|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.75 |
4 |
1.26 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
6. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
4 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
2 (50%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| I really gained alot from observing the inside work of how governments deal with foreign affairs publicly and privately. I definitely recomend it for any political science major or any one interested in foreign affairs. |
| I liked the presentations. It offered us a chance to bring in information that wasn't previously
discussed or to discuss about what is going on in the world currently. |
| The variety of the books we covered. The Mead book helped to structure understanding of how policy makers think. |
|
|
8. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| I can't think of one; every piece of knowledge that was introduced held some level of value that pertained to the topics we discuss in class. |
| I would have liked more structure to the lectures. The readings we probably could have done
without as well. |
| Something that can easily be altered: having more structure to the course by having a more chronological approach to the material. |
|
|
9. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
10. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
11. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
12. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
1 (25%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was thoughtful and precise in response to questions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
14. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.0 |
3 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
1 (33%) |
|
|
15. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.25 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
1 (25%) |
|
