|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
3 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.67 |
3 |
1.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
|
|
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
3 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
|
|
5. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
3 |
1.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
3 |
1.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
7. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.0 |
3 |
2.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
|
|
8. The instructor sets high standards for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
3 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
|
|
9. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
3 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
2 (67%) |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| I liked the videos which was provided by professor. I really enjoyed them. |
|
|
11. What changes would you make in the lectures?
|
| more organization would be beneficial. seemed like there was no direction |
|
|
12. What changes would you make in the readings?
|
| No survey responses were found. |
|
|
13. What changes would you make in the discussion sections?
|
| again, more oraganization. discussions didn't have much direction |
|
|
14. Comment on the physical environment of the classroom (space, noise, lighting, seating, etc.)
|
| the move to the smaller room was helpful to learning. |
| It's a bit noisy in the class room because of construction, sometimes it disturbs my concentration. |
|
|
15. What changes would you make in the writing assignments?
|
| I would eliminate it all together. It didn't seem to pertain to the course material at all. A short paper each week as a reaction to the topics covered in class that week would have been more effective in retaining course information. |
| I learned how to use the materials effectively, it helped me a lot. |
|
|
16. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
|
| A more organized approach to the material would help in retention and also with overall interest in discussion topics. Also I think an evaluation of the teacher's methods and teaching styles is necessary. |
| I think that it's a bit noisy in the classroom and sometimes people passes by; it disturbs my attention sometimes. The door can be closed or classes can be held in other room. |
|
|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
15 |
1.19 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (20%) |
3 (20%) |
8 (53%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.67 |
15 |
1.23 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
5 (33%) |
3 (20%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.93 |
15 |
1.49 |
Freq(%) |
2 (13%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
3 (20%) |
8 (53%) |
|
|
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.8 |
15 |
1.32 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
2 (13%) |
4 (27%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
5. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.73 |
15 |
1.22 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
4 (27%) |
4 (27%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
15 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
3 (20%) |
10 (67%) |
|
|
7. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.67 |
15 |
1.23 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
5 (33%) |
3 (20%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
8. The instructor sets high standards for students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.93 |
15 |
0.8 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (33%) |
6 (40%) |
4 (27%) |
|
|
9. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
15 |
1.33 |
Freq(%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (73%) |
|
|
10. Other comments:
|
| Hannah Miyamoto is one of the best professors i have ever studied under. Not only is she
knowledgeable about the course she has a way of not having to repeat herself ever because she
connects to her students and genuinely informs us perfectly. |
| very animated however much of the time off topic |
| It was a good class. |
| I was offended that she would open our textbook, relying on the terms and concepts in order to
continue her lecture. She should have had a powerpoint lecture for every class period. |
| I believe Hannah was able to utilize many different media to convey certain topics within the course. Overall a very interesting course! |
| She's doing her best as teaching. She's good in lecturing and getting to the point of what she's lecturing about. |
| -- snipped -- |
| I enjoyed her class a lot. The teacher was fun and knowledgeable and shared
many things with us. Overall, the course was really good. However,I was
confused about quiz dates and the course felt a little unorganized. |
| n/a |
* Showing 8 out of 9 survey responses.
|
