|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 5.05 |
19 |
0.23 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
18 (95%) |
1 (5%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.72 |
18 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
5 (28%) |
13 (72%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
18 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
16 (89%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.79 |
19 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (21%) |
15 (79%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.68 |
19 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
4 (21%) |
14 (74%) |
|
|
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
18 |
0.43 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (22%) |
14 (78%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
19 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (47%) |
10 (53%) |
|
|
8. I developed a set of overall values in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
19 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (47%) |
10 (53%) |
|
|
9. I participated actively in class discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.26 |
19 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (16%) |
8 (42%) |
8 (42%) |
|
|
10. I reconsidered many of my former attitudes.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.84 |
19 |
0.96 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
4 (21%) |
8 (42%) |
5 (26%) |
|
|
11. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.26 |
19 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
10 (53%) |
7 (37%) |
|
|
12. I developed a clearer sense of professional identity.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.26 |
19 |
0.56 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
12 (63%) |
6 (32%) |
|
|
13. My opinions about some topics changed because of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
19 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (5%) |
3 (16%) |
10 (53%) |
5 (26%) |
|
|
14. Ten years from now I'll probably remember this course most by ...
|
| how hard I had to work on keeping up with the course requirements. |
| the instructorʻs regular communication with everyone in class, his individualized feedback, and
his expectations of us to be reflective in our work both in class and career, and the reflective
questions he posed for all of us to consider and respond to. |
| The flexibility of the teacher in regards to the submission dates of assignments. |
| ideas and concepts from the course that I will be applying to my current job responsibilities. |
| its focus on developing a stronger philosophy of education, especially as an administrator. |
| the skills I learned to become a more effective school leader/supervisor. |
| ...the readings, discussions and communications provided by my professor and classmates in this course. |
| proper school supervision drives school improvement |
| The dialogue and discussions with other aspiring professionals. |
| the crafting of my educational leadership platform. |
| An opportunity to continue communicating with the people I started this
journey with. |
| the comments and insights I received from classmates. |
| online discussions and learning logs conducted through classroom observations |
| Some of the more challenged conversations. |
| Reading my Educational Platform |
| the understanding of the instructor as well as his ability to support the students' learning. |
| Revising my educational platform so that I continue to remember why I choose to be in the education
field. I'll also remember the posts. |
| How to help teachers conduct student engagement activities via supervising teachers. |
|
|
15. What things did you get from this course that will benefit you personally?
|
| I learned how important time management and organization were to my success in completing an on-line course. |
| - different perspectives of supervision that I had not considered previously
- guided reflection opportunities to review my current role, my progress, and what to consider
when I take my next steps.
- deeper understanding of my role as an instructional leader and supervisor |
| This is the first time that I am learning about the Educational Platform. I never knew that what I belive in and value in relation to education was called the Educational Platform. |
| New ideas about teaching and learning that should be occurred in the classroom. Collaborative school culture where principal and teachers work together to attain school goals and student achievement. |
| I really appreciated the connections I made with some of the other teachers in the course. Although the focus was administration, I'm still currently a teacher, so it was good to hear about information from a teaching perspective and then reflecting on how these situations would impact me as an administrator. |
| Personally, I take away from this course the value of providing feedback to a teacher. As a mentor teacher to UH students doing their OP, I try my best to provide them with positive and constructive feedback so they know what they are doing good and what they can work on to do better. I also have more insight of different methods that administrators use in their practice. Some I would like to use myself, others I would probably tweak to my style. |
| I think that as a new vice principal, it is always a good thing to be exposed to a variety of viewpoints and and insights. The text provided research based information which my professor supported with his personal knowledge and beliefs. |
| A thorough explanation of what it means to be an instructional leader. |
| The opportunity to reflect upon and revise my educational platform. |
| I have a better understanding of the basics of school supervision and the
role that I will play in supervising a school. Through the course, I gained
insights into how school leadership influences teaching and learning. |
| Thinking about deeper personal reflection. |
| collaboration with others helped to clarify my own position on many things. In addition, I was able to network with others in my field. |
| Opportunity to hear multiple persectives on school supervision. |
| Great discussion from a multitude of different teachers from different districs and grade
levels/subject areas. |
| Rich conversations with fellow-students and the professor that tied in with our readings. The discussion topics and assignments could directly be put to practical use. |
| Learning how to respond to classmates contributions so that they do not feel slighted or that we get into
a loud disagreement. Learning with a diverse community required that I spend time learning to
understand other experiences and the resulting perspectives. |
| How to supervise teachers effectively. |
|
|
16. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.58 |
19 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (42%) |
11 (58%) |
|
|
17. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
19 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (47%) |
10 (53%) |
|
|
18. I was able to get individual help when I needed it.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.53 |
19 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11%) |
5 (26%) |
12 (63%) |
|
|
19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
|
| thoughtful, reflective, knowledgeable |
| understanding, flexible, reflective |
| Flexible
Understanding
Passionate |
| An expert, true education leader, very knowledgeable |
| Honest and reflective |
| Patient, understanding, accommodating |
| Knowledgeable-insightful-understanding |
| Prompt, Involved, sympathetic |
| Supportive, Flexible, and Intelligent |
| flexible, thoughtful |
| Knowledgeable Understanding Driver |
| insightful, informed |
| Knowledgeable, flexible, facilitative |
| Helpful, genuine, responsive |
| Supportive, caring and thought-provoking. |
| Organized and Thoughtful |
| Helpful, enthusiastic, very reachable |
|
|
20. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
|
| he was an excellent, hard working, efficient, and effective instructor. He was cognizant of our needs and challenged us to think about the topics we were reading and discussing. |
| I believe Steven is one of the most communicative instructors I have ever had online. I am
only disappointed in myself and my performance as a student as I donʻt believe I met his
expectations to the fullest and am not satisfied with my performance online. Yet he has been
so kind to extend opportunities to me and others so that we could catch up and actively
participate in class. |
| He was a very flexible teacher. |
| An excellent professor, he deserves to be recognized for his outstanding performance. |
| I really appreciated his honesty when dealing with topics rather than just giving us a sugar-coated or diplomatic answer. I also was happy to get lots of feedback and other things to consider throughout the term. |
| an excellent instructor. Dr. Shiraki has a wealth of knowledge and challenges his students to have deeper thought and go beyond the surface of the topic. At the same time, is willing to adjust the course to meet the needs of his students as any true educator would do. He treated all of us fairly no matter what our background is. He has a genuine interest in his students and truly wants to see each and everyone of them succeed. |
| ....if I would grade/evaluate Steven using DOE standards, he would receive a rating of EXCEEDS. |
| Prof. Shirak did the best job he could do with an online distance learning course. He responded to every individual post, which requires an immense understanding of the different needs each student requires as some are teachers, counselors, and practicing principals. |
| Dr. Shiraki is an excellent instructor. He is one whose passion for helping other aspiring professionals should be commended. |
| positive. He understands that the individuals in his class are working
professionals. He does his best to encourage us and accommodate our needs
and schedules. He provided thoughtful probing questions, actively engaged in
our conversations, and provided individual comments. |
| A very good man. The type of person that you become a better person for
having known them. |
| very flexible in understanding the predicament of new administrators and all the demands/responsibilities that we are tasked with. he was willing to accommodate our needs while still maintaining the integrity of the course. |
| that he is an effective Instructor in the online format.He desires his students to be successful and is compassionate about the realities of our busy lives. He understands the re4alities and needs of adult learners. |
| Very knowledgeable and passionate. I learned a lot, even without a lot of personal interaction. |
| Excellent instructor |
| Dr. Shiraki continues to share his passion for education with students still refining and unpacking what it
means to be an Administrator. He has a wealth of experience and shares his "lectures" with us at the end
of our discussions, synthesizing the learning and extending our understanding. He is also flexible to
make changes as needed when we have "one of those days" or "one of those weeks...months" as we try to
work effectively and attend to school. |
| great. He teaches with encouragement and motivation to help students to meet the objective of the course. |
|
|
21. The writing assignments helped me understand the course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.47 |
17 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (53%) |
8 (47%) |
|
|
22. What did you like most about your online course experience?
|
| Being able to go back and re-read comments made by others. |
| I can tend to my assignments at times convenient to my work schedule and homelife. |
| I did not have to travel into class. |
| I had the opportunity to do my work and at the same time do weekly postings and assignments. |
| I love the flexibility of the online courses. I also appreciated that Dr. Shiraki took the time to respond to the postings. Even if other students didn't respond to my work, I knew he would comment in some way. |
| The thing I liked most about this course experience was the non-threatening feeling when conversing with the other students. We come from various experiences and situations and I feel we all had equal value. |
| I liked the dialog/discussions between my professor and myself/professor and my classmates and classmate to classmate. |
| No commute and raw opinions from real administrators. |
| The flexibility of an on-line course with my work schedule. |
| Everyone has a chance to participate in the discussions.
I could complete my work at my convenience. |
| Hard to say. |
| flexibility |
| The conversations about current practice and challenges |
| The ease of submitting responses and papers. |
| convenience. |
| The postings of my classmates - They gave me opportunities to appreciate the thinking of others. |
| Students were very engaged because of Steve's instant followup. |
|
|
23. What did you like least about your online course experience?
|
| I did not like the number of times I had to log on. |
| My work (job) demanded so much time that it took away the time needed to effectively
participate in this online course. |
| I would of preferred to do this specific class in person versus on-line due to the content. |
| Less opportunity to see my classmates and instructors in person. |
| The timing of the postings was a bit awkward at first, but then it shifted to a much more manageable schedule. However, some of my classmates were not punctual with their postings (at all!) so it made it difficult to engage in conversation when they didn't post until weeks later. |
| There wasn't really anything that I would say was bad about the course. Initially I struggled with the discussion deadlines, but Dr. Shiraki made adjustments to the course to meet our needs to make this a more pleasant experience for us. |
| Not being able to meet/see my professor-classmates in person. |
| No F2F time. |
| The lack of regular face-to-face made it a bit challenging. |
| The class was too large. Dr. Shiraki divided us into two groups for
discussion purposes, which was helpful. But, it made me feel disconnected
from the other group. |
| There was a lot to do..............especially with many of us in brand new
positions.............at times it was very challenging to balance everything. |
| technical issues in posting assignment. |
| I never seem to have enough time! That is a personal problem, not related to Steve's instruction.He was more than accomodating. |
| The lack of personal interaction. |
| only one face-to-face class. Would have liked a few more. |
| Writing the platform - only because I didn't feel I had the time to fully sit and reflect about whether I've
grown as a Supervisor/Administrator. I kept having to re-write because what I originally wrote did not
really express what I believe in. Just made me work hard...LOL! |
| Internet connection |
|
|
24. My overall evaluation of this course is...
|
| it was a very insightful, practical course that will help me in my career as an administrator. |
| The course included the necessary rigor needed to push and stretch our thinking and current
beliefs and understandings. The instructor was flexible and always looked to find ways to
make this class meaningful, productive, and doable for us. |
| I enjoyed this course and learned alot about my own personal thoughts in comparison to others in my class and the textbook. |
| Excellent |
| it's an interesting view of the many challenges of being an administrator, but it's also helpful if you are actively teaching. |
| Excellent! I enjoyed the dialog I had with my peers and I feel that Dr. Shiraki kept the course closely related to the events that are currently happening in the DOE with the implementation of the new teacher evaluation tool. |
| "EXCEEDS" |
| Quality course, text was a little bit dull, possibly split the text between Sergiovanni and Starrat, and then another books that details REAL stories of principals struggling to fix schools. Something more tangible. |
| This course and instructor was excellent. |
| positive. |
| Good experience. |
| great. i learned a lot from steve, and from my classmates |
| It is a valuable course. it facilitated considerable reflection for me. Developing a platform was an important exercise. |
| B+ |
| 8.5/10 |
| This course helped me understand the various methods of supervising, the importance and challenges of
this position. There were a lot of assignments since there were reflective, the learning was personal and
relevant. |
| I really love this class |
|
|
25. Other comments:
|
| I appreciated how Dr. Shiraki took so much time to summarize and comment on each assignment we had. He spent a lot of time commenting to students, he was very sensitive to the needs of his students, and was very knowledgeable about the course content. |
| My only comment would be to keep the due dates consistent. I would have preferred having an assignment due every week and at the same time and date such as due every monday by 4:30pm. This is only my suggestion based on what would work best for me as a student. I still feel that students would have a chance to interact with other as long as they submitted their assignments before the due date. |
| I wish to see more online EDEA courses in being offered in the future. This is a great opportunity to take courses while at the same time do my office work. |
| I believe it would be very beneficial to school leaders and administrators if this course was offered more frequently. Especially at a time when so much emphasis is being placed on teacher evaluation. |
| Thank you Steven for your time, knowledge and encouragement throughout the course. I am fortunate to have been able to have participated in the course and more so, feel fortunate to have the opportunity to be a VP and work in the DOE. |
| N/A |
| Although I appreciated the flexibility of the deadlines, it made it easy for
me to push my course work further down my priority list. As a working mom
who is in school, I have many responsibilities. Even though I did complete
all of my assignments, I would have turned them in on the suggested date if
the deadline was firm. |
| None |
| Thanks for a great semester! |
| I want to explain my answer to #13. I agree with the author's perspectives shared in the textbook. So,
while my learning was increased, it didn't change my opinions. My opinions were aligned with the
material and the stronger recommendations. I do not recall reading contrary positions which is why my
opinion did change. The rating is not a negative one and I hope my overall positive experience is
appreciated. You may consider Q #13 as an outlier. |
| I will apply knowledge which I learned into practice at my school. I am thinking about topics which relate this class for research studies. |
|
