University of Hawai'i eCAFE

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

Instructor: Creighton Litton

Available Survey Results

NREM 301, Spring 2012
NREM 301L, Spring 2012
NREM 680, Spring 2012
NREM 682, Fall 2011
NREM 301, Spring 2011
NREM 301L, Spring 2011
NREM 480, Spring 2011
NREM 301, Spring 2010
NREM 301L, Spring 2010
NREM 680, Spring 2010
NREM 682, Fall 2009

Creighton Litton: NREM 301, Spring 2012

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 301 - Natural Resources Management	Crn (Section):	84856 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.92	13	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	12 (92%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	13	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (23%)	10 (77%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.46	13	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	7 (54%)	6 (46%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.62	13	0.51	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (38%)	8 (62%)

5. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	13	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (23%)	10 (77%)

6. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.69	13	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	2 (15%)	10 (77%)

7. I generally understood the material presented in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.69	13	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (31%)	9 (69%)

8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

I enjoyed getting a taste of all the components of natural resource management before choosing a specialization

I felt that the course as a whole contained so much valuable information that I can apply in real life as well as my specific field of work.

I liked how for each topic we discussed, we were given basic scientific information which was followed up by implications for management. Learning some basic tools, such as the USLE and basic forest mensuration calculations, was a good preview of what some of us will undoubtedly be doing in the future.

This course was great because I feel like I really gained immense knowledge on not only the basic aspects of natural resource management, but also on field-work procedures which will be very useful in my prospective career field. Lectures were informative, slides with easy to interpret graphs and figures were a great addition!

i really enjoyed the global change biology section.

going out into the filed and gaining the knowledge of how things are done in what order and being able to know what exactly to look for, and then taking this data back to the lad and analyzing it.

Giving examples of real life ecosystems around the world where the Natural resource management techniques or lack there of are being used or not. Being able to relate what is learned in the class to what is actually happening out in the world.

Hands on experiences

I thought how the instructor was able to get class involvement and how he related the topics to the students and everyday life was most valuable.

The professors were very knowledgable about the material being taught and the course was very organized

9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

Nothing

There were not really any aspects of the course that I found the least valuable. All of the aspects were valuable in one form or another.

Any course with such a range of topics will, by nature, have to remain relatively general. I guess this generality was the least valuable aspect of the class, but I understand its nature. It would be impossible (to teach AND learn) in-depth on each of the individual sections covered throughout the course though.

Sometimes lectures were a little boring, but that is bound to happen in any science course.

it was all pretty valuable to me

none

N/A

10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.85	13	0.38	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	11 (85%)

11. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.85	13	0.38	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	11 (85%)

12. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.92	13	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	12 (92%)

13. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	13	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (23%)	10 (77%)

14. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	12	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	10 (83%)

15. The course objectives were clear.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	13	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (23%)	10 (77%)

16. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.62	13	0.51	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (38%)	8 (62%)

17. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

put more notes on board and put powerpoints on laulima for students who are too lazy to search for his site.

He could definitely point out more important points in his lectures. Especially points that we will need to know for the exam.

I personally feel like the class is a great introduction course for those students, like myself this semester,who are starting to get more familiar with the major. I feel like the class doesn't need changes.

I really can't think of anything...

I felt it was easier to follow Dr. Bruland's notes when he wrote them on the board the way Dr. Litton presented the information.

just keep on doing what your doing!!!

A lot of information is given out and while all of it is interesting, sometimes it can be hard to determine what is most important to focus on in terms of needing to remember especially for the test.

I thought the overall the instructor was well rounded and don't see anywhere he needs to improve.

He was a very good professor wouldn't change anything

18. Reading assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.31	13	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	7 (54%)	5 (38%)

19. The guest lecturers were interesting and stimulating.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.31	13	0.75	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	5 (38%)	6 (46%)

20. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.54	13	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (46%)	7 (54%)

21. Instruction is well-coordinated among the team teachers.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	13	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (23%)	10 (77%)

22. The teachers were compatible in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.92	13	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	12 (92%)

23. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.92	13	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	12 (92%)

24. Other comments:

Thanks :)

It was a fun and interesting class.

i always get excited to come to class and learn !

Awesome broad range course on natural resource management

This is a very well taught course. I think that all the material were pertinent and the instructor is very knowledgable.

Creighton Litton: NREM 301L, Spring 2012 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 301L - Natural Resources Mgmt Lab	Crn (Section):	84858 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.85	13	0.38	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	11 (85%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	12	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	10 (83%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.85	13	0.38	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	11 (85%)

4. I improved my abilities to do the kinds of writing used by professionals in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.92	13	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	12 (92%)

5. I improved my abilities to revise my rough drafts and to make my writing more effective.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.85	13	0.38	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	11 (85%)

6. This course was helpful in developing new skills.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.85	13	0.38	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	11 (85%)

7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

Data collecting in the field

i really improved my skills on excel which is advantageous for everything and anything i want to analyze and set up as graphs

The writing of lab reports was very valuable as a skill that I will continue to use in my field of work in the future. It was very clear what was a good report and it was reflected in the grading, so overall the expectations of writing as a professional was a great skill that I learned.

Hands-on experience helps me learn, so completing the lab reports and activities really helped me study for the lecture portion of the class. Having the labs coincide so well with course material is the way to go! I've had lecture+lab combos where this wasn't the case, and I think it really makes a difference. I liked how we were given the mandatory revisions on the first two reports, so we could get used to what was expected of us. Passing out an example of an ideal lab report was a smart move too. (I promise that wasn't my report so that isn't why I'm saying that!!)

Having to write lab reports was a great experience. Writing them and getting feedback was a great way to improve my writing and is a good way to instruct others as well

I thought that learning how to write formal and good scientific papers were most valuable.

Going out and doing field-work oriented labs were awesome...good way to understand what resource management actually entails.

the free admission to waikiki aquarium and increased familiarity of excel

I found it helpful to do the first two reports with a rough draft and then it was a lot easier when we did not have them on the next two to remember the comments given out and not make the same mistakes when we just turned in final drafts. Also making us write our own hypothesis before the lab and then going over a hypothesis together helped me to have a better understanding of a good hypothesis and determine what mine was lacking.

Learning scientific writing skills

hands on learning

The hands on learning. I also really enjoyed the field trips it kept class interesting. All of the instructors were also very helpful and nice.

8. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

none

labs that we collected non-important data (such as the aquarium lab - not that it wasn't interesting but it could have been an extra credit lab, the information we learned is learned by everyone walking through there and didn't really benefit me much)

Some of the labs could have been elaborated to relate to what was being learned in lecture at the time.

I'm sure this is where everyone writes "lab reports!!!" But I'd rather write a lab report than a research paper any day, so for a WI class I really don't think the reports were so bad. That being said...I don't really know what I found least valuable. Maybe for the soil lab you can find a site that has actual canopy cover, so students (like myself) don't get confused when writing their lab reports.

Although I thought the symposium was really interesting, I would have thought that it could have been replaced with a lab that was conducted outdoors more in line of a hands on experience as opposed to seeing it on posters.

Sometimes computer based labs were difficult if they were not thoroughly explained at the start of lab.

N/A

9. The instructor helped me understand how writing is used in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.62	13	0.65	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	3 (23%)	9 (69%)

10. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

penmenship when writting notes

i really enjoyed the outdoors adventures especially the soil lab where we came out with a great understanding of what components are most important to avoiding soil loss. basically keep teaching things that can be used outside the classroom :)

I donÊ»t really feel that any improvements needed to be made. Maybe explain specific things that need to be included in each lab report a little more.

I thought that he already is a great instructor.

It would be helpful to start each lab by going through all steps (at least briefly) so time can be used most effectively.

More field trips

His teaching was very good. One of the best professors yet

11. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.54	13	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (46%)	7 (54%)

12. The writing assignments helped me develop abilities to solve problems.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	12	0.65	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	6 (50%)	5 (42%)

13. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	12	0.49	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (33%)	8 (67%)

14. Laboratory assignments are interesting and stimulating.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.38	13	0.65	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	6 (46%)	6 (46%)

15. Laboratory assignments make students think.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.69	13	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (31%)	9 (69%)

16. Directions for laboratory assignments are clear and specific.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.46	13	0.66	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	5 (38%)	7 (54%)

17. Lab assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	13	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (23%)	10 (77%)

18. Lab reports are graded fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.46	13	0.88	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	0 (0%)	4 (31%)	8 (62%)

19. Lab reports are returned promptly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.08	13	0.95	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	2 (15%)	5 (38%)	5 (38%)

20. The field trips were useful learning experiences.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.92	13	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	12 (92%)

21. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.75	12	0.45	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (25%)	9 (75%)

22. Other comments:

Awesome labs!

I would have like to have gone to coconut island.

This lab really helped to bring the lecture portion of the class into a new perspective and help me better understand how Natural Resource Management techniques are applied.

Creighton Litton: NREM 680, Spring 2012 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 680 - Ecosystem Ecology	Crn (Section):	88412 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

5. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

6. I enjoyed this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.78	9	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (22%)	7 (78%)

8. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

9. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

10. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

11. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

12. The instructor encouraged class discussion.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

13. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	10 (100%)

14. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	10	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (40%)	6 (60%)

15. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

16. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.

None, the course was taught effectively and every subject was well explained and developed. Handouts for each class were very good also.

I loved the class as it was

Cover more aquatic ecosystems

As participation is a big part of the grade, please be aware of speaking over others who are trying to answer or ask questions and thus lose that opportunity to be heard. It only happened once that I remember. Otherwise, discussions were conducted fairly.

I did't think that the last mid term covered materials evenly. There were a lot of questions from nitrogen.

It probably makes sense to discuss Chapter 8 first before Chapter 9.

17. The assigned readings significantly contribute to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

18. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

19. Exams are creative and require original thought.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.4	10	0.84	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	2 (20%)	6 (60%)

20. What changes would you make in the lectures?

I would have liked to see more about overall nutrient cycling, such as the mobility of other nutrients in ecosystems apart from N and P, such as Sulfur. Maybe it can be covered in a discussion lab.

Cover more aquatic ecosystems

Is there a way to make them more interactive? Brainstorming sessions to help tie things together?

I was satisfied with the lectures.

one, they are always really good and clear

It probably makes sense to discuss Chapter 8 first before Chapter 9.

21. What changes would you make in the readings?

None that I can think of.

Readings were good.

I was satisfied with the lectures.

less readings would be helpful, though I do feel they were all very helpful to facilitating understanding, It's just they take a long time as they are very dense. Combined with discussion articles this can take up a significant portion of one's time each week which can be difficult to balance. Maybe providing some reading notes or small assignments with reading questions could be helpful to ensure students are understanding the key concepts and able to synthesize the main points. It can be difficult to know what to focus on learning since the material is so dense and much of it is important and new information to students.

22. What changes would you make in the discussion sections?

Many readings were highly technical, bordering on the abstract, while others were very straightforward and pleasant to read, therefore I think there was a good distribution of topics and matters.

Announce certain feedbacks not to just the individual discussion leader, but to the entire class, so that the next students do not keep repeating things that get points deducted

Extremely intimidating at first, but the snacks help!

I was satisfied with the discussion sections.

I would change discussion so that they are not all about reading articles. It would be good to do activities together, games or some sort of interactive application of the concepts. I'm not sure what this would look like, but for example, understanding the climate system could be facilitated by an activity whereby students are asked to correctly assimilate lessons learned into a working diagram of climate/global atmospheric and ocean currents. Or having students be at different stations where they have to correctly map/track a carbon molecule through different types of ecosystems under different conditions. These sessions could then be followed by discussion about student's different thoughts and processes. The info is so dense when read, that "living" it would help imprint deeper understanding about these complex topics for students. There are so many moving parts floating around in my head that having some sort of assignment or more practice collating them all together would be helpful and fun. I'd have been willing to stay for the full discussion time to participate in that type of exercise.

Doing it by twos (pairs) is probably a good idea. It creates teamwork and more heads are better than one.

23. My overall evaluation of this course is...

Being a purely ecological/scientific subject, I think the course could not have been taught any better. I have never appreciated ecosystmes from a purely ecological point of view (productivity, cycling, etc.) and I have to say that I learned plenty from this standpoint, and have a new appreciation for carbon.

I liked the class, overall I feel that Dr. Litton does a great job of conveying the matterial and has high expectations of his students (which we may or may not meet, but it encourages us to strive. THe discussion classes are good, I sometimes wished we had more time to tlak about the bigger picture on some of the papers after hashing out the methods and results, but over all the discussions were great, people were prepared and the discussions organic. His tests were fair and required synthesis of the material. I like the informative challenging classes that Dr. Litton teaches.

Superlative

Challenging, but extremely beneficial because Dr. Litton makes himself available for questions and promotes discussion.

Fantasic course overall. The passion of the Dr. Litton went a long way toward driving discussion and interest in the topic. The only suggestion I would make is the possible addition of a few homeworks (graded or not graded) between exams. There is so much material that reviewing for exams is difficult. I think having homeworks along the way that reaffirm the main concepts of the topic sections would help students keep ontop of the material during the course as well as help when reviewing for exams. Other than that, Great Job!

great class where you can learn subjects and also participating skills such as discussion leader. The teacher answer the students' questions clearly and effectively. He does his best to listen to students comments and feedbacks.

this course was great!

Overall, it is a good course. Dr. Litton is very passionate about the course. Having the guest lecturers also enhanced the overall quality of the class. It is just unfortunate that the guest lecturer's schedule sometime is not in sync with the discussion (sometimes before the guest lecturer presents, we have not learned the concepts or theories yet). It would help if the students at least would have some conceptual background of the topic before guest lecturers present the applied research.

24. Other comments:

The exams were too intensive. Strongly suggest to change from 2 midterms to 3 shorter midterms

why is this not a core course? One of the best courses and seemingly a crash course to everything terrestrial ecosystem managers should.

Thank you for a wonderful semester. I did learn a lot! I would strongly recommend the course to other students.

Creighton Litton: NREM 682, Fall 2011 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 682 - Restoration Ecology	Crn (Section):	78748 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	17	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	16 (94%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.88	17	0.33	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (12%)	15 (88%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	17	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	16 (94%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.71	17	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (29%)	12 (71%)

5. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.76	17	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (24%)	13 (76%)

6. I enjoyed this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	17	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (18%)	14 (82%)

7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	17	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (18%)	14 (82%)

8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

I liked the way the course was structured and organized. I also thought the discussion sessions were very interesting.

Group discussions were valuable. The mixing of many perspectives from many different fields gave me further insights into restoration ecology. Also, the focus put on Hawai'i was much appreciated and really spurred my interest. Much more so than reading about restoration research elsewhere.

I found that the lectures were most helpful in really understanding the concepts being presented in the course. The discussions were interesting but I did not feel that they always provided additional insight into the topics at hand.

I enjoyed how every class started with questions and comments about the reading. It was a great primer to get me thinking about the topic to be discussed

The presentations and student-led discussions were very helpful.

The discussion sessions were very helpful and gave an opportunity to apply the concepts discussed in lecture.

I enjoyed it all. The text readings and scientific readings built off on another and allowed the students to see how the science was practiced in the field. Discussion was good for synthesis of information.

Learning the theories behind all levels of ecological processes from individual to ecosystem really gave this course a broad but thoughtful approach. The class presentations did a good job of showing the real world application of what we learned in class. Adding a concurrent lab where we could do some more application would be helpful but at the same time, Im not sure if that could be done in a semester time frame.

I thought the most valuable parts of the course were the discussions about papers.

Student presentations (specifically doing it!)

The synthesis of many other ideas that I have learned in other ecology classes and in the field into a holistic view of restoration was helpful. I also enjoyed the discussions and reading current papers.

The chapter readings were generally good in summarizing the very broad issues that were covered in the class, and helped to flesh out the lectures.

lecture and discussion

I liked the discussion portion of the course in particular. I thought reading papers and discussing them with my classmates not only gave me a better understanding of topics in restoration ecology but also gave the information a practical context.

The most valuable aspect of the course were the group discussions. I do not have much experience sitting around smart people that talk about science to better the world. I am only a part time student so this once a week class helps me keep that part of my brain working.

9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

I would have liked that the students chose more controversial and thought provoking discussion topics.

Some of the papers that we had to discuss as a class seemed to be slightly off topic. I feel like maybe it would be better for Dr. Litton to pick the article just to make sure it was relevant and useful.

Some students monopolized the discussion. More importantly, they monopolized with what I thought were asides, tangents, and inane stories relating to your work. I know that it's not the professor's fault but eventually, I would tune out the second certain individuals started speaking

Some readings are very technical to me. But the lecture helped me understand these technical concepts most of the time.

Team discussions presentation format. With everyone having read the paper - I think the format should have focussed more on the related studies and less on the article.

I really enjoyed it all.

Midterm- maybe a little less writing intensive?

The papers and presentations at times were not very stimulating, though I would not take it out of the course.

I didn't find the textbook particularly valuable, as the important portions of the readings were covered in lecture anyway. Sometimes figures were too small to see on the lecture slides. This ended up being irritating as I couldn't figure out what was going on.

10. The instructor gives clear explanations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.88	17	0.33	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (12%)	15 (88%)

11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	15	0.59	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	12 (80%)

12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	17	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (18%)	14 (82%)

13. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	16	0.25	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	15 (94%)

14. The instructor encouraged class discussion.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	16	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	16 (100%)

15. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	17	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	16 (94%)

16. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	17	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (18%)	14 (82%)

17. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.76	17	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (24%)	13 (76%)

18. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.

Maybe talk a little more about models and how they work. I think a lot of students would have benefited from a brief background on modeling. Not specifically on any kind of modeling program, but the concepts behind modeling.

Spreading the overall class time over 2 class periods would have been more conducive for absorbing information.

Having the papers available in an electronic format would be nice. I frequently use a tablet to read material so having to keep track of papers and slide printouts was tedious. Laulima is free

The chapter readings are good. It would be interesting if a part of the class would be devoted to cater for students who do not have any ecology background.

Team discussions. While I enjoyed having everyone lead discussions, if the discussions had to be done as a team it would have been nice to chose team members. For several of the teams you could tell one person was carrying more of the effort.

The only improvement I could suggest is that "debate" in the second lecture allow for rebuttal. I did not learn much from this debate style....discussion seemed more important. But if you leave it structured, I would suggest allowing rebuttals so that it is more discussion-like. Leaving the rebuttals until the conclusion was confusing.

Great job with the knowledge your provide with the course. Teaching style is great and great use of lecture time and to stay enthusiastic during the 3 hour course.

Sometimes the lecture part of course ran a bit long and timing the presentations might help us have the correct amount of time for discussion. Overall though I've really enjoyed the course.

I appreciate having the slides printed out so that I could take notes on the paper and not have to fervently wirte everything down, it allowed me to listen and pay attention to what he was saying. I like his teaching style.

Perhaps splitting the class into two smaller classes could help as far as increasing the students ability to absorb more and new information. The two hours were manageable, but splitting it into two class sessions with the lecture first and the presentation and discussion the second day, could help to keep the energy up in the class.

I think the course is already quite good. My only suggestion would be to get rid of the textbook or to more carefully consider which chapters to assign for reading. Some of the chapters were good but I thought some were not.

Could a lab section or a ecological restoration techniques section be added?

19. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....

I thought Creighton did an amazing job. It's difficult for professors to allow their students to take charge of a discussion and give only a little input, and he did very well in this aspect.

Great. Excellent teacher, lots of experience with restoration efforts in Hawai'i.

that he is really interested in this topic and has enthusiasm for teaching

Great professor, one of the better classes I've had in NREM. It makes me wonder why the elective classes are so excellent but the required ones are so rubbish.

Great instructor. I appreciated his manner in which he engaged students in discussion during lecture - especially for an after lunch class.

Great professor!

Great lecturer. I enjoyed taking this class.

Overall, I enjoyed the class and interacting w Dr. Litton. I found him to be passionate and knowledgable about the material and that he expected me to work and learn, I appreciate that. I also found him to be available for out of class time when I requested it.

Great teacher, as he said himself, can talk a bit much, but it just shows his enthusiasm and knowledge of the subject.

Creighton is good lecture, is always well-prepared for class, and has clear expectations of students. I appreciated that grades were returned quickly and that we were given a mid-semester evaluation of our participation grade.

Excellent. Very well spoken and knowledgeable of course content and material. I would consider him an expert in the field and use him as a resource in the area of restoration ecology.

20. The assigned readings significantly contribute to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	17	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (18%)	14 (82%)

21. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	17	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (18%)	14 (82%)

22. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.94	17	0.24	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (6%)	16 (94%)

23. My overall evaluation of this course is...

I think it was a great course and it should be something natural resource managers include in their coursework.

Great. Challenging course, but full of intriguing and extremely useful information.

One of the best courses NREM has to offer.

A+, even though the plus won't increase your teaching GPA above 4.0

This class was really beneficial. It brought me quickly up to speed either on theories that were rusty or new concepts.

The course is great. I would suggest it to other students. I appreciated that discussion was encouraged. I dislike group work, but I know its probably important in the long run. Creighton is well-read in this field and can explain concepts eloquently.

Great class, but it would be nice to have some more practical knowledge to go along with all the theory.

The course was fun and informative and as mentioned earlier, synthesiszed much of what I have learned elsewhere. While it is not a cookbook class on how to restore a system, I feel more prepared to figure out how to approach a restoration project in any given area.

Great, really helps to give perspective to those who are going into restoration ecology or those going into ecology restoration who will probably have to use restoration ecology to help in their projects.

Restoration Ecology was a valuable course overall. I learned a lot of important ecological principles as well as how restoration ecology informs ecological restoration. The discussions and journal articles gave practical context for the theoretical information we were taught in lecture. I liked how the course material progressed from the small scale to the large scale as well.

Excellent. I would definetly like to continue to work or study in this field but am not sure what the next steps are...

24. Other comments:

I hope ecosystem ecology is just as good:)

You should offer a lab that gives us more practical knowledge from how and what kind of herbicides to use, to restoration plants for specific areas. This would really help, but this class served the purpose that you said it would from the first day. Thanks!

It was hard to find primary articles of restoration ecology work in hawaii. There should be more funding towards this field of work and money should be set aside somehow in the government system to keep projects sustainable.

Creighton Litton: NREM 301, Spring 2011 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 301 - Natural Resources Management	Crn (Section):	85254 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	12	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	10 (83%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	12	0.45	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (25%)	9 (75%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	12	0.51	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (42%)	7 (58%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	12	0.65	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	2 (17%)	9 (75%)

5. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	12	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	4 (33%)	7 (58%)

6. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	12	0.65	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	2 (17%)	9 (75%)

7. I generally understood the material presented in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	12	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	3 (25%)	8 (67%)

8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

The covered material was well versed in different areas of ecology and environmental issues that helped me determine my interests and what I would like to focus on for my specialization.

I thought that every part of this class was valuable, and the subjects continuously built on each other.

I really liked some of the materials that we have covered in class such as soil basics, forest ecology and management, and also global change biology. Actually, I liked all the materials/ topics throughout this semester but those I mentioned above are the most interesting for me. However to view the entire coursework I would have to say that everything is valuable. I'm not speaking in a sense of the material itself, but rather how it changes the way I think about natural resources management. The guest lectures were so helpful as well.

I thought that the introduction to soil science was the most valuable because it is a widely used sub-discipline in the fields of conservation, planning, engineering, sciences,et.

The group activities in class that related to the same day lecture

Course contents(syllabus). Instructors' ability and willingness to enhance students' understanding. Style of lecture. Hint of humor. Also, helpful TA.

words

taking notes in lecture

I liked this course, and appreciated how passionate both professors were.

The readings that were given provided good background info on the subjects presented during the lecture.

I felt the lectures to be surprisingly intriguing WAY more than my bio172 lecture class. The instructors did a great job at intriguing the class about the material through their in depth lectures and powerpoints.

9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

I would have like to discussed more about what solutions there are to some of the environmental problems we discussed.

Only few discussions that we had in class.

I honestly thought that climate change should have not been given much focus because it is such a redundant topic for those in the environmental field.

N/A

Markers used to write on the whiteboard could be newer(darker).

tsunamis

none

I think the radical shift between teaching styles was hard to get used to. On one hand taking an overlod of notes, and then on the other not knowing what exactly to write down, also never knowing whats really going to be on the test was confusing some other students and myself.

It might just be me but i hate doing group work during class. I'd much rather have the teacher teach me instead of having the students engage with classmates to find out the answer.

10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	12	0.49	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (33%)	8 (67%)

11. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	12	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	10 (83%)

12. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	12	0.45	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (25%)	9 (75%)

13. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	12	0.45	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (25%)	9 (75%)

14. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.83	12	0.39	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	10 (83%)

15. The course objectives were clear.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	12	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	3 (25%)	8 (67%)

16. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.42	12	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	5 (42%)	6 (50%)

17. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

I enjoyed his "discussion style" of teaching the course material but a little more notes on the board would be helpful.

All the professors are great. They knew exactly their materials and I really liked their teaching methods. I might only suggest one thing. I do hope if the professors could talk and explain the materials a little bit slowly because I found a hard time to take notes and listen to them at the same time. But overall, they are great teachers. Thanks very much. It is a pleasure to be one of your students. I really enjoyed this course.

For those of us not taking the lab if we could have more practice doing paper exercises regarding modeling such as hydrological flow, total production, etc.

Not being able to finish + double check my answers during the allotted time was stressful(since the exams were designed to take up the whole period). But being allowed to go overtime a little bit was very helpful/less stressful.

He can't because it's perfect

give better review of material that is going to be on exams

Maybe more consolidation of objectives. Learning about sooo many different ecosystems and processes, we as undergrads get a little lost. Overall I enjoyed the course and thought both professors were awesome and defiitely treated students fairly as well as putting out an extra effort to let students know they were always there for us to come talk to if we needed help or support.

I felt that the instructors of this course were extremely knowledgeable and very organized and thorough in the way in which they taught the material. both instructors were also approachable and encouraged questions and responses from the students. I felt they always pushed students to think not just in small terms but on a global scale, they constantly challenged us. The only improvement i might suggest would be perhaps a study guide for the exams even if it is a brief one.

18. Reading assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	12	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	3 (25%)	8 (67%)

19. The guest lecturers were interesting and stimulating.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.25	12	0.97	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	1 (8%)	4 (33%)	6 (50%)

20. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.45	11	0.69	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (9%)	4 (36%)	6 (55%)

21. Instruction is well-coordinated among the team teachers.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	12	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	4 (33%)	7 (58%)

22. The teachers were compatible in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	12	0.45	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (25%)	9 (75%)

23. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.64	11	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (36%)	7 (64%)

24. Other comments:

Great class with great teachers Asking the class questions during lectures to keep the students involved, and bringing up important facts or terms to help the students remember them really helped.

A study guide for exams would be helpful but not necessarily needed

Extremely exciting contents, extremely approachable instructors, and looking forward to studying more NREM!

Awesome

one of the best courses ive taken

Overall this class was enjoyable,I looked forward to going to class. The professors and TA were nice and easy to talk to, which made asking questions easy. The course covers a lot of topics but it is a good starting point to figure out what you want to do later on.

awesome class! i learned a lot!!! thank you!!!!!!!!

Creighton Litton: NREM 301L, Spring 2011 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 301L - Natural Resources Mgmt Lab	Crn (Section):	85256 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	11	0.4	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (18%)	9 (82%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	11	0.4	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (18%)	9 (82%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.64	11	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (36%)	7 (64%)

4. I improved my abilities to do the kinds of writing used by professionals in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	11	0.4	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (18%)	9 (82%)

5. I improved my abilities to revise my rough drafts and to make my writing more effective.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	11	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (27%)	8 (73%)

6. This course was helpful in developing new skills.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.82	11	0.4	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (18%)	9 (82%)

7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

The feedback on the first drafts of the lab reports was really helpful and allowed me to improve my writing skills and grade. The field trips were also really interesting and fun.

Getting out and using the ideas, theories, and techniques talked about in lecture. GIS and GPS Learning to use Excel How to write a scientific paper, and all the steps involved before

The field trips were so helpful to understand the materials that we learned in class. I have also improved my scientific writing skills throughout this semester. The feedback of the two first lab reports were helpful because I was able to improve grades for the next lab reports.

Field trips with hands on experience were very helpful in understanding the material and it made it easier to write lab reports.

The field trips were the most valuable to me because not only were they the most fun but i also felt like i learned the most on fieldtrips because it was more hands on.

Field trips

learning to improve my writing on lab reports

The labs allowed us to get actual field experience in a broad array of various fields. And learning how to use excel was a helpful thing too.

The labs and getting hands-on experience.

Hands on experience

8. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

I wish there could be a make up lab for the forest measurements which has been cancelled due to the tsunami warning. I was trying to say that it would be better if we always have a back up plan, so we all could have a chance to do the measurements. I think that is important to do and learn.

N/A

n/a

none

I think that some labs could of been changed, for example the waikiki lab.

9. The instructor helped me understand how writing is used in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

10. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

The professors' teaching are great. They always answered all the questions that I had which helped me to fully understand about the materials. The explained things clear and well too. There is nothing to be improved for now because everything went well so far.

have more fieldtrips!!!!!

More funding

have labs relate to lecture. some topics in lab didnt go with what we were learning in lecture

During lecture, Dr. Litton needs to write key notes he wants us to remember on the board, not just verbally. There was some moments that it was hard hear what he said or what he actually wanted us to remember from all the information he was stating.

11. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.64	11	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (36%)	7 (64%)

12. The writing assignments helped me develop abilities to solve problems.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	11	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (27%)	8 (73%)

13. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

14. Laboratory assignments are interesting and stimulating.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	11	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (27%)	8 (73%)

15. Laboratory assignments make students think.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	11	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (27%)	8 (73%)

16. Directions for laboratory assignments are clear and specific.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.91	11	0.3	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (9%)	10 (91%)

17. Lab assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.55	11	0.69	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (9%)	3 (27%)	7 (64%)

18. Lab reports are graded fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	11	0.47	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (27%)	8 (73%)

19. Lab reports are returned promptly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.64	11	0.5	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (36%)	7 (64%)

20. The field trips were useful learning experiences.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.91	11	0.3	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (9%)	10 (91%)

21. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

22. Other comments:

i really liked the hands on experience during each field trips

I hate having labs on Friday

The TA for this class was so great and helpful. :) :) THANKS RYAN, Dr. Litton and Dr. Bruland.

SUPER FUN and i also learned tons!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thank you!

Great class!

really enjoyed this lab. i liked that the instructors developed a good relationship with the students. it made it easier to communicate and learn.

Creighton Litton: NREM 480, Spring 2011 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 480 - Applied Forest Ecology	Crn (Section):	89327 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.93	15	0.26	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	14 (93%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	15	0.41	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (20%)	12 (80%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	15	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (27%)	11 (73%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	10 (67%)

5. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.57	14	0.51	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (43%)	8 (57%)

6. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	15	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	4 (27%)	10 (67%)

7. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	15	0.77	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	14 (93%)

8. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	15	0.41	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (20%)	12 (80%)

9. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	15	0.59	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	12 (80%)

10. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.53	15	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	3 (20%)	10 (67%)

11. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.73	15	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (27%)	11 (73%)

12. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.2	15	0.86	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	1 (7%)	7 (47%)	6 (40%)

13. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.2	15	0.94	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	5 (33%)	7 (47%)

14. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?

He makes it very easy to ask questions, easy to talk to. Presents info in great format for learning and is a very good lecturer, as was Lisa. Its rare that a TA is as knowledgeable, or able to give a quality lecture as she was.

Field trip and critiques & discussion.

He explain concepts and examples clearly and effectively. He also is well-prepared lectures.

Dr. Litton's lectures are very effective. He communicates very well, is enthusiastic about the topic, and makes the environment easy to ask questions. His lecture slides are brief and to the point, and the examples that he uses to further explain his point or slides are very relevant and helps to better understand the course material. A lot of the concepts I remember, while studying, are through his examples that he brings up outside of the slides. Also, his classes are actually relevant to natural resource management as he focuses on the science, management, AND application of the topic. On the other hand, a lot of classes just focus on one of these and forgets to tie in the need for interdisciplinary and multi-perspective approach.

Creighton is extremely enthusiastic about this course. He's extremely involved in the students progress in the course and is willing to give up his time to educate students outside of the classroom. It's hard to come by a professor who is so willing to go the extra mile to see a student do well.

He demonstrates respect to the students by creating a comfortable intellectual environment filled with discussion.

He was available for outside help if needed

i learn a lot from this course, particularly in the forest field

Dr.Litton was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively. The contents are not so intensive science.So,it is understandable and fun ,even having limited basic scientific knowledge.

-articulate -extremely knowledgeable and passionate about the subject

I liked how he structured his class where he makes his expectations specific and clear. Meanwhile, he still encourages a classroom atmosphere that shows that he is open towards his students; very approachable and tries to accomodate our needs as students.

Powerpoints clear and direct, gives overall class results for tests...

very knowledgeable about the subject and makes it easy to ask questions

enthusiastic about the course material and was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

15. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?

Homework

No ideal

Creighton loves to use definitions as a way to educate his students. The issue isn't the definitions, but sometimes (and very rarely) is a tad bit too wordy. His use of word play can get hard to follow after a long lecture - for example: "Conservation biology is to biological conservation what restoration ecology is to ecological restoration." Clever clever, tricky tricky.

He can be so thorough and enthusiastic about lecture and answering questions that some lectures were skipped due to time constraints.

Gave way too many handouts. For a class talking about forest management we sure wasted a lot of paper that I'm sure the majority of will not get recycled. Having the handouts and chapters available online to view would be far more sustainable

critique

so much pressure during take the test, because too many details to be productively completed in time.

His monotone voice and over enunciation of words.. it almost comes off as over-the-top or slightly condescending.

This class needs a lab. Then it would be applied forest ecology.

16. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.

A study guide would have been very useful for this course. Even just a list of topics needed to know for exams. The exams literally covered EVERYTHING we went through in class, so it was difficult to study when typically the most important topics are covered by exams. Its kinda of overwhelming trying to make sure you studied EVERYTHING. Just a list to check off terms or topics you know would be great to help studying.

1. More case studies would help students to understand the topics. 2. The readings are too long for students to finish. 3. The exams are too detail, I would expect essays to discuss real problems with the basic knowledge of forest ecosystem.

Giving more problem sets, for example the assignment is related to species richness and abundance calculation. Writing critiques cost much time, so the syllabus should mention them. I can manage my available time to do them. All assignments you intend to give us this course should be in the syllabus.

The students in this course are a little disconnected from one another. It would be nice if we were able to interact with one another more. It can get a little intimidating speaking with Creighton because he has a tendency to question/correct students - but overall his corrections are appreciated!

The course should contain a lab portion, but with that it should be a 4 credit course. The lab portion is invaluable applying concepts from the classroom and demonstrating them through field methods and techniques. Lecture is knowledge and lab is application of that knowledge. If the course is called 'Applied' Forest Ecology there needs to be a lab portion.

Exams are too long and far too detailed. The length of the exam makes it difficult to finish in the given amount of time. When almost the entire class is still working when class time is over, the exam need to be shortened.

- more field trip and field work would be helpful for understanding the applied forest ecology.

please decrease the number of questions in each test a little bit

I really enjoyed small group discussions--I think that by doing smaller discussions first and then bringing those discussions into a collective larger group might be more beneficial for some students. I know with the readings for each class session it was a struggle to get opinions from us--an idea would be to assign pairs to briefly summarize and start a discussion about the reading to start the lecture--it would ensure that everyone participated over the course of the semester.

Vocal enthusiasm! More hands on activities, even videos..to make up for lack of lab class..

I would have liked to have all the lecture powerpoints before hand.

Hands on learning. Add a lab or field course.

17. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....

Great professor. He knows his stuff, can present it in a clear manner, and is very helpful. You can tell he cares about teaching, which can be hard to find in professors.

Great!

He is really good teacher but rather demanding

very good professor

Creighton is one of those professors students will talk about later in their lives because of his incredible attention to details. He is thorough and encouraging. I will definitely remember him for these qualities.

He is a knowledgeable professor with a down to earth attitude willing to learn from the students just as much as we learn from him.

Good guy but needs to shorten his exams

He is able to explain terms and stuff very clearly

He did a very good job.

I really enjoyed his teaching style and the classroom atmosphere he established. I would enjoy taking another course from Creighton.

Good teacher, very interested in students doing well.. but just lacks audio and visual appeal..

very good teacher

good

18. The assigned readings significantly contribute to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.2	15	0.86	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	1 (7%)	7 (47%)	6 (40%)

19. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.2	15	0.94	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (7%)	2 (13%)	5 (33%)	7 (47%)

20. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.4	15	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (13%)	5 (33%)	8 (53%)

21. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?

The field trips. And how easy the slides were to follow. Photos. I really really like the format of the exams ( Fill in the blank, matching, define, short answer etc.). I like having all different styles of questions. The short( or long) answer question are a very good format for the material of the course.

No idea

I really enjoyed the lecture style and the actual lectures themselves. It is difficult to find a professor who can communicate effectively and that is enthusiastic about what they are teaching.

The readings are helpful and his lectures are thorough.

The research paper, because this was a way to apply concepts from lecture.

lectures, field trip

I enjoin most of the content, which I am able to understand.

I tend to favor lecture based classes more than discussion classes but I think there was a good balance of discussion (on readings/articles) and lecture, which I liked. I also enjoyed the field experience; learning by doing is always fun. I also really liked the test format--the mix of different types of questions is different from the normal type of short answer/essay based test.

the discussions and lab handouts.. although tedious, they made me apply my skills..

restoration and conservation sections

22. Which aspects of the course did you like least?

Although I loved the format of the exams, they were too long for the given time. I was too rushed on my answers and didn't have time to think. Some you know right off the bat, but others take time to put into words and I was not able to that. I ended up putting some bs answers just to have something since I didn't have time to write out a quality answer. Perhaps a "choose 7 out of the 10 questions to answer", or just cutting a few of the longer questions out that you don't feel are as important. I understand the prof may want to test on all the info from class so maybe just convert some of the long answer questions into another form that won't take as long to answer. I felt like I could have done better if I had a little more time for such a long test. I also felt great about how I was doing until "Only 20 minutes left!" and I realized how many questions I had left. I knew I could answer some but didn't have time to get to it. I didn't like some of the readings because they weren't written in an easy to follow style. Sometimes the daily readings were too long to reasonably complete when required. Also, when the powerpoints were posted online (since animation was used one some I think) not ALL of the text on the slides that appeared in class showed up when posted online. That made studying difficult when trying to connect my notes with the slides.

No ideal

I think showing us an example for the final project would have been helpful. Towards the end of the semester I had a very hard time keeping up with the readings expecially around the time when the final project was due. The final two journal reviews were helpful and interesting, but having them earlier in the semester would have been easier to manage.

There were not really any aspects of the courses I disliked. I personally found the section of nutrient cycling boring; however, that's more so personal because it was very science-heavy and not really my area of interest at all.

The power point is intended for lecture, but it would be nice if it included a little more than just pictures. There are a LOT of readings...

The readings for the conservation lecture series were disinteresting.

The long exams

a little bit too much exams and homework

the number of questions in each test

The discussions were always difficult for me in a "large" group setting.

The readings! An enormous amount of material, wasting paper! Most students dont even read them!

I wished that we would of had some field exercises

this class would be better if applied forest ecology was applied in the field.

23. My overall evaluation of this course is...

I highly recommend it.

Excellent

I really enjoyed this course

one of the better courses that I have taken in NREM and sufficient for a 400-level introductory class to this topic.

Awesome.

Great course! Learned priceless information in regards to general ecology and forest ecology.

Good course

a great course that makes me interested in working on the field of forest ecology

The course is very good.

It was really interesting and stimulating and I would recommend the course/professor to a friend that was interested.

Slightly boring, but valuable knowledge for my career...

good

24. Other comments:

Although I really enjoyed the class and found it very interesting. I think it's funny that although i think this class is good for a 400-level class, it was more challenging, I learned a lot more, and is much better organized than some of the 600-level classes I have taken in NREM. This class made me realize more that some 600-level classes in NREM are definitely more so appropriate and at the level of 400/undergraduate classes, but that may just depend on my own personal undergraduate educational experience/college....

THANK YOU CREIGHTON!

Jesus loves you!

Good to know what are under the ground and above the canopy. Now I know a little bit more.. forests are not only trees or animals! ^_^ Mahalo

Another valuable part of this course was our TA; she was able to share a lot of knowledge and expereiences on specific parts of this course that was helpful to our understanding of particular concepts in the course.

Creighton Litton: NREM 301, Spring 2010 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 301 - Natural Resources Management	Crn (Section):	85767 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	10	0.97	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	7 (70%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

5. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

6. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	10	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (40%)	6 (60%)

7. I generally understood the material presented in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.56	9	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	5 (56%)

8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

The lectures were always informative and flowed well.

All

I felt that most of the information that we learned in this class is the basis of learning for the other NREM courses. I feel that this class has prepared me to know whats to come in my other courses. It allowed me to learn about many different parts of resource management.

management tools and techniques. Better understanding of Mans impact on planer

It was a really encompassing course that did a good job of showing the range of resource management. The online slides were great and really helpful and I liked the games too.

All. I really enjoyed myself for this course. It was incredibly thorough!

9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

We needed to do more in-class exercises to solidify formulas and concepts.

None

I didn't think that any thing taught in this course was not valuable.

The room.

10. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	10	0.97	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	7 (70%)

11. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	10	0.7	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	2 (20%)	7 (70%)

12. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	10	0.7	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	2 (20%)	7 (70%)

13. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	10	0.85	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	1 (10%)	7 (70%)

14. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	8 (80%)

15. The course objectives were clear.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

16. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	10	0.7	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	2 (20%)	7 (70%)

17. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

Be more organized in how you present your lesson for the day.. you would often randomly write scattered notes all over the board and it was difficult to follow the topic. Stay more on point and make sure everything moves along in a logical order. Also be more enthusiastic in the method of presenting as well as your tone of voice.

Creighton Litton: NREM 301L, Spring 2010 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 301L - Natural Resources Mgmt Lab	Crn (Section):	85769 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.88	8	0.35	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (13%)	7 (88%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.86	7	0.38	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	6 (86%)

4. I improved my abilities to do the kinds of writing used by professionals in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

5. I improved my abilities to revise my rough drafts and to make my writing more effective.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

6. This course was helpful in developing new skills.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

7. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

Applying the formulas and knowledge from the lecture in real worlld examples.

Experience gained during field trips

The rough drafts. It really helped to see where silly mistakes were made and what style of writing was appropriate

All!

I really enjoyed actually going out in the fields and actually having hands on experiences. The experiences allowed us to be in the situations that we were learning about in lecture.

8. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

None

I thought it was all valuable.

9. The instructor helped me understand how writing is used in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	7	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	7 (100%)

10. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?

N/A

I thought this course was great!

11. Assignments require a reasonable amount of time and effort.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

12. The writing assignments helped me develop abilities to solve problems.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

13. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	8	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	8 (100%)

14. Laboratory assignments are interesting and stimulating.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.63	8	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (38%)	5 (63%)

15. Laboratory assignments make students think.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

16. Directions for laboratory assignments are clear and specific.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

17. Lab assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

18. Lab reports are graded fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)

19. Lab reports are returned promptly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.25	8	0.89	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	2 (25%)	4 (50%)

20. The field trips were useful learning experiences.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	8	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	8 (100%)

21. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
4.86	7	0.38	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (14%)	6 (86%)

22. Other comments:

No survey responses were found.

Creighton Litton: NREM 680, Spring 2010 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 680 - Ecosystem Ecology	Crn (Section):	88847 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	13	0.6	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	1 (8%)	11 (85%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.62	13	0.65	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	3 (23%)	9 (69%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.46	13	0.88	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	0 (0%)	4 (31%)	8 (62%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.38	13	0.96	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	1 (8%)	3 (23%)	8 (62%)

5. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.54	13	0.88	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	0 (0%)	3 (23%)	9 (69%)

6. I enjoyed this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.85	13	1.28	Freq(%)	1 (8%)	1 (8%)	2 (15%)	4 (31%)	5 (38%)

7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.62	13	1.12	Freq(%)	1 (8%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	11 (85%)

8. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.69	13	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (31%)	9 (69%)

9. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.92	13	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	12 (92%)

10. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.38	13	1.19	Freq(%)	1 (8%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	2 (15%)	9 (69%)

11. The instructor frequently discussed recent developments related to the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.77	13	0.44	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (23%)	10 (77%)

12. The instructor encouraged class discussion.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	13	1.15	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	2 (15%)	3 (23%)	6 (46%)

13. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.92	13	0.28	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	12 (92%)

14. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.08	13	0.86	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (31%)	4 (31%)	5 (38%)

15. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.62	13	1.12	Freq(%)	1 (8%)	0 (0%)	5 (38%)	4 (31%)	3 (23%)

16. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.

good, lots of information in short time

Overall I felt that the design of the course was excellent. If I had to change anything it would be that the 2nd test not be so long. I felt it a little unfair/unnecessary to make that test twice as long than the first test. Yeah we got extra time, but I thought the whole reason for changing the date of the test was to give us extra time to do the same length test, not elongate the test. If I had known that I would have voted to NOT have the test on the Wednesday and instead have it on the scheduled Thursday.

Great content, but I think students would retain more if more time was spent going through subjects. We covered a lot of material, very quickly. When You (Creighton, I'm assuming you're reading this) would ask us if we understood everything, and whether things were clear... I think we were just somewhat recovering from everything we'd been hit by. When you asked that, I personally just couldn't even think of anything. I'm not sure why. Some of the time I felt like information was just going to my short memory bank, then later I hadn't retained it all. Take time. Encourage discussions. Don't steam roll the class.

1. Exams should be taken during lecture, not laboratory, time blocks. 2. Consideration of international students' language barriers interfering with ability to perform well on exams; either providing some approved, extra time for international students on exams or taking this into consideration when formulating the length of exams overall. 3. I did not think it was fair when two people were allowed to "adjust" their topics for methods leader presentations. One of the presentations was hardly even on topic for what we were learning in the course. These methods presentations required an intense amount of preparation and planning, and I felt like these individuals were in some way exempt from the hard work required to prepare a methods review. 4. Some discussion leaders did not lead the discussion, instead, Creighton did most of the facilitating. I think Creighton should try to restrain from any facilitation of discussion until there is a very noticeable and apparent lull in the discussion, and until the discussion leader obviously needs help re-directing. Sometimes it was hard to tell if the leader knew the topic well, because Creighton would answer questions instead of the leader themself. 5. If possible, partners on methods review should receive slightly differentiated grades based on individual performance during the presentation. 6. Maybe instead of two big exams, there could be one big midterm, and smaller "quizzes" on key topics and readings given consistently throughout the semester. If there were quizzes, people would be more inclined to read. And I personally like a dozen or so quizzes throughout the semester much better than an additional exam. 7. Figure handouts were key. It would have been helpful to have access to the powerpoints before the class in which they were presented, so we could have thus taken notes directly on the powerpoint presentations.

-- snipped --

Class was almost exclusively focused on biogeochemistry and could have benefited greatly from more diversity of topics or guest lecturers on other aspects of ecosystem ecology. Methods review too exhaustive and not all that useful. Take home exams would make more sense for the types and number of questions posed on midterms.

Shorten the exam questions or shorten the exams. Students should be able to demonstrate their knowledge with a different format of questioning.

N/A, Creighton ROCKS!

Reduce the course work required.

* Showing 8 out of 9 survey responses.

17. The assigned readings significantly contribute to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.23	13	1.01	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	2 (15%)	3 (23%)	7 (54%)

18. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.67	12	0.49	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (33%)	8 (67%)

19. Exams are creative and require original thought.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.31	13	0.75	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (15%)	5 (38%)	6 (46%)

20. What changes would you make in the lectures?

Exams are to long for the available time.

spend more time to explain? I feel sometime too many information to absorb in a single lecture, maybe because I have little background in biogeochem

Get Noe to shut the hell up every once in a while

Take your time. Let the class absorb the information. Let it sink in. Encourage questions with a more mellow atmosphere. Don't slam things you don't necessarily agree with. I'd say, also, just cut like three lectures out, there's a lot of information there.

I would have stuck to the originial order on the syllabus for nutrients, instead of waiting until after the second exam for the last lecture on nutrients.

The book does a great job of going into depth on the principles taught in class. the instructor does not need to repeat word for word the things in the book. lectures would have been much more effective if the instructor would have synthesized the information and explained it clearly. Instructor needs to slow way down. There is way too much material covered in the course and it is not clear what is important. Instructor can not assume that all students have had and understand soil science, organic chemistry, and statistics.

Simplify lectures, make the main point-there were too many details, lists of them, which should be left for the reading. Could also bring in guest lecturers to mix things and topics up.

Sometimes I felt like it was more important for you to get through the slides than it was for you to explain individual concepts clearly.

Great lectures! Good preparition of materials. Creighton knows his stuff!

Absolutely nothing, the best lectures in UH. I really enjoy going to class, maybe allow more time to discussion. Sometimes I think that there was a lot of material to be cover and that conflicted with class discussion...but the lectures were amazing.

n/a

21. What changes would you make in the readings?

nothing, its been great.

None

Readings were fine.

Readings were valuable and interesting. No change.

-- snipped --

Textbook good, but more readings about ecosystem ecology beyond what is talked about in the course syllabus would be nice.

Readings were execellent.

Probably none.

n/a

* Showing 8 out of 9 survey responses.

22. What changes would you make in the discussion sections?

-Not allow Creighton to take over the discussion like he is the leader.

encourage the student too speak out, sometime some student overdominating the other, sometime the lecturer that dominates.

Dr. Litton would encourage discussion leaders to take charge of the discussion but would sometimes take control without giving the leader a fair chance. Most of the time it was necessary for Dr. Litton to jump in and take the bull by the horns, but sometimes it was not.

The discussion sections were good, but almost became a class directed lecture at times. They were better when people read and discussed. I do feel like most of the time the discussions were between like three people, and could have done with more participation.

See block 16.

-- snipped --

Be more patient and let students run the discussion, defer especially to the discussion leader. This would dramatically improve the dialogue and make the discussion less of a lecture or ongoing debate between the instructor and 1 or 2 students.

On several occasions the discussions were dominated by the instructor. I think the discussion section is an execellent opportunity to reinforce the material presented in the presentation but there should be more responsability placed on the discussion leader to keep the conversation going. When the instructor takes over the whole discussion something is lost in the exercise. This happened on several occasions.

Nothing, I learned a lot preparing my discussion and found that most of the discussions in class were very helpful.

Methods and discussion leader are perfect for this class but if a format is chosen, it should be followed. I didn't like the change of methods review topic with one team, from the established topic to an open one, personally I think it represented unequal treatment, it made me feel a little mad. The rest of the groups had to confront a challenge situation and it looked like a joke for those two students. I was really close to leave that particular session.

Maybe doing hands on experience with different instruments.

* Showing 10 out of 11 survey responses.

23. My overall evaluation of this course is...

Great! very informative for me, I learned a lot. really makes me think.

Good course. The work load seemed to be a little daunting at first but after getting through the class I think it was fair.

This course was FULL value... this course was actually a bit sandbagged. I think that it was a bit more than 4 units worth of information.

Creighton is one of the best teachers I have had so far at UH. His body of knowledge and experience in the field is incredibly vast and that was apparent through his teaching. He has high expectations for students, which I personally found to be a good thing; enhancing desire to learn and absorb material as well as providing incentive to try your hardest. I rarely felt like there was a question asked he could not give some form of answer to address accurately. This was also the most challenging course I have had yet at UH. Finally, I felt like I was in graduate school and not simply a repetition of undergrad!

-- snipped --

It's a good course if you want to learn about carbon cycling, which is the most useful thing I learned in this class. But sometimes, I could not see the trees for the carbon.

Outstanding!

Fantastic! I recommend this course and Creighton to all students in the NREM department!

10 over 10, no doubt about it. Amazing material and probably the best instructor in the department.

Good

* Showing 9 out of 10 survey responses.

24. Other comments:

-- snipped --

That second exam was NOT the same length as the first exam. That thing was killer. Work on your perception of time. Ten minutes is not an hour and we can't fit 40 power point slides into 15 minutes. If you lower the volume, people will gain more knowledge in the end. I think I was fairly redundant in these comments, and I think other students will write the same thing. So, you get the point.

Exams were very unfair. first exam was way too long for the time provided and no students finished in time. second exam was twice as long as the first? adding a major project to the course at the very end of the semester is unreasonable. there are 2 hours allotted for a final exam, and it is not the instructors business how much time we "should" put in studying and thus "should" spend on a final project. the project is not a terrible assignment, it is just very unfair to add it in at the last minute. if students knew this was part of the class they could have been thinking about it and working on it much earlier. telling new grad students that they need to come up with a research proposal in 3 weeks is totally unreasonable. new grad students cannot be expected to know how to lay out an experimental design, what kind of sampling is necessary, and how write good objectives.

Thanks for the take home final-relief.

The instructor is extremely well organized but I believe that there should be more consideration put into time management. It's ok that all of the material that you were planning on covering didn't get covered. It probably means students were asking questions and trying to grasp certain concepts. Maybe schedule one or two more catch up days to take the pressure off of yourself and the students to get though more information than can reasonably fit into a single lecture. This was by far one of the best learning experiences I have had at UH Manoa. Keep doing what you are doing. You are an execellent instructor and an asset to the NREM department and the University of Hawaii.

Creighton is an awesome teacher, and more importantly he puts a lot of time and thought into the materials he is presenting. If more of the staff in the NREM department were like Creighton the program would be top-notch in the nation in no time!

The exams were great but I would recommend to measure time more accurately. Both exams were too long for the time frame given. I don't mind to answer 20 questions but you have to give me the time to do it. It was kind of depressing to know the answers and not have time to write them down. From my point of view the extra point question in the exam is unfair and even insulting, but that is just my opinion. I wander how many people actually had time to answer those. Anyways, great class, challenging, amazing...so far the best I've taken in UH.

n/a

* Showing 7 out of 8 survey responses.

Creighton Litton: NREM 682, Fall 2009 Back to top

Campus:	University of Hawaii at Manoa	Department:	Natural Res & Environmtl Mgt
Course:	NREM 682 - Restoration Ecology	Crn (Section):	79438 (001)

1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	10 (100%)

2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

3. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

5. I learned a lot in this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

6. I enjoyed this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	10	0.84	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	0 (0%)	8 (80%)

7. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
5.0	10	0.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	10 (100%)

8. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

I like the class discussions. I find them much more stimulating than lectures. Although Dr Litton is one of the best lecturers I have experienced to date. He is very animated and enthusiastic, speaks clearly, and encourages input from students. The field trip was also very valuable. I would recommend a field trip be put in the syllabus next time the course is taught.

I enjoyed seeing how restoration integrated at all levels. I also thought the student led papers was a very good tool for teh class.

Leading and taking part in the discussion component. Coupling lectures that coincided with a student led discussion on the subject covered in the lecture. It was good to provide information and reinforce it with an example of how that information is put into practice.

presentation leader was a good challenge. The text book is awesome, one of my favorite reads.

I really enjoyed the reading discussion days and felt it was an excite way to further explore the restoration topics as well as interact with fellow classmates. Also the field trip was excellent and brought a new understanding to why the work at that site was being done.

Discussions

I like the discussion leader sessions, it gave me opportunity to freely convey my thoughts and generate new thoughts on the issues discussed.

Discussions on how ecology in the restoration context pertains to Hawaii

9. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

I liked all aspects of the course.

The assignment on the field trip I didn't attend. Haha

all part were valuable

I thought all parts were valuable

none

10. The instructor gives clear explanations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.7	10	0.48	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	7 (70%)

12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

13. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

14. The instructor encouraged class discussion.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

15. The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.9	10	0.32	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	9 (90%)

16. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	10	0.97	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	7 (70%)

17. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	10	0.53	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (50%)	5 (50%)

18. Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.

Let the presenting students lead the in-class discussion more. Do not let students go more than 5 mins overtime when presenting.

I liked the course and the instructor methodology.

Ensure that powerpoint presentations have all of the slide content on it when printed as a handout. Smile more, you have a great smile.

is there a possiblity of a lab component? visiting various land managers implementing restoration ecology ideas in the field. Maybe a second mock debate like one in the begnning of the semester.

I really enjoyed the course design, but do feel that I could have benefited from at least one to two examinations... as another way to reinforce the material.

Sometimes the professor would dominate discussions when they were supposed to be student-led. Too focused on terrestrial plants, should be a more well-rounded and balanced approach to restoration ecology including all ecosystems as well as plants, animals, etc. to better train students and to meet the diverse interests of the class. A lab component of actual restoration. move beyond just restoration ecology theory and discussion and into ecological restoration in the field

None. For 2 credit of course, nothing can be improved. The teaching materials and curricula is perfect. If the course become 3 credit course, than more fieldtrip/discussion with local stakeholders that doing the ecological restoration in Hawaii, would give more benefit to the students.

19. My overall evaluation of this instructor is....

Excellent!

An excellent instructor who was well prepared and organized for all classes.

Dr. Litton was professional, prepared and knowledgeable about the course material. He made himself available whenever you had questions and treated students fairly. Overall I would say that he has been one of the best instructor's I've had over my academic career.

great powerpoints. i love the printed sheets at the beginning of the class. It helps for students to bring in copies of their reads and outlines of presentations.

Excellent!

great. very knowledgeable, prepared, organized and enthusiastic about the topic.

Excellent!

The best instructor I've had so far. Very knowledgeable of the subject material. Presented material of the course in the best way possible.

20. The assigned readings significantly contribute to this course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.6	10	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (40%)	6 (60%)

21. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	10	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	3 (30%)	6 (60%)

22. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.8	10	0.42	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	8 (80%)

23. My overall evaluation of this course is...

Excellent.

A very useful course for expanding my understanding of ecology.

I thought that the material covered was informative and interesting. I thought that the course overall was excellent.

application of restoration ecology, share ideals of restoration ecoog with community members, create that bridge between academia and community. Create a community restoration ecology project with ecological restoration implementation at the end of the semester. Many require opening of separate course.

The course was great and I fell that I learned a lot over the last few months.

great

I found this class is very interesting, not only because it gives me better understanding on the context discussed, but also it encourage me to convey thoughts. What is also interesting with this class, the instructor gave material from new perspectives that are discussed in the current publications.

An excellent course and am looking forward to taking futher courses taught by the same instructor.