|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.38 |
8 |
1.06 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
2 (25%) |
3 (38%) |
1 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.38 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
5 (63%) |
3 (38%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
7. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
8. I gained a better understanding of myself through this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
9. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
10. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
11. Other comments:
|
| Crazy stressful but awesome. This class is a class that everyone needs to take. I learned more about
myself, my community, and my culture in a way that makes me want to share the knowledge I
learned to others. It is amazing the change that I have gone through while taking this class. I love
this class <3 |
| Love this class. We need more classes like this in school!! |
| thank you for having Professors like Jeffery Acido! gave me the opportunity to find myself through understanding my cultures.this has made me realize that I'm special because of who I am and the prefect person I'm about to become. thank you, University of Hawaii for this education that will make this world a better place for you and me. |
| BEST teacher ever. There's a reason why I took his class twice in a row and
looking forward to finishing up my degree with his IP courses that he offers.
I think he is a great scholar and a hardworking individual who knows what
he's talking about. |
| The best teacher at UH Manoa. Forces you to think critically and will
motivate you to make a difference in the world. Everyone should take a class
similar to this. |
| Followed the class schedule really good, and also provided time outside of class to meet with you.
The overall communication was good but the only down side was he didn't reply to some emails. But
that not to say my email wasn't answered by another professor. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
4 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
6. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
4 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
7. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
8. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
9. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
10. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
14. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
4 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
15. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
16. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
17. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
18. The course has given me more insight into the behavior and culture of native speakers of the language.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
19. The course is so conducted that I know on a daily/weekly basis what is expected of me.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
20. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
21. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| I really enjoyed this class and his teaching style is so different but i really liked that about it. I love that this class was all about deep thinking, debates, sharing of experiences and thoughts, making connections, and everything all connected. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.0 |
7 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
4 (57%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.43 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
4 (57%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.79 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
2 (29%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
6. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
7. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (100%) |
|
|
8. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
9. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
10. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (43%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
11. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
12. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
7 |
0.79 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
1 (14%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
14. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (57%) |
3 (43%) |
|
|
15. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
16. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
17. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
18. The course has given me more insight into the behavior and culture of native speakers of the language.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
19. The course is so conducted that I know on a daily/weekly basis what is expected of me.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
20. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
7 |
0.79 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
2 (29%) |
4 (57%) |
|
|
21. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 5.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (100%) |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| Best teacher and best class I've ever taken in my entire academic life! I wish there were more
teachers like Jeff out there. |
| This class made me think outside of the box. I really enjoyed this class! |
| Jeffrey Acido's IP 398 course was one of the most amazing classes that I have taken to date as a student here in the University of Hawai'i at Manoa (UHM). I really think that more classes like his should be offered at UHM. His way of leading the class provides his students the opportunity to teach the class through discussion and debate. Acido's class has also made me appreciate my culture and family. For this, I'm very thankful for having this class offered at UHM for both my personal and intellectual growth. I think that the amount of work assigned for this class was fairly given. However, I think that Acido should have a more transparent grading system. It would also be helpful if he provided a syllabus in the beginning of class for those students who start the semester off better with a hard copy of the guidelines and expectations of the class. Other than these notes, I really enjoyed the class and would recommend it to many others! :) |
| the best class in the whole university of hawaii system. |
| Very fun class! Really broadened my knowledge of the subject and provided a different perspective
on a subject that has not gotten the attention it deserves. I would definitely consider taking it
again. |
| This class was AWESOME! I really enjoyed everything that we learned and it helped me learn things about myself and my culture. The class made me think about things that were really deep and at times, difficult to answer. I really wish we had more time together, but it was fun while it lasted! :) |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.81 |
27 |
0.48 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
3 (11%) |
23 (85%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.7 |
27 |
0.54 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
6 (22%) |
20 (74%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
25 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
3 (12%) |
21 (84%) |
|
|
4. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.7 |
27 |
0.54 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
6 (22%) |
20 (74%) |
|
|
5. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.74 |
27 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
5 (19%) |
21 (78%) |
|
|
6. The instructor is sensitive to student difficulty with course work.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.85 |
27 |
0.36 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (15%) |
23 (85%) |
|
|
7. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.74 |
27 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
5 (19%) |
21 (78%) |
|
|
8. The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.59 |
27 |
0.69 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (11%) |
5 (19%) |
19 (70%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
27 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (7%) |
6 (22%) |
19 (70%) |
|
|
10. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.7 |
27 |
0.61 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (7%) |
4 (15%) |
21 (78%) |
|
|
11. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
27 |
0.68 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (11%) |
3 (11%) |
21 (78%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.54 |
26 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
10 (38%) |
15 (58%) |
|
|
13. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.74 |
27 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
5 (19%) |
21 (78%) |
|
|
14. Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.59 |
27 |
0.69 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (11%) |
5 (19%) |
19 (70%) |
|
|
15. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
27 |
0.85 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
3 (11%) |
6 (22%) |
17 (63%) |
|
|
16. The course has given me more insight into the behavior and culture of native speakers of the language.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.81 |
27 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (19%) |
22 (81%) |
|
|
17. The course is so conducted that I know on a daily/weekly basis what is expected of me.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.52 |
27 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (11%) |
7 (26%) |
17 (63%) |
|
|
18. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.54 |
26 |
0.81 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
2 (8%) |
5 (19%) |
18 (69%) |
|
|
19. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.7 |
27 |
0.54 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
6 (22%) |
20 (74%) |
|
|
20. Other comments:
|
| The course as well as the instructor makes you want to learn. Jeff is very passionate about what he
teaches in the classroom and it shows. Im glad i took this class because i have more knowledge and
more understanding of my culture. I appreciate who i am as a person and where i come from as well
as my parents. This class is life-changing :) |
| Class structure is effective and well organized. Content was relevant to everything that was
covered. I believe we all took more than just knowledge from this course that we are able
to apply to our daily lives; really enjoyable class. |
| Out of all the years I've been at UHM this class, by far, really pushed me mentally and opened
my eyes about my "identity"!!
Please give Jeff a raise! His procedures in conducting class time is engaging and interactive!
I've never cried in a class yet love it at the same time with a passion!! |
| Jeff was a phenomenal teacher. He would teach us so much in a little amount
of time. I learned a lot about pop culture and the ways it has affected my
culture and other cultures in society. Excellent class! I recommended all of
my friends to take this class because I believe my whole perspective on life
changed so much just from this teacher. I hope he will be able to teach more
classes in the future because I would love to take another class from him. |
| Manong Jeff was able to help us all respect and gain trust for every individual in the classroom. All of
us were able to mirror parts of our existence into information from every class meeting discussion.
The short clips, films and articles that were brought up in the class all facilitated us to gain more of
an understanding about the Filipino culture. |
| I must say this is one of the best class I have ever taken. Jeff is still a young teacher and really relates to us students and is still fun to learn from. He is very enthusiastic and passionate in what he teaches and has us really thinking about things.I have learned so many things from this class and shared alot of ideas with my classmates. Class discussions have been powerfuland has inspired all of us to appreciate the Ilokano culture more. |
| I love how Jeff is so passionate about Philippine Popular Culture!! |
| Great Teacher! will take another class from him if I could. Recomend this
class and teacher to all of my friends and peers! |
| THE BEST TEACH I HAVE EVER HAD. VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE, EASY TO APPROACH, MADE SURE ALL STUDENTS WERE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE MATERIAL. |
| I loved this course. It really gave me a better understanding about the Ilokano culture and how pop culture influences everything that we do, even culture. This class actually opened my mind to events that not only deal with class, but to the outside world. This class was a great learning experience and i would gladly take it again or take a class with this professor. |
| One of the best courses and teachers ive ever took here at UH. Changed my life! |
| Never give up. |
| I enjoyed this class, and that's why time flies during this class. |
| Jeffrey is an awesome guy that inspires students to think critically and to try their hardest. He brings a burst of energy and happiness to the classroom making it an enjoyable environment. |
| Jeff was a good professor. easy to talk to and approach. i wouldnt mind taking a class from him
again. |
| This was a very interesting class. It is very different from other lecture
classes that I have taken. It put a lot of things about Filipino pop culture
into perspective and has opened my mind about other issues as well. I would
definitely recommend this class to anyone interested in learning about
society as well as culture. |
| Jeffrey is an excellent teacher who knows his stuff. He always gives good examples and has that
willingness to teach his best to get through his students. Jeff demonstrates the best while teaching. |
|