|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.64 |
22 |
0.66 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (9%) |
4 (18%) |
16 (73%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
22 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
5 (23%) |
14 (64%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.45 |
22 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
6 (27%) |
13 (59%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
20 |
0.68 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (10%) |
4 (20%) |
14 (70%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
21 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (24%) |
2 (10%) |
14 (67%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.52 |
21 |
0.81 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (19%) |
2 (10%) |
15 (71%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
21 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
3 (14%) |
15 (71%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
21 |
0.66 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (10%) |
3 (14%) |
16 (76%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.45 |
20 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (15%) |
5 (25%) |
12 (60%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.35 |
20 |
0.81 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (20%) |
5 (25%) |
11 (55%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.52 |
21 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
4 (19%) |
14 (67%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
21 |
0.68 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (10%) |
5 (24%) |
14 (67%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.52 |
21 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
4 (19%) |
14 (67%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.57 |
21 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
3 (14%) |
15 (71%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.48 |
21 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
5 (24%) |
13 (62%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.52 |
21 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (14%) |
4 (19%) |
14 (67%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.58 |
19 |
0.69 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
4 (21%) |
13 (68%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
F |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| 4.81 |
16 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (19%) |
13 (81%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| nothing it all was okay and didnmt have no problems. |
| nothing |
| Nothing |
| If I were teaching the course I wouldn't change anything major. |
| nothing |
| everything was real good. |
| i wouldnt really change anything, because i found that this class was really helpful and it taught me alot. |
| the course is fine as is |
| a. In working in the different stations-assign people to specific tasks and make rotations so that everyone has a chance to perform different assessment tasks |
| nothing |
| Nothing, the instructors are doing a great job |
| improve nothing |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| the teachers methods was alright. |
| good but could be a little more patient |
| They were clear and helpful... |
| good |
| I think that the teacher and his methods are helpful and are understandable in learning what we are doing. |
| good |
| it's real well and understandable. |
| i think that his teaching methods were gewd because not only did he just teach us the materialbut he also had storys and jokes to go with it to keep our attention |
| its very olden style. but it does get the point across. |
| there teaching method was effective and helped me learn and figure out what i needed in the kitchen |
| He's a very chanllenging in instructor that pushes myself and fellow students to our limits |
| The instructor has been teaching for so long (no offense) that he has had time to perfect his teaching skills that his methods are very effective. |
| awsome |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| yes they have contributed to my learning a lot. |
| yes |
| Very much so... |
| it's kind of intersting for me
because,i could study about food in the different view,America. |
| Yes the teacher has because what we learn in the classroom is what we will be able to aply to a job because we are put in that situation. |
| yes |
| yes, a lot!! i can't beleive how much i learned in the first semester |
| yes because before this class i only really new the basic kind stuff, but now i feel like i can do so much more and i know alot more then what i starte dwith. |
| yes, greatly. a lot of things that we learned in his class were very helpful and will help with future employment. |
| Yes, the environment that they provide enables students to perform in ways that of real world job skills |
| yes i expanded my knowledge of cooking |
| Yes |
| yes she/he has |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| None... |
| everything is new for me as well food acnowledge and english stuff through class. |
| N/A |
| i really like this program and really appreciate the instructors. |
| NONE |
| none |
| no comment |
|
