University of Hawai'i eCAFE

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

Instructor: Rachel Lindsey

Available Survey Results

KRS 493, Fall 2009
KLS 420, Fall 2008

Rachel Lindsey: KRS 493, Fall 2009

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Kinesiology & Rehab Science
Course:	KRS 493 - AT Practicum III	Crn (Section):	78418 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

4. I developed a set of overall values in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)

5. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

6. This course was helpful in developing new skills.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

7. I performed up to my potential in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)

8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

The most valuable aspects of the course were being able to review previously covered material in a more in depth manner. This allows more practice time, time for questions, and hopefully enables students to retain more information.

9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

In regards to our graduate program the established criteria are quite restrictive and voluminous. It is challenging to say that the amount of instruction time and methods of evaluation actually reflect students learning and knowledge of material.

10. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

11. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

12. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

13. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)

14. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

15. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)

16. The instructor keeps students informed of their progress.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)

17. The objectives of the course were clearly explained.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)

18. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

19. The instructor sets high standards for students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

20. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

The instructor could try to provide a better framework in regards to a class schedule, content covered, and evaluation criteria.

21. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Passionate, knowledgeable, and sincere.

22. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
5.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)

23. I feel that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

24. The exams gave students an opportunity to demonstrate what they had learned.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	2	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (100%)	0 (0%)

25. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

26. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.5	2	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (50%)	1 (50%)

27. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.

This course could be improved by providing a syllabus that more accurately describes what topics will be covered throughout the class schedule. It could also be improved by breaking broad topics down into a more manageable size and stating specific criteria for evaluation.

Rachel Lindsey: KLS 420, Fall 2008 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Kinesiology & Leisure Science
Course:	KLS 420 - Lower Extremity Assessment	Crn (Section):	72665 (001)

1. Class Level (pick one)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Freshman	Sophomore	Junior	Senior	Grad	Other
4.11	9	0.93	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (33%)	2 (22%)	4 (44%)	0 (0%)

2. Course

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Elective	Required
2.0	8	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	8 (100%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.78	9	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (22%)	7 (78%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	9	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (33%)	6 (67%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

6. I developed a set of overall values in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

7. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	9	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (33%)	6 (67%)

8. This course was helpful in developing new skills.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	9	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (33%)	6 (67%)

9. I performed up to my potential in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	9	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (11%)	4 (44%)	4 (44%)

10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

EVERYTHING

The course format and organization were most valuable. Knowing the manner in which topics would be presented and being consistent with that method was helpful.

The labs helped apply the lecture material.

The injury evaluation labs and other labs gave us a hands on learning experience

The valuable aspects of this course was having the lab days where you are conducting a mock scenerio and you have to conduct an evaluation on a patient. The quizes on the anatomy helps to make sure you know it because that's the most important part to know exactly what you are testing. The demonstrations of the evaluative tests were very helpful.

11. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

Most aspects of the course were valuable. I am unable to identify any part of the course that was less valuable than another.

none

12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	9	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (33%)	6 (67%)

13. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.78	9	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (22%)	7 (78%)

14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	9	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (33%)	6 (67%)

15. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

16. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.73	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (11%)	2 (22%)	6 (67%)

17. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

18. The instructor keeps students informed of their progress.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

19. The objectives of the course were clearly explained.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

20. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

21. The instructor sets high standards for students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

22. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

DOESN'T NEED IMPROVEMENT

The instructor can improve the teaching of the course by oulining course assignments and providing them early on in the semester.

Be just a little more understanding. Some students have more experience than others and you forgot at times. The effort was definitely there, but there is much room for improvement.

none

23. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

SHE'S AWESOME

Consistent, non-partial, and helpful.

knowledgeable experienced

helpful, knowledgable

knowledgeable, helpful

24. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.67	9	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (33%)	6 (67%)

25. I feel that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

26. The exams gave students an opportunity to demonstrate what they had learned.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

27. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

28. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

29. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.

DOESN'T NEED IMPROVEMENT

This course could be improved by outlining and providing assignments at the beginning of the semester. It could also be improved by providing practice exams.

Organize the lab time better. They were not clearly listed on the syllabus and it was still expected that we know when they were scheduled.

none