eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Gene Harada

Available Survey Results

CARP22, Spring 2012
CARP41, Fall 2010
CARP22, Spring 2010
CARP41, Fall 2009
CARP22, Spring 2009
CARP41, Fall 2008
CARP22, Spring 2008
CARP41, Fall 2007

Gene Harada: CARP22, Spring 2012

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Carpentry
Course: CARP 22 - Concrete Form Construct Crn (Section): 16434 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.85 14 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%) 1 (7%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 14 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 10 (71%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.79 14 0.43 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 11 (79%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 14 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 14 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 10 (71%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 14 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 1 (7%) 11 (79%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.64 14 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 1 (7%) 11 (79%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.71 14 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
I like the hands on pricticals of building.
Hands-on experience
Hands on. Group effort.
What i like about this course is the practical and projects.
the lectures and practicals were verry helpful
all the hands on was exciting
the fact gene made it very interesting to do the practicals
Hands on work
:)
I like how everybody learned how to work togerther. How we mixed up are groups and work with everybody.
i like that this course is hands on and very easy
I learned alot in this class from building a hollow tile wall to forms to a concrete stairway I'm glad I got to take this class
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
No
shorter lectures more practical
Negative
none
more hands on
none
None
:)
i dont thing this course can get any better. it good how its is already.
none
No leave it like how it is
15. Other comments:
Thank You
none
gene was straight up with the class which i liked and very honest on what he thought about out practicals which help me by not only going through the motions but by always improving on each assignment
:)
MR.HARADA CAN WAIT TO SEE YOU NEXT YEAR!!!
none
Good job keep up the good work

Gene Harada: CARP41, Fall 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Carpentry
Course: CARP 41 - Rough Framing/Ext Finish Crn (Section): 17601 (0)    
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 10 (67%) 0 (0%)
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 15 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (40%) 9 (60%) 0 (0%)
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 10 (67%) 0 (0%)
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
6. The instructor was well prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.8 15 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 12 (80%) 0 (0%)
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.6 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 2 (13%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%) 0 (0%)
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
What I like about the course is that it simulates a real job site, and gives you the actual hands on experience especially with the model home project done with the drafting course. The course lets you learn about the process in getting a construction project ready for building, but you also get to learn how to interact and work with others in different situations, and help each other to make sure your finished product comes out right.
learning new things that i didnt know.
i like the hands on activities and practicals that were active in this course. i have the hands on experience of what its like to build an actual home. its a great learning experience.
all the hands on work and the learning environment. it's very a fun and exciting experience. it hardly ever feels like your in school.
EVERYTHING!!!!!
Mr. Harada's devotion to the Carpentry program and putting out well-prepared student's is inspirational. His approach to teaching Carpentry and no-nonsense mentality gives his students a chance to learn carpentry at its highest level in quality craftsmanship
This course is very hands on and very effective to the learning experience.
You learn alot about carpnetry.
the instructors are very knowlegable and they explain the course well and teach at a level that is approprate for the enviorment. I would recomend this course with these instructors to anyone. Thank you for sharing your knowlege with me.. Aloha Odell
alot of learning, learn something new everyday and alot of hands on
To Mr. Harada you did an awesome job. I loved that we all our projects are hands on and lets assignment. I know i didn't do great on my testes but i know i tryed my best and learned alot.I thank you alot Mr.Harada
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
no it was fine
no improvements.
none. keep up the great work! 8)
there is nothing there to improve
no suggestions needed
KEEP INSTRUCTORS THAT LOVE TO TEACH AND WHO LOVE THEIR STUDENTS LIKE THE ONES IN THIS PROGRAM NOW....
N/A
No....
15. Other comments:
Thanks Mann!!!
Good job Gene Harada:)
It was a great learning experience! Thank you!
N/A
Hi again Mr Harada, It's me kris, I want to give much pleasure to you for giving me the oppertunite to learn your trade that you have became a master of. I have learned so much from you in these past year and just want to THANK YOU from the bottom of my heart. May you have a blessed day n always smile.

Gene Harada: CARP22, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Carpentry
Course: CARP 22 - Concrete Form Construct Crn (Section): 16289 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 15 0.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 12 (80%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 15 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 14 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 13 (93%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 15 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
nothing
i wouldnt change nothing.
nothing would be needed to change.Everything was meet in class
n/a
Perhaps, try and schedule a class visitation to a union job site where form work is being done for visualization
I would recomend this class to anyone, I also recomend that students do NOT miss any class time, easy to fall behind...
i would change nothing but thank you for staying in class after hours and helping and supporting us with projects that we were behind on.
If i were teaching the course i wouldn't do much but the same as the instructor taught me.
Nothing
nothing. thank you Mr.harada you are a great teacher.
nothing. Gene Harada is clearly a superior when it comes to teaching carpentry.
nothing
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
Very good teaching methods are demonstrated daily. I really like how the cousre is set up to simulate an actual industry work place where all the key requirements to succeed in the real job are praticed. Such practices are Being on time, following directions, team work, and many others. Also a good in addtion is how every week each student in the class is rotated on certain tasks for the week in which they play the role of a foreman. This is very good to boost responsibility, and to prepare one for situations which are stressful.
it is very good I learned alot in this class, he is a very good teacher
i think he is a great teacher and he has taught me alot
His methods are really good.very easy to understand everything he teaches u.
n/a
Mr. Harada is a very effective teacher who is dedicated to assuring his students get the most out of his class, including maturing to be able to succeed in the future. He is very easy to approach with questions or personal situations.
i think your teaching methods are The Bomb!!! You really helped me with my work wthics and my attitude toward my fellow classmates.
The instructors teaching methods is something rare when taking classes. It requires you to think. Instead of giving you the answer off the back. The instructor makes you think what the answer would be when dealt with different situations and problems. In lectures, the instructor tends to drift to different topics, but it's not all bad, because it still pretains to the subject of the major. So for that matter its like killing two birds with one stone. A little bonus on the side. But overall great teaching methods.
His teaching methods are very effective
Thanks Mr.
old school, but its pretty nuts!
interesting and challenging.
stern but very effective.
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
Absolutely, and because of the many ways we are shown of how this field works and how to be successful in it.
Yes, he has tought me alot, and i want to learn more see you next semester
of course he did
yes i have learned a lot from his class.everything from concrete to what contractors expect from a worker
n/a
Most definately. I use the skills that i learn in school outside in my social life. I Think!!
yes
yes.
Yes
Yes I feel that he helped me to learn more about my carpentry skills.
he has contributed alot to my experience in the field of work inside and outside of class.
yes.
Very much so. I have gained a lot more knowledge since i have entered his program
22. Other comments:
can't wait for next semester.....BRING KILAWAN!!!!
cant wait for next semester..... I LOVE U MAN!!!!!
Again thank you for your support and sharing with us the knowledge you have and also being such a good teacher and a mentor.
Well rounded teacher.
thank you Mr. Harada, I am very happy that I was in your class. I can't wait till next year. thank you for inspiring me to presue my goals in carpentry.have a blessed summer.
cant wait for next semester! bring the kilawan too ah? ;)

Gene Harada: CARP41, Fall 2009     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Carpentry
Course: CARP 41 - Rough Framing/Ext Finish Crn (Section): 15291 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 12 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 3 (25%) 8 (67%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 12 0.67 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 4 (33%) 7 (58%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 12 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A  
4.82 11 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 9 (82%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
idk..i learned so i guess keep it the same.
nothing
nothing
Nothing at all. Because it is good as it is
nothing everything is pretty much great and easy for understand.
Find funding for better and newer equipments for the carpentry program as well as building materials for carpentry practicals.
more time for hands on
i would change nothing about this class.....
every thing is more than good. There wouldn't be enough time to add more. Keep up the good work.
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
the methods are a little hard to understand at first. more production.
The instructional methods used are highly effective.
good teacher
good
great methods!
It's good because he helps you every step of the way.
the teachers technique is good and that if you can't understand what is being taught in the classrom it can also understand it when working out on the practicals.
Extremely unprecedented!!! I nominate Mr. Harada as the top instructor of the year!!!! He deserves recognition as well as a raise!!!
good
its challenging but appropriaite and diverse towards the carpentry program.....
very good and practical
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
yes, he has provided a great amount of knowledge toward the subject.
The intsructor has greatly contributed to my general knowledge and over all job skills.
yes
yes
yes alot
Yes
yes i learned things that i wanted to learn on the job because of all the practicals, on how you should try to keep busy and always find something to do because there is always something that needs to be done.
Definately, absolutely and so much more!!!!!!
yes
thats a positive baby.....
yes very much so!
22. Other comments:
he should let me call him uncle GeNo
None
the instructor has taught me things that i wanted to learn. this program is great but i think that more funding to the program would be even greater for students to learn
Mr Harada should be recogized as, "The most outstanding Instructor of all time". Amazing instructor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
none at all.........
Thank you mister Harada!

Gene Harada: CARP22, Spring 2009     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Carpentry
Course: CARP 22 - Concrete Form Construct Crn (Section): 18348 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 12 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 12 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 12 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 12 0.39 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 10 (83%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 12 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
none
i would give away soda for free
A) We need new equiptment and new building materials. B) Replace all the old lumber for new ones and all old power tools and hardware for new ones too.
there is nothing more to improve in this course. nothing.
Nothing
nothing that i could think of because the course is being taught really good, and i can understand it well.
a. add the type and placement of rebars needed for each form that is made so even when not working in the Union the student will have knowledge when doing a side job on his or her own. b. I wouldn't change anything. I hope other students will get a chance in the future to learn as I did.
Nothing much. Because the way the class was being thought I dont see any thing to change. Subjects were clear and the instructor made things clear.
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
good
very good and enjoyable
iss cherry
Shear excellence. A master at his best. I nominate him for best instructor of this year!
he knows what he is doing
Good, the hands on part is really helpful.
he connects with all of the students in a way that each one can relate too.
Excellent teaching methods
the instructors teaching method great because the subject is clearly explained and the hands on that is done helps us understand the subject more.
Very good. I like the practicals and the actuals. That is the best way to learn.
It is great.
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
YES
yes
yea
Indeed! He's very clear and concise and will go out of his way to help and explain everything until you completely understand. Superior teaching methods!
yes. alot
more then what i expected to get out of the class.
Greatly
yes, he has contributed ti my general knowledge and learning job skills because of all the hands on activities that we do is related to the field like as if we were really working for a company. i learnd about more tools that i have not known before.
Very much so!
Yeah. He always is telling us how the industry is and how he training us for it.
22. Other comments:
mr. harada is a very good teacher
good job. im smarter now.
"BEST INSTRUCTOR OF 2009!" He definately deserves a raise! Awesome! Mr Harada is absolutely Awesome!
great semester, learned a lot.
Love it
this course and teacher was great.
Mahalo, keep up the good work!
None.

Gene Harada: CARP41, Fall 2008     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Carpentry
Course: CARP 41 - Rough Framing/Ext Finish Crn (Section): 17167 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 3 (20%) 10 (67%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 15 0.56 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 13 (87%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 9 (60%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 3 (20%) 10 (67%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 15 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 8 (53%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 5 (33%) 8 (53%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 15 1.24 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 11 (73%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.27 15 1.22 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 10 (67%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 15 1.21 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 2 (13%) 9 (60%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 1 (7%) 12 (80%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 3 (20%) 10 (67%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 14 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 10 (71%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.99 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 1 (7%) 11 (73%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 14 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 12 (86%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 15 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 4 (27%) 7 (47%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.98 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 3 (20%) 9 (60%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   F   D   C   B   A  
4.07 15 1.39 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 9 (60%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
-goin off track
na
nothing.
there is nothing that io could think of improving the class
everything was god good
explain hw assignments more clearer. otherwise the carp program is outstanding
I would involve less manual labor
nothing he's doin a grate job
nothing
no need change
motavate everyone more equally
nothing
Push for funding to make pimp houses!!
- Stay on subject when lecturing - Keep personal problems at home or out of class lectures - No wasting TIME - No extra work that does not need to be done
Nothing
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
na
Great teacher. He knows what he is talking about.
his teaching method was good. he teachest us first and then put it to practicle
made everything clear so it made it easier for me to learn
GRRRRRRREAT!
old fashioned
he's a kool guy an a kinda interesting instructor
very good methods i learned alot
he knows everything about carpentry
not very professional
Gene-o is the man...i think the class is perfect,he takes us through every step of building a house,with books and hands on...he sure knows how to make us laugh...thanks for the semester of fun mr. harada...
Cherry
They are good, need to work on lecturing on subject
GREAT
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
na
Yes.A lot was learned.
yes! mostly every day
yes
yess-sirr-ree-bob
Yes
yep
yea i have learned plenty from him
yeah!!
somewhat
he showed me every step in building a house from ground up...
yes
yes, he made us learn the hard way
ABSOLUTELY
22. Other comments:
always wanted to call him gene-o. I'm going to miss you gene-o!!!! let me know when you're going to sell your truck for 2,500. oh yea! BEEL KITTY and eleven was here. I bet you cant guess who wrote this GENE-O!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Love your 2009 carpenty class oh and before i forget I'm here in the lab and I just noticed that dumaso put the picture of him up on my space already(in love with himself?) I think so!!!! Lets see nick names for this year RABBET FRESHES, RENDACOUS, GAYBALL, BILL-KITTY, RUBBER MALLET, DK, CABIN FEVER COLSON, DUMBASSHOLE, ELEVEN. THATS ALL GUESS WHO????
i learned a lot and it was a great experience. Thank you.
=)
nope
none
nothing
none
it was nice being a part of of the program
i had a great time in this class,i dont wanna leave...best teacher through my whole life,no joke..gonna miss you gene-o...i going come back visit you guarantee,im going to need your kokua to help build my house...ALOHA
I'm gonna miss you Gene-O.... i'll come visit when that lab class get chicks!!! You'll always remember this class for the many times that BEEL KITTY got fired and smiled... And the many times that ELEVEN thought he was right , but was wrong... And that time COWBOY thought he could fly on the roof... And the times that DAMASO was... a DAMASO!! SHOOTS HARADA
23. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 8 (57%)
24. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.36 14 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 7 (50%)
25. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 14 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 12 (86%)
26. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 14 0.43 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 11 (79%)

Gene Harada: CARP22, Spring 2008     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Carpentry
Course: CARP 22 - Concrete Form Construct Crn (Section): 16242 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 16 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (31%) 11 (69%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 16 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (38%) 10 (63%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 16 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (38%) 10 (63%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 16 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (25%) 12 (75%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 16 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (50%) 8 (50%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 16 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (31%) 11 (69%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 10 (67%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 16 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (38%) 10 (63%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 16 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 3 (19%) 12 (75%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.31 16 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 7 (44%) 7 (44%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.81 16 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (19%) 13 (81%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 16 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 2 (13%) 13 (81%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 10 (67%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 16 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (25%) 12 (75%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 16 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (25%) 11 (69%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 16 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 5 (31%) 9 (56%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   A   B   C   D   F  
4.63 16 0.62 Freq(%) 11 (69%) 4 (25%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
more matirials and new matirials
no need to change already.
nothing
none
I don't think I would change anything in this course. The teachers lessons were well taught.
i would do a practical before every test. this would happen every once in a while and when it did, i understood the subject a lot more clearer.
NOTHING
nothing
Nothing.
Making all the students work together as one instead of observing only a few working constantly.
N/A
give the students more confidance
None that I can think of
none
i would have lecture time and talk about the subject, and not make distractions when the students are taking tests. The prgram is great.
more time
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
good!
he teaches very well.
tricks of the trades
okay
I think his teaching lessons are well explained.
the teacher was very cool in showing us methods in a way for our generation to understand yet explain how to doo things properly with quality
HIS TEACHING METHODS WAS CLEAR ON VERY UNDERSTANDING
knows what he is talking about.
Very good and understanding.
Great guy from a military stand point. Good instructor to learn from.
Superior
good motivation
The practicals are evry helpful and helps the students understand the materials better.
good
-- snipped --
good
* Showing 15 out of 16 survey responses.

 

21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
yes, almost every day
yes.I got some skills from him.
yes
yes
Yes he has.
i have learned a lot with the knowledge mr. harada knows
YES
yes
Yes ,a lot.
Yes
Yes
yes
Yes
so-so
yes, i learned alot of stuff that i did not know
yes i learned alot
22. Other comments:
:D
keep going!! Thanks a lot, Mr.!! oh,Mr.Harada!!
none
none
NONE
n/a
none.
Nothing
N/A
n/a
good work
nope
23. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.56 16 1.03 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (19%) 12 (75%)
24. I enjoyed this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.19 16 1.17 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 3 (19%) 3 (19%) 9 (56%)
25. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 16 1.03 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (31%) 10 (63%)
26. The lab sections were a valuable part of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.44 16 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 3 (19%) 11 (69%)

Gene Harada: CARP41, Fall 2007     Back to top

Campus: Hawaii Community College Department: Carpentry
Course: CARP 41 - Rough Framing/Ext Finish Crn (Section): 15130 (0)    
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.71 14 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%)
2. Course objectives were met.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 14 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 4 (29%) 8 (57%)
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 8 (57%)
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 14 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%)
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 14 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 9 (64%)
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 14 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 2 (14%) 10 (71%)
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 14 0.94 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 9 (64%)
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 14 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%)
9. The instructor was always prepared.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 14 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%)
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 14 0.91 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 7 (50%)
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.86 14 0.36 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 12 (86%)
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 14 0.43 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 11 (79%)
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 10 (71%)
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 14 1.14 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 8 (57%)
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 14 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 10 (71%)
16. The instructor graded fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 14 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (14%) 4 (29%) 8 (57%)
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 14 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 10 (71%)
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   A   B   C   D   F  
4.64 14 0.84 Freq(%) 11 (79%) 2 (14%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%)
19. If you were teaching this course: a. What would you do to improve it? b. What would you change?
nothing
none
If I was the teacher, I would ask for extending working hours. Class time is to short.
nothing
I wouldn't change anything
nothing
n/a
i wouldnt change any thing at all.
nothing
i would change my atitude towards the students and i would not critizes the students
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
the methods were clear.
very good
He is a wonderful person. If you want to learn, he there for you.
great teacher
He teaches very well
complicating but understandable
he has good teaching methods
His methods was very helpful.
nothing
Even though it's not par and parcel for the type of subject being thought, encouragement should be more forthcoming especially with students who just don't get it! Your method of teaching is very good for getting student's ready for a workplace environme
-- snipped --
* Showing 10 out of 11 survey responses.

 

21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
he always has contributed to job learning skills.
yes
yes
He has contributed to my general knowledge and job skills.
yes 100% is credited to my insturctor
Yes he did
yes
yes
Mr. Harada contributed a lot to my job skills.
yes
yes very much
You were great at teaching the class real world/work environments!!! Kudo's to you!!! Eventhough they didn't get it yet.....they will remember you when they finally get jobs!!!
yes and no some of the knowledge is helpful and some wernt
22. Other comments:
none
Job well done.
great teacher and very understanding
None
none
I loved your class and your humor...keep up the great work!!! Hopefully I will be able to retain some of the wisdoms that you have given me and continue to dable in this great field!
-- snipped --
* Showing 6 out of 7 survey responses.

 

23. I learned to recognize quality work in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 14 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (21%) 10 (71%)
24. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 14 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 12 (86%)