eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Hannah Miyamoto

Available Survey Results

SOC362, WS362, Summer II 2011
SOC362, WS362, Summer II 2010

Hannah Miyamoto: SOC362, WS362, Summer II 2011

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Sociology
Course: SOC 362 - Sociology of Gender Crn (Section): 91701 (701)    
Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Women's Studies Program
Course: WS 362 - Sociology of Gender Crn (Section): 92091 (701)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 3 1.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
5. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
6. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (67%)
7. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 3 2.0 Freq(%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%)
8. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 3 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%) 1 (33%)
9. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 3 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
10. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
I liked the videos which was provided by professor. I really enjoyed them.
11. What changes would you make in the lectures?
more organization would be beneficial. seemed like there was no direction
12. What changes would you make in the readings?
No survey responses were found.
13. What changes would you make in the discussion sections?
again, more oraganization. discussions didn't have much direction
14. Comment on the physical environment of the classroom (space, noise, lighting, seating, etc.)
It's a bit noisy in the class room because of construction, sometimes it disturbs my concentration.
the move to the smaller room was helpful to learning.
15. What changes would you make in the writing assignments?
I learned how to use the materials effectively, it helped me a lot.
I would eliminate it all together. It didn't seem to pertain to the course material at all. A short paper each week as a reaction to the topics covered in class that week would have been more effective in retaining course information.
16. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
I think that it's a bit noisy in the classroom and sometimes people passes by; it disturbs my attention sometimes. The door can be closed or classes can be held in other room.
A more organized approach to the material would help in retention and also with overall interest in discussion topics. Also I think an evaluation of the teacher's methods and teaching styles is necessary.

Hannah Miyamoto: SOC362, WS362, Summer II 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Sociology
Course: SOC 362 - Sociology of Gender Crn (Section): 92031 (701)    
Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Women's Studies Program
Course: WS 362 - Sociology of Gender Crn (Section): 92179 (701)    
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.92 12 1.24 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 5 (42%)
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 12 1.24 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 1 (33%) 3 (25%) 2 (67%)
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.67 12 1.56 Freq(%) 2 (17%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 3 (25%) 3 (100%)
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.58 12 1.38 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 3 (25%) 4 (33%)
5. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 3 1.15 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%)
6. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 3 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 7 (58%)
7. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.58 12 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 2 (67%)
8. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.83 12 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (33%) 1 (33%)
9. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.08 12 1.44 Freq(%) 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 0 (0%) 8 (67%)
10. Other comments:
I was offended that she would open our textbook, relying on the terms and concepts in order to continue her lecture. She should have had a powerpoint lecture for every class period.
She's doing her best as teaching. She's good in lecturing and getting to the point of what she's lecturing about.
-- snipped --
It was a good class.
very animated however much of the time off topic
I believe Hannah was able to utilize many different media to convey certain topics within the course. Overall a very interesting course!
Hannah Miyamoto is one of the best professors i have ever studied under. Not only is she knowledgeable about the course she has a way of not having to repeat herself ever because she connects to her students and genuinely informs us perfectly.
n/a
I enjoyed her class a lot. The teacher was fun and knowledgeable and shared many things with us. Overall, the course was really good. However,I was confused about quiz dates and the course felt a little unorganized.
* Showing 8 out of 9 survey responses.