|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 1.9 |
10 |
0.99 |
Freq(%) |
4 (40%) |
4 (40%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.4 |
10 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
6 (60%) |
4 (40%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
6. What did you like best about the course?
|
| I like working with partners in class. It really helps me gain more in terms of speaking Japanese and it reenforces the material we go over. |
| Forte Sensei had an extremely agreeable manner. I enjoyed his lectures and discussions. Frankly, he
knew what he was talking about and had the excitement to get us interested at 7:30 in the
morning, which is commendable on all levels really. |
| It was fun and interesting, and it moved at a good pace. |
| He was really patient with us. That being said I really enjoyed the examples that he used and the context of the program. |
| Everything |
| The instructor gave very helpful descriptions of what to do and helped the whole class work on their
grammar and reading throughout the class. He did not leave out anyone and helped each person
with anything they were struggling to do. |
| I enjoyed this class and just about everything about it. |
| That it was fun. And that he did a good job explaining the language. |
| I really enjoyed the discussions with Forte sensei. He was clear and got right down to the
point |
|
|
7. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| Not much because you got everyone involved and tried to help the students. We all are at different levels and Sean understands this. |
| I have no complaints on his methodology. My only issues are with the department and their ways of
handling second language education. |
| Having review sessions before, I felt that having to put everything that we learned together was slightly intimidating. |
| I think he just has to continue what he is doing. |
| He was cool, he is a good listener and not judgmental. He is a good teacher. |
| No improvements needed |
|
|
8. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
9. I learned to value new viewpoints.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
10 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
6 (60%) |
3 (30%) |
|
|
10. I try to relate what I learn in this course to my own experience.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (50%) |
5 (50%) |
|
|
11. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| I think the cultural aspects were most valuable. Learning when to use a word for different types of situations helped me understand the material better. |
| Grammer certainly. |
| Practicing communication skills and communicating with peers. |
| Learning the grammar was interesting, I also enjoyed learning about adjectives and verbs towards the end of the class. With that said, the lesson about food and how to order was the most fun for me. |
| Everything |
| The grammar help and learning of new words and phrases not already in the textbook. |
| Understanding everyday conversations with Japanese tourists at work and signs around Hawaii. |
| The grammar |
| Discussions, group practice, oral practice |
|
|
12. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| Nothing because all aspects were valuable. The writing, speaking, and reading is something Japanese learners need to become efficient. |
| Nothing was invaluable; as it shouldn't be in a language course. |
| I thought that some of the movies and clips were old and I could not relate to them. |
| Nothing that I can think off. Everything pretty much had value to it when learning a new language
for the first time. |
| None |
|
|
13. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
14. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
15. The course objectives were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
16. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (100%) |
|
|
17. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (100%) |
|
|
18. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
19. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
20. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
|
|
21. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
22. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
23. Other comments:
|
| Good Job Sensei and ã?©ã??ã??ã??ã??ã??ã?¨ï¼? |
| Forte Sensei has done an exceptional job. If he is reading this, I want to personally thank him for
his help this semester and for his constant upbeat attitude. |
| Excellent class and teacher. |
| I would love to take more classes from Forte Sensei in the future |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 2.46 |
13 |
1.13 |
Freq(%) |
3 (23%) |
4 (31%) |
3 (23%) |
3 (23%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.46 |
13 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
7 (54%) |
6 (46%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
13 |
0.28 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
12 (92%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.69 |
13 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
10 (77%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.69 |
13 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
10 (77%) |
|
|
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.31 |
13 |
1.11 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (23%) |
8 (62%) |
|
|
7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| We were given lots of opportunities to practice the different sentence
structures, vocabulary, and grammar. |
| The worksheets with the grammar points on them were very helpful. Sensei also gave very
good examples using words and grammar pertinent to the material. |
| Forte sensei was very effective in teaching the basics of Japanese language. If there were any subjects that students had trouble with, he spent the time to thoroughly explain it. |
| Grammar, communication, pair work, Kanjis, and particles. |
| The lectures and in-class practice and activities were all great. I also enjoyed the small class size
and that the people in the class were all friendly. |
| Learning the vocab and kanji. |
| Japanese is second language to him he knows perfect way to teach the language |
| This 101 course summarized what I learned in 3 years of Japanese back in high school. While the speed was relatively quick, I still maintained a good grade in the class. I think all of the materials in the Jap101 course were valuable. |
| The vocabulary and grammar |
| Learning hiragana and katakana. |
| - Helped evaluate my interest in the Japanese language and culture
- Helped strengthen my understanding of other cultures and languages
- Helped me communicate with my peers |
| The in-class practice, he really made us interact. It was always for better.
The random pairing allowed us to strengthen our skills in speaking Japanese.
We got alot of practice for most of our oral exams, which really helped, this
is something that should be continued. |
|
|
8. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| The extra side notes were a nice addition, but they could be overwhelming at times. Also, I felt
that there was very little time spent in trying to memorize the vocabulary outside of verbs or
adjectives. I sometimes felt like there were too many grammar points at once as well. The
textbook wasn't very relevant either. |
| nothing. |
| SD Homework. I learned much more from the worksheets than I did from those things. |
| n/a |
| All aspects of the course were useful in daily Japanese speaking situations. |
| None |
| Everything was valuable. |
| -- snipped -- |
| There should be practice lesson quizs that shows the format of the actually
lesson quiz to avoid shocks. Class was too short 50 minutes is not long
enough, it should be 75 minutes. |
* Showing 8 out of 9 survey responses.
|
|
9. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.54 |
13 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
2 (15%) |
9 (69%) |
|
|
10. The instructor's voice was clear and understandable.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.77 |
13 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (23%) |
10 (77%) |
|
|
11. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.85 |
13 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
11 (85%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.62 |
13 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (23%) |
9 (69%) |
|
|
13. The course objectives were clear.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.77 |
13 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (23%) |
10 (77%) |
|
|
14. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.54 |
13 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
2 (15%) |
9 (69%) |
|
|
15. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.85 |
13 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
11 (85%) |
|
|
16. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.23 |
13 |
1.09 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (23%) |
1 (8%) |
8 (62%) |
|
|
17. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| I think he did a wonderful job in teaching this class. I can't think of
anything that he could do to make this class any better. |
| Jump from grammar point to grammar point less. Maybe keep it to one grammar point at a
time before mentioning others and then coming back to the original one. Over all I thought this
course was very good. A little dry sometimes though. I had grown accustomed to playing
games and learning silly pneumonic devices to learn vocabulary and grammar, so I think
including some of those would also be beneficial. They would also engage the class more. |
| He was excellent, it would be hard to improve. |
| I liked the random things that made going to class everyday different and new. The presentations
that were done were all interesting. Do more of them! Other than that nothing. Good Job! |
| Do some more kanji practice in class. |
| more fun way. do some activities. confidence :) |
| Perhaps set a firm time limit in midterm/final oral evaluation. Also, for lesson oral evaluations, since every pair of students are speaking at the same time, I think it's hard for the instructor to realize if the pair of students did all the requirements from the oral evaluation. For example, if the oral evaluation asked student A to act as person X in the dialogue in round 1, and then act as person Y in round 2. It would be hard for the instructor to realize if student A has only been acting as person X in the dialogue, and totally omitted person Y's role. |
| he can add some field trip and add some extra credits |
| Learning new material at a slower pace. Not moving on to the next lesson so quickly. |
| -- snipped -- |
| There should be practice lesson quizs that shows the format of the actually
lesson quiz to avoid shocks. |
* Showing 10 out of 11 survey responses.
|
|
18. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.54 |
13 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (15%) |
2 (15%) |
9 (69%) |
|
|
19. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.23 |
13 |
1.17 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
4 (31%) |
7 (54%) |
|
|
20. Exams are reasonable in length and difficulty.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.77 |
13 |
1.54 |
Freq(%) |
2 (15%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (23%) |
6 (46%) |
|
|
21. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.38 |
13 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (23%) |
8 (62%) |
|
|
22. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.38 |
13 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (23%) |
8 (62%) |
|
|
23. Other comments:
|
| Forte Sensei is a wonderful teacher who helped re-ignite my interest for the
Japanese language. He is very enthusiastic and knowledgeable about the
Japanese language, as well as the culture. I kinda wish he could be my
teacher for all the Japanese language classes. If anyone had to take this
course I would absolutely recommend Forte Sensei's class. |
| Hmm I think I said everything already. Thanks for the great semester! |
| Great communication, the emails to student who weren't at class saved them when they were sick or couldn't make it to class. He was also very attentive to his email answering questions via email all the time. |
| Why can't we choose our teachers for Japanese 102... |
| Sean Forte did an excellent job in encouraging his students to learn and to
practice. He was an entertaining teacher and kept us well engaged in the
class. |
| I would say I was focused in the class 90% of the time. The other 10% I was either too tired since it's a 7:30am class in the morning, and/or the materials in a certain lecture wasn't interesting. I would give Sensei Forte a 9.9/10 in teaching the Jap101 class. |
| Sean Forte was a good instructor with strong knowledge of the Japanese language. |
| -- snipped -- |
| There should be a grading scale for late homework, obviously significantly
lower credit. Is what I first thought. However, I realized the homework
reinforces preparedness for class. Therefore, homework should mostly be
accepted on time. |
* Showing 8 out of 9 survey responses.
|
