eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Ying Liu

Available Survey Results

Ying Liu: BUS310, Fall 2009

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Information Technology Mgt
Course: BUS 310 - Stat Analysis for Bus Decision Crn (Section): 70637 (005)     70638 (006)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.32 34 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 23 (68%) 17 (53%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
2.0 31 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 31 (97%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 35 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 13 (41%) 19 (59%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.35 31 0.66 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 14 (45%) 14 (45%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.91 32 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (3%) 3 (9%) 4 (12%) 12 (38%) 15 (44%)
6. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.97 32 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 3 (9%) 7 (22%) 10 (31%) 12 (38%)
7. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.54 35 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 10 (32%) 22 (63%)
8. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 32 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 6 (17%) 13 (37%) 15 (43%)
9. The instructor has been helpful whenever I have encountered difficulties.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 34 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 6 (18%) 27 (79%)
10. The objectives of the course were clearly explained.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.51 35 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 5 (16%) 12 (34%) 21 (60%)
11. In general, the course was well organized.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 35 0.6 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 10 (29%) 23 (66%)
12. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.43 35 0.98 Freq(%) 1 (3%) 2 (6%) 0 (0%) 10 (29%) 17 (53%)
13. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.37 35 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 16 (46%) 16 (46%)
14. I am generally pleased with the materials (texts, handouts) required for this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.28 32 0.81 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (22%) 12 (34%) 16 (50%)
15. Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.66 35 0.64 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (17%) 21 (66%)