|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 2.8 |
5 |
1.64 |
Freq(%) |
1 (20%) |
2 (40%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 2.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| I think because it was such a small class compare to a bigger lecture hall class, I was able to
understand the content better and he was able to focus on each student more which really helped
me a lot in class. |
| I found the concepts leaned to be the most valuable to me. |
| I appreciate how he provided lecture notesn for all classes well in advance so that students have the chance to look over them before each class. These notes were easy to understand and was very useful for exam revisions |
| Wayne Liou's colloquial speech style. and effective use of graphs to simplify powerpoint presentations. Supplemental pdfs on the important terms and their applications. |
| Online notes and lecutres |
|
|
9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| None. |
| occasional oral problems when describing graph dynamics to those who had very little understanding. |
|
|
10. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
5 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
2 (40%) |
2 (40%) |
|
|
11. The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
12. The instructor uses class time well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
5 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
2 (40%) |
2 (40%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
14. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.4 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (60%) |
2 (40%) |
|
|
15. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
16. Exams are reasonable in length and difficulty.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
5 |
1.79 |
Freq(%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
17. The instructor was fair in grading and criteria of grades.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
18. What changes would you make in the lectures?
|
| Nothing really, he's very helpful and really good in teaching the class. |
| Not much. knowledge of different ways to present information will be accumulated over time. |
|
|
19. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
|
| Nothing really, i really like this course and I like it the way it is. |
| Perhaps more revision sessions for those that don't understand certain topics should be held often. |
| The course could benefit from more review sessions and more emphasis on the
application of the lesson material. |
|
|
20. Other comments:
|
| He is an excellent teacher and very well knowledgeable about the course. Very interesting teacher
to listen to. |
| Good quality for summer course. Concise, efficient. |
| Shorter exams. Good coverage of concepts, but there was definitely too much
workable material on the exam to finish in the testing period. |
|
