|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
14. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
15. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
16. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (100%) |
|
|
17. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: A=Superior; B=Good; C=Average; D=Poor; F=Inferior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
| 5.0 |
1 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
1 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
18. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| More time to work on the course subjects. Maybe break-up the course into 2 parts it's alot to learn in 4 months. |
|
|
19. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| GREAT teaching methods very understanding and fair. Love the fact that he has extensive knowledge in ART! |
|
|
20. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| Very much so. I really enjoyed this class. I am looking forward to taking more DMA classes and getting my certificate before Summer 2009! |
|
|
21. Other comments:
|
| This is my 2nd time taking this course. I really love it everyone has been so supportive and helpful. The lab times are necessary and very important. The staff and teachers were awesome. THANK YOU! |
|
