|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 2.13 |
8 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
2 (25%) |
3 (38%) |
3 (38%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
7. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (50%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Just being in class, listening and doing activities was fun. |
| The japanese |
| the way that the class was run. it made learning japanese fun. |
| Communicating in class was most helpful because using a new language orally for me helps me
learn it. |
| The powerpoints were great for in class and made a huge difference when studying for exams |
| EVERYTHING. Each lesson was taught at the right time in the right intervals. |
|
|
9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| N/A |
| Nothing |
| i think that everything in this class is valuable. |
| -- snipped -- |
* Showing 3 out of 4 survey responses.
|
|
10. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
11. The instructor is friendly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
12. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
14. The course objectives were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
15. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
16. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
17. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
18. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
19. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
|
| Pretty darn good. |
| A very good teacher of Japanese. |
| he is a fun teacher and makes me want to learn more. |
| He is a good teacher. He keeps students in check while at the same time keeping the class work and
homework at a decent amount. Very well balanced. |
| Great professor who is still young enough to relate to the everyday life of a student. Best professor this semester, by far. |
| ã??ã??ã??ã??ã??ã??ã??ã??ã?§ã?? |
| Amazing professor. Enjoyed class and learned a lot! He took a difficult language and made learning it easier and more fun |
|
|
20. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (50%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
21. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
22. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
23. Other comments:
|
| Very merciful grader and easygoing instructor. An ideal JPN 101 sensei. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 1.7 |
10 |
1.25 |
Freq(%) |
6 (60%) |
3 (30%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (40%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
7. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| I liked the in-class practice sessions. This helped develope more confidence in speaking the language. |
| Learning new phrases and such |
| Really enjoyed the class - oral communication class seemed to help with understanding grammar rules a bit better than previous Japanese classes taken in elementary/intermediate/high school. Definitely helped with being able to communicate and form sentences better. Role playing and having a communication partner was effective. |
| Oral communications |
| every thing, teaching ,practice, and the way Mr Kubota teach is really good |
| Everything |
| Culture and application of language |
|
|
9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| I do not like how the textbook did not provide all of the vocabulary words used in the listening excerices. It is difficult to understand and gather meaning from words that are not in the textbook. Many times, I had to search on google just to find the definitions. |
| I don't know... |
| N/A |
| Planning and organization |
| None |
| none |
|
|
10. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
11. The instructor is friendly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
12. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
14. The course objectives were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
3 (30%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
15. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
4 (40%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
16. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.3 |
10 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
3 (30%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
17. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.7 |
10 |
0.48 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
18. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
1 (13%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
19. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
|
| -- snipped -- |
| Great teacher |
| a fun smart kind of guy who is also understanding. |
| Made a good teacher, was flexible and available to students during and after class. Readily explained cultural and grammatical notes and was able to answer questions students posed. Would recommend having him teach another Japanese class whether it be the same one or a different course level. Encouraged students and also made students feel comfortable with the language even if they were having difficulties. |
| Amazing |
| Great teacher, really improved my Japanese, loved his class, super nice teacher |
| Great!!!!! |
* Showing 6 out of 7 survey responses.
|
|
20. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
21. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
22. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
1 (13%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
23. Other comments:
|
| I liked his class... |
| Really enjoyed the course - enjoyed it much more than the previous Japanese classes taken in secondary school. Definitely got more out of this course and has seen improvement in being able to converse in Japanese. |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.79 |
14 |
0.43 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (21%) |
11 (79%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.93 |
14 |
0.27 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
13 (93%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (38%) |
8 (62%) |
|
|
4. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.85 |
13 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
11 (85%) |
|
|
5. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Learning Japanese. More specifically, the different tenses and how to conjugate. Also Kubota-sensei was open to random questions and would sometimes reply even if it was late at night. |
| learned at a good pace
but it did get harder and harder throughout the semester
everything i learned was pretty valuable |
| I believe everything was the valuable in my case. I believe all the moments he taught teaching us and communicating with us helped us grow more interesting in Japanese as a language. |
| I could learn basic grammar and expression through this class |
| Kubota's interest in his students. He was always willing to help when ever needed. His use of
Power point presentations was really useful and made it easy to study at home. |
| The in-class exercises helped me a lot. |
| Every part of it. The way Kubota approached teaching us a new language in
reading, writing, and speaking was easy to understand and fun to learn. I
learned a lot. |
| The activities were a good way to practice sentence structures. Excellent visuals helped in understanding material. Review sessions were helpful in preparing for the lesson quizzes. |
| The powerpoint slides were very helpful because he posted them every night on Laulima and we were able to reference them while we studied for our tests. |
| The professor was really helpful during office hours. He explained things well. |
| The most valuable aspect of the course were the lectures. It was very interactive and fun that I
enjoyed coming to class everyday. In addition, the lectures were important because each day there
was a new lesson and I always learned something that can be useful for the test or orals. |
|
|
6. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| Can't think of anything. |
| i do wish i learned more conversational japanese |
| Nothing was not valuable in this class. Everything we learned showed up somewhere in test or quizzes or exams. Everthing was very useful. |
| i don't think so |
| Sometimes I felt that in class practice deemed useless. Not because it was a bad teaching
tool it was that most of the time you would have one student who wanted to practice but their
partner did not. |
| .... |
| None. Everything we learned and all of the tools and handouts that were given to us were extremely useful. |
| None. |
| Many of the aspects in this course are important, so I can't pinpoint any unvaluable aspect. I believe
that all the aspects of the course are equally important in order to get a better understanding of
Japanese and to get the most out of the course. |
|
|
7. The instructor is friendly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.93 |
14 |
0.27 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
13 (93%) |
|
|
8. The instructor is permissive and flexible.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
14 |
0.36 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (14%) |
12 (86%) |
|
|
9. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.93 |
14 |
0.27 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
13 (93%) |
|
|
10. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
14 |
0.36 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (14%) |
12 (86%) |
|
|
11. The course objectives were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.79 |
14 |
0.43 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (21%) |
11 (79%) |
|
|
12. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.79 |
14 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
12 (86%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
14 |
0.36 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (14%) |
12 (86%) |
|
|
14. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
14 |
0.36 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (14%) |
12 (86%) |
|
|
15. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
|
| Type-O looks, Type-AB personality. xD |
| understanding
good teacher |
| He is friendly because always comes into class saying "konnichiwa". He always comes into class with a good mood. He makes funny jokes to make class more interesting. He is also very easy to be around and is very understanding of beginners in the language. |
| available and friendly |
| He is by far the best teacher I have ever had. Always willing to help and his attitude in class
made you want to come to class. |
| Friendly, enthusiastic, informative |
| fun, appropriately challenging |
| funny
Awesome |
| Very enthusiastic. |
| Friendly, knowledgeable, and enthusiastic. |
| Fun, knowledgeable, personable |
| Helpful, friendly |
| friendly, entertaining, and understanding |
|
|
16. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.92 |
13 |
0.28 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
12 (92%) |
|
|
17. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
|
| Very good teacher. Would definitely take his class again if I ever have the chance (without failing of course). |
| great teacher |
| I would always recommend him to other students to take his Japanese 101 class. He's funny, friendly, happy, easy to talk and cares. You could say I see him as a perfect teacher. |
| he is abailable and good at teaching |
| Overall review is excellent. I really wish he was my professor next semester. It is sad that UH
is losing such a fine teacher and overall good person. |
| I would definitely recommend this professor to others. |
| GOOOOooooood |
| He is a great teacher. He helps his students and gives many great and funny examples of each
thing he teaches. He is available everyday after school or via email. and always make an effort to
help his students. |
| Very good teacher. He makes sure everything taught is understandable and his class is very well-organized. Very friendly, makes the class fun and interesting everyday. |
| He is a great teacher and if he were not leaving to go back to Japan, I would definitely sign up to take another Japanese language course with him. He is a passionate instructor who really wants to help those willing to further their knowledge of the Japanese language and culture. I would highly recommend him as a teacher and anyone who takes his class in the future will learn a lot! |
| Very good teacher. My interest grew. |
| Nobuo Kubota is a great Japanese teacher. He's very knowledgeable about the Japanese language
that he could answer many of the questions we had in class. Even the random things that we were
just curious about. In addition, he was always willing to help students outside of class hours in order
to do better on tests or orals. Lastly, I like that he is a very understanding teacher because there
were times that I had conflicts that I had to take care of and couldn't come to class. Overall, Nobuo
Kubota is an awesome teacher and I would highly recommend him to other students that are
interested in learning about the Japanese language. |
|
|
18. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.79 |
14 |
0.43 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (21%) |
11 (79%) |
|
|
19. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.93 |
14 |
0.27 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
13 (93%) |
|
|
20. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.92 |
13 |
0.28 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
12 (92%) |
|
|
21. Other comments:
|
| He needs other costumes besides Buddha and Mario for Halloween! |
| If it were not for Kubota I do believe I would have given up on learning Japanese but his
attitude and eagerness to help gave me the faith that I could learn this hard language. I am
glad I decided to stick it out and meet with him on a regular basis. He always answered emails
in a timely manner. He took his job as a sensei very seriously. Hope to see him again in the
future. |
| Keep doing what your doing. |
| My first semester of Japanese was unforgettable. I had a lot of fun while learning about Japanese in
class. Sensei Kubota inspired me to work harder and to not give up on learning the Japanese
language. Thank you for all the great memories, have fun in Japan, and I hope to see you again in
the future. (: |
|