his teaching methods makes learning his class much more interesting and easy. |
| yes. Wants students to learn. Breaks away from the traditional method of teaching and makes class
enjoyable. |
|
|
17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| He made learning a difficult course fun and understandable |
| His passion for teaching really shows |
| He is the best teacher that I have had at KCC, the way he teaches makes learning the subject much more easier than the way others have taught me. |
| Great teacher. If every teacher were like him; regardless of the subject they taught, there would be
no such thing as a student who failed a subject. |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| This course was just right not too hard, but not too easy. What I like the most it that it expose the student to what is Respiratory Care and what to expect in the fall. I can't wait for the fall to start. I want begin my learning in the hospital. The hands on activity were great I really enjoyed my first experience "cracking" the cylinder. The power point presentation was a terrific idea. It got us exposed with what we need to learn as well as it gave us opportunity to get more comfortable with presentations.
Great class, I had fun. |
|
|
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
3. The course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
6 |
1.26 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.83 |
6 |
1.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
12. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| Stephen Wehrman is a great teacher. He knows the subject material very well and is always answer my questions. |
| Stephen Wehrman is an excellent teacher, and I would recommend him to anyone who wants to come into the respiratory care program. He knows his area of expertise very well, and encourages me to learn more. |
| He was very knowledgable and very dynamic. Also, I like how he goes over certain topics when he knows that we are struggling. |
| He knows everything. |
|
|
14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| He needs to have another PB 840 ventilator in the class. The vent was broken in the first part and the last part of the semester. |
| N?A |
| Just be a little more organized and let us know how we are doing in each class so we can adjust as necessary. |
| none |
|
|
15. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| He did tutorials to the students |
| Asking followup questions to everything he covers. |
|
|
16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| Yes. Because he is the best teacher in the program |
| Yes I enjoyed his class and I learned a lot! |
| yes. he is the best |
|
|
17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| Continue the great job he is doing |
| Good job Steve. Keep up the good work. |
| he is the best |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| He is the best teacher I ever had |
| Very Awesome teacher |
|
|
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
3. The course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.22 |
9 |
1.2 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.11 |
9 |
1.17 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
12. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| He is always in the good mood and can answer my questions right away |
| he knows everything |
| He is an awesome teacher! |
| knows the subject VERY well! |
|
|
14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| none |
| maybe a little more organized |
|
|
15. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| asking followup questions |
| talked to them |
|
|
16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| yes. he is a great professor |
| Yes. |
| yes, perfect teacher for respiratory. makes the class more interesting and entertaining |
|
|
17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
|
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| No survey responses were found. |
|
|
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
3. The course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
1.12 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
4. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
1.12 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
12. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| knows respiratory perfectly, has many stories and great in education |
| he knows all |
|
|
14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| Maybe the next class could try a book?? but, i think we all did fine without one |
| none |
| none |
|
|
15. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| talked to them |
| ask followup questions |
|
|
16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
|
|
|
17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| none |
| he is a great knows everything |
|
|
18. Other comments:
|
| I thought that not having a book in pharm was fine. The info needed was provided for us. |
| It would've been nice to have a textbook in the class. Just something to refer to when the lectures and powerpoints weren't too clear. |
|
|
1. The instructor did not speak clearly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 1.5 |
16 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
10 (63%) |
5 (31%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. The instructor explained course procedure. (attendance, assignments, grading policy, exams, etc.)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.81 |
16 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (19%) |
13 (81%) |
|
|
3. The instructor was available during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
16 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (25%) |
12 (75%) |
|
|
4. The instructor explained the course goals and objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.81 |
16 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (19%) |
13 (81%) |
|
|
5. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.94 |
16 |
0.25 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
15 (94%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was prepared for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.69 |
16 |
0.48 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (31%) |
11 (69%) |
|
|
7. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
16 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
2 (13%) |
13 (81%) |
|
|
8. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.94 |
16 |
0.25 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
15 (94%) |
|
|
9. The instructor's way of teaching assisted my learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
16 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (38%) |
10 (63%) |
|
|
10. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
16 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
4 (25%) |
11 (69%) |
|
|
11. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.69 |
16 |
0.48 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (31%) |
11 (69%) |
|
|
12. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.73 |
15 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (27%) |
11 (73%) |
|
|
13. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
16 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (25%) |
12 (75%) |
|
|
14. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
16 |
0.34 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
14 (88%) |
|
|
15. The instructor spoke clearly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.81 |
16 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (19%) |
13 (81%) |
|
|
16. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| The instructor is vary knowledgeable in the subjects matter. He knows how to deliver his lecture. |
| He knew the respiratory stuff very well and knew how to make the class more entertaining |
| Extreme depth of knowledge and experience leads to good mentoring in the class room |
| I enjoyed his enthusiasm for the subject area. He would always encourage and help me if I appeared to be struggling. |
| made the class fun but allowed us to learn the subject thoroughly |
| supportive |
| If there was any kind of clarification, steve always showed an interest in each students needs. |
| Great Great teacher, one of the best teachers I have ever had. You can tell he has a great passion for his profession and he really cares about the students success. |
| Making learning fun |
| He is all knowing and has the ability bto help share that with his students. |
| knowledge and sense of humors |
| very encouraging, made me feel like i can do it, even though i small kine lolo. Good positive attitude |
| He is a genies!!! |
| Steve know the subject very well. He is meant to be an instructor/director for this program. |
| His major strengths as a teacher is that he has a lot of experience and knows Respiratory well. |
| He knows everything about everything. He is very passionate about the subject he teaches. |
|
|
17. The instructor was not available during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 1.75 |
16 |
1.18 |
Freq(%) |
9 (56%) |
5 (31%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
1 (6%) |
|
|
18. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| None. |
| Be a little bit more organized and not jump into other areas so much. |
| None |
| Nothing, does a great job. |
| none |
| None. |
| finish class on time |
| none, all good here |
| He is great the way he is, no changes please!! |
| Steve is very knowlegable and has the ability to teach the class, but he speaks very fast and sometimes I get lost trying to keep up. |
| None |
| Sometimes I feel that there are too many good articles he gives us to just read and I don't have time to read them so I feel bad. Sometimes he gets really excited about a topic and doesn't realize how lost we students are during the lecture. |
|
|
19. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| The instructor will review the lecture to with the students during lunch break. |
| Spoke with them |
| Spends lots of time explaining more difficult concepts |
| He always made himself available if we needed the extra help. |
| made himself available at all times if I needed help |
| did one on ones with every student in the class |
| Progress notes and current grade status |
| He was available for tutoring on phone and before and after class and via email |
| asking for feedback and offer help when class is done. |
| He listened and gave constructive critisism. |
| was always available for students to get a hold of the instructor |
| spending extra time to show and explain stuff to us. |
| Steve has the passion to always show care and concern for all students |
| He treats everyone fairly and equally. He always helps us and wants us to do well. He is very encouraging and makes me want to learn. |
| He was always willing to have study sessions with us during lunch. He answered any questions we had. He spent time out of his busy schedule to talk to us about stuff. |
|
|
20. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| Yes. Because he is fun to learn from. |
| YES! He's a great respiratory teacher and works well with a whole lotta different kind of personalities. |
| Yes, the teacher shows concern for the welfare of student and genuinely desires for the students to succeed. Makes the class room a fun environment to learn in. |
| Yes, he is a fun teacher and I enjoy taking his classes. |
| yes, a superb teacher |
| yes, great instructor |
| DEFINIETLY |
| YES!!!!! people who are not even in the program have heard of him and think he is an extraordinary professor. He is very motivational and inspirational |
| yes, great teacher |
| Yes. He is the program director. He is the best. |
| definitely! great teacher with so much knowledge |
| Yes, makes everyone feel a part of the lecture. very helpful |
| Yes, he has the is very supportive and encourages all students to do well. |
| Yes he is the best for REspiratory |
| Yes, I think he is the best respiratory teacher around. |
|
|
21. The instructor actively listened to students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
16 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (6%) |
2 (13%) |
13 (81%) |
|
|
22. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| The instructor is a great teacher |
| He should become a doctor....need more doctors to listen |
| Enjoyed learning from this professor |
| Great job Steve! |
| gives you chances to improve if you needed more time |
| best instructor i have had in a while |
| THNAK YOU FOF GIVING ME THE WISDOM SO THAT I KNOW THAT I CAN SUCCEED!!!! |
| thank you for being such a great positive person. Its because of this teacher I decided to go into respiratory threapy. He really inspired me. |
| great teacher |
| Thank you and see you next semester. |
| Great instructor and director who inspires many students to register the program. |
| I enjoy being in his classes and look forward for the next two years. |
| He is very funny and laid back but expects alot from you. I like his teaching style. He does a great job making complex stuff more simple. |
|
|
1. The instructor did not speak clearly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 1.11 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
8 (89%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. The instructor explained course procedure. (attendance, assignments, grading policy, exams, etc.)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
3. The instructor was available during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
4. The instructor explained the course goals and objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
5. The instructor knew the subject area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was prepared for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
7. The instructor encouraged students' participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
8. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
9. The instructor's way of teaching assisted my learning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
10. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
11. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
12. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
13. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
14. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
15. The instructor spoke clearly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
16. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?
|
| He doesn't mind demonstrating the skills for us. |
| Knowledgable regarding subject matter and had a lot of passion. It really showed. |
| Spending time and being patient with the class during clinicals. Explaining concepts and ideas in easily understandable ways. |
| He is very knowlegable about resp.care field. |
| supportive |
| knowledge |
|
|
17. The instructor was not available during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 1.22 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
7 (78%) |
2 (22%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
18. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?
|
| None, I like the hands on practice. |
| None!! perfect teacher |
| Change the grading system for lab skills testing so the student doesn't fail for missing a step. |
| None. |
| talk little more slow |
|
|
19. How did the instructor show concern for students?
|
| He made us practice over and over. He let us know honestly what we were doing wrong and how to improve. |
| Always available and still remembers what its like to be a student who is overwhelmed. |
| Gave the students extra time in lab to practice skills |
| did one on ones with every student in the class |
|
|
20. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?
|
| Yes, he is a great instructor. Very enthusiastic about teaching. |
| Hell yes!! Great teacher, very inspirational and motivational, makes me feel like I really can accomplish anything I put my mind too. Funny too, class isnt boring. Even though the subject matter is difficult he makes it fun and teaches in a way that anyonne can learn |
| Yes, because they exhibit concern for the students well being and want us to succeed. |
| Yes,of course. |
| yes, great instructor |
| yes. you will definitely learn a lot from this instructor. |
|
|
21. The instructor actively listened to students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
22. What else would you like to say about this instructor?
|
| He is totally cool and has a great sense of humor. |
| Thank you for becoming a teacher. |
| Thanks! |
| very honest, smart, and funny |
|
