|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.8 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
6 (60%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.8 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
6 (60%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.8 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
4 (40%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.6 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
5 (50%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
3 (30%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.4 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
3 (30%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.6 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
3 (30%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.9 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
5 (50%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.5 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (50%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.1 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (50%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.63 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (13%) |
1 (13%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
3 (38%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.8 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
4 (40%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.89 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
4 (44%) |
2 (22%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.8 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
6 (60%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.3 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
2 (20%) |
3 (30%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.6 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
4 (40%) |
2 (20%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
| 3.9 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
2 (20%) |
5 (50%) |
3 (30%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| nothing |
| I would assign more homework, and use the text book that i believe most of us bought, but wasn't required to use it. i could've save money knowing that we didn't have to use the book. For Quiz/exams, ask more question for less points. five and ten points |
| I think his grading was fair but I didnt understand how he marks off points. I mean I try so hard and give my all to each exam but the points just keep marking off. I know the answer and put in my owns works but if it is not stated in exact word for word |
| I wouldn't show outdated films from the 1960's-1970 about inflation and business without showing updated films too, then I could compare the two. |
| Nothing |
| Be very clear about what is expected from the students. It creates confusion when professors go back and forth about ideas. |
| I would give out reviews for tests that apply to the test been given. |
| The tests need to be more specific in what it is looking for. |
| i would have taught from the book, not from copies of paper. also when giving tests, not to make us study everything if only certain parts of the subject matter would be on the test |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| its good. explains things well and repeats what he says is good |
| Good. I like the old (very old) videos and audio. |
| GOOD! |
| Mr. Ching is very nice, but I don't feel like I learned anything about business now, he showed us slides and film strips from the 60's and 70's. |
| Mr.Ching is a very funny teacher. He makes learning a little bit easier. |
| Mr. Ching is a very understanding teacher. I would have liked him to be more clear about what he expects from the students and be a little more firm with the assignments and what not. |
| He is a very cheerful teacher but sometimes he went overload on study materials for the tests. A lot that I studied was not on the test at all. |
| Mr. Ching shouldn't jump around to other subjects during his lectures. |
| his teaching methods were alright. the notes that he gave, compared to the sheets of paper with information, didn't exactly go hand-in-hand |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| yes |
| yes. i learned a lot about business and how they work. |
| Yes! he very knowledgeable in this course just really fast pace. |
| No |
| Yes |
| yes, I learned things about business. |
| I learned some things to do with the principles of business. |
| Yes. |
| what i learned in this course will surely help me in everyday life and the real world |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| good teaching |
| I like how he handle himself in the situation in class when other students were ganging up on you. Very pofessional. |
| I know it was hard for him because he said he didn't have the right equipment. Hopefully he will soon. |
| None. |
|
